Vancouver Whitecaps IIvsLos Angeles FC II
Vancouver Whitecaps II 4–1 Los Angeles FC II
All 4 AIs backed Los Angeles FC II — reality had other ideas.
- AI lean
- Los Angeles FC II 4/4
- Correct calls
- 0/4
- Final
- 4–1
Every pick below was locked before the match and graded automatically against the final score — no hindsight edits.
AI predictions
8 markets · 4 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 8 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
|
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
|
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Los Angeles FC II -1.0 2/4 models |
Los Angeles FC II 2/4 models |
Los Angeles FC II 4/4 models |
Los Angeles FC II 4/4 models |
Los Angeles FC II / Los Angeles FC II 2/4 models |
0-2 1/4 models |
over 3/4 models |
yes 3/4 models |
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
|
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market.
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
No pick on this market.
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
No pick on this market. |
|||||||||
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
|
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market.
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
No pick on this market.
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
No pick on this market. |
|||||||||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
|
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market.
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
No pick on this market.
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
No pick on this market. |
|||||||||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
60%
Los Angeles FC II -0.5
L
|
48%
Los Angeles FC II -1
L
|
52%
Los Angeles FC II
L
|
65%
Los Angeles FC II
L
|
38%
Los Angeles FC II / Los Angeles FC II
L
|
18%
1-2
L
|
58%
over
W
|
61%
yes
W
|
|
|
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
60%
Los Angeles FC II -0.5 Away side's undefeated run and better goal difference make the half-goal handicap attractive. Home side has failed to win in five straight....
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
48%
Los Angeles FC II -1 Away team's superior form and scoring edge make covering -1 realistic despite home venue. Home defense has allowed multiple goals in four st...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
52%
Los Angeles FC II Away side shows strong recent form with 3 wins and only 6 conceded in 5 games while home side has lost 4 of 5 and conceded 15. Training data...
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
65%
Los Angeles FC II Home team's poor defensive record and lack of wins make an away win the most probable outcome. Away side's recent scoring rate of 2.2 per ga...
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
38%
Los Angeles FC II / Los Angeles FC II Away team's strong away form suggests they take control early and maintain it. Home side's leaky defense often concedes first. Settled MLS N...
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
18%
1-2 Away side expected to edge a 2-1 or 3-1 style win given defensive frailty at home. Training data through 2025-09 shows 1-2 and 0-2 as freque...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
over Both teams average over 3 goals per game in recent fixtures and home side's defense concedes heavily. Training data shows MLS Next Pro match...
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
61%
yes Home side concedes frequently yet still manages to score, while away side has netted in all last 5. Settled database indicates BTTS occurs i... |
|||||||||
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
58%
Los Angeles FC II -1.0
L
|
88%
Los Angeles FC II +1
L
|
68%
Los Angeles FC II
L
|
85%
Los Angeles FC II
L
|
45%
Los Angeles FC II / Los Angeles FC II
L
|
15%
1-3
L
|
68%
Over 2.5
W
|
58%
Yes
W
|
|
|
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
58%
Los Angeles FC II -1.0 Los Angeles FC II's exceptional form, scoring 2.2 goals per game, contrasts sharply with Vancouver Whitecaps II's defense, which concedes 3...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
88%
Los Angeles FC II +1 Los Angeles FC II is the overwhelming favorite, boasting strong attacking form and facing a team with a highly permeable defense. Betting on...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
68%
Los Angeles FC II Based on the provided team context and my training data, Los Angeles FC II is in superior form, being undefeated in their last five matches...
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
85%
Los Angeles FC II Given Los Angeles FC II's dominant recent form and Vancouver Whitecaps II's struggle to secure wins, LAFC II is highly likely to either win...
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
45%
Los Angeles FC II / Los Angeles FC II Considering Los Angeles FC II's consistent goal-scoring and Vancouver Whitecaps II's defensive struggles, LAFC II is highly likely to take a...
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
15%
1-3 Los Angeles FC II averages 2.2 goals per game, while Vancouver Whitecaps II concedes 3.0 goals per game, indicating a significant offensive...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
68%
Over 2.5 Vancouver Whitecaps II has conceded 15 goals in their last five matches, averaging 3 goals per game, while Los Angeles FC II has scored 11 g...
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
58%
Yes Los Angeles FC II consistently finds the back of the net, having scored 11 goals in their last five outings. While Vancouver Whitecaps II's... |
|||||||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
58%
away_ 0.0 |
52%
Los Angeles FC II
L
|
57%
Los Angeles FC II
L
|
60%
Los Angeles FC II
L
|
30%
Draw / Los Angeles FC II
L
|
14%
0-2
L
|
55%
over
W
|
51%
yes
W
|
|
|
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
58%
away_ 0.0 LAFC II's current form and attacking capabilities make them the clear favorites. A zero handicap on them reflects the expectation that they...
4 sources cited
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
52%
Los Angeles FC II LAFC II's superior form and offensive prowess make them the likely winner by more than one goal. Vancouver's recent defensive struggles furt...
4 sources cited
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
57%
Los Angeles FC II Los Angeles FC II is in significantly better form, with an unbeaten streak of 5 games (3W-2D) compared to Vancouver Whitecaps II's winless s...
4 sources cited
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
60%
Los Angeles FC II Given LAFC II's superior recent form and attacking threat, they are the strong favorites. Even accounting for a potential draw, the advantag...
4 sources cited
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
30%
Draw / Los Angeles FC II Vancouver's weak first-half performance and LAFC II's ability to score in the second half make a draw at halftime followed by an away win th...
4 sources cited
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
14%
0-2 Considering LAFC II's strong form and Vancouver's defensive frailty, a 0-2 victory for LAFC II seems most likely. LAFC II's consistent scori...
4 sources cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over LAFC II's strong attacking record (11 goals in 5 games) and Vancouver's poor defense (15 goals conceded in 5 games) suggest that goals are l...
4 sources cited
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
51%
yes Vancouver's defense has been very leaky, conceding 15 goals in their last 5 games. While their attack is weak, LAFC II has conceded 6 goals...
4 sources cited
|
|||||||||
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
55%
Los Angeles FC II -1.0
L
|
55%
Los Angeles FC II
L
|
62%
Los Angeles FC II
L
|
68%
Los Angeles FC II
L
|
45%
away_away |
12%
2-1
L
|
60%
over
W
|
55%
yes
W
|
|
|
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
55%
Los Angeles FC II -1.0 LAFC II's form and scoring ability give them a strong chance of winning by a margin that covers -1.0. Vancouver's defensive problems are sev...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
55%
Los Angeles FC II The away team's form and scoring record suggest they can win by at least two goals. Vancouver's defensive collapse (conceding 15 in 5) makes...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Los Angeles FC II Training data through 2025-09: Vancouver Whitecaps II have lost four of their last five, conceding fifteen goals, while LAFC II are unbeaten...
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
68%
Los Angeles FC II The draw-no-bet market removes the draw, so the away win probability is normalized. Given LAFC II's strong recent form and Vancouver's poor...
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
45%
away_away Given LAFC's strong form, they are likely to lead at halftime and extend the lead in the second half. Vancouver's defense is likely to conce...
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
12%
2-1 The most likely scoreline sees LAFC winning by a single goal, with Vancouver scoring once given their home advantage but defensive weakness....
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
over Both teams have shown goal involvement: LAFC II scored 11 in their last 5, while Vancouver conceded 15 in the same span, indicating likely g...
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
55%
yes Vancouver have scored in 4 of their last 5 games but conceded heavily, while LAFC have scored in every match. Both teams have shown the abil... |
|||||||||
Asian handicap
ConsensusLos Angeles FC II -1.0 2/4
Claude Haiku 4.5
—
GPT-5 Mini
—
GPT-4o Mini
—
Grok 4 Fast
60%
Los Angeles FC II -0.5
L
Away side's undefeated run and better goal difference make the half-goal handicap attractive. Home side has failed to win in five straight....
Gemini 2.5 Flash
58%
Los Angeles FC II -1.0
L
Los Angeles FC II's exceptional form, scoring 2.2 goals per game, contrasts sharply with Vancouver Whitecaps II's defense, which concedes 3...
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
58%
away_ 0.0
LAFC II's current form and attacking capabilities make them the clear favorites. A zero handicap on them reflects the expectation that they...
DeepSeek V3
55%
Los Angeles FC II -1.0
L
LAFC II's form and scoring ability give them a strong chance of winning by a margin that covers -1.0. Vancouver's defensive problems are sev...
Spread
ConsensusLos Angeles FC II 2/4
Claude Haiku 4.5
—
GPT-5 Mini
—
GPT-4o Mini
—
Grok 4 Fast
48%
Los Angeles FC II -1
L
Away team's superior form and scoring edge make covering -1 realistic despite home venue. Home defense has allowed multiple goals in four st...
Gemini 2.5 Flash
88%
Los Angeles FC II +1
L
Los Angeles FC II is the overwhelming favorite, boasting strong attacking form and facing a team with a highly permeable defense. Betting on...
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
52%
Los Angeles FC II
L
LAFC II's superior form and offensive prowess make them the likely winner by more than one goal. Vancouver's recent defensive struggles furt...
DeepSeek V3
55%
Los Angeles FC II
L
The away team's form and scoring record suggest they can win by at least two goals. Vancouver's defensive collapse (conceding 15 in 5) makes...
Match winner
ConsensusLos Angeles FC II 4/4
Claude Haiku 4.5
—
GPT-5 Mini
—
GPT-4o Mini
—
Grok 4 Fast
52%
Los Angeles FC II
L
Away side shows strong recent form with 3 wins and only 6 conceded in 5 games while home side has lost 4 of 5 and conceded 15. Training data...
Gemini 2.5 Flash
68%
Los Angeles FC II
L
Based on the provided team context and my training data, Los Angeles FC II is in superior form, being undefeated in their last five matches...
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
57%
Los Angeles FC II
L
Los Angeles FC II is in significantly better form, with an unbeaten streak of 5 games (3W-2D) compared to Vancouver Whitecaps II's winless s...
DeepSeek V3
62%
Los Angeles FC II
L
Training data through 2025-09: Vancouver Whitecaps II have lost four of their last five, conceding fifteen goals, while LAFC II are unbeaten...
Draw no bet
ConsensusLos Angeles FC II 4/4
Claude Haiku 4.5
—
GPT-5 Mini
—
GPT-4o Mini
—
Grok 4 Fast
65%
Los Angeles FC II
L
Home team's poor defensive record and lack of wins make an away win the most probable outcome. Away side's recent scoring rate of 2.2 per ga...
Gemini 2.5 Flash
85%
Los Angeles FC II
L
Given Los Angeles FC II's dominant recent form and Vancouver Whitecaps II's struggle to secure wins, LAFC II is highly likely to either win...
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
60%
Los Angeles FC II
L
Given LAFC II's superior recent form and attacking threat, they are the strong favorites. Even accounting for a potential draw, the advantag...
DeepSeek V3
68%
Los Angeles FC II
L
The draw-no-bet market removes the draw, so the away win probability is normalized. Given LAFC II's strong recent form and Vancouver's poor...
Half-time / Full-time
ConsensusLos Angeles FC II / Los Angeles FC II 2/4
Claude Haiku 4.5
—
GPT-5 Mini
—
GPT-4o Mini
—
Grok 4 Fast
38%
Los Angeles FC II / Los Angeles FC II
L
Away team's strong away form suggests they take control early and maintain it. Home side's leaky defense often concedes first. Settled MLS N...
Gemini 2.5 Flash
45%
Los Angeles FC II / Los Angeles FC II
L
Considering Los Angeles FC II's consistent goal-scoring and Vancouver Whitecaps II's defensive struggles, LAFC II is highly likely to take a...
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
30%
Draw / Los Angeles FC II
L
Vancouver's weak first-half performance and LAFC II's ability to score in the second half make a draw at halftime followed by an away win th...
DeepSeek V3
45%
away_away
Given LAFC's strong form, they are likely to lead at halftime and extend the lead in the second half. Vancouver's defense is likely to conce...
Correct score
Consensus0-2 1/4
Claude Haiku 4.5
—
GPT-5 Mini
—
GPT-4o Mini
—
Grok 4 Fast
18%
1-2
L
Away side expected to edge a 2-1 or 3-1 style win given defensive frailty at home. Training data through 2025-09 shows 1-2 and 0-2 as freque...
Gemini 2.5 Flash
15%
1-3
L
Los Angeles FC II averages 2.2 goals per game, while Vancouver Whitecaps II concedes 3.0 goals per game, indicating a significant offensive...
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
14%
0-2
L
Considering LAFC II's strong form and Vancouver's defensive frailty, a 0-2 victory for LAFC II seems most likely. LAFC II's consistent scori...
DeepSeek V3
12%
2-1
L
The most likely scoreline sees LAFC winning by a single goal, with Vancouver scoring once given their home advantage but defensive weakness....
Over / Under
Consensusover 3/4
Claude Haiku 4.5
—
GPT-5 Mini
—
GPT-4o Mini
—
Grok 4 Fast
58%
over
W
Both teams average over 3 goals per game in recent fixtures and home side's defense concedes heavily. Training data shows MLS Next Pro match...
Gemini 2.5 Flash
68%
Over 2.5
W
Vancouver Whitecaps II has conceded 15 goals in their last five matches, averaging 3 goals per game, while Los Angeles FC II has scored 11 g...
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
55%
over
W
LAFC II's strong attacking record (11 goals in 5 games) and Vancouver's poor defense (15 goals conceded in 5 games) suggest that goals are l...
DeepSeek V3
60%
over
W
Both teams have shown goal involvement: LAFC II scored 11 in their last 5, while Vancouver conceded 15 in the same span, indicating likely g...
Both teams to score
Consensusyes 3/4
Claude Haiku 4.5
—
GPT-5 Mini
—
GPT-4o Mini
—
Grok 4 Fast
61%
yes
W
Home side concedes frequently yet still manages to score, while away side has netted in all last 5. Settled database indicates BTTS occurs i...
Gemini 2.5 Flash
58%
Yes
W
Los Angeles FC II consistently finds the back of the net, having scored 11 goals in their last five outings. While Vancouver Whitecaps II's...
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
51%
yes
W
Vancouver's defense has been very leaky, conceding 15 goals in their last 5 games. While their attack is weak, LAFC II has conceded 6 goals...
DeepSeek V3
55%
yes
W
Vancouver have scored in 4 of their last 5 games but conceded heavily, while LAFC have scored in every match. Both teams have shown the abil...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winner
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Los Angeles FC II
DeepSeek V3
Los Angeles FC II
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Los Angeles FC II
Grok 4 Fast
Los Angeles FC II
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Beat the AIs · Predict the score
Picks closed
Match has already kicked off. Picks are permanent — no late entries.
Team news
ProInjuries and confirmed lineups — the same team news the AIs factored into their reads.
Team news is a Pro feature
see exactly who's out and the XIs the AIs reasoned on, before kickoff.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
412198969528092c…
- Kickoff
- Thu, Aug 27 · 01:00 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Draw no bet · Over / Under 2.5 · Both teams to score · Spread -1 · Asian handicap · Half-time / Full-time · Correct score
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 8. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 8, in this order): h2h | draw_no_bet | totals_2.5 | btts | spreads_-1 | asian_handicap | ht_ft | correct_score
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 31527,
"sport": "football",
"venue": "Swangard Stadium",
"league": "MLS Next Pro",
"starts_at": "2026-08-27T01:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Thu, 27 Aug 2026 01:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Los Angeles FC II",
"home": "Vancouver Whitecaps II"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Weight CONFIRMED team news heavily: a missing first-choice striker, creator, or centre-back swings a match more than season-long form.",
"Compare attacking vs defensive quality directly — clean-sheet rate and goals-conceded trend often predict unders/BTTS better than the win line.",
"Set pieces decide tight games: note corner/free-kick threat and aerial mismatches.",
"Account for fixture congestion + likely rotation (midweek European or cup games before this one) and the home/away form split.",
"For outdoor venues, factor heavy rain or strong wind — both suppress goals and favour the under.",
"Tactical style matters: a high-press side vs a possession side, or two defensive setups, shapes the goals expectation."
],
"team_context": {
"note": "Reference data from our settled-results database. Verify + extend it with your own research; it is not a substitute for current team news.",
"away_form": {
"last": "WWDWD",
"record": "3W-2D-0L",
"scored": 11,
"matches": 5,
"conceded": 6
},
"home_form": {
"last": "LLDLL",
"record": "0W-1D-4L",
"scored": 5,
"matches": 5,
"conceded": 15
},
"rest_days": {
"away": 5,
"home": 11
}
},
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"draw_no_bet",
"totals_2.5",
"btts",
"spreads_-1",
"asian_handicap",
"ht_ft",
"correct_score"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Research trail
What each AI looked up before picking
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 3 sources
3 citations captured — unlock with Pro
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
Recent recaps
How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.