The TownvsLos Angeles FC II
The Town 3–2 Los Angeles FC II
All 4 AIs backed Los Angeles FC II — reality had other ideas.
- AI lean
- Los Angeles FC II 4/4
- Correct calls
- 0/4
- Final
- 3–2
Every pick below was locked before the match and graded automatically against the final score — no hindsight edits.
AI predictions
8 markets · 4 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 8 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
|
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
|
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
|
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Los Angeles FC II 2/4 models |
Los Angeles FC II 4/4 models |
Los Angeles FC II 4/4 models |
0-1 2/4 models |
Los Angeles FC II / Los Angeles FC II 2/4 models |
over 2/4 models |
yes 2/4 models |
away_ -0.5 2/4 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market.
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
No pick on this market.
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
No pick on this market.
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
No pick on this market. |
|||||||||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market.
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
No pick on this market.
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
No pick on this market.
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
No pick on this market. |
|||||||||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market.
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
No pick on this market.
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
No pick on this market.
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
No pick on this market. |
|||||||||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
51%
Los Angeles FC II
L
|
48%
Los Angeles FC II
L
|
55%
Los Angeles FC II
L
|
14%
1-2
L
|
29%
Los Angeles FC II / Los Angeles FC II
L
|
53%
over
W
|
52%
yes
W
|
50%
Los Angeles FC II |
|
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
51%
Los Angeles FC II Away form edge suggests they cover a -1 spread more often than not. Home scoring drought weakens their cover chance. Training data through 2...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
48%
Los Angeles FC II Away side shows superior recent form with 3 wins in last 5 and better goal output. Home side has managed only draws and losses with minimal...
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
55%
Los Angeles FC II Away team's attacking output and recent wins give them the edge in a no-draw scenario. Home struggles to score limit their chances. Training...
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
14%
1-2 1-2 reflects away form advantage and expected low scoring from home. Multiple 1-2 or 0-2 outcomes fit recent goal trends. Training data thro...
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
29%
Los Angeles FC II / Los Angeles FC II Away side's stronger overall form makes full away win most probable outcome. Early lead likely given home's low scoring. Training data throu...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
53%
over Away side averages high goal tallies while home concedes steadily. Combined scoring trends point to over 2.5 goals. Training data through 20...
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
52%
yes Both teams concede regularly and away attack is potent. Home defensive record allows goals at both ends. Training data through 2025-09 used.
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
50%
Los Angeles FC II Even split after home rest advantage offsets away form. Expect tight margin favoring slight away lean. Training data through 2025-09 used. |
|||||||||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
55%
Los Angeles FC II -1
L
|
55%
Los Angeles FC II
L
|
70%
Los Angeles FC II
L
|
20%
0-2
L
|
40%
Los Angeles FC II / Los Angeles FC II
L
|
55%
Under
L
|
60%
No
L
|
55%
Los Angeles FC II -0.5
L
|
|
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
55%
Los Angeles FC II -1 Los Angeles FC II's superior offensive form (2 goals per game) against The Town's weak attack (0.6 goals per game) makes a multi-goal victor...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Los Angeles FC II Los Angeles FC II is in significantly better form, winning 3 of their last 5 matches and scoring 10 goals. The Town has failed to win any of...
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
70%
Los Angeles FC II Given Los Angeles FC II's superior recent form and goal-scoring ability, they are the clear favorite to win this match outright. The Town's...
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
20%
0-2 Based on Los Angeles FC II's strong attacking form and The Town's severe struggles to score (only 3 goals in 5 matches), a 2-0 victory for t...
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
40%
Los Angeles FC II / Los Angeles FC II Los Angeles FC II's strong form and offensive strength suggest they are likely to take an early lead and maintain it throughout the match. T...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Under While Los Angeles FC II has a strong attack, The Town has scored only 3 goals in their last 5 matches and conceded a moderate 6. The home si...
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
60%
No The Town has struggled significantly to score, netting only 3 goals in their last five matches. This poor offensive record suggests a high p...
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
55%
Los Angeles FC II -0.5 This market is equivalent to betting on the outright winner. Given Los Angeles FC II's significantly better form and offensive firepower com... |
|||||||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
52%
Los Angeles FC II
L
|
55%
Los Angeles FC II
L
|
58%
Los Angeles FC II
L
|
18%
0-1
L
|
48%
away_away |
55%
over
W
|
53%
yes
W
|
57%
away_ -0.5 |
|
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
52%
Los Angeles FC II LAFC II's better form and higher scoring potential make them the favorite to win by more than one goal. The Town's struggles, especially at...
3 sources cited
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Los Angeles FC II LAFC II has shown better recent form with more wins and a higher scoring rate compared to The Town FC. The Town's home form is particularly...
3 sources cited
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
58%
Los Angeles FC II Given LAFC II's superior recent form and offensive capabilities, they are the more likely winners. The Town's defensive struggles and lack o...
3 sources cited
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
18%
0-1 LAFC II's recent form suggests they are the more likely winners, but The Town's defensive struggles might not lead to a high-scoring game. A...
3 sources cited
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
48%
away_away Considering LAFC II's better form and offensive potential, they are likely to control the game and lead at halftime, and ultimately secure a...
3 sources cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over Both teams have shown a tendency to concede goals, and LAFC II has a decent scoring record. While The Town's offense is weak, LAFC II's abil...
3 sources cited
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
53%
yes LAFC II has a solid scoring record recently, while The Town has conceded frequently. Although The Town's offense is not prolific, the combin...
3 sources cited
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
57%
away_ -0.5 This market aligns with the head-to-head prediction. LAFC II's superior recent form, better scoring record, and The Town's significant strug...
3 sources cited
|
|||||||||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
40%
away_ -1 |
50%
Los Angeles FC II
L
|
65%
Los Angeles FC II
L
|
20%
0-1
L
|
20%
draw_away |
55%
under
L
|
55%
no
L
|
50%
away_ -0.5 |
|
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
40%
away_ -1 LAFC II is favored but winning by more than one goal is not certain given The Town's defensive resilience at home. The Town often draws, so...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
50%
Los Angeles FC II Training knowledge through 2025 suggests LAFC II has stronger squad depth and attacking output, while The Town struggles to score. Away form...
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
65%
Los Angeles FC II Drawn matches are likely given The Town's tendency to draw, but LAFC II has more quality to take the win. Removing the draw strengthens the...
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
20%
0-1 LAFC II's defensive solidity and The Town's lack of goals make a narrow away win likely. A 1-0 or 0-1 scoreline is common in tight matches....
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
20%
draw_away The Town often starts slow and concedes later, leading to a half-time draw and second-half away win. LAFC II has won matches in the second h...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
under Both teams have modest scoring rates, with The Town averaging under a goal per game. Defensive solidity of LAFC II in recent matches suggest...
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
55%
no The Town has failed to score in several recent matches, making a clean sheet for LAFC II plausible. LAFC II's defense has been decent, conce...
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
50%
away_ -0.5 LAFC II's superior form gives them a slight edge, but The Town's tendency to draw makes the half-goal handicap a close call. The away -0.5 e... |
|||||||||
Spread
ConsensusLos Angeles FC II 2/4
Away form edge suggests they cover a -1 spread more often than not. Home scoring drought weakens their cover chance. Training data through 2...
Los Angeles FC II's superior offensive form (2 goals per game) against The Town's weak attack (0.6 goals per game) makes a multi-goal victor...
LAFC II's better form and higher scoring potential make them the favorite to win by more than one goal. The Town's struggles, especially at...
LAFC II is favored but winning by more than one goal is not certain given The Town's defensive resilience at home. The Town often draws, so...
Match winner
ConsensusLos Angeles FC II 4/4
Away side shows superior recent form with 3 wins in last 5 and better goal output. Home side has managed only draws and losses with minimal...
Los Angeles FC II is in significantly better form, winning 3 of their last 5 matches and scoring 10 goals. The Town has failed to win any of...
LAFC II has shown better recent form with more wins and a higher scoring rate compared to The Town FC. The Town's home form is particularly...
Training knowledge through 2025 suggests LAFC II has stronger squad depth and attacking output, while The Town struggles to score. Away form...
Draw no bet
ConsensusLos Angeles FC II 4/4
Away team's attacking output and recent wins give them the edge in a no-draw scenario. Home struggles to score limit their chances. Training...
Given Los Angeles FC II's superior recent form and goal-scoring ability, they are the clear favorite to win this match outright. The Town's...
Given LAFC II's superior recent form and offensive capabilities, they are the more likely winners. The Town's defensive struggles and lack o...
Drawn matches are likely given The Town's tendency to draw, but LAFC II has more quality to take the win. Removing the draw strengthens the...
Correct score
Consensus0-1 2/4
1-2 reflects away form advantage and expected low scoring from home. Multiple 1-2 or 0-2 outcomes fit recent goal trends. Training data thro...
Based on Los Angeles FC II's strong attacking form and The Town's severe struggles to score (only 3 goals in 5 matches), a 2-0 victory for t...
LAFC II's recent form suggests they are the more likely winners, but The Town's defensive struggles might not lead to a high-scoring game. A...
LAFC II's defensive solidity and The Town's lack of goals make a narrow away win likely. A 1-0 or 0-1 scoreline is common in tight matches....
Half-time / Full-time
ConsensusLos Angeles FC II / Los Angeles FC II 2/4
Away side's stronger overall form makes full away win most probable outcome. Early lead likely given home's low scoring. Training data throu...
Los Angeles FC II's strong form and offensive strength suggest they are likely to take an early lead and maintain it throughout the match. T...
Considering LAFC II's better form and offensive potential, they are likely to control the game and lead at halftime, and ultimately secure a...
The Town often starts slow and concedes later, leading to a half-time draw and second-half away win. LAFC II has won matches in the second h...
Over / Under
Consensusover 2/4
Away side averages high goal tallies while home concedes steadily. Combined scoring trends point to over 2.5 goals. Training data through 20...
While Los Angeles FC II has a strong attack, The Town has scored only 3 goals in their last 5 matches and conceded a moderate 6. The home si...
Both teams have shown a tendency to concede goals, and LAFC II has a decent scoring record. While The Town's offense is weak, LAFC II's abil...
Both teams have modest scoring rates, with The Town averaging under a goal per game. Defensive solidity of LAFC II in recent matches suggest...
Both teams to score
Consensusyes 2/4
Both teams concede regularly and away attack is potent. Home defensive record allows goals at both ends. Training data through 2025-09 used.
The Town has struggled significantly to score, netting only 3 goals in their last five matches. This poor offensive record suggests a high p...
LAFC II has a solid scoring record recently, while The Town has conceded frequently. Although The Town's offense is not prolific, the combin...
The Town has failed to score in several recent matches, making a clean sheet for LAFC II plausible. LAFC II's defense has been decent, conce...
Asian handicap
Consensusaway_ -0.5 2/4
Even split after home rest advantage offsets away form. Expect tight margin favoring slight away lean. Training data through 2025-09 used.
This market is equivalent to betting on the outright winner. Given Los Angeles FC II's significantly better form and offensive firepower com...
This market aligns with the head-to-head prediction. LAFC II's superior recent form, better scoring record, and The Town's significant strug...
LAFC II's superior form gives them a slight edge, but The Town's tendency to draw makes the half-goal handicap a close call. The away -0.5 e...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGemini 2.5 Flash
Los Angeles FC II
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Los Angeles FC II
DeepSeek V3
Los Angeles FC II
Grok 4 Fast
Los Angeles FC II
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Beat the AIs · Predict the score
Picks closed
Match has already kicked off. Picks are permanent — no late entries.
Team news
ProInjuries and confirmed lineups — the same team news the AIs factored into their reads.
Team news is a Pro feature
see exactly who's out and the XIs the AIs reasoned on, before kickoff.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
d069ee7468d9f81c…
- Kickoff
- Mon, Aug 31 · 02:30 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Draw no bet · Over / Under 2.5 · Both teams to score · Spread -1 · Asian handicap · Half-time / Full-time · Correct score
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 8. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 8, in this order): h2h | draw_no_bet | totals_2.5 | btts | spreads_-1 | asian_handicap | ht_ft | correct_score
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 34635,
"sport": "football",
"venue": "PayPal Park",
"league": "MLS Next Pro",
"starts_at": "2026-08-31T02:30:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Mon, 31 Aug 2026 02:30:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Los Angeles FC II",
"home": "The Town"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Weight CONFIRMED team news heavily: a missing first-choice striker, creator, or centre-back swings a match more than season-long form.",
"Compare attacking vs defensive quality directly — clean-sheet rate and goals-conceded trend often predict unders/BTTS better than the win line.",
"Set pieces decide tight games: note corner/free-kick threat and aerial mismatches.",
"Account for fixture congestion + likely rotation (midweek European or cup games before this one) and the home/away form split.",
"For outdoor venues, factor heavy rain or strong wind — both suppress goals and favour the under.",
"Tactical style matters: a high-press side vs a possession side, or two defensive setups, shapes the goals expectation."
],
"team_context": {
"note": "Reference data from our settled-results database. Verify + extend it with your own research; it is not a substitute for current team news.",
"away_form": {
"last": "LWWDW",
"record": "3W-1D-1L",
"scored": 10,
"matches": 5,
"conceded": 8
},
"home_form": {
"last": "LDLDD",
"record": "0W-3D-2L",
"scored": 3,
"matches": 5,
"conceded": 6
},
"rest_days": {
"away": 4,
"home": 7
}
},
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"draw_no_bet",
"totals_2.5",
"btts",
"spreads_-1",
"asian_handicap",
"ht_ft",
"correct_score"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Research trail
What each AI looked up before picking
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 3 sources
3 citations captured — unlock with Pro
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
Recent recaps
How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.