PSV/Eindhoven WvsKøge W
PSV/Eindhoven W 0–1 Køge W
All 4 AIs backed PSV/Eindhoven W — reality had other ideas.
- AI lean
- PSV/Eindhoven W 4/4
- Correct calls
- 0/4
- Final
- 0–1
Every pick below was locked before the match and graded automatically against the final score — no hindsight edits.
AI predictions
8 markets · 4 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 8 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
|
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
|
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
|
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
|
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
yes 3/4 models |
PSV/Eindhoven W 4/4 models |
PSV/Eindhoven W 4/4 models |
over 3/4 models |
PSV/Eindhoven W 2/4 models |
PSV/Eindhoven W -0.25 1/4 models |
PSV/Eindhoven W / PSV/Eindhoven W 2/4 models |
2-1 4/4 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
|
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
No pick on this market.
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
No pick on this market.
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
No pick on this market.
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
No pick on this market. |
|||||||||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
|
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
No pick on this market.
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
No pick on this market.
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
No pick on this market.
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
No pick on this market. |
|||||||||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
|
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
No pick on this market.
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
No pick on this market.
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
No pick on this market.
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
No pick on this market. |
|||||||||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
54%
yes
L
|
62%
PSV/Eindhoven W
L
|
52%
PSV/Eindhoven W
L
|
57%
over
L
|
49%
PSV/Eindhoven W
L
|
51%
PSV/Eindhoven W -1
L
|
38%
PSV/Eindhoven W / PSV/Eindhoven W
L
|
18%
2-1
L
|
|
|
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
54%
yes Køge concede regularly on the road while PSV create chances at home. Training data through 2024-10 indicates BTTS occurs in over half of sim...
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
62%
PSV/Eindhoven W Home side benefits from venue familiarity and shorter rest but still favored over the high-scoring visitors. Training data through 2024-10 s...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
52%
PSV/Eindhoven W PSV Eindhoven Women hold a clear home advantage at De Herdgang and enter with a strong DWWWW record. Køge W are in excellent form but face a...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
57%
over Both teams average over 2.4 goals per game recently and defensive records are not elite. Training data through 2024-10 shows women's CL qual...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
49%
PSV/Eindhoven W Home side expected to win but margin uncertain given Køge's scoring rate. Training data through 2024-10 shows PSV cover -1 handicap in rough...
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
51%
PSV/Eindhoven W -1 PSV's home edge and recent results support a narrow handicap lean. Training data through 2024-10 favors the home team covering -1 in this le...
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
38%
PSV/Eindhoven W / PSV/Eindhoven W PSV likely to lead at half and maintain control given home form. Training data through 2024-10 shows home/home is the most common HT/FT outc...
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
18%
2-1 Expected low-to-mid scoring game with PSV edging it. Training data through 2024-10 shows 2-1 as the single most frequent scoreline in compar... |
|||||||||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
60%
Yes
L
|
55%
PSV/Eindhoven W
L
|
40%
PSV/Eindhoven W
L
|
55%
Over 2.5
L
|
60%
Køge W +1
W
|
55%
Køge W +0.5
W
|
25%
Draw / PSV/Eindhoven W
L
|
15%
2-1
L
|
|
|
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
60%
Yes Given the strong attacking records of both PSV (12 goals in 5 games) and Køge W (15 goals in 5 games), it's highly probable that both teams...
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
55%
PSV/Eindhoven W Given the balanced H2H outlook and PSV's home advantage, the Draw No Bet market offers a safer pick. PSV is slightly favored to win, and thi...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
40%
PSV/Eindhoven W Based on my training data up to my last update, PSV/Eindhoven W holds a home advantage in this UEFA Champions League match. Both teams show...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Over 2.5 Both teams have shown good attacking prowess, with PSV scoring 12 and Køge W scoring 15 in their last 5 matches. While defenses are decent,...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
60%
Køge W +1 While PSV has home advantage, Køge W's perfect recent form suggests they are very capable of keeping the game tight or even winning. Betting...
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
55%
Køge W +0.5 This pick aligns with the expectation of a tight match where Køge W is unlikely to lose outright. Køge W +0.5 covers a draw or an away win,...
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
25%
Draw / PSV/Eindhoven W Given the competitive nature expected, a cautious first half leading to a draw at halftime is plausible. PSV's home advantage and desire to...
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
15%
2-1 A 2-1 scoreline for PSV aligns with my overall prediction of a home win, 'Over 2.5' goals, and 'Both Teams To Score Yes'. It suggests a hard... |
|||||||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
60%
yes
L
|
58%
PSV/Eindhoven W
L
|
55%
PSV/Eindhoven W
L
|
56%
over
L
|
53%
Køge W |
55%
home_ -0.25 |
30%
Draw / PSV/Eindhoven W
L
|
12%
2-1
L
|
|
|
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
60%
yes Both teams are in excellent scoring form and have conceded a reasonable number of goals in their recent matches. PSV/Eindhoven W conceded 4...
2 sources cited
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
58%
PSV/Eindhoven W Given PSV/Eindhoven W's strong home record and offensive capability, they are more likely to secure at least a draw. Køge W's away form is e...
2 sources cited
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
PSV/Eindhoven W PSV/Eindhoven W has a slightly better recent home form and is playing at home, which is generally an advantage in football. Køge W has stron...
2 sources cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
56%
over Both teams have strong recent scoring records. PSV/Eindhoven W averages 2.4 goals per home game, and Køge W averages 3 goals per game. This...
2 sources cited
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
53%
Køge W While PSV/Eindhoven W is favored to win, Køge W's strong offensive form and recent perfect record suggest they can at least keep the scoreli...
2 sources cited
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
55%
home_ -0.25 PSV/Eindhoven W has a slight edge due to home advantage and a solid overall record, even with Køge W's impressive recent run. A -0.25 handic...
2 sources cited
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
30%
Draw / PSV/Eindhoven W PSV/Eindhoven W is expected to press their advantage at home in the second half, but Køge W's strong form suggests they could hold out for a...
2 sources cited
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
12%
2-1 Given both teams' scoring prowess and the expected tight nature of a Champions League fixture, a 2-1 scoreline in favor of PSV/Eindhoven W s...
2 sources cited
|
|||||||||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
55%
yes
L
|
60%
PSV/Eindhoven W
L
|
55%
PSV/Eindhoven W
L
|
55%
over
L
|
45%
PSV/Eindhoven W
L
|
50%
PSV/Eindhoven W -0.25
L
|
30%
PSV/Eindhoven W / PSV/Eindhoven W
L
|
12%
2-1
L
|
|
|
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
55%
yes Both teams have shown ability to score and also concede (PSV conceded 4 in last 5, Køge 3). With attacking styles, it's likely both will sco...
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
60%
PSV/Eindhoven W With the draw removed, PSV's home advantage and historical strength give them a clear edge over Køge. The away team's good form is countered...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
PSV/Eindhoven W Based on training data through 2025-09, PSV/Eindhoven W have strong home form and recent results, while Køge W are also in good form but may...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over Both teams have been scoring frequently in recent matches (PSV 12 goals in 5, Køge 15 in 5), suggesting attacking quality. The match is expe...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
45%
PSV/Eindhoven W PSV are expected to win by at least one goal given home advantage, but the margin is uncertain. Køge's strong form could keep it close, so t...
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
50%
PSV/Eindhoven W -0.25 A quarter-goal handicap is a balanced bet, giving half-win on a draw. PSV's slight edge suggests a value in taking the home side. No live da...
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
30%
PSV/Eindhoven W / PSV/Eindhoven W PSV likely to take the lead early and maintain it, but Køge could also equalize. With both teams strong, a home/home result is most probable...
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
12%
2-1 Given both teams' scoring, a 2-1 home win is a plausible outcome. Other low-scoring draws and a 1-0 are also possible. Based on training kno... |
|||||||||
Both teams to score
Consensusyes 3/4
Køge concede regularly on the road while PSV create chances at home. Training data through 2024-10 indicates BTTS occurs in over half of sim...
Given the strong attacking records of both PSV (12 goals in 5 games) and Køge W (15 goals in 5 games), it's highly probable that both teams...
Both teams are in excellent scoring form and have conceded a reasonable number of goals in their recent matches. PSV/Eindhoven W conceded 4...
Both teams have shown ability to score and also concede (PSV conceded 4 in last 5, Køge 3). With attacking styles, it's likely both will sco...
Draw no bet
ConsensusPSV/Eindhoven W 4/4
Home side benefits from venue familiarity and shorter rest but still favored over the high-scoring visitors. Training data through 2024-10 s...
Given the balanced H2H outlook and PSV's home advantage, the Draw No Bet market offers a safer pick. PSV is slightly favored to win, and thi...
Given PSV/Eindhoven W's strong home record and offensive capability, they are more likely to secure at least a draw. Køge W's away form is e...
With the draw removed, PSV's home advantage and historical strength give them a clear edge over Køge. The away team's good form is countered...
Match winner
ConsensusPSV/Eindhoven W 4/4
PSV Eindhoven Women hold a clear home advantage at De Herdgang and enter with a strong DWWWW record. Køge W are in excellent form but face a...
Based on my training data up to my last update, PSV/Eindhoven W holds a home advantage in this UEFA Champions League match. Both teams show...
PSV/Eindhoven W has a slightly better recent home form and is playing at home, which is generally an advantage in football. Køge W has stron...
Based on training data through 2025-09, PSV/Eindhoven W have strong home form and recent results, while Køge W are also in good form but may...
Over / Under
Consensusover 3/4
Both teams average over 2.4 goals per game recently and defensive records are not elite. Training data through 2024-10 shows women's CL qual...
Both teams have shown good attacking prowess, with PSV scoring 12 and Køge W scoring 15 in their last 5 matches. While defenses are decent,...
Both teams have strong recent scoring records. PSV/Eindhoven W averages 2.4 goals per home game, and Køge W averages 3 goals per game. This...
Both teams have been scoring frequently in recent matches (PSV 12 goals in 5, Køge 15 in 5), suggesting attacking quality. The match is expe...
Spread
ConsensusPSV/Eindhoven W 2/4
Home side expected to win but margin uncertain given Køge's scoring rate. Training data through 2024-10 shows PSV cover -1 handicap in rough...
While PSV has home advantage, Køge W's perfect recent form suggests they are very capable of keeping the game tight or even winning. Betting...
While PSV/Eindhoven W is favored to win, Køge W's strong offensive form and recent perfect record suggest they can at least keep the scoreli...
PSV are expected to win by at least one goal given home advantage, but the margin is uncertain. Køge's strong form could keep it close, so t...
Asian handicap
ConsensusPSV/Eindhoven W -0.25 1/4
PSV's home edge and recent results support a narrow handicap lean. Training data through 2024-10 favors the home team covering -1 in this le...
This pick aligns with the expectation of a tight match where Køge W is unlikely to lose outright. Køge W +0.5 covers a draw or an away win,...
PSV/Eindhoven W has a slight edge due to home advantage and a solid overall record, even with Køge W's impressive recent run. A -0.25 handic...
A quarter-goal handicap is a balanced bet, giving half-win on a draw. PSV's slight edge suggests a value in taking the home side. No live da...
Half-time / Full-time
ConsensusPSV/Eindhoven W / PSV/Eindhoven W 2/4
PSV likely to lead at half and maintain control given home form. Training data through 2024-10 shows home/home is the most common HT/FT outc...
Given the competitive nature expected, a cautious first half leading to a draw at halftime is plausible. PSV's home advantage and desire to...
PSV/Eindhoven W is expected to press their advantage at home in the second half, but Køge W's strong form suggests they could hold out for a...
PSV likely to take the lead early and maintain it, but Køge could also equalize. With both teams strong, a home/home result is most probable...
Correct score
Consensus2-1 4/4
Expected low-to-mid scoring game with PSV edging it. Training data through 2024-10 shows 2-1 as the single most frequent scoreline in compar...
A 2-1 scoreline for PSV aligns with my overall prediction of a home win, 'Over 2.5' goals, and 'Both Teams To Score Yes'. It suggests a hard...
Given both teams' scoring prowess and the expected tight nature of a Champions League fixture, a 2-1 scoreline in favor of PSV/Eindhoven W s...
Given both teams' scoring, a 2-1 home win is a plausible outcome. Other low-scoring draws and a 1-0 are also possible. Based on training kno...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
PSV/Eindhoven W
DeepSeek V3
PSV/Eindhoven W
Grok 4 Fast
PSV/Eindhoven W
Gemini 2.5 Flash
PSV/Eindhoven W
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Beat the AIs · Predict the score
Picks closed
Match has already kicked off. Picks are permanent — no late entries.
Team news
ProInjuries and confirmed lineups — the same team news the AIs factored into their reads.
Team news is a Pro feature
see exactly who's out and the XIs the AIs reasoned on, before kickoff.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
d02915d074eba82f…
- Kickoff
- Wed, Aug 26 · 17:00 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Draw no bet · Over / Under 2.5 · Both teams to score · Spread -1 · Asian handicap · Half-time / Full-time · Correct score
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 8. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 8, in this order): h2h | draw_no_bet | totals_2.5 | btts | spreads_-1 | asian_handicap | ht_ft | correct_score
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 31402,
"sport": "football",
"venue": "De Herdgang",
"league": "UEFA Champions League Women",
"starts_at": "2026-08-26T17:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Wed, 26 Aug 2026 17:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Køge W",
"home": "PSV/Eindhoven W"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Weight CONFIRMED team news heavily: a missing first-choice striker, creator, or centre-back swings a match more than season-long form.",
"Compare attacking vs defensive quality directly — clean-sheet rate and goals-conceded trend often predict unders/BTTS better than the win line.",
"Set pieces decide tight games: note corner/free-kick threat and aerial mismatches.",
"Account for fixture congestion + likely rotation (midweek European or cup games before this one) and the home/away form split.",
"For outdoor venues, factor heavy rain or strong wind — both suppress goals and favour the under.",
"Tactical style matters: a high-press side vs a possession side, or two defensive setups, shapes the goals expectation."
],
"team_context": {
"note": "Reference data from our settled-results database. Verify + extend it with your own research; it is not a substitute for current team news.",
"away_form": {
"last": "WWWWW",
"record": "5W-0D-0L",
"scored": 15,
"matches": 5,
"conceded": 3
},
"home_form": {
"last": "DWWWW",
"record": "4W-1D-0L",
"scored": 12,
"matches": 5,
"conceded": 4
},
"rest_days": {
"away": 7,
"home": 4
}
},
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"draw_no_bet",
"totals_2.5",
"btts",
"spreads_-1",
"asian_handicap",
"ht_ft",
"correct_score"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Research trail
What each AI looked up before picking
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 2 sources
2 citations captured — unlock with Pro
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
Recent recaps
How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.