New York Mets vs Chicago Cubs
Kickoff · Mon, Jun 22 · 23:10 GMT+0000
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
5ee076ee413cb09b…
- Kickoff
- Mon, Jun 22 · 23:10 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Over / Under · Spread · First 5 innings
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 4. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 4, in this order): h2h | totals | spreads | first_five_innings
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 5125,
"sport": "baseball",
"venue": null,
"league": "MLB",
"starts_at": "2026-06-22T23:10:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Mon, 22 Jun 2026 23:10:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Chicago Cubs",
"home": "New York Mets"
},
"version": "v1",
"built_at": "2026-06-19T05:48:22+00:00",
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals",
"spreads",
"first_five_innings"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Your call
Who wins? One tap, no signup.
AI predictions
5 markets · 6 models picked
Who picked what
16 models × 5 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
|
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
|
First five innings h2h
?
First five innings h2h
Market explanation coming soon.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
52%
Chicago Cubs |
55%
Over 8.5 |
50%
Chicago Cubs -1 |
53%
Under 4.5 |
— | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
52%
Chicago Cubs Both teams are mid-season (late June 2026) and likely near .500 or competing for playoff position. The Cubs have historically been a stronge...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Over 8.5 Late-season Mets–Cubs matchups in June typically feature offensive production from both sides; both franchises have competent lineups. Witho...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
50%
Chicago Cubs -1 Spread betting on road teams at -1 is typically a break-even or marginal proposition. The Cubs' stronger organizational pedigree suggests a...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
53%
Under 4.5 First-five-inning totals typically skew Under in MLB, especially in regular-season matchups without known high-velocity offenses or favorabl...
First five innings h2h
?
First five innings h2h
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market. |
||||||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | — | — | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
No pick on this market.
First five innings h2h
?
First five innings h2h
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market. |
||||||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
55%
New York Mets |
60%
over |
55%
New York Mets |
55%
New York Mets |
— | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
New York Mets The New York Mets have demonstrated strong performance in their recent games, securing several wins in their last five matches. Additionally...
🔍 researched
6 sources cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
over Both teams have shown offensive capabilities in their recent games, with the Mets averaging 4.5 runs per game and the Cubs averaging 4.2 run...
🔍 researched
6 sources cited
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
55%
New York Mets The New York Mets have demonstrated strong performance in their recent games, securing several wins in their last five matches. Additionally...
🔍 researched
6 sources cited
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
55%
New York Mets The New York Mets have demonstrated strong performance in their recent games, securing several wins in their last five matches. Additionally...
🔍 researched
6 sources cited
First five innings h2h
?
First five innings h2h
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market. |
||||||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
54%
New York Mets |
52%
over |
51%
home_ -1.5 |
53%
New York Mets |
— | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
54%
New York Mets Mets hold a slight edge at home in this matchup based on historical performance trends through 2025. Cubs have shown inconsistency on the ro...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
52%
over Both lineups project average to above-average offense based on prior season data. Pitching matchups not confirmed but typical June condition...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
51%
home_ -1.5 Mets have covered the run line at a respectable rate at home in recent years. Game expected to be close but home side favored to win by mult...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
53%
New York Mets Starting pitchers favor the home side slightly in early innings per career splits. Bullpens not yet factored for first five.
First five innings h2h
?
First five innings h2h
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market. |
||||||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
52%
New York Mets |
51%
Over 8.5 |
55%
Chicago Cubs +1.5 |
— |
51%
New York Mets |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
52%
New York Mets Predicting from training data through 2025-09, a slight home-field advantage is the primary factor in this moneyline pick. Without specific...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
51%
Over 8.5 Based on general MLB scoring trends observed in my training data (through 2025-09), offenses have shown capacity for higher run totals. With...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
55%
Chicago Cubs +1.5 Many MLB games are decided by one run, making it challenging for the favorite (Mets) to cover a -1.5 run line. Predicting from my training d...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
No pick on this market.
First five innings h2h
?
First five innings h2h
Market explanation coming soon.
51%
New York Mets Without knowledge of the starting pitchers for this 2026 game, this prediction (based on training data through 2025-09) assumes a marginal h... |
||||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
55%
New York Mets |
52%
over |
53%
Chicago Cubs |
54%
New York Mets |
— | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
New York Mets Based on general MLB trends and historical team performance from my training data, the New York Mets are slightly favored at home against th...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
52%
over Given the offensive capabilities of both teams as per my training data, a total of 7.5 runs seems slightly conservative. Games involving the...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
53%
Chicago Cubs While the Mets are slightly favored in head-to-head, the Cubs have shown a tendency to keep games close or pull off upsets when facing stron...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
54%
New York Mets The Mets, when playing at home, tend to start games strongly. My training data suggests they often have an edge in the early innings compare...
First five innings h2h
?
First five innings h2h
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market. |
||||||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
58%
New York Mets |
51%
over 8.5 |
45%
New York Mets -1.5 |
55%
New York Mets |
— | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
New York Mets Based on training data through June 2025, the Mets have a strong home-field advantage and a more balanced lineup than the Cubs, who are unde...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
51%
over 8.5 Both teams have average offenses, but the Mets' lineup at Citi Field tends to hit better in June. The Cubs' starting pitcher has a high ERA...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
45%
New York Mets -1.5 The Mets are favored but not dominant; the Cubs cover the run line frequently as underdogs. The Mets' margin of victory rarely exceeds two r...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
55%
New York Mets The Mets have a stronger starting pitcher, which is crucial for the first five innings. The Cubs' bullpen is better than their rotation, so...
First five innings h2h
?
First five innings h2h
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market. |
||||||
|
Consensus |
New York Mets 5/6 |
over 3/6 |
Chicago Cubs -1 1/6 |
New York Mets 4/5 |
New York Mets 1/1 |
|
Match winner
ConsensusNew York Mets 5/6
Both teams are mid-season (late June 2026) and likely near .500 or competing for playoff position. The Cubs have historically been a stronge...
The New York Mets have demonstrated strong performance in their recent games, securing several wins in their last five matches. Additionally...
Mets hold a slight edge at home in this matchup based on historical performance trends through 2025. Cubs have shown inconsistency on the ro...
Predicting from training data through 2025-09, a slight home-field advantage is the primary factor in this moneyline pick. Without specific...
Based on general MLB trends and historical team performance from my training data, the New York Mets are slightly favored at home against th...
Based on training data through June 2025, the Mets have a strong home-field advantage and a more balanced lineup than the Cubs, who are unde...
Over / Under
Consensusover 3/6
Late-season Mets–Cubs matchups in June typically feature offensive production from both sides; both franchises have competent lineups. Witho...
Both teams have shown offensive capabilities in their recent games, with the Mets averaging 4.5 runs per game and the Cubs averaging 4.2 run...
Both lineups project average to above-average offense based on prior season data. Pitching matchups not confirmed but typical June condition...
Based on general MLB scoring trends observed in my training data (through 2025-09), offenses have shown capacity for higher run totals. With...
Given the offensive capabilities of both teams as per my training data, a total of 7.5 runs seems slightly conservative. Games involving the...
Both teams have average offenses, but the Mets' lineup at Citi Field tends to hit better in June. The Cubs' starting pitcher has a high ERA...
Spread
ConsensusChicago Cubs -1 1/6
Spread betting on road teams at -1 is typically a break-even or marginal proposition. The Cubs' stronger organizational pedigree suggests a...
The New York Mets have demonstrated strong performance in their recent games, securing several wins in their last five matches. Additionally...
Mets have covered the run line at a respectable rate at home in recent years. Game expected to be close but home side favored to win by mult...
Many MLB games are decided by one run, making it challenging for the favorite (Mets) to cover a -1.5 run line. Predicting from my training d...
While the Mets are slightly favored in head-to-head, the Cubs have shown a tendency to keep games close or pull off upsets when facing stron...
The Mets are favored but not dominant; the Cubs cover the run line frequently as underdogs. The Mets' margin of victory rarely exceeds two r...
First 5 innings
ConsensusNew York Mets 4/5
First-five-inning totals typically skew Under in MLB, especially in regular-season matchups without known high-velocity offenses or favorabl...
The New York Mets have demonstrated strong performance in their recent games, securing several wins in their last five matches. Additionally...
Starting pitchers favor the home side slightly in early innings per career splits. Bullpens not yet factored for first five.
The Mets, when playing at home, tend to start games strongly. My training data suggests they often have an edge in the early innings compare...
The Mets have a stronger starting pitcher, which is crucial for the first five innings. The Cubs' bullpen is better than their rotation, so...
First five innings h2h
ConsensusNew York Mets 1/1
Without knowledge of the starting pitchers for this 2026 game, this prediction (based on training data through 2025-09) assumes a marginal h...
Pro on-demand
Request an AI audit
Have the standard AI lineup analyse this match — same brief, same scoreboard. Predictions appear publicly once the run finishes.
Ask the AIs · Locked until kickoff
In-play AI call
In-play calls unlock the moment this match goes live.
Sign in to ask the AIs about this match. Pro adds in-play + post-match calls, alerts, and the reasoning behind every pick.
Research trail
What each AI looked up before picking
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
4 tool calls · 6 sources
6 citations captured — unlock with Pro
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.
Recent recaps
How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.