Arizona Diamondbacks vs Minnesota Twins
Kickoff · Sun, Jun 21 · 02:10 GMT+0000
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
96fea9d41200e91e…
- Kickoff
- Sun, Jun 21 · 02:10 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Over / Under · Spread · First 5 innings
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 4. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 4, in this order): h2h | totals | spreads | first_five_innings
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 4901,
"sport": "baseball",
"venue": null,
"league": "MLB",
"starts_at": "2026-06-21T02:10:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Sun, 21 Jun 2026 02:10:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Minnesota Twins",
"home": "Arizona Diamondbacks"
},
"version": "v1",
"built_at": "2026-06-17T05:56:48+00:00",
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals",
"spreads",
"first_five_innings"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Your call
Who wins? One tap, no signup.
AI predictions
4 markets · 6 models picked
Who picked what
16 models × 4 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
|
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
55%
Arizona Diamondbacks |
52%
Over 8.5 |
54%
Arizona Diamondbacks -1.5 |
56%
Under 4.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Arizona Diamondbacks As of my training data (through September 2025), the Diamondbacks have been a competitive NL West franchise with strong pitching depth, whil...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
52%
Over 8.5 MLB totals in mid-June typically trend toward moderate scoring environments; a total around 8.5 reflects standard park factors and early-sum...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
54%
Arizona Diamondbacks -1.5 The Diamondbacks' home-field advantage and established pitching tradition support a modest run-line edge. A -1.5 spread implies Arizona favo...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
56%
Under 4.5 First-five-inning totals typically see lower run production than full-game markets; starters and early bullpen are generally fresher and sha... |
|||||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | — | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
No pick on this market. |
|||||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
55%
Arizona Diamondbacks |
60%
over |
55%
Arizona Diamondbacks |
55%
Arizona Diamondbacks |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Arizona Diamondbacks The Arizona Diamondbacks have a slight edge over the Minnesota Twins, with a 4-6 record in their last 10 head-to-head matchups. ([matchstat....
🔍 researched
4 sources cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
over Both teams have shown moderate offensive capabilities, with the Twins averaging 4.6 runs per game and the Diamondbacks averaging 4.5 runs pe...
🔍 researched
4 sources cited
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
55%
Arizona Diamondbacks The Diamondbacks' home advantage and recent form suggest they are likely to cover a -1 spread against the Twins.
🔍 researched
4 sources cited
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
55%
Arizona Diamondbacks The Diamondbacks' home performance and recent form give them a slight edge in the first five innings against the Twins.
🔍 researched
4 sources cited
|
|||||
|
o3 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
53%
Arizona Diamondbacks |
51%
over |
52%
Arizona Diamondbacks |
50%
Arizona Diamondbacks |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
53%
Arizona Diamondbacks Diamondbacks hold slight home edge in training data patterns through 2023 and early 2024 seasons. Twins show inconsistent road performance h...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
51%
over Both lineups project average offense in neutral conditions per historical matchups. Pitching staffs not dominant enough to suppress runs con...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
52%
Arizona Diamondbacks Home field and rest advantage give Arizona a narrow spread lean. Twins road record historically weaker. No fresh injury data forces conserva...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
50%
Arizona Diamondbacks Early innings often favor home starter per historical splits. No 2026 lineups available so default to balanced lean from past season archety... |
|||||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
52%
Arizona Diamondbacks |
53%
Over 8.5 |
51%
Arizona Diamondbacks -1.5 |
38%
Arizona Diamondbacks |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
52%
Arizona Diamondbacks This prediction is based on general team competitiveness and a slight home-field advantage drawn from my training data through 2025-09. With...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
53%
Over 8.5 Based on my training data through 2025-09, both the Diamondbacks and Twins typically feature capable offenses. This suggests a game with a m...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
51%
Arizona Diamondbacks -1.5 Relying on my training data through 2025-09, if the home team, Arizona, is to win, they often do so by more than one run, especially when th...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
38%
Arizona Diamondbacks Based on general team strengths from my training data through 2025-09, a slight edge is given to the home team in the initial innings. While... |
|||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
55%
Arizona Diamondbacks |
53%
over |
54%
Minnesota Twins |
52%
Arizona Diamondbacks |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Arizona Diamondbacks Based on training data, the Arizona Diamondbacks have historically performed well at home and generally have a stronger pitching rotation, g...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
53%
over Both teams have shown a tendency for moderate scoring games, and without specific pitching matchups or lineup information, the over is a sli...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
54%
Minnesota Twins Given the slight lean towards the Diamondbacks winning the head-to-head, this suggests the Twins might be slightly undervalued on the spread...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
52%
Arizona Diamondbacks Historically, the Diamondbacks have been known to start games strong at home, particularly against teams without a definitive ace pitching.... |
|||||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
55%
Arizona Diamondbacks |
60%
Over 8.5 |
45%
Arizona Diamondbacks -1.5 |
55%
Arizona Diamondbacks |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Arizona Diamondbacks Based on training data through 2025, the Diamondbacks have been a strong home team with a potent offense, while the Twins have had inconsist...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
Over 8.5 Both teams have decent offensive lineups and Arizona's ballpark is hitter-friendly. Starting pitchers are likely to be mid-rotation, leading...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
45%
Arizona Diamondbacks -1.5 Arizona is expected to win, but by a narrow margin. The run line is a risky pick without up-to-date lineup and bullpen info. Slight lean to...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
55%
Arizona Diamondbacks Arizona's starting pitcher, likely Zac Gallen based on 2025 rotation, is strong early. Twins' offense may take time to adjust. However, no c... |
|||||
|
Consensus |
Arizona Diamondbacks 6/6 |
Over 8.5 3/6 |
Arizona Diamondbacks -1.5 3/6 |
Arizona Diamondbacks 5/6 |
|
Pro on-demand
Request an AI audit
Have the standard AI lineup analyse this match — same brief, same scoreboard. Predictions appear publicly once the run finishes.
Ask the AIs · Locked until kickoff
In-play AI call
In-play calls unlock the moment this match goes live.
Sign in to ask the AIs about this match. Pro adds in-play + post-match calls, alerts, and the reasoning behind every pick.
Research trail
What each AI looked up before picking
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
4 tool calls · 4 sources
4 citations captured — unlock with Pro
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.