New England IIvsHuntsville City
New England II 1–4 Huntsville City
3 of 4 AIs leaned New England II — reality had other ideas.
- AI lean
- New England II 3/4
- Correct calls
- 1/4
- Final
- 1–4
Every pick below was locked before the match and graded automatically against the final score — no hindsight edits.
AI predictions
8 markets · 4 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 8 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
|
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
|
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
|
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
New England II 2/4 models |
New England II -0.25 1/4 models |
New England II / New England II 3/4 models |
New England II 3/4 models |
New England II 3/4 models |
2-1 3/4 models |
over 3/4 models |
yes 3/4 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
No pick on this market.
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market.
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
No pick on this market. |
|||||||||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
No pick on this market.
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market.
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
No pick on this market. |
|||||||||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
No pick on this market.
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market.
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
No pick on this market. |
|||||||||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
48%
New England II
L
|
52%
New England II -0.25
L
|
29%
New England II / New England II
L
|
44%
New England II
L
|
55%
New England II
L
|
18%
2-1
L
|
57%
over
W
|
61%
yes
W
|
|
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
48%
New England II Home side's goal output supports a -1 spread chance but away side's defensive record keeps it close. Recent form split favors slight lean aw...
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
52%
New England II -0.25 New England II's home attacking edge gives a quarter-ball handicap value. Huntsville's away results are not dominant enough to overcome the...
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
29%
New England II / New England II Home side's strong second-half finishes in recent wins support home/home. Both teams start cautiously but home has better overall quality. T...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
44%
New England II New England II's home form shows a strong recent finish with two wins, outscoring opponents heavily despite defensive lapses. Huntsville Cit...
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
55%
New England II New England II's attacking output at home (12 goals in 5) exceeds Huntsville's road scoring. Both sides concede frequently, but the home sid...
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
18%
2-1 High-scoring tendencies for both sides point to 2-1 or 2-2 as top outcomes. Home edge and BTTS lean favor 2-1. Training data through 2025-09...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
57%
over Both teams average over 2.3 goals per game in recent form with leaky defenses. New England II's high-scoring home matches and Huntsville's c...
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
61%
yes High concession rates for both sides (home 12, away 7 in 5 games) make BTTS likely. New England II's home matches frequently see goals at bo... |
|||||||||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
70%
Huntsville City
W
|
55%
Huntsville City +0.5
W
|
25%
New England II / New England II
L
|
45%
New England II
L
|
62%
New England II
L
|
15%
2-1
L
|
65%
Over 2.5
W
|
60%
Yes
W
|
|
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
70%
Huntsville City New England II -1 means NEII must win by two or more goals for the 'Home' pick to win. Given NEII's defensive frailties and the general vola...
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
55%
Huntsville City +0.5 The 'Huntsville City +0.5' Asian Handicap pick wins if Huntsville City either draws or wins the match. Based on my H2H probabilities, the co...
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
25%
New England II / New England II New England II's recent home wins suggest they can start strong and maintain a lead, despite their defensive issues. While their games are h...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
45%
New England II Based on internal training data through late 2025 and the provided team form, New England II's recent home record of two wins following thre...
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
62%
New England II Extrapolating from the H2H prediction, if the match results in a draw, stakes are refunded. With New England II favored to win outright, the...
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
15%
2-1 Given the lean towards a New England II win and the high likelihood of both teams scoring and over 2.5 goals, a 2-1 victory for the home sid...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
65%
Over 2.5 New England II's home matches have been very high-scoring, with 12 goals scored and 12 conceded in their last 5, averaging 4.8 goals per gam...
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
60%
Yes New England II has conceded 12 goals in their last 5 home matches, indicating a vulnerable defense. While Huntsville City scores less, they... |
|||||||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
53%
Huntsville City
W
|
55%
away_ 0.0 |
35%
Draw / Huntsville City |
52%
Huntsville City
W
|
55%
Huntsville City
W
|
10%
1-2
L
|
58%
over
W
|
60%
yes
W
|
|
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
53%
Huntsville City While Huntsville is favored to win, the -1 handicap suggests a need for a two-goal margin. Given the relatively close form and potential for...
3 sources cited
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
55%
away_ 0.0 Huntsville City is slightly favored based on their recent performance and defensive stability. The 0.0 Asian Handicap means a push if the ga...
3 sources cited
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
35%
Draw / Huntsville City New England II has shown a tendency to start poorly, with their recent losses often seeing them behind at halftime. Huntsville City may stru...
3 sources cited
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
52%
Huntsville City Huntsville City FC has shown slightly better recent form and a more balanced performance compared to New England II, who have a losing strea...
3 sources cited
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
55%
Huntsville City Given Huntsville City's slightly superior recent form and better defensive record over their last five games, they are favored to at least a...
3 sources cited
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
10%
1-2 Given the prediction for both teams to score and a slight edge to Huntsville City, a scoreline of 1-2 reflects this. Huntsville's offensive...
3 sources cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
over Both teams have shown a tendency to both score and concede, with New England II's recent matches featuring a high number of goals. Huntsvill...
3 sources cited
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
60%
yes New England II has conceded in all of their last three losses, indicating defensive frailties. Huntsville City, while having a more solid de...
3 sources cited
|
|||||||||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
40%
New England II
L
|
50%
Huntsville City +0.25
W
|
20%
New England II / New England II
L
|
45%
New England II
L
|
55%
New England II
L
|
18%
2-1
L
|
55%
over
W
|
60%
yes
W
|
|
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
40%
New England II New England II have won only 2 of last 5 and conceded heavily. Covering a -1 spread (win by 2+) is tough given their inconsistency. Huntsvil...
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
50%
Huntsville City +0.25 New England II are slightly favored but not convincingly. Huntsville City have been more stable and could avoid defeat. Taking the away side...
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
20%
New England II / New England II New England II have the home edge and might start strongly, but their defensive issues often lead to comebacks. Given the unpredictability,...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
45%
New England II Training data through 2025-09. Both teams are mid-table MLS Next Pro sides with erratic form. New England II at home have scored more but al...
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
55%
New England II With the draw removed, New England II's home advantage and slightly better attacking output give them a modest edge. Huntsville City are sol...
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
18%
2-1 New England II's attack is strong but defense weak, so a 2-1 home win fits their profile. Huntsville City are likely to score but concede to...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over New England II's matches have averaged 4.8 goals over their last five (12 scored, 12 conceded). Huntsville City's have averaged 2.6 (6 score...
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
60%
yes Both teams have scored in most of their recent games: New England II had BTTS in 4 of 5, Huntsville City in 3 of 5. The home side's defensiv... |
|||||||||
Spread
ConsensusNew England II 2/4
Home side's goal output supports a -1 spread chance but away side's defensive record keeps it close. Recent form split favors slight lean aw...
New England II -1 means NEII must win by two or more goals for the 'Home' pick to win. Given NEII's defensive frailties and the general vola...
While Huntsville is favored to win, the -1 handicap suggests a need for a two-goal margin. Given the relatively close form and potential for...
New England II have won only 2 of last 5 and conceded heavily. Covering a -1 spread (win by 2+) is tough given their inconsistency. Huntsvil...
Asian handicap
ConsensusNew England II -0.25 1/4
New England II's home attacking edge gives a quarter-ball handicap value. Huntsville's away results are not dominant enough to overcome the...
The 'Huntsville City +0.5' Asian Handicap pick wins if Huntsville City either draws or wins the match. Based on my H2H probabilities, the co...
Huntsville City is slightly favored based on their recent performance and defensive stability. The 0.0 Asian Handicap means a push if the ga...
New England II are slightly favored but not convincingly. Huntsville City have been more stable and could avoid defeat. Taking the away side...
Half-time / Full-time
ConsensusNew England II / New England II 3/4
Home side's strong second-half finishes in recent wins support home/home. Both teams start cautiously but home has better overall quality. T...
New England II's recent home wins suggest they can start strong and maintain a lead, despite their defensive issues. While their games are h...
New England II has shown a tendency to start poorly, with their recent losses often seeing them behind at halftime. Huntsville City may stru...
New England II have the home edge and might start strongly, but their defensive issues often lead to comebacks. Given the unpredictability,...
Match winner
ConsensusNew England II 3/4
New England II's home form shows a strong recent finish with two wins, outscoring opponents heavily despite defensive lapses. Huntsville Cit...
Based on internal training data through late 2025 and the provided team form, New England II's recent home record of two wins following thre...
Huntsville City FC has shown slightly better recent form and a more balanced performance compared to New England II, who have a losing strea...
Training data through 2025-09. Both teams are mid-table MLS Next Pro sides with erratic form. New England II at home have scored more but al...
Draw no bet
ConsensusNew England II 3/4
New England II's attacking output at home (12 goals in 5) exceeds Huntsville's road scoring. Both sides concede frequently, but the home sid...
Extrapolating from the H2H prediction, if the match results in a draw, stakes are refunded. With New England II favored to win outright, the...
Given Huntsville City's slightly superior recent form and better defensive record over their last five games, they are favored to at least a...
With the draw removed, New England II's home advantage and slightly better attacking output give them a modest edge. Huntsville City are sol...
Correct score
Consensus2-1 3/4
High-scoring tendencies for both sides point to 2-1 or 2-2 as top outcomes. Home edge and BTTS lean favor 2-1. Training data through 2025-09...
Given the lean towards a New England II win and the high likelihood of both teams scoring and over 2.5 goals, a 2-1 victory for the home sid...
Given the prediction for both teams to score and a slight edge to Huntsville City, a scoreline of 1-2 reflects this. Huntsville's offensive...
New England II's attack is strong but defense weak, so a 2-1 home win fits their profile. Huntsville City are likely to score but concede to...
Over / Under
Consensusover 3/4
Both teams average over 2.3 goals per game in recent form with leaky defenses. New England II's high-scoring home matches and Huntsville's c...
New England II's home matches have been very high-scoring, with 12 goals scored and 12 conceded in their last 5, averaging 4.8 goals per gam...
Both teams have shown a tendency to both score and concede, with New England II's recent matches featuring a high number of goals. Huntsvill...
New England II's matches have averaged 4.8 goals over their last five (12 scored, 12 conceded). Huntsville City's have averaged 2.6 (6 score...
Both teams to score
Consensusyes 3/4
High concession rates for both sides (home 12, away 7 in 5 games) make BTTS likely. New England II's home matches frequently see goals at bo...
New England II has conceded 12 goals in their last 5 home matches, indicating a vulnerable defense. While Huntsville City scores less, they...
New England II has conceded in all of their last three losses, indicating defensive frailties. Huntsville City, while having a more solid de...
Both teams have scored in most of their recent games: New England II had BTTS in 4 of 5, Huntsville City in 3 of 5. The home side's defensiv...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Huntsville City
Gemini 2.5 Flash
New England II
DeepSeek V3
New England II
Grok 4 Fast
New England II
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Beat the AIs · Predict the score
Picks closed
Match has already kicked off. Picks are permanent — no late entries.
Team news
ProInjuries and confirmed lineups — the same team news the AIs factored into their reads.
Team news is a Pro feature
see exactly who's out and the XIs the AIs reasoned on, before kickoff.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
5d255a37735b9dce…
- Kickoff
- Sun, Aug 30 · 23:00 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Draw no bet · Over / Under 2.5 · Both teams to score · Spread -1 · Asian handicap · Half-time / Full-time · Correct score
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 8. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 8, in this order): h2h | draw_no_bet | totals_2.5 | btts | spreads_-1 | asian_handicap | ht_ft | correct_score
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 34607,
"sport": "football",
"venue": "Gillette Stadium",
"league": "MLS Next Pro",
"starts_at": "2026-08-30T23:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Sun, 30 Aug 2026 23:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Huntsville City",
"home": "New England II"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Weight CONFIRMED team news heavily: a missing first-choice striker, creator, or centre-back swings a match more than season-long form.",
"Compare attacking vs defensive quality directly — clean-sheet rate and goals-conceded trend often predict unders/BTTS better than the win line.",
"Set pieces decide tight games: note corner/free-kick threat and aerial mismatches.",
"Account for fixture congestion + likely rotation (midweek European or cup games before this one) and the home/away form split.",
"For outdoor venues, factor heavy rain or strong wind — both suppress goals and favour the under.",
"Tactical style matters: a high-press side vs a possession side, or two defensive setups, shapes the goals expectation."
],
"team_context": {
"note": "Reference data from our settled-results database. Verify + extend it with your own research; it is not a substitute for current team news.",
"away_form": {
"last": "WWDLL",
"record": "2W-1D-2L",
"scored": 6,
"matches": 5,
"conceded": 7
},
"home_form": {
"last": "LLLWW",
"record": "2W-0D-3L",
"scored": 12,
"matches": 5,
"conceded": 12
},
"rest_days": {
"away": 7,
"home": 8
}
},
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"draw_no_bet",
"totals_2.5",
"btts",
"spreads_-1",
"asian_handicap",
"ht_ft",
"correct_score"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Research trail
What each AI looked up before picking
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 3 sources
3 citations captured — unlock with Pro
Recent recaps
How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.