LillestromvsEgnatia Rrogozhinë
Lillestrom 2–1 Egnatia Rrogozhinë
2 of 4 AIs leaned Draw — reality had other ideas.
- AI lean
- Draw 2/4
- Correct calls
- 1/4
- Final
- 2–1
Every pick below was locked before the match and graded automatically against the final score — no hindsight edits.
AI predictions
8 markets · 4 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 8 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
|
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
|
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
|
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
under 3/4 models |
no 3/4 models |
Draw 2/4 models |
Egnatia Rrogozhinë 2/4 models |
Egnatia Rrogozhinë 3/4 models |
Egnatia Rrogozhinë +0.25 1/4 models |
1-1 1/4 models |
Draw / Draw 3/4 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
No pick on this market.
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
No pick on this market.
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
No pick on this market. |
|||||||||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
No pick on this market.
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
No pick on this market.
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
No pick on this market. |
|||||||||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
No pick on this market.
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
No pick on this market.
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
No pick on this market. |
|||||||||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
61%
under
L
|
58%
no
L
|
42%
Egnatia Rrogozhinë
L
|
48%
Egnatia Rrogozhinë
L
|
39%
Egnatia Rrogozhinë
L
|
51%
Egnatia Rrogozhinë +0.25
L
|
19%
0-1
L
|
33%
Draw / Draw
L
|
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
61%
under Both sides average under 3 total goals per game in recent outings, Lillestrom especially low-scoring at home. The 0-0 first leg and Lillestr...
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
58%
no Lillestrom have failed to score in three of their last five and kept no clean sheets. Egnatia's solid defensive record on the road combined...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
42%
Egnatia Rrogozhinë Egnatia arrive with superior recent form, scoring 10 goals and conceding only 5 in their last 5, while Lillestrom managed just 2 goals and c...
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
48%
Egnatia Rrogozhinë Lillestrom's home scoring drought and defensive leaks make them unreliable favourites. Egnatia's better attacking output and rest advantage...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
39%
Egnatia Rrogozhinë Egnatia's better goal difference and attacking threat make them capable of covering +1 on the handicap. Lillestrom's poor home results incre...
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
51%
Egnatia Rrogozhinë +0.25 The 0-0 first leg and Lillestrom's attacking struggles give Egnatia a strong chance to avoid defeat. Half-goal Asian line on the visitors of...
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
19%
0-1 The 0-0 first leg and Lillestrom's scoring issues point to another low-scoring result. Egnatia's better away output makes 0-1 the single mos...
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
33%
Draw / Draw Both teams are defensively cautious, with the first leg finishing 0-0. Lillestrom's lack of home goals and Egnatia's controlled style make a... |
|||||||||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
65%
Under
L
|
70%
No
L
|
40%
Draw
L
|
65%
Egnatia Rrogozhinë
L
|
70%
Egnatia +1 |
75%
Egnatia +0.5 |
20%
0-0
L
|
30%
Draw / Draw
L
|
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
65%
Under The first leg ended 0-0, indicating a defensive setup from both sides or difficulty in breaking down defenses. Lillestrom has only scored tw...
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
70%
No Lillestrom's significant difficulty in finding the net (2 goals in 5 matches) suggests they might struggle to score even at home. Given the...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
40%
Draw Lillestrom enters this second leg with very poor form, failing to win any of their last five matches and scoring only two goals. Egnatia's r...
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
65%
Egnatia Rrogozhinë Considering Lillestrom's struggles and Egnatia's better form, Egnatia is favored to either win outright or draw, making the 'Away' pick for...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
70%
Egnatia +1 Lillestrom's form (0 wins in last 5, 2 goals scored) makes winning by two or more goals highly unlikely. Egnatia's better form and the first...
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
75%
Egnatia +0.5 Egnatia +0.5 essentially means Egnatia to win or draw, which aligns with their superior recent form compared to Lillestrom. Lillestrom's poo...
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
20%
0-0 Given the 0-0 draw in the first leg and Lillestrom's severe struggles to score (2 goals in their last 5 games), a goalless draw again is a v...
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
30%
Draw / Draw With the first leg ending 0-0 and both teams likely to be cautious in such a crucial European fixture, a goalless first half is highly proba... |
|||||||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
55%
under
L
|
55%
no
L
|
45%
Draw
L
|
45%
Draw
L
|
50%
Egnatia Rrogozhinë
L
|
55%
Egnatia Rrogozhinë |
25%
1-1
L
|
30%
Draw / Draw
L
|
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
under Both teams have shown defensive solidity in their recent matches, with Egnatia conceding 5 goals in 5 games and Lillestrom also conceding a...
3 sources cited
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
55%
no The previous 0-0 draw is a strong indicator that both teams may struggle to score against each other. Considering Lillestrom's recent scorin...
3 sources cited
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
45%
Draw The recent 0-0 draw between these two teams suggests a closely contested match. Lillestrom's poor recent home form contrasts with Egnatia's...
3 sources cited
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
45%
Draw Given the evenly matched nature of the teams, as evidenced by their recent 0-0 draw and Egnatia's slightly better away form, a draw is the m...
3 sources cited
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
50%
Egnatia Rrogozhinë Egnatia has shown more resilience away from home compared to Lillestrom's struggles at home. While Lillestrom might be motivated to perform...
3 sources cited
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
55%
Egnatia Rrogozhinë Considering Egnatia's superior away form and Lillestrom's concerning home form, Egnatia is more likely to get a result. Even if Lillestrom m...
3 sources cited
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
25%
1-1 The previous 0-0 draw indicates that these teams are closely matched. However, Lillestrom's poor home scoring record combined with Egnatia's...
3 sources cited
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
30%
Draw / Draw Given the previous 0-0 draw and both teams' tendency to be solid defensively for periods, a draw at halftime is highly probable. Lillestrom'...
3 sources cited
|
|||||||||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
55%
under
L
|
60%
no
L
|
45%
Lillestrom
W
|
60%
Lillestrom
W
|
50%
Egnatia Rrogozhinë
L
|
55%
Egnatia Rrogozhinë +0.5
L
|
20%
1-0
L
|
20%
Draw / Lillestrom |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
under The first leg ended 0-0, and Egnatia are likely to defend deep. Lillestrom have been in poor scoring form, netting just 2 in their last 5. E...
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
60%
no Egnatia are unlikely to score away from home, as they failed to do so in the first leg and will likely park the bus. Lillestrom may struggle...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
45%
Lillestrom Training data through 2025 shows Lillestrom as a solid Norwegian side, and they have home advantage with extra rest. Egnatia are from Albani...
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
60%
Lillestrom With the draw removed, the home side are more likely to win given home advantage and the away side's likely defensive approach. Lillestrom h...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
50%
Egnatia Rrogozhinë With a -1 spread, the home team must win by 2 or more goals. Given Lillestrom's poor scoring form and Egnatia's defensive approach, a clear...
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
55%
Egnatia Rrogozhinë +0.5 The away side receiving a half-goal cushion is valuable because they are expected to defend and could snatch a draw or win. Lillestrom's for...
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
20%
1-0 A narrow home win is the most likely outcome given home advantage and the away side's defensive setup. The first leg was 0-0, so a 1-0 score...
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
20%
Draw / Lillestrom Given the low-scoring nature of the first leg, a draw at half-time is likely. Lillestrom may then push for a winner in the second half, maki... |
|||||||||
Over / Under
Consensusunder 3/4
Both sides average under 3 total goals per game in recent outings, Lillestrom especially low-scoring at home. The 0-0 first leg and Lillestr...
The first leg ended 0-0, indicating a defensive setup from both sides or difficulty in breaking down defenses. Lillestrom has only scored tw...
Both teams have shown defensive solidity in their recent matches, with Egnatia conceding 5 goals in 5 games and Lillestrom also conceding a...
The first leg ended 0-0, and Egnatia are likely to defend deep. Lillestrom have been in poor scoring form, netting just 2 in their last 5. E...
Both teams to score
Consensusno 3/4
Lillestrom have failed to score in three of their last five and kept no clean sheets. Egnatia's solid defensive record on the road combined...
Lillestrom's significant difficulty in finding the net (2 goals in 5 matches) suggests they might struggle to score even at home. Given the...
The previous 0-0 draw is a strong indicator that both teams may struggle to score against each other. Considering Lillestrom's recent scorin...
Egnatia are unlikely to score away from home, as they failed to do so in the first leg and will likely park the bus. Lillestrom may struggle...
Match winner
ConsensusDraw 2/4
Egnatia arrive with superior recent form, scoring 10 goals and conceding only 5 in their last 5, while Lillestrom managed just 2 goals and c...
Lillestrom enters this second leg with very poor form, failing to win any of their last five matches and scoring only two goals. Egnatia's r...
The recent 0-0 draw between these two teams suggests a closely contested match. Lillestrom's poor recent home form contrasts with Egnatia's...
Training data through 2025 shows Lillestrom as a solid Norwegian side, and they have home advantage with extra rest. Egnatia are from Albani...
Draw no bet
ConsensusEgnatia Rrogozhinë 2/4
Lillestrom's home scoring drought and defensive leaks make them unreliable favourites. Egnatia's better attacking output and rest advantage...
Considering Lillestrom's struggles and Egnatia's better form, Egnatia is favored to either win outright or draw, making the 'Away' pick for...
Given the evenly matched nature of the teams, as evidenced by their recent 0-0 draw and Egnatia's slightly better away form, a draw is the m...
With the draw removed, the home side are more likely to win given home advantage and the away side's likely defensive approach. Lillestrom h...
Spread
ConsensusEgnatia Rrogozhinë 3/4
Egnatia's better goal difference and attacking threat make them capable of covering +1 on the handicap. Lillestrom's poor home results incre...
Lillestrom's form (0 wins in last 5, 2 goals scored) makes winning by two or more goals highly unlikely. Egnatia's better form and the first...
Egnatia has shown more resilience away from home compared to Lillestrom's struggles at home. While Lillestrom might be motivated to perform...
With a -1 spread, the home team must win by 2 or more goals. Given Lillestrom's poor scoring form and Egnatia's defensive approach, a clear...
Asian handicap
ConsensusEgnatia Rrogozhinë +0.25 1/4
The 0-0 first leg and Lillestrom's attacking struggles give Egnatia a strong chance to avoid defeat. Half-goal Asian line on the visitors of...
Egnatia +0.5 essentially means Egnatia to win or draw, which aligns with their superior recent form compared to Lillestrom. Lillestrom's poo...
Considering Egnatia's superior away form and Lillestrom's concerning home form, Egnatia is more likely to get a result. Even if Lillestrom m...
The away side receiving a half-goal cushion is valuable because they are expected to defend and could snatch a draw or win. Lillestrom's for...
Correct score
Consensus1-1 1/4
The 0-0 first leg and Lillestrom's scoring issues point to another low-scoring result. Egnatia's better away output makes 0-1 the single mos...
Given the 0-0 draw in the first leg and Lillestrom's severe struggles to score (2 goals in their last 5 games), a goalless draw again is a v...
The previous 0-0 draw indicates that these teams are closely matched. However, Lillestrom's poor home scoring record combined with Egnatia's...
A narrow home win is the most likely outcome given home advantage and the away side's defensive setup. The first leg was 0-0, so a 1-0 score...
Half-time / Full-time
ConsensusDraw / Draw 3/4
Both teams are defensively cautious, with the first leg finishing 0-0. Lillestrom's lack of home goals and Egnatia's controlled style make a...
With the first leg ending 0-0 and both teams likely to be cautious in such a crucial European fixture, a goalless first half is highly proba...
Given the previous 0-0 draw and both teams' tendency to be solid defensively for periods, a draw at halftime is highly probable. Lillestrom'...
Given the low-scoring nature of the first leg, a draw at half-time is likely. Lillestrom may then push for a winner in the second half, maki...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Draw
DeepSeek V3
Lillestrom
Grok 4 Fast
Egnatia Rrogozhinë
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Draw
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Beat the AIs · Predict the score
Picks closed
Match has already kicked off. Picks are permanent — no late entries.
Team news
ProInjuries and confirmed lineups — the same team news the AIs factored into their reads.
Team news is a Pro feature
see exactly who's out and the XIs the AIs reasoned on, before kickoff.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
dbf9e7c0614017ff…
- Kickoff
- Thu, Aug 27 · 17:00 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Draw no bet · Over / Under 2.5 · Both teams to score · Spread -1 · Asian handicap · Half-time / Full-time · Correct score
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 8. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 8, in this order): h2h | draw_no_bet | totals_2.5 | btts | spreads_-1 | asian_handicap | ht_ft | correct_score
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 31602,
"sport": "football",
"venue": null,
"league": "UEFA Europa League",
"starts_at": "2026-08-27T17:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Thu, 27 Aug 2026 17:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Egnatia Rrogozhinë",
"home": "Lillestrom"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Weight CONFIRMED team news heavily: a missing first-choice striker, creator, or centre-back swings a match more than season-long form.",
"Compare attacking vs defensive quality directly — clean-sheet rate and goals-conceded trend often predict unders/BTTS better than the win line.",
"Set pieces decide tight games: note corner/free-kick threat and aerial mismatches.",
"Account for fixture congestion + likely rotation (midweek European or cup games before this one) and the home/away form split.",
"For outdoor venues, factor heavy rain or strong wind — both suppress goals and favour the under.",
"Tactical style matters: a high-press side vs a possession side, or two defensive setups, shapes the goals expectation."
],
"team_context": {
"note": "Reference data from our settled-results database. Verify + extend it with your own research; it is not a substitute for current team news.",
"away_form": {
"last": "WDWLD",
"record": "2W-2D-1L",
"scored": 10,
"matches": 5,
"conceded": 5
},
"home_form": {
"last": "DDLLL",
"record": "0W-2D-3L",
"scored": 2,
"matches": 5,
"conceded": 9
},
"rest_days": {
"away": 3,
"home": 7
},
"head_to_head": {
"recent": [
"2026-08-20: Egnatia Rrogozhinë 0–0 Lillestrom"
],
"matches": 1
}
},
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"draw_no_bet",
"totals_2.5",
"btts",
"spreads_-1",
"asian_handicap",
"ht_ft",
"correct_score"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Research trail
What each AI looked up before picking
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 3 sources
3 citations captured — unlock with Pro
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
Recent recaps
How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.