LarnevsLincoln Red Imps FC
Larne 0–3 Lincoln Red Imps FC
All 4 AIs backed Larne — reality had other ideas.
- AI lean
- Larne 4/4
- Correct calls
- 0/4
- Final
- 0–3
Every pick below was locked before the match and graded automatically against the final score — no hindsight edits.
AI predictions
8 markets · 4 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 8 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
|
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
|
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
|
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Larne 4/4 models |
Larne 4/4 models |
under 3/4 models |
Larne / Larne 2/4 models |
2-0 3/4 models |
Larne -1 1/4 models |
Larne -1.5 1/4 models |
no 3/4 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
No pick on this market.
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
No pick on this market.
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
No pick on this market. |
|||||||||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
No pick on this market.
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
No pick on this market.
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
No pick on this market. |
|||||||||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
No pick on this market.
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
No pick on this market.
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
No pick on this market. |
|||||||||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
62%
Larne
L
|
68%
Larne
L
|
57%
under
L
|
48%
Larne / Larne
L
|
28%
2-0
L
|
51%
home_ -1 |
53%
home_ -1 |
59%
no
W
|
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Larne Larne won the first leg 2-0 away and hold a clear home advantage at Inver Park. Both sides show similar recent records but Larne's defensive...
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
68%
Larne Larne are at home with a two-goal aggregate lead and more rest. Lincoln's away form is poor and they struggle to score on the road. A draw w...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
57%
under First leg finished 0-2 and both teams average under 2 goals per game recently. Set-piece focus and defensive setups point to a low-scoring r...
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
48%
Larne / Larne Larne are expected to control the first half and protect the aggregate. Lincoln's poor away record suggests they will struggle to respond ea...
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
28%
2-0 First leg 2-0 result and low-scoring trends point to another narrow home win. Larne average just 0.6 goals per home game recently but will p...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
51%
home_ -1 Larne should win by at least one goal given the two-goal lead and home support. Lincoln rarely score away and have lost their last European...
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
53%
home_ -1 Aggregate position and home advantage make Larne -1 the value. Lincoln have only one win in five and face a side that has already beaten the...
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
59%
no Lincoln have scored in only two of their last five and Larne kept a clean sheet in the first leg. Home side concedes at home but the aggrega... |
|||||||||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
65%
Larne
L
|
80%
Larne
L
|
60%
Under 2.5 Goals
L
|
45%
Larne / Larne
L
|
18%
2-0
L
|
50%
Larne -1
L
|
50%
Larne -1.5
L
|
60%
No
W
|
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Larne This prediction is based on the provided brief and general football knowledge, as live research for future events is not possible. Larne hol...
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
80%
Larne Based on the provided brief and general football knowledge for this future event. Larne's 2-0 away win in the first leg makes them strong fa...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
Under 2.5 Goals This prediction is based on the provided brief and general football knowledge, as live research for future events is not possible. The first...
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
45%
Larne / Larne This prediction is based on the provided brief and general football knowledge, as live research for future events is not possible. Given Lar...
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
18%
2-0 Based on the provided brief and general football knowledge for this future event. Larne's 2-0 away victory in the first leg suggests they ca...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
50%
Larne -1 This prediction is based on the provided brief and general football knowledge, as live research for future events is not possible. Larne's 2...
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
50%
Larne -1.5 Based on the provided brief and general football knowledge for this future event. Larne demonstrated their capability to win by a comfortabl...
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
60%
No Based on the provided brief and general football knowledge for this future event. The first leg resulted in a clean sheet for Larne (0-2), s... |
|||||||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
55%
Larne
L
|
60%
Larne
L
|
65%
under
L
|
40%
Draw / Larne
L
|
25%
2-0
L
|
50%
Larne
L
|
55%
home_ 0 |
60%
no
W
|
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Larne Larne won the first leg 2-0, giving them a significant advantage. While both teams have had mixed recent form, Larne's home advantage at Inv...
3 sources cited
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
60%
Larne Given Larne's 2-0 lead from the first leg and their home advantage, they are strongly favored to at least avoid a loss. Lincoln Red Imps wou...
3 sources cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
65%
under The first leg ended 2-0, suggesting a relatively low-scoring affair. Both teams' recent form indicates a struggle to score consistently, and...
3 sources cited
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
40%
Draw / Larne Given Larne's aggregate lead, they may start cautiously and aim to control the game in the second half. A draw at halftime followed by a hom...
3 sources cited
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
25%
2-0 Larne won the first leg 2-0, and with home advantage and a two-goal cushion, they are likely to secure a similar scoreline or at least avoid...
3 sources cited
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
50%
Larne Larne won the first leg 2-0, indicating they can overcome a -1 handicap against Lincoln. While they may not necessarily win by two clear goa...
3 sources cited
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
55%
home_ 0 Larne is the favorite to win or draw this match, especially at home. The first leg result gives them a strong psychological and tactical adv...
3 sources cited
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
60%
no In the first leg, only one team scored. Lincoln Red Imps have a poor scoring record recently, and Larne may focus on maintaining their clean...
3 sources cited
|
|||||||||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
55%
Larne
L
|
65%
Larne
L
|
60%
under
L
|
30%
draw_home |
20%
1-0
L
|
50%
Lincoln Red Imps FC
W
|
55%
Lincoln Red Imps FC |
55%
no
W
|
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Larne Larne won the first leg 2-0 away and have home advantage. They have had more rest (7 days vs 4) and are likely to control the tie. However,...
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
65%
Larne With the draw removed, Larne's home advantage and first-leg lead make them the stronger side. They should avoid defeat, though Lincoln could...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
under Larne lead 2-0 and may sit back, while Lincoln need goals but have been modest in attack. Both teams have low scoring rates recently (Larne...
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
30%
draw_home Larne may start cautiously and score in the second half as they manage the tie. Lincoln might hold out in the first half but concede later....
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
20%
1-0 A low-scoring game is likely, with Larne winning by a single goal most probably. 1-0 is the most common scoreline in such situations. Other...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
50%
Lincoln Red Imps FC Larne are likely to win by a narrow margin, possibly 1-0 or 2-1, which would cover a -1 spread only if they win by 2+ goals. Given they migh...
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
55%
Lincoln Red Imps FC Assuming a -1 Asian handicap, Larne is favored. They might win by exactly one goal, in which case a push is possible. But Lincoln's need to...
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
55%
no Lincoln Red Imps have scored in most matches but face a confident Larne defense at home. Larne might keep a clean sheet given they only need... |
|||||||||
Match winner
ConsensusLarne 4/4
Larne won the first leg 2-0 away and hold a clear home advantage at Inver Park. Both sides show similar recent records but Larne's defensive...
This prediction is based on the provided brief and general football knowledge, as live research for future events is not possible. Larne hol...
Larne won the first leg 2-0, giving them a significant advantage. While both teams have had mixed recent form, Larne's home advantage at Inv...
Larne won the first leg 2-0 away and have home advantage. They have had more rest (7 days vs 4) and are likely to control the tie. However,...
Draw no bet
ConsensusLarne 4/4
Larne are at home with a two-goal aggregate lead and more rest. Lincoln's away form is poor and they struggle to score on the road. A draw w...
Based on the provided brief and general football knowledge for this future event. Larne's 2-0 away win in the first leg makes them strong fa...
Given Larne's 2-0 lead from the first leg and their home advantage, they are strongly favored to at least avoid a loss. Lincoln Red Imps wou...
With the draw removed, Larne's home advantage and first-leg lead make them the stronger side. They should avoid defeat, though Lincoln could...
Over / Under
Consensusunder 3/4
First leg finished 0-2 and both teams average under 2 goals per game recently. Set-piece focus and defensive setups point to a low-scoring r...
This prediction is based on the provided brief and general football knowledge, as live research for future events is not possible. The first...
The first leg ended 2-0, suggesting a relatively low-scoring affair. Both teams' recent form indicates a struggle to score consistently, and...
Larne lead 2-0 and may sit back, while Lincoln need goals but have been modest in attack. Both teams have low scoring rates recently (Larne...
Half-time / Full-time
ConsensusLarne / Larne 2/4
Larne are expected to control the first half and protect the aggregate. Lincoln's poor away record suggests they will struggle to respond ea...
This prediction is based on the provided brief and general football knowledge, as live research for future events is not possible. Given Lar...
Given Larne's aggregate lead, they may start cautiously and aim to control the game in the second half. A draw at halftime followed by a hom...
Larne may start cautiously and score in the second half as they manage the tie. Lincoln might hold out in the first half but concede later....
Correct score
Consensus2-0 3/4
First leg 2-0 result and low-scoring trends point to another narrow home win. Larne average just 0.6 goals per home game recently but will p...
Based on the provided brief and general football knowledge for this future event. Larne's 2-0 away victory in the first leg suggests they ca...
Larne won the first leg 2-0, and with home advantage and a two-goal cushion, they are likely to secure a similar scoreline or at least avoid...
A low-scoring game is likely, with Larne winning by a single goal most probably. 1-0 is the most common scoreline in such situations. Other...
Spread
ConsensusLarne -1 1/4
Larne should win by at least one goal given the two-goal lead and home support. Lincoln rarely score away and have lost their last European...
This prediction is based on the provided brief and general football knowledge, as live research for future events is not possible. Larne's 2...
Larne won the first leg 2-0, indicating they can overcome a -1 handicap against Lincoln. While they may not necessarily win by two clear goa...
Larne are likely to win by a narrow margin, possibly 1-0 or 2-1, which would cover a -1 spread only if they win by 2+ goals. Given they migh...
Asian handicap
ConsensusLarne -1.5 1/4
Aggregate position and home advantage make Larne -1 the value. Lincoln have only one win in five and face a side that has already beaten the...
Based on the provided brief and general football knowledge for this future event. Larne demonstrated their capability to win by a comfortabl...
Larne is the favorite to win or draw this match, especially at home. The first leg result gives them a strong psychological and tactical adv...
Assuming a -1 Asian handicap, Larne is favored. They might win by exactly one goal, in which case a push is possible. But Lincoln's need to...
Both teams to score
Consensusno 3/4
Lincoln have scored in only two of their last five and Larne kept a clean sheet in the first leg. Home side concedes at home but the aggrega...
Based on the provided brief and general football knowledge for this future event. The first leg resulted in a clean sheet for Larne (0-2), s...
In the first leg, only one team scored. Lincoln Red Imps have a poor scoring record recently, and Larne may focus on maintaining their clean...
Lincoln Red Imps have scored in most matches but face a confident Larne defense at home. Larne might keep a clean sheet given they only need...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGemini 2.5 Flash
Larne
Grok 4 Fast
Larne
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Larne
DeepSeek V3
Larne
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Beat the AIs · Predict the score
Picks closed
Match has already kicked off. Picks are permanent — no late entries.
Team news
ProInjuries and confirmed lineups — the same team news the AIs factored into their reads.
Team news is a Pro feature
see exactly who's out and the XIs the AIs reasoned on, before kickoff.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
f1b020b4793ebea2…
- Kickoff
- Thu, Aug 27 · 19:00 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Draw no bet · Over / Under 2.5 · Both teams to score · Spread -1 · Asian handicap · Half-time / Full-time · Correct score
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 8. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 8, in this order): h2h | draw_no_bet | totals_2.5 | btts | spreads_-1 | asian_handicap | ht_ft | correct_score
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 31639,
"sport": "football",
"venue": "Inver Park",
"league": "UEFA Europa Conference League",
"starts_at": "2026-08-27T19:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Thu, 27 Aug 2026 19:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Lincoln Red Imps FC",
"home": "Larne"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Weight CONFIRMED team news heavily: a missing first-choice striker, creator, or centre-back swings a match more than season-long form.",
"Compare attacking vs defensive quality directly — clean-sheet rate and goals-conceded trend often predict unders/BTTS better than the win line.",
"Set pieces decide tight games: note corner/free-kick threat and aerial mismatches.",
"Account for fixture congestion + likely rotation (midweek European or cup games before this one) and the home/away form split.",
"For outdoor venues, factor heavy rain or strong wind — both suppress goals and favour the under.",
"Tactical style matters: a high-press side vs a possession side, or two defensive setups, shapes the goals expectation."
],
"team_context": {
"note": "Reference data from our settled-results database. Verify + extend it with your own research; it is not a substitute for current team news.",
"away_form": {
"last": "WLLDD",
"record": "1W-2D-2L",
"scored": 4,
"matches": 5,
"conceded": 5
},
"home_form": {
"last": "WDLDL",
"record": "1W-2D-2L",
"scored": 3,
"matches": 5,
"conceded": 7
},
"rest_days": {
"away": 4,
"home": 7
},
"head_to_head": {
"recent": [
"2026-08-20: Lincoln Red Imps FC 0–2 Larne"
],
"matches": 1
}
},
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"draw_no_bet",
"totals_2.5",
"btts",
"spreads_-1",
"asian_handicap",
"ht_ft",
"correct_score"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Research trail
What each AI looked up before picking
-
0 tool calls · 3 sources
3 citations captured — unlock with Pro
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
Recent recaps
How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.