FK JablonecvsRangers
FK Jablonec 1–0 Rangers
3 of 4 AIs leaned Rangers — reality had other ideas.
- AI lean
- Rangers 3/4
- Correct calls
- 1/4
- Final
- 1–0
Every pick below was locked before the match and graded automatically against the final score — no hindsight edits.
AI predictions
8 markets · 4 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 8 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
|
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
|
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
|
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Rangers 3/4 models |
Rangers 3/4 models |
no 2/4 models |
Rangers 1/4 models |
1-1 2/4 models |
under 2/4 models |
Rangers -1 1/4 models |
Draw / Rangers 2/4 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market.
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
No pick on this market.
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
No pick on this market. |
|||||||||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market.
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
No pick on this market.
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
No pick on this market. |
|||||||||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market.
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
No pick on this market.
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
No pick on this market. |
|||||||||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
72%
Rangers
L
|
78%
Rangers
L
|
64%
no
W
|
59%
Rangers
L
|
22%
0-2
L
|
61%
under
W
|
57%
Rangers -1
L
|
48%
Rangers / Rangers
L
|
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
72%
Rangers Rangers won the first leg 1-0 and are the stronger side overall. Jablonec's home form is solid but they lack the quality to overturn the tie...
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
78%
Rangers Rangers are clear favorites after the first-leg lead. Jablonec must attack and will leave gaps Rangers can exploit. Draw no bet removes the...
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
64%
no Rangers kept a clean sheet in the first leg and Jablonec have struggled to score against stronger opponents. Expect Rangers to keep it tight...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
59%
Rangers Rangers are expected to win by at least one goal on aggregate. Jablonec's need to push forward increases the chance Rangers cover the -1 lin...
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
22%
0-2 Rangers to win 2-0 or 1-2 are the most probable outcomes given their defensive record and Jablonec's limited attacking threat. Aggregate lea...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
61%
under First leg finished 1-0 and both sides have shown defensive organization. Jablonec need a result but will be cautious; Rangers can control te...
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
57%
Rangers -1 Rangers hold the aggregate advantage and superior squad depth. Asian handicap -1 offers value given the likelihood of a narrow away win.
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
48%
Rangers / Rangers Rangers are likely to manage the game from the first half and add to their lead after the break. First-leg pattern suggests control rather t... |
|||||||||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
38%
Rangers
L
|
65%
Rangers
L
|
60%
Yes
L
|
60%
FK Jablonec +1
W
|
25%
1-1
L
|
55%
Under 2.5
W
|
62%
FK Jablonec +0.5
W
|
30%
Draw / Rangers
L
|
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
38%
Rangers Based on training data and the provided context, Rangers are generally a stronger team and hold a 1-0 aggregate lead. While FK Jablonec has...
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
65%
Rangers Rangers possess superior overall quality and have the aggregate advantage from the first leg. It's improbable they will lose outright to FK...
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
60%
Yes FK Jablonec must score to have any chance of progressing, which means they will push forward and create opportunities. Rangers, despite hold...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
60%
FK Jablonec +1 Rangers winning by two or more goals against a defensively sound FK Jablonec at home is a tall order, especially with a 1-0 aggregate lead....
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
25%
1-1 Given that Jablonec must score, and Rangers are likely to net on the counter or from set-pieces, a 1-1 draw is a strong possibility. This sc...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Under 2.5 The first leg ended 1-0, and FK Jablonec's home form shows a tight defense, conceding only 2 goals in 5 matches. While Jablonec must score,...
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
62%
FK Jablonec +0.5 This pick implies FK Jablonec will either win or draw the match. Given their impressive home form and the need to push for goals, combined w...
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
30%
Draw / Rangers In a critical second leg, the first half is often cautious, especially with Rangers holding a lead. Jablonec will push, but Rangers' defense... |
|||||||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
55%
Rangers
L
|
60%
Rangers
L
|
60%
no
W
|
45%
Draw |
25%
1-1
L
|
65%
under
W
|
55%
home_ 0.0 |
35%
Draw / Rangers
L
|
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Rangers Rangers secured a narrow 1-0 victory in the first leg, giving them a slight advantage. While Jablonec has strong recent home form, Rangers'...
3 sources cited
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
60%
Rangers Given Rangers' narrow lead from the first leg and their greater European pedigree, they are more likely to avoid defeat. FK Jablonec's home...
3 sources cited
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
60%
no The first leg ended 1-0, suggesting neither team found it easy to score. FK Jablonec's home form is strong offensively, but Rangers have sho...
3 sources cited
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
45%
Draw FK Jablonec is strong at home, and Rangers will be content to defend their first-leg lead. A narrow home win for Jablonec or a draw would co...
3 sources cited
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
25%
1-1 Given the 1-0 first-leg result and FK Jablonec's strong home form, a 1-1 draw is a likely outcome, which would see Rangers progress. This sc...
3 sources cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
65%
under The first leg finished 1-0, indicating a tight affair. Both teams have shown some defensive solidity in their recent matches, and with Range...
3 sources cited
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
55%
home_ 0.0 FK Jablonec has a strong home record and will be looking to overturn the first-leg deficit. Rangers, with their narrow lead, may adopt a mor...
3 sources cited
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
35%
Draw / Rangers Rangers' first-leg advantage suggests they will aim to hold their lead. A scenario where the first half is drawn, and Rangers secure the win...
3 sources cited
|
|||||||||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
55%
FK Jablonec
W
|
62%
FK Jablonec
W
|
55%
yes
L
|
40%
FK Jablonec |
20%
2-1
L
|
55%
over
L
|
55%
FK Jablonec -0.25
W
|
25%
Draw / FK Jablonec |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
FK Jablonec Based on training data through 2025-09, FK Jablonec are in excellent form with 4 wins in their last 5, conceding only 2 goals. They are at h...
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
62%
FK Jablonec Jablonec's strong home form and defensive solidity make them a solid pick to win without the draw option. Rangers are generally inconsistent...
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
55%
yes Given Jablonec's need to score and Rangers' scoring form, both teams are likely to find the net. Rangers scored in 4 of their last 5 and Jab...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
40%
FK Jablonec A -1 spread for Jablonec means they need to win by 2 goals. While they are in good form, winning by a two-goal margin against Rangers is cha...
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
20%
2-1 Since Jablonec need to win by 2, a 2-1 scoreline would send the tie to extra time (or win on away goals if applicable), so it's plausible. R...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over Jablonec need to score at least 2 goals to advance, which should open up the game. Rangers have scored 9 in their last 5, averaging almost 2...
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
55%
FK Jablonec -0.25 I think Jablonec will avoid defeat and likely win. The -0.25 line gives some protection against a draw, which is possible. Rangers are away...
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
25%
Draw / FK Jablonec Jablonec are likely to start strong but may not break Rangers down until the second half. Rangers could sit back early, making a draw at hal... |
|||||||||
Match winner
ConsensusRangers 3/4
Rangers won the first leg 1-0 and are the stronger side overall. Jablonec's home form is solid but they lack the quality to overturn the tie...
Based on training data and the provided context, Rangers are generally a stronger team and hold a 1-0 aggregate lead. While FK Jablonec has...
Rangers secured a narrow 1-0 victory in the first leg, giving them a slight advantage. While Jablonec has strong recent home form, Rangers'...
Based on training data through 2025-09, FK Jablonec are in excellent form with 4 wins in their last 5, conceding only 2 goals. They are at h...
Draw no bet
ConsensusRangers 3/4
Rangers are clear favorites after the first-leg lead. Jablonec must attack and will leave gaps Rangers can exploit. Draw no bet removes the...
Rangers possess superior overall quality and have the aggregate advantage from the first leg. It's improbable they will lose outright to FK...
Given Rangers' narrow lead from the first leg and their greater European pedigree, they are more likely to avoid defeat. FK Jablonec's home...
Jablonec's strong home form and defensive solidity make them a solid pick to win without the draw option. Rangers are generally inconsistent...
Both teams to score
Consensusno 2/4
Rangers kept a clean sheet in the first leg and Jablonec have struggled to score against stronger opponents. Expect Rangers to keep it tight...
FK Jablonec must score to have any chance of progressing, which means they will push forward and create opportunities. Rangers, despite hold...
The first leg ended 1-0, suggesting neither team found it easy to score. FK Jablonec's home form is strong offensively, but Rangers have sho...
Given Jablonec's need to score and Rangers' scoring form, both teams are likely to find the net. Rangers scored in 4 of their last 5 and Jab...
Spread
ConsensusRangers 1/4
Rangers are expected to win by at least one goal on aggregate. Jablonec's need to push forward increases the chance Rangers cover the -1 lin...
Rangers winning by two or more goals against a defensively sound FK Jablonec at home is a tall order, especially with a 1-0 aggregate lead....
FK Jablonec is strong at home, and Rangers will be content to defend their first-leg lead. A narrow home win for Jablonec or a draw would co...
A -1 spread for Jablonec means they need to win by 2 goals. While they are in good form, winning by a two-goal margin against Rangers is cha...
Correct score
Consensus1-1 2/4
Rangers to win 2-0 or 1-2 are the most probable outcomes given their defensive record and Jablonec's limited attacking threat. Aggregate lea...
Given that Jablonec must score, and Rangers are likely to net on the counter or from set-pieces, a 1-1 draw is a strong possibility. This sc...
Given the 1-0 first-leg result and FK Jablonec's strong home form, a 1-1 draw is a likely outcome, which would see Rangers progress. This sc...
Since Jablonec need to win by 2, a 2-1 scoreline would send the tie to extra time (or win on away goals if applicable), so it's plausible. R...
Over / Under
Consensusunder 2/4
First leg finished 1-0 and both sides have shown defensive organization. Jablonec need a result but will be cautious; Rangers can control te...
The first leg ended 1-0, and FK Jablonec's home form shows a tight defense, conceding only 2 goals in 5 matches. While Jablonec must score,...
The first leg finished 1-0, indicating a tight affair. Both teams have shown some defensive solidity in their recent matches, and with Range...
Jablonec need to score at least 2 goals to advance, which should open up the game. Rangers have scored 9 in their last 5, averaging almost 2...
Asian handicap
ConsensusRangers -1 1/4
Rangers hold the aggregate advantage and superior squad depth. Asian handicap -1 offers value given the likelihood of a narrow away win.
This pick implies FK Jablonec will either win or draw the match. Given their impressive home form and the need to push for goals, combined w...
FK Jablonec has a strong home record and will be looking to overturn the first-leg deficit. Rangers, with their narrow lead, may adopt a mor...
I think Jablonec will avoid defeat and likely win. The -0.25 line gives some protection against a draw, which is possible. Rangers are away...
Half-time / Full-time
ConsensusDraw / Rangers 2/4
Rangers are likely to manage the game from the first half and add to their lead after the break. First-leg pattern suggests control rather t...
In a critical second leg, the first half is often cautious, especially with Rangers holding a lead. Jablonec will push, but Rangers' defense...
Rangers' first-leg advantage suggests they will aim to hold their lead. A scenario where the first half is drawn, and Rangers secure the win...
Jablonec are likely to start strong but may not break Rangers down until the second half. Rangers could sit back early, making a draw at hal...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGrok 4 Fast
Rangers
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Rangers
DeepSeek V3
FK Jablonec
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Rangers
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Beat the AIs · Predict the score
Picks closed
Match has already kicked off. Picks are permanent — no late entries.
Team news
ProInjuries and confirmed lineups — the same team news the AIs factored into their reads.
Team news is a Pro feature
see exactly who's out and the XIs the AIs reasoned on, before kickoff.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
15d1cd83f46744a6…
- Kickoff
- Thu, Aug 27 · 16:00 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Draw no bet · Over / Under 2.5 · Both teams to score · Spread -1 · Asian handicap · Half-time / Full-time · Correct score
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 8. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 8, in this order): h2h | draw_no_bet | totals_2.5 | btts | spreads_-1 | asian_handicap | ht_ft | correct_score
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 31572,
"sport": "football",
"venue": "Stadion Strelnice",
"league": "UEFA Europa Conference League",
"starts_at": "2026-08-27T16:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Thu, 27 Aug 2026 16:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Rangers",
"home": "FK Jablonec"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Weight CONFIRMED team news heavily: a missing first-choice striker, creator, or centre-back swings a match more than season-long form.",
"Compare attacking vs defensive quality directly — clean-sheet rate and goals-conceded trend often predict unders/BTTS better than the win line.",
"Set pieces decide tight games: note corner/free-kick threat and aerial mismatches.",
"Account for fixture congestion + likely rotation (midweek European or cup games before this one) and the home/away form split.",
"For outdoor venues, factor heavy rain or strong wind — both suppress goals and favour the under.",
"Tactical style matters: a high-press side vs a possession side, or two defensive setups, shapes the goals expectation."
],
"team_context": {
"note": "Reference data from our settled-results database. Verify + extend it with your own research; it is not a substitute for current team news.",
"away_form": {
"last": "WWDLL",
"record": "2W-1D-2L",
"scored": 9,
"matches": 5,
"conceded": 6
},
"home_form": {
"last": "LWWWW",
"record": "4W-0D-1L",
"scored": 7,
"matches": 5,
"conceded": 2
},
"rest_days": {
"away": 6,
"home": 6
},
"head_to_head": {
"recent": [
"2026-08-20: Rangers 1–0 FK Jablonec"
],
"matches": 1
}
},
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"draw_no_bet",
"totals_2.5",
"btts",
"spreads_-1",
"asian_handicap",
"ht_ft",
"correct_score"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Research trail
What each AI looked up before picking
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 3 sources
3 citations captured — unlock with Pro
Recent recaps
How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.