FC JuarezvsCF Pachuca
FC Juarez 0–2 CF Pachuca
4 of 5 AIs leaned CF Pachuca — and reality agreed.
- AI lean
- CF Pachuca 4/5
- Correct calls
- 4/5
- Final
- 0–2
Every pick below was locked before the match and graded automatically against the final score — no hindsight edits.
AI predictions
8 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 8 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
|
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
|
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
|
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
over 3/5 models |
yes 4/5 models |
CF Pachuca 4/5 models |
CF Pachuca 3/5 models |
1-2 2/5 models |
CF Pachuca 4/5 models |
CF Pachuca / CF Pachuca 3/5 models |
CF Pachuca 1/5 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
59%
under
W
|
64%
no
W
|
68%
CF Pachuca
W
|
55%
CF Pachuca
W
|
22%
1-0
L
|
62%
CF Pachuca
W
|
38%
CF Pachuca / CF Pachuca |
62%
CF Pachuca -0.5
W
|
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
59%
under Juarez have averaged just 1.0 goal per home match (5 in 5) while Pachuca average 1.2 per away match (6 in 5). Combined expected output is ~2...
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
64%
no Juarez's defensive frailty (16 conceded in 5) does not equate to attacking prowess; they scored only 5 at home. Pachuca's defensive solidity...
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
68%
CF Pachuca Draw No Bet removes the draw and forces a binary choice. Pachuca's recent stability and strong away defensive record make them the clear pre...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
55%
CF Pachuca Pachuca favoured by 1 goal aligns with their form edge and Juarez's home collapse. However, single-goal spreads carry inherent push risk (0....
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
22%
1-0 Pachuca likely win by 1–2 goals given their form and Juarez's defensive collapse. A 1-0 scoreline is the single most probable outcome (Pachu...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
CF Pachuca Pachuca arrive in superior form (1W-2D-2L vs Juarez's 1W-0D-4L over 5 matches) with a tighter defensive record (7 conceded vs 16). Juarez ar...
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
38%
CF Pachuca / CF Pachuca Pachuca's form and Juarez's home collapse make an away/away scoreline (Pachuca lead at half and full time) the most likely outcome. Pachuca...
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
62%
CF Pachuca -0.5 Asian Handicap -0.5 for away eliminates the push and forces a cleaner binary: Pachuca win or draw favours home. Given Juarez's home form col... |
|||||||||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
No pick on this market.
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
No pick on this market.
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
No pick on this market. |
|||||||||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
No pick on this market.
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
No pick on this market.
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
No pick on this market. |
|||||||||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
53%
over
L
|
56%
yes
L
|
55%
CF Pachuca
W
|
51%
CF Pachuca
W
|
18%
1-2
L
|
48%
CF Pachuca
W
|
38%
CF Pachuca / CF Pachuca |
52%
CF Pachuca |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
53%
over Juarez concede heavily at home while Pachuca score regularly on the road, pushing expected goals above 2.5. Set-piece and counter threats fr...
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
56%
yes Both sides have shown attacking output but defensive weaknesses; Juarez's high concession rate pairs with Pachuca's ability to score away. F...
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
55%
CF Pachuca Pachuca hold the edge on quality and recent results; Juarez's leaky defense favors the visitors in a no-draw bet. Similar rest days limit fa...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
51%
CF Pachuca Pachuca's superior organization and away scoring edge give them the nod on a -1 spread against a porous home defense. Juarez's recent result...
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
18%
1-2 Juarez concede frequently while Pachuca score enough to edge most games; 1-2 captures the most likely narrow away win. High home concession...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
48%
CF Pachuca Pachuca's more stable recent record and better defensive metrics outweigh Juarez's poor home form and heavy concessions. Home side's LLLLW s...
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
38%
CF Pachuca / CF Pachuca Pachuca's control and Juarez's defensive issues point to an away lead at half and full time. Home side struggles to mount comebacks based on...
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
52%
CF Pachuca Asian handicap aligns with Pachuca's edge; their better form and Juarez's defensive lapses make the visitors the value side. Rest days are n... |
|||||||||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
65%
over_2.5
L
|
60%
yes
L
|
70%
CF Pachuca
W
|
50%
away_ -1 |
15%
1-2
L
|
55%
CF Pachuca
W
|
35%
CF Pachuca / CF Pachuca |
55%
away_ -1.0 |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
65%
over_2.5 FC Juarez's defensive record of 16 goals conceded in their last five matches points to a highly porous defense that is likely to allow multi...
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
60%
yes FC Juarez has scored 5 goals in their last five matches, indicating some offensive capability despite their overall poor form. Given they ar...
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
70%
CF Pachuca With the draw option removed, CF Pachuca's probability of winning outright increases significantly, aligning with their superior historical...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
50%
away_ -1 This pick expects CF Pachuca to win by at least a two-goal margin. Given FC Juarez's catastrophic defensive record of 16 goals conceded in t...
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
15%
1-2 Pachuca is favored to win, and Juarez's weak defense (16 goals conceded in 5) suggests multiple goals. A 2-1 or 3-1 win for Pachuca is plaus...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
CF Pachuca Based on the provided recent form and general historical knowledge of Liga MX teams (as specific match details for 2026 are unavailable), FC...
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
35%
CF Pachuca / CF Pachuca Given CF Pachuca's overall superiority and FC Juarez's significant defensive vulnerabilities, it is reasonable to expect Pachuca to establis...
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
55%
away_ -1.0 Considering FC Juarez's profoundly weak defense, which has leaked an average of 3.2 goals per game, CF Pachuca is highly likely to secure a... |
|||||||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
55%
over
L
|
58%
yes
L
|
68%
CF Pachuca
W
|
55%
CF Pachuca
W
|
15%
0-2
W
|
65%
CF Pachuca
W
|
35%
Draw / CF Pachuca |
60%
away_ -0.75 |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over FC Juarez's defense has been particularly porous, conceding many goals at home. While Pachuca's defense is more solid, the leaky Juarez defe...
2 sources cited
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
58%
yes FC Juarez has a very poor defensive record, suggesting they are likely to concede. Pachuca, while defensively sound, will face a desperate J...
2 sources cited
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
68%
CF Pachuca Given Pachuca's stronger overall form and historical dominance, they are unlikely to lose. The draw insurance further bolsters the confidenc...
2 sources cited
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
55%
CF Pachuca Pachuca is the superior team and should be able to secure a win by more than one goal against a struggling Juarez side, especially consideri...
2 sources cited
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
15%
0-2 Considering Juarez's poor defensive record and Pachuca's historical dominance and better form, a 0-2 scoreline for Pachuca seems plausible....
2 sources cited
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
CF Pachuca CF Pachuca's superior league position and better recent form, compared to FC Juarez's poor home record, suggests an away win. Historically,...
2 sources cited
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
35%
Draw / CF Pachuca Given FC Juarez's struggles, it's likely they will start defensively and aim to hold Pachuca in the first half. Pachuca, being the stronger...
2 sources cited
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
60%
away_ -0.75 Pachuca is the stronger team, and their historical advantage and current form suggest they can overcome a -0.75 handicap against a strugglin...
2 sources cited
|
|||||||||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
60%
over
L
|
65%
yes
L
|
55%
FC Juarez
L
|
40%
FC Juarez
L
|
10%
2-1
L
|
45%
FC Juarez
L
|
12%
Draw / FC Juarez
L
|
55%
CF Pachuca +0.25
W
|
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
over Juarez have been involved in high-scoring games recently, conceding an average of 3.2 goals per match in their last five. Pachuca also tend...
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
65%
yes Both teams have shown they can score in recent matches, and both defenses have been leaky. Juarez have scored in most home games despite los...
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
55%
FC Juarez With the draw removed, Juarez's home advantage and Pachuca's poor away form make the home side the more likely winner. Despite Juarez's defe...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
40%
FC Juarez Juarez are at home but have been poor, and Pachuca are not strong away. A win by exactly one goal for Juarez is not improbable, but given th...
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
10%
2-1 Given Juarez's leaky defense and scoring ability, a 2-1 home win seems plausible but not hugely likely. The most common scoreline in this ty...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
45%
FC Juarez FC Juarez are at home and despite a poor run, they have a chance to bounce back against a Pachuca side that has been inconsistent. Pachuca's...
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
12%
Draw / FC Juarez Juarez have often started slowly, and conceding early has been an issue, but they have also equalized in some games. A draw at half-time wit...
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
55%
CF Pachuca +0.25 With Pachuca receiving a slight positive handicap, they only need a draw to win half the stake and a win to win fully. Given Juarez's poor f... |
|||||||||
Over / Under
Consensusover 3/5
Juarez have averaged just 1.0 goal per home match (5 in 5) while Pachuca average 1.2 per away match (6 in 5). Combined expected output is ~2...
Juarez concede heavily at home while Pachuca score regularly on the road, pushing expected goals above 2.5. Set-piece and counter threats fr...
FC Juarez's defensive record of 16 goals conceded in their last five matches points to a highly porous defense that is likely to allow multi...
FC Juarez's defense has been particularly porous, conceding many goals at home. While Pachuca's defense is more solid, the leaky Juarez defe...
Juarez have been involved in high-scoring games recently, conceding an average of 3.2 goals per match in their last five. Pachuca also tend...
Both teams to score
Consensusyes 4/5
Juarez's defensive frailty (16 conceded in 5) does not equate to attacking prowess; they scored only 5 at home. Pachuca's defensive solidity...
Both sides have shown attacking output but defensive weaknesses; Juarez's high concession rate pairs with Pachuca's ability to score away. F...
FC Juarez has scored 5 goals in their last five matches, indicating some offensive capability despite their overall poor form. Given they ar...
FC Juarez has a very poor defensive record, suggesting they are likely to concede. Pachuca, while defensively sound, will face a desperate J...
Both teams have shown they can score in recent matches, and both defenses have been leaky. Juarez have scored in most home games despite los...
Draw no bet
ConsensusCF Pachuca 4/5
Draw No Bet removes the draw and forces a binary choice. Pachuca's recent stability and strong away defensive record make them the clear pre...
Pachuca hold the edge on quality and recent results; Juarez's leaky defense favors the visitors in a no-draw bet. Similar rest days limit fa...
With the draw option removed, CF Pachuca's probability of winning outright increases significantly, aligning with their superior historical...
Given Pachuca's stronger overall form and historical dominance, they are unlikely to lose. The draw insurance further bolsters the confidenc...
With the draw removed, Juarez's home advantage and Pachuca's poor away form make the home side the more likely winner. Despite Juarez's defe...
Spread
ConsensusCF Pachuca 3/5
Pachuca favoured by 1 goal aligns with their form edge and Juarez's home collapse. However, single-goal spreads carry inherent push risk (0....
Pachuca's superior organization and away scoring edge give them the nod on a -1 spread against a porous home defense. Juarez's recent result...
This pick expects CF Pachuca to win by at least a two-goal margin. Given FC Juarez's catastrophic defensive record of 16 goals conceded in t...
Pachuca is the superior team and should be able to secure a win by more than one goal against a struggling Juarez side, especially consideri...
Juarez are at home but have been poor, and Pachuca are not strong away. A win by exactly one goal for Juarez is not improbable, but given th...
Correct score
Consensus1-2 2/5
Pachuca likely win by 1–2 goals given their form and Juarez's defensive collapse. A 1-0 scoreline is the single most probable outcome (Pachu...
Juarez concede frequently while Pachuca score enough to edge most games; 1-2 captures the most likely narrow away win. High home concession...
Pachuca is favored to win, and Juarez's weak defense (16 goals conceded in 5) suggests multiple goals. A 2-1 or 3-1 win for Pachuca is plaus...
Considering Juarez's poor defensive record and Pachuca's historical dominance and better form, a 0-2 scoreline for Pachuca seems plausible....
Given Juarez's leaky defense and scoring ability, a 2-1 home win seems plausible but not hugely likely. The most common scoreline in this ty...
Match winner
ConsensusCF Pachuca 4/5
Pachuca arrive in superior form (1W-2D-2L vs Juarez's 1W-0D-4L over 5 matches) with a tighter defensive record (7 conceded vs 16). Juarez ar...
Pachuca's more stable recent record and better defensive metrics outweigh Juarez's poor home form and heavy concessions. Home side's LLLLW s...
Based on the provided recent form and general historical knowledge of Liga MX teams (as specific match details for 2026 are unavailable), FC...
CF Pachuca's superior league position and better recent form, compared to FC Juarez's poor home record, suggests an away win. Historically,...
FC Juarez are at home and despite a poor run, they have a chance to bounce back against a Pachuca side that has been inconsistent. Pachuca's...
Half-time / Full-time
ConsensusCF Pachuca / CF Pachuca 3/5
Pachuca's form and Juarez's home collapse make an away/away scoreline (Pachuca lead at half and full time) the most likely outcome. Pachuca...
Pachuca's control and Juarez's defensive issues point to an away lead at half and full time. Home side struggles to mount comebacks based on...
Given CF Pachuca's overall superiority and FC Juarez's significant defensive vulnerabilities, it is reasonable to expect Pachuca to establis...
Given FC Juarez's struggles, it's likely they will start defensively and aim to hold Pachuca in the first half. Pachuca, being the stronger...
Juarez have often started slowly, and conceding early has been an issue, but they have also equalized in some games. A draw at half-time wit...
Asian handicap
ConsensusCF Pachuca 1/5
Asian Handicap -0.5 for away eliminates the push and forces a cleaner binary: Pachuca win or draw favours home. Given Juarez's home form col...
Asian handicap aligns with Pachuca's edge; their better form and Juarez's defensive lapses make the visitors the value side. Rest days are n...
Considering FC Juarez's profoundly weak defense, which has leaked an average of 3.2 goals per game, CF Pachuca is highly likely to secure a...
Pachuca is the stronger team, and their historical advantage and current form suggest they can overcome a -0.75 handicap against a strugglin...
With Pachuca receiving a slight positive handicap, they only need a draw to win half the stake and a win to win fully. Given Juarez's poor f...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
CF Pachuca
Claude Haiku 4.5
CF Pachuca
Gemini 2.5 Flash
CF Pachuca
Grok 4 Fast
CF Pachuca
DeepSeek V3
FC Juarez
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Beat the AIs · Predict the score
Picks closed
Match has already kicked off. Picks are permanent — no late entries.
Team news
ProInjuries and confirmed lineups — the same team news the AIs factored into their reads.
Team news is a Pro feature
see exactly who's out and the XIs the AIs reasoned on, before kickoff.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
6f75c85d7d8d44e7…
- Kickoff
- Sat, Sep 5 · 03:00 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Draw no bet · Over / Under 2.5 · Both teams to score · Spread -1 · Asian handicap · Half-time / Full-time · Correct score
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 8. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 8, in this order): h2h | draw_no_bet | totals_2.5 | btts | spreads_-1 | asian_handicap | ht_ft | correct_score
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 36208,
"sport": "football",
"venue": null,
"league": "Liga MX",
"starts_at": "2026-09-05T03:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Sat, 05 Sep 2026 03:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "CF Pachuca",
"home": "FC Juarez"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Weight CONFIRMED team news heavily: a missing first-choice striker, creator, or centre-back swings a match more than season-long form.",
"Compare attacking vs defensive quality directly — clean-sheet rate and goals-conceded trend often predict unders/BTTS better than the win line.",
"Set pieces decide tight games: note corner/free-kick threat and aerial mismatches.",
"Account for fixture congestion + likely rotation (midweek European or cup games before this one) and the home/away form split.",
"For outdoor venues, factor heavy rain or strong wind — both suppress goals and favour the under.",
"Tactical style matters: a high-press side vs a possession side, or two defensive setups, shapes the goals expectation."
],
"team_context": {
"note": "Reference data from our settled-results database. Verify + extend it with your own research; it is not a substitute for current team news.",
"away_form": {
"last": "DDLWL",
"record": "1W-2D-2L",
"scored": 6,
"matches": 5,
"conceded": 7
},
"home_form": {
"last": "LLLLW",
"record": "1W-0D-4L",
"scored": 5,
"matches": 5,
"conceded": 16
},
"rest_days": {
"away": 6,
"home": 5
}
},
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"draw_no_bet",
"totals_2.5",
"btts",
"spreads_-1",
"asian_handicap",
"ht_ft",
"correct_score"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Research trail
What each AI looked up before picking
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 2 sources
2 citations captured — unlock with Pro
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
Recent recaps
How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.