FC CopenhagenvsInter Turku
FC Copenhagen 4–1 Inter Turku
All 4 AIs backed FC Copenhagen — and reality agreed.
- AI lean
- FC Copenhagen 4/4
- Correct calls
- 4/4
- Final
- 4–1
Every pick below was locked before the match and graded automatically against the final score — no hindsight edits.
AI predictions
8 markets · 4 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 8 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
|
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
|
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
|
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Under 1/4 models |
No 2/4 models |
2-0 3/4 models |
FC Copenhagen 2/4 models |
FC Copenhagen -1.0 2/4 models |
FC Copenhagen / FC Copenhagen 2/4 models |
FC Copenhagen 4/4 models |
FC Copenhagen 4/4 models |
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
No pick on this market.
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
No pick on this market.
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market. |
|||||||||
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
No pick on this market.
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
No pick on this market.
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market. |
|||||||||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
No pick on this market.
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
No pick on this market.
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market. |
|||||||||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
61%
over
W
|
57%
no
L
|
22%
2-0
L
|
65%
home_ -1 |
59%
home_ -1.5 |
54%
home_home |
78%
FC Copenhagen
W
|
82%
FC Copenhagen
W
|
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
61%
over Copenhagen average over 2.4 goals per home game and Inter Turku concede steadily on the road. Set-piece threat at Parken adds goal potential...
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
57%
no Copenhagen's defensive record at home and Inter Turku's low scoring away form point to a clean sheet likely. The 0-0 in the first leg reinfo...
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
22%
2-0 2-0 aligns with Copenhagen's home scoring rate and Inter Turku's low output. The 0-0 reverse leg suggests a repeat low away goals total. Tra...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
65%
home_ -1 Copenhagen expected to win by two or more given attacking output and home advantage. Inter Turku struggle to score away and recently failed...
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
59%
home_ -1.5 Expected margin favors Copenhagen by two goals at Parken against limited opposition. Recent form split and 0-0 H2H still leave room for a mu...
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
54%
home_home Copenhagen typically control games from the first half and build on leads at home. Inter Turku's defensive setup rarely produces comebacks....
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
78%
FC Copenhagen FC Copenhagen show strong home form with three wins in five and superior attacking output. Inter Turku's recent results are draw-heavy and t...
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
82%
FC Copenhagen Home side's quality edge and recent scoring trend make a Copenhagen win the clear outcome. The 0-0 H2H does not alter the home dominance pat... |
|||||||||
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
55%
Over 2.5 Goals
W
|
65%
No
L
|
20%
2-0
L
|
55%
FC Copenhagen -1
W
|
50%
FC Copenhagen -1.5
W
|
55%
FC Copenhagen / FC Copenhagen |
70%
FC Copenhagen
W
|
88%
FC Copenhagen
W
|
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Over 2.5 Goals While the first leg was 0-0 and Inter Turku has a solid defense, FC Copenhagen's strong home scoring form (2.4 goals per match in last 5) co...
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
65%
No Given the 0-0 first leg and Inter Turku's low-scoring form (1.0 goals per match in last 5), it is more probable that only one team or neithe...
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
20%
2-0 A 2-0 victory for FC Copenhagen is a highly plausible outcome, reflecting their offensive capability at home and their need to win decisivel...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
55%
FC Copenhagen -1 FC Copenhagen is expected to dominate at home and secure a comfortable win, likely by more than one goal, to progress in the tie. Their stro...
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
50%
FC Copenhagen -1.5 Assuming a -1.5 Asian Handicap for FC Copenhagen, this pick reflects their expectation to win by at least two goals at home. While Inter Tur...
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
55%
FC Copenhagen / FC Copenhagen FC Copenhagen will be aggressive from the start, aiming to establish an early lead and maintain control throughout the match, especially aft...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
70%
FC Copenhagen FC Copenhagen is the stronger team playing at home and needs to win after a 0-0 first leg away draw. Inter Turku's defensive solidity is not...
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
88%
FC Copenhagen Removing the draw option further strengthens the case for FC Copenhagen. They are heavily favored at home and need to secure a victory to pr... |
|||||||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
60%
Under
L
|
62%
No
L
|
20%
2-0
L
|
65%
FC Copenhagen
W
|
68%
FC Copenhagen -1.0
W
|
55%
FC Copenhagen / FC Copenhagen |
75%
FC Copenhagen
W
|
78%
FC Copenhagen
W
|
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
Under The first leg ended 0-0, indicating a potentially low-scoring affair. While Copenhagen has a strong home attack, Inter Turku's defensive rec...
3 sources cited
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
62%
No The 0-0 scoreline in the first leg suggests defensive solidity from both sides or inefficiency in attack. Considering Copenhagen's attacking...
3 sources cited
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
20%
2-0 Considering FC Copenhagen's attacking prowess at home and Inter Turku's defensive approach, a 2-0 victory for Copenhagen seems the most prob...
3 sources cited
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
65%
FC Copenhagen FC Copenhagen's strong home attacking record and the need to win this tie suggest they will push for multiple goals. If they can score early...
3 sources cited
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
68%
FC Copenhagen -1.0 FC Copenhagen's dominant performance in the first leg, despite the 0-0 scoreline, and their strong home record indicate they should be able...
3 sources cited
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
55%
FC Copenhagen / FC Copenhagen FC Copenhagen is expected to control the game and score, likely breaking the deadlock in the first half and maintaining their lead throughou...
3 sources cited
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
75%
FC Copenhagen FC Copenhagen has a superior recent home form, scoring 12 goals in their last 5 home matches, compared to Inter Turku's away form. The first...
3 sources cited
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
78%
FC Copenhagen Given FC Copenhagen's strong home form and the expectation that they will push for a win after the 0-0 draw in the first leg, they are the c...
3 sources cited
|
|||||||||
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
55%
under
L
|
55%
no
L
|
25%
1-0
L
|
50%
FC Copenhagen
W
|
50%
FC Copenhagen -1.0
W
|
18%
Draw / FC Copenhagen |
55%
FC Copenhagen
W
|
65%
FC Copenhagen
W
|
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
under Inter Turku's matches tend to be low-scoring (4 goals in last 5). First leg was 0-0, suggesting tight tactical battle. Copenhagen may strugg...
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
55%
no Inter Turku have scored only 5 goals in 5 matches and may sit deep. Copenhagen should keep a clean sheet at home. The first leg ended 0-0, i...
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
25%
1-0 Given Inter's defensive style and Copenhagen's moderate scoring, a 1-0 home win is the most probable single scoreline. Clean sheets are like...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
50%
FC Copenhagen Copenhagen are favourites but Inter Turku are defensively solid. It's a coin flip whether Copenhagen win by 2+. They may grind out a 1-0 or...
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
50%
FC Copenhagen -1.0 Asian handicap -1 means push if win by exactly 1. Given Inter's defensive resilience, a one-goal win is plausible. The first leg was a draw,...
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
18%
Draw / FC Copenhagen Copenhagen may start cautiously and score after half-time. Inter Turku will defend early. A goalless first half is likely, with Copenhagen p...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
FC Copenhagen FC Copenhagen have strong home form (3W-1D-1L) and superior attacking output (12 goals in 5 matches). Inter Turku are solid defensively but...
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
65%
FC Copenhagen Removing the draw, Copenhagen are clear favourites. Their home form and attacking depth outweigh Inter Turku's resilience. Likely narrow win... |
|||||||||
Over / Under
ConsensusUnder 1/4
Claude Haiku 4.5
—
GPT-5 Mini
—
GPT-4o Mini
—
Grok 4 Fast
61%
over
W
Copenhagen average over 2.4 goals per home game and Inter Turku concede steadily on the road. Set-piece threat at Parken adds goal potential...
Gemini 2.5 Flash
55%
Over 2.5 Goals
W
While the first leg was 0-0 and Inter Turku has a solid defense, FC Copenhagen's strong home scoring form (2.4 goals per match in last 5) co...
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
60%
Under
L
The first leg ended 0-0, indicating a potentially low-scoring affair. While Copenhagen has a strong home attack, Inter Turku's defensive rec...
DeepSeek V3
55%
under
L
Inter Turku's matches tend to be low-scoring (4 goals in last 5). First leg was 0-0, suggesting tight tactical battle. Copenhagen may strugg...
Both teams to score
ConsensusNo 2/4
Claude Haiku 4.5
—
GPT-5 Mini
—
GPT-4o Mini
—
Grok 4 Fast
57%
no
L
Copenhagen's defensive record at home and Inter Turku's low scoring away form point to a clean sheet likely. The 0-0 in the first leg reinfo...
Gemini 2.5 Flash
65%
No
L
Given the 0-0 first leg and Inter Turku's low-scoring form (1.0 goals per match in last 5), it is more probable that only one team or neithe...
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
62%
No
L
The 0-0 scoreline in the first leg suggests defensive solidity from both sides or inefficiency in attack. Considering Copenhagen's attacking...
DeepSeek V3
55%
no
L
Inter Turku have scored only 5 goals in 5 matches and may sit deep. Copenhagen should keep a clean sheet at home. The first leg ended 0-0, i...
Correct score
Consensus2-0 3/4
Claude Haiku 4.5
—
GPT-5 Mini
—
GPT-4o Mini
—
Grok 4 Fast
22%
2-0
L
2-0 aligns with Copenhagen's home scoring rate and Inter Turku's low output. The 0-0 reverse leg suggests a repeat low away goals total. Tra...
Gemini 2.5 Flash
20%
2-0
L
A 2-0 victory for FC Copenhagen is a highly plausible outcome, reflecting their offensive capability at home and their need to win decisivel...
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
20%
2-0
L
Considering FC Copenhagen's attacking prowess at home and Inter Turku's defensive approach, a 2-0 victory for Copenhagen seems the most prob...
DeepSeek V3
25%
1-0
L
Given Inter's defensive style and Copenhagen's moderate scoring, a 1-0 home win is the most probable single scoreline. Clean sheets are like...
Spread
ConsensusFC Copenhagen 2/4
Claude Haiku 4.5
—
GPT-5 Mini
—
GPT-4o Mini
—
Grok 4 Fast
65%
home_ -1
Copenhagen expected to win by two or more given attacking output and home advantage. Inter Turku struggle to score away and recently failed...
Gemini 2.5 Flash
55%
FC Copenhagen -1
W
FC Copenhagen is expected to dominate at home and secure a comfortable win, likely by more than one goal, to progress in the tie. Their stro...
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
65%
FC Copenhagen
W
FC Copenhagen's strong home attacking record and the need to win this tie suggest they will push for multiple goals. If they can score early...
DeepSeek V3
50%
FC Copenhagen
W
Copenhagen are favourites but Inter Turku are defensively solid. It's a coin flip whether Copenhagen win by 2+. They may grind out a 1-0 or...
Asian handicap
ConsensusFC Copenhagen -1.0 2/4
Claude Haiku 4.5
—
GPT-5 Mini
—
GPT-4o Mini
—
Grok 4 Fast
59%
home_ -1.5
Expected margin favors Copenhagen by two goals at Parken against limited opposition. Recent form split and 0-0 H2H still leave room for a mu...
Gemini 2.5 Flash
50%
FC Copenhagen -1.5
W
Assuming a -1.5 Asian Handicap for FC Copenhagen, this pick reflects their expectation to win by at least two goals at home. While Inter Tur...
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
68%
FC Copenhagen -1.0
W
FC Copenhagen's dominant performance in the first leg, despite the 0-0 scoreline, and their strong home record indicate they should be able...
DeepSeek V3
50%
FC Copenhagen -1.0
W
Asian handicap -1 means push if win by exactly 1. Given Inter's defensive resilience, a one-goal win is plausible. The first leg was a draw,...
Half-time / Full-time
ConsensusFC Copenhagen / FC Copenhagen 2/4
Claude Haiku 4.5
—
GPT-5 Mini
—
GPT-4o Mini
—
Grok 4 Fast
54%
home_home
Copenhagen typically control games from the first half and build on leads at home. Inter Turku's defensive setup rarely produces comebacks....
Gemini 2.5 Flash
55%
FC Copenhagen / FC Copenhagen
FC Copenhagen will be aggressive from the start, aiming to establish an early lead and maintain control throughout the match, especially aft...
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
55%
FC Copenhagen / FC Copenhagen
FC Copenhagen is expected to control the game and score, likely breaking the deadlock in the first half and maintaining their lead throughou...
DeepSeek V3
18%
Draw / FC Copenhagen
Copenhagen may start cautiously and score after half-time. Inter Turku will defend early. A goalless first half is likely, with Copenhagen p...
Match winner
ConsensusFC Copenhagen 4/4
Claude Haiku 4.5
—
GPT-5 Mini
—
GPT-4o Mini
—
Grok 4 Fast
78%
FC Copenhagen
W
FC Copenhagen show strong home form with three wins in five and superior attacking output. Inter Turku's recent results are draw-heavy and t...
Gemini 2.5 Flash
70%
FC Copenhagen
W
FC Copenhagen is the stronger team playing at home and needs to win after a 0-0 first leg away draw. Inter Turku's defensive solidity is not...
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
75%
FC Copenhagen
W
FC Copenhagen has a superior recent home form, scoring 12 goals in their last 5 home matches, compared to Inter Turku's away form. The first...
DeepSeek V3
55%
FC Copenhagen
W
FC Copenhagen have strong home form (3W-1D-1L) and superior attacking output (12 goals in 5 matches). Inter Turku are solid defensively but...
Draw no bet
ConsensusFC Copenhagen 4/4
Claude Haiku 4.5
—
GPT-5 Mini
—
GPT-4o Mini
—
Grok 4 Fast
82%
FC Copenhagen
W
Home side's quality edge and recent scoring trend make a Copenhagen win the clear outcome. The 0-0 H2H does not alter the home dominance pat...
Gemini 2.5 Flash
88%
FC Copenhagen
W
Removing the draw option further strengthens the case for FC Copenhagen. They are heavily favored at home and need to secure a victory to pr...
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
78%
FC Copenhagen
W
Given FC Copenhagen's strong home form and the expectation that they will push for a win after the 0-0 draw in the first leg, they are the c...
DeepSeek V3
65%
FC Copenhagen
W
Removing the draw, Copenhagen are clear favourites. Their home form and attacking depth outweigh Inter Turku's resilience. Likely narrow win...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winner
Grok 4 Fast
FC Copenhagen
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
FC Copenhagen
Gemini 2.5 Flash
FC Copenhagen
DeepSeek V3
FC Copenhagen
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Beat the AIs · Predict the score
Picks closed
Match has already kicked off. Picks are permanent — no late entries.
Team news
ProInjuries and confirmed lineups — the same team news the AIs factored into their reads.
Team news is a Pro feature
see exactly who's out and the XIs the AIs reasoned on, before kickoff.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
54e553fc21e1784f…
- Kickoff
- Thu, Aug 27 · 17:00 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Draw no bet · Over / Under 2.5 · Both teams to score · Spread -1 · Asian handicap · Half-time / Full-time · Correct score
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 8. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 8, in this order): h2h | draw_no_bet | totals_2.5 | btts | spreads_-1 | asian_handicap | ht_ft | correct_score
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 31596,
"sport": "football",
"venue": "Parken Stadium",
"league": "UEFA Europa Conference League",
"starts_at": "2026-08-27T17:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Thu, 27 Aug 2026 17:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Inter Turku",
"home": "FC Copenhagen"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Weight CONFIRMED team news heavily: a missing first-choice striker, creator, or centre-back swings a match more than season-long form.",
"Compare attacking vs defensive quality directly — clean-sheet rate and goals-conceded trend often predict unders/BTTS better than the win line.",
"Set pieces decide tight games: note corner/free-kick threat and aerial mismatches.",
"Account for fixture congestion + likely rotation (midweek European or cup games before this one) and the home/away form split.",
"For outdoor venues, factor heavy rain or strong wind — both suppress goals and favour the under.",
"Tactical style matters: a high-press side vs a possession side, or two defensive setups, shapes the goals expectation."
],
"team_context": {
"note": "Reference data from our settled-results database. Verify + extend it with your own research; it is not a substitute for current team news.",
"away_form": {
"last": "DDWDD",
"record": "1W-4D-0L",
"scored": 5,
"matches": 5,
"conceded": 4
},
"home_form": {
"last": "LDWWW",
"record": "3W-1D-1L",
"scored": 12,
"matches": 5,
"conceded": 5
},
"rest_days": {
"away": 4,
"home": 4
},
"head_to_head": {
"recent": [
"2026-08-20: Inter Turku 0–0 FC Copenhagen"
],
"matches": 1
}
},
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"draw_no_bet",
"totals_2.5",
"btts",
"spreads_-1",
"asian_handicap",
"ht_ft",
"correct_score"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Research trail
What each AI looked up before picking
-
0 tool calls · 3 sources
3 citations captured — unlock with Pro
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
Recent recaps
How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.