Crown LegacyvsChicago Fire II
Crown Legacy 4–0 Chicago Fire II
3 of 4 AIs leaned Crown Legacy — and reality agreed.
- AI lean
- Crown Legacy 3/4
- Correct calls
- 3/4
- Final
- 4–0
Every pick below was locked before the match and graded automatically against the final score — no hindsight edits.
AI predictions
8 markets · 4 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 8 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
|
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
|
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
|
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
|
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
yes 3/4 models |
Crown Legacy 3/4 models |
2-1 3/4 models |
Crown Legacy 3/4 models |
Crown Legacy 2/4 models |
Crown Legacy / Crown Legacy 3/4 models |
Crown Legacy -0.5 2/4 models |
over 3/4 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
|
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
No pick on this market.
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market.
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
No pick on this market.
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||||||||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
|
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
No pick on this market.
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market.
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
No pick on this market.
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||||||||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
|
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
No pick on this market.
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market.
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
No pick on this market.
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||||||||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
55%
yes
L
|
62%
Crown Legacy
W
|
14%
2-1
L
|
48%
Crown Legacy
W
|
51%
Crown Legacy
W
|
29%
Crown Legacy / Crown Legacy |
52%
Crown Legacy -0.25
W
|
53%
over
W
|
|
|
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
55%
yes Both sides concede regularly and score in most matches. Prior H2H saw both teams score. Training data through 2025-09 used for baseline.
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
62%
Crown Legacy Home side has better record and venue advantage in MLS Next Pro. Away side concedes more on the road. Training data through 2025-09 used for...
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
14%
2-1 Most likely scores cluster around 2-1 given scoring trends and H2H. Training data through 2025-09 used for baseline.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
48%
Crown Legacy Crown Legacy hold a slight edge from recent home form and the only prior H2H win. Chicago's away record shows more losses and higher goals c...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
51%
Crown Legacy Home team slightly more likely to win by 2+ given form and H2H result. Training data through 2025-09 used for baseline.
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
29%
Crown Legacy / Crown Legacy Home side favored to lead at half and full time based on venue and recent results. Training data through 2025-09 used for baseline.
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
52%
Crown Legacy -0.25 Small home advantage reflected in form and rest. Training data through 2025-09 used for baseline.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
53%
over Both teams average over 3 goals per game in recent form. H2H ended 5-2. Outdoor venue and rest days suggest open game. Training data through... |
|||||||||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
70%
Yes
L
|
67%
Crown Legacy
W
|
18%
3-2
L
|
50%
Crown Legacy
W
|
40%
Draw |
28%
Crown Legacy / Crown Legacy |
50%
Crown Legacy -0.5
W
|
65%
Over 2.5 Goals
W
|
|
|
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
70%
Yes Given both teams' recent goal-scoring form (Crown Legacy 1.8 GF/game, Chicago Fire II 1.6 GF/game) and the single head-to-head match ending...
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
67%
Crown Legacy Removing the draw outcome strengthens Crown Legacy's position. They are favored to win based on home advantage and their head-to-head record...
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
18%
3-2 The only head-to-head match between these teams ended 3-2 in favor of Crown Legacy, making this a highly plausible scoreline. This also alig...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
50%
Crown Legacy This prediction is based on the provided data and training knowledge, as the match is in the future. Crown Legacy has the home advantage, a...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
40%
Draw Crown Legacy is favored to win, and Chicago Fire II has also shown they can score. The previous H2H was 3-2 (Crown Legacy win by 1 goal), wh...
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
28%
Crown Legacy / Crown Legacy Crown Legacy is the favored side with home advantage and a 3-2 H2H win. Given the expectation of an open, high-scoring game, it's plausible...
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
50%
Crown Legacy -0.5 Crown Legacy holds the home advantage and secured a 3-2 victory in their sole previous encounter against Chicago Fire II. This, combined wit...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
65%
Over 2.5 Goals Both teams have shown a propensity for high-scoring games in their recent form, with Crown Legacy averaging 1.8 GF and Chicago Fire II avera... |
|||||||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
60%
yes
L
|
50%
Chicago Fire II
L
|
12%
2-1
L
|
45%
Chicago Fire II
L
|
40%
Chicago Fire II
L
|
18%
Draw / Chicago Fire II
L
|
45%
away_ 0.0 |
55%
over
W
|
|
|
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
60%
yes Both teams have conceded a significant number of goals in their recent games, and their head-to-head encounter also featured both teams scor...
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
50%
Chicago Fire II Given the slight edge in form for Chicago Fire II and the potential for a close game, they are favored in the draw no bet market. Removing t...
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
12%
2-1 Considering the offensive capabilities and defensive frailties of both teams, as well as the previous 3-2 scoreline, a narrow victory for Ch...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
45%
Chicago Fire II Chicago Fire II have a slightly better recent form in terms of wins, despite conceding more goals. The head-to-head record is only one game,...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
40%
Chicago Fire II Chicago Fire II have a slight edge in recent form and win percentage. While Crown Legacy won the previous encounter, it was by a single goal...
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
18%
Draw / Chicago Fire II Chicago Fire II have a slightly better chance of winning the match, but Crown Legacy has shown the ability to come back or hold their own. A...
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
45%
away_ 0.0 Given the close head-to-head and similar recent form, the Asian Handicap of 0.0 (which essentially acts as a draw no bet) favors Chicago Fir...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over Both teams have shown a tendency to concede goals in their recent matches. Crown Legacy conceded 8 goals in their last 5, and Chicago Fire I... |
|||||||||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
62%
yes
L
|
60%
Crown Legacy
W
|
12%
2-1
L
|
45%
Crown Legacy
W
|
30%
Crown Legacy
W
|
25%
Crown Legacy / Crown Legacy |
45%
Crown Legacy -0.5
W
|
55%
over
W
|
|
|
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
62%
yes Both teams have scored in many matches; Chicago Fire II have scored in 4 of last 5, Crown Legacy in 5 of last 5. Defensive vulnerabilities s...
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
60%
Crown Legacy Home advantage and head-to-head win tilt this toward Crown Legacy when the draw is removed. Chicago Fire II away form is inconsistent. Expec...
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
12%
2-1 Given both teams' scoring and conceding trends, a narrow home win like 2-1 is plausible. The H2H was 3-2, but that's less likely. The draw a...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
45%
Crown Legacy Crown Legacy have home advantage and won the only recent meeting 3-2 at home. Chicago Fire II have poor away form but are competitive, makin...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
30%
Crown Legacy Winning by more than one goal is difficult given the closeness of the teams. Chicago Fire II are capable of keeping it close. Home win by 2+...
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
25%
Crown Legacy / Crown Legacy Crown Legacy at home may start well but matches between these teams are often close. A halftime lead for the home side is plausible, but not...
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
45%
Crown Legacy -0.5 Home win is slightly favored but not with high confidence. The only H2H was a home win. However, away side has decent attack, so the handica...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over Both teams have high scoring and conceding rates (average over 3 goals per game combined). Recent H2H had 5 goals. Defenses are leaky, so ov... |
|||||||||
Both teams to score
Consensusyes 3/4
Both sides concede regularly and score in most matches. Prior H2H saw both teams score. Training data through 2025-09 used for baseline.
Given both teams' recent goal-scoring form (Crown Legacy 1.8 GF/game, Chicago Fire II 1.6 GF/game) and the single head-to-head match ending...
Both teams have conceded a significant number of goals in their recent games, and their head-to-head encounter also featured both teams scor...
Both teams have scored in many matches; Chicago Fire II have scored in 4 of last 5, Crown Legacy in 5 of last 5. Defensive vulnerabilities s...
Draw no bet
ConsensusCrown Legacy 3/4
Home side has better record and venue advantage in MLS Next Pro. Away side concedes more on the road. Training data through 2025-09 used for...
Removing the draw outcome strengthens Crown Legacy's position. They are favored to win based on home advantage and their head-to-head record...
Given the slight edge in form for Chicago Fire II and the potential for a close game, they are favored in the draw no bet market. Removing t...
Home advantage and head-to-head win tilt this toward Crown Legacy when the draw is removed. Chicago Fire II away form is inconsistent. Expec...
Correct score
Consensus2-1 3/4
Most likely scores cluster around 2-1 given scoring trends and H2H. Training data through 2025-09 used for baseline.
The only head-to-head match between these teams ended 3-2 in favor of Crown Legacy, making this a highly plausible scoreline. This also alig...
Considering the offensive capabilities and defensive frailties of both teams, as well as the previous 3-2 scoreline, a narrow victory for Ch...
Given both teams' scoring and conceding trends, a narrow home win like 2-1 is plausible. The H2H was 3-2, but that's less likely. The draw a...
Match winner
ConsensusCrown Legacy 3/4
Crown Legacy hold a slight edge from recent home form and the only prior H2H win. Chicago's away record shows more losses and higher goals c...
This prediction is based on the provided data and training knowledge, as the match is in the future. Crown Legacy has the home advantage, a...
Chicago Fire II have a slightly better recent form in terms of wins, despite conceding more goals. The head-to-head record is only one game,...
Crown Legacy have home advantage and won the only recent meeting 3-2 at home. Chicago Fire II have poor away form but are competitive, makin...
Spread
ConsensusCrown Legacy 2/4
Home team slightly more likely to win by 2+ given form and H2H result. Training data through 2025-09 used for baseline.
Crown Legacy is favored to win, and Chicago Fire II has also shown they can score. The previous H2H was 3-2 (Crown Legacy win by 1 goal), wh...
Chicago Fire II have a slight edge in recent form and win percentage. While Crown Legacy won the previous encounter, it was by a single goal...
Winning by more than one goal is difficult given the closeness of the teams. Chicago Fire II are capable of keeping it close. Home win by 2+...
Half-time / Full-time
ConsensusCrown Legacy / Crown Legacy 3/4
Home side favored to lead at half and full time based on venue and recent results. Training data through 2025-09 used for baseline.
Crown Legacy is the favored side with home advantage and a 3-2 H2H win. Given the expectation of an open, high-scoring game, it's plausible...
Chicago Fire II have a slightly better chance of winning the match, but Crown Legacy has shown the ability to come back or hold their own. A...
Crown Legacy at home may start well but matches between these teams are often close. A halftime lead for the home side is plausible, but not...
Asian handicap
ConsensusCrown Legacy -0.5 2/4
Small home advantage reflected in form and rest. Training data through 2025-09 used for baseline.
Crown Legacy holds the home advantage and secured a 3-2 victory in their sole previous encounter against Chicago Fire II. This, combined wit...
Given the close head-to-head and similar recent form, the Asian Handicap of 0.0 (which essentially acts as a draw no bet) favors Chicago Fir...
Home win is slightly favored but not with high confidence. The only H2H was a home win. However, away side has decent attack, so the handica...
Over / Under
Consensusover 3/4
Both teams average over 3 goals per game in recent form. H2H ended 5-2. Outdoor venue and rest days suggest open game. Training data through...
Both teams have shown a propensity for high-scoring games in their recent form, with Crown Legacy averaging 1.8 GF and Chicago Fire II avera...
Both teams have shown a tendency to concede goals in their recent matches. Crown Legacy conceded 8 goals in their last 5, and Chicago Fire I...
Both teams have high scoring and conceding rates (average over 3 goals per game combined). Recent H2H had 5 goals. Defenses are leaky, so ov...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGemini 2.5 Flash
Crown Legacy
Grok 4 Fast
Crown Legacy
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Chicago Fire II
DeepSeek V3
Crown Legacy
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Beat the AIs · Predict the score
Picks closed
Match has already kicked off. Picks are permanent — no late entries.
Team news
ProInjuries and confirmed lineups — the same team news the AIs factored into their reads.
Team news is a Pro feature
see exactly who's out and the XIs the AIs reasoned on, before kickoff.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
55e360d5ed27f504…
- Kickoff
- Fri, Sep 4 · 21:30 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Draw no bet · Over / Under 2.5 · Both teams to score · Spread -1 · Asian handicap · Half-time / Full-time · Correct score
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 8. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 8, in this order): h2h | draw_no_bet | totals_2.5 | btts | spreads_-1 | asian_handicap | ht_ft | correct_score
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 36129,
"sport": "football",
"venue": "Sportsplex at Matthews",
"league": "MLS Next Pro",
"starts_at": "2026-09-04T21:30:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Fri, 04 Sep 2026 21:30:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Chicago Fire II",
"home": "Crown Legacy"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Weight CONFIRMED team news heavily: a missing first-choice striker, creator, or centre-back swings a match more than season-long form.",
"Compare attacking vs defensive quality directly — clean-sheet rate and goals-conceded trend often predict unders/BTTS better than the win line.",
"Set pieces decide tight games: note corner/free-kick threat and aerial mismatches.",
"Account for fixture congestion + likely rotation (midweek European or cup games before this one) and the home/away form split.",
"For outdoor venues, factor heavy rain or strong wind — both suppress goals and favour the under.",
"Tactical style matters: a high-press side vs a possession side, or two defensive setups, shapes the goals expectation."
],
"team_context": {
"note": "Reference data from our settled-results database. Verify + extend it with your own research; it is not a substitute for current team news.",
"away_form": {
"last": "LWLWL",
"record": "2W-0D-3L",
"scored": 8,
"matches": 5,
"conceded": 11
},
"home_form": {
"last": "LWLDW",
"record": "2W-1D-2L",
"scored": 9,
"matches": 5,
"conceded": 8
},
"rest_days": {
"away": 5,
"home": 4
},
"head_to_head": {
"recent": [
"2026-07-18: Crown Legacy 3–2 Chicago Fire II"
],
"matches": 1
}
},
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"draw_no_bet",
"totals_2.5",
"btts",
"spreads_-1",
"asian_handicap",
"ht_ft",
"correct_score"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Recent recaps
How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.