Columbus Crew IIvsChicago Fire II
Columbus Crew II 4–0 Chicago Fire II
3 of 4 AIs leaned Columbus Crew II — and reality agreed.
- AI lean
- Columbus Crew II 3/4
- Correct calls
- 3/4
- Final
- 4–0
Every pick below was locked before the match and graded automatically against the final score — no hindsight edits.
AI predictions
8 markets · 4 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 8 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
|
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
|
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
|
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
draw_home 2/4 models |
Columbus Crew II 3/4 models |
Columbus Crew II 3/4 models |
yes 3/4 models |
home_ -1 2/4 models |
Chicago Fire II 0.0 1/4 models |
2-1 3/4 models |
over 3/4 models |
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
|
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market.
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
No pick on this market.
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||||||||
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
|
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market.
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
No pick on this market.
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||||||||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
|
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market.
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
No pick on this market.
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||||||||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
28%
draw_home |
52%
Columbus Crew II
W
|
58%
Columbus Crew II
W
|
55%
yes
L
|
48%
home_ -1 |
54%
home_ 0 |
18%
2-1
L
|
53%
over
W
|
|
|
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
28%
draw_home Matches often see home teams take control after halftime in this league. Early draws are common before home side pushes ahead. Training data...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
52%
Columbus Crew II Columbus Crew II hold a slight home edge based on their stadium familiarity in MLS Next Pro reserve fixtures. Both sides show inconsistent r...
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
58%
Columbus Crew II Home advantage at Historic Crew Stadium favors Columbus Crew II over Chicago Fire II. Limited head-to-head history between reserve sides poi...
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
55%
yes Both sides concede regularly and score at decent rates in reserve matches. Defensive vulnerabilities in MLS Next Pro lineups often lead to b...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
48%
home_ -1 Columbus Crew II at home can cover a narrow spread against Chicago Fire II. Form splits favor the home side slightly. Training data through...
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
54%
home_ 0 Home side expected to avoid defeat in this reserve matchup. Similar rest days reduce fatigue edge. Training data through 2025-09 gives home...
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
18%
2-1 Typical reserve match scoreline leans toward 2-1 or 1-1 given goal trends. Home edge pushes toward narrow home wins. Training data through 2...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
53%
over Reserve-team matches in this league trend toward open play and higher goal counts. Both teams average over 2.5 combined goals in recent outi... |
|||||||||
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
30%
Chicago Fire II / Chicago Fire II
L
|
45%
Chicago Fire II
L
|
62%
Chicago Fire II
L
|
60%
Yes
L
|
70%
Chicago Fire II +1
L
|
62%
Chicago Fire II 0.0
L
|
12%
1-3
L
|
65%
Over 2.5
W
|
|
|
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
30%
Chicago Fire II / Chicago Fire II Given Chicago Fire II's strong offensive form and higher scoring rate, they are likely to take an early lead and maintain it throughout the...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
45%
Chicago Fire II Based on the provided recent form data, Chicago Fire II has a stronger offensive record (15 goals in 5 games) and a better win-loss record (...
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
62%
Chicago Fire II Chicago Fire II's superior recent form, especially their attacking prowess, makes them the more likely winner. The draw no bet option mitiga...
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
60%
Yes Chicago Fire II, while scoring heavily (3.0 goals/game), also concedes an average of 1.8 goals per game. Columbus Crew II averages 1.6 goals...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
70%
Chicago Fire II +1 Columbus Crew II would need to win by 2 or more goals for their -1 spread to hit. Given their recent 2W-0D-3L form, this is less likely. Chi...
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
62%
Chicago Fire II 0.0 This market, effectively a Draw No Bet, favors Chicago Fire II due to their superior recent form and prolific scoring. If the match ends in...
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
12%
1-3 Chicago Fire II averages 3 goals scored and Columbus Crew II averages 1.6 goals scored per game based on recent form. A 1-3 scoreline aligns...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
65%
Over 2.5 Chicago Fire II's matches have been high-scoring recently, averaging 4.8 goals per game (15 scored, 9 conceded in 5 matches). Columbus Crew... |
|||||||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
35%
Draw / Columbus Crew II |
55%
Columbus Crew II
W
|
60%
Columbus Crew II
W
|
60%
yes
L
|
55%
Columbus Crew II
W
|
55%
Columbus Crew II -0.25
W
|
15%
2-1
L
|
55%
over
W
|
|
|
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
35%
Draw / Columbus Crew II Columbus Crew II is expected to have a slight edge at home, but Chicago Fire II's attacking prowess could lead to a competitive first half....
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Columbus Crew II Columbus Crew II has a slightly better defensive record in their last 5 games, conceding fewer goals. While their recent form is mixed, they...
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
60%
Columbus Crew II Given the slight edge in home form and defensive solidity, Columbus Crew II is favored. The draw no bet market removes the possibility of a...
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
60%
yes Chicago Fire II has a strong offense and has scored in most of their recent games. Columbus Crew II, while having a slightly better defense,...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
55%
Columbus Crew II Columbus Crew II, playing at home, has shown a slightly better defensive structure than their opponents. While Chicago Fire II has a potent...
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
55%
Columbus Crew II -0.25 Columbus Crew II has a slight edge at home and a slightly more stable defense in recent games. The -0.25 handicap suggests a belief in them...
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
15%
2-1 Considering Columbus Crew II's slight home advantage and Chicago Fire II's attacking threat, a narrow win for the home side seems most likel...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over Both teams have shown a capacity to score goals in their recent matches, and their defensive records suggest that goals are likely to be con... |
|||||||||
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
25%
draw_home |
45%
Columbus Crew II
W
|
55%
Columbus Crew II
W
|
60%
yes
L
|
30%
home_ -1 |
50%
away_ +0.25 |
15%
2-1
L
|
55%
over
W
|
|
|
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
25%
draw_home With both teams evenly matched, a first-half draw is plausible, and Columbus's slight edge at home may see them edge it in the second half....
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
45%
Columbus Crew II Columbus Crew II have home advantage and a slightly better recent defensive record, though their form is inconsistent. Chicago Fire II have...
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
55%
Columbus Crew II With the draw removed, home win probability is slightly higher than away. Columbus's defensive solidity and home support tip the balance, de...
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
60%
yes Both teams have scored in most of their recent matches, with Chicago scoring in all last 5 and Columbus in 4 of 5. Defensive lapses are comm...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
30%
home_ -1 Columbus are not strong enough to win by 2+ goals given their inconsistent form. Chicago's attacking output makes covering the spread diffic...
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
50%
away_ +0.25 The away side has a slight edge in form and scoring, while Columbus have struggled to win comfortably. A quarter-goal handicap on the away s...
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
15%
2-1 A 2-1 home win is a common scoreline given both teams' goal trends and Columbus's slight home edge. However, a 1-1 draw is equally likely. T...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over Both teams have been involved in high-scoring games recently, with Chicago averaging 3.0 goals per match and Columbus 3.0. The lack of defen... |
|||||||||
Half-time / Full-time
Consensusdraw_home 2/4
Claude Haiku 4.5
—
GPT-5 Mini
—
GPT-4o Mini
—
Grok 4 Fast
28%
draw_home
Matches often see home teams take control after halftime in this league. Early draws are common before home side pushes ahead. Training data...
Gemini 2.5 Flash
30%
Chicago Fire II / Chicago Fire II
L
Given Chicago Fire II's strong offensive form and higher scoring rate, they are likely to take an early lead and maintain it throughout the...
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
35%
Draw / Columbus Crew II
Columbus Crew II is expected to have a slight edge at home, but Chicago Fire II's attacking prowess could lead to a competitive first half....
DeepSeek V3
25%
draw_home
With both teams evenly matched, a first-half draw is plausible, and Columbus's slight edge at home may see them edge it in the second half....
Match winner
ConsensusColumbus Crew II 3/4
Claude Haiku 4.5
—
GPT-5 Mini
—
GPT-4o Mini
—
Grok 4 Fast
52%
Columbus Crew II
W
Columbus Crew II hold a slight home edge based on their stadium familiarity in MLS Next Pro reserve fixtures. Both sides show inconsistent r...
Gemini 2.5 Flash
45%
Chicago Fire II
L
Based on the provided recent form data, Chicago Fire II has a stronger offensive record (15 goals in 5 games) and a better win-loss record (...
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
55%
Columbus Crew II
W
Columbus Crew II has a slightly better defensive record in their last 5 games, conceding fewer goals. While their recent form is mixed, they...
DeepSeek V3
45%
Columbus Crew II
W
Columbus Crew II have home advantage and a slightly better recent defensive record, though their form is inconsistent. Chicago Fire II have...
Draw no bet
ConsensusColumbus Crew II 3/4
Claude Haiku 4.5
—
GPT-5 Mini
—
GPT-4o Mini
—
Grok 4 Fast
58%
Columbus Crew II
W
Home advantage at Historic Crew Stadium favors Columbus Crew II over Chicago Fire II. Limited head-to-head history between reserve sides poi...
Gemini 2.5 Flash
62%
Chicago Fire II
L
Chicago Fire II's superior recent form, especially their attacking prowess, makes them the more likely winner. The draw no bet option mitiga...
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
60%
Columbus Crew II
W
Given the slight edge in home form and defensive solidity, Columbus Crew II is favored. The draw no bet market removes the possibility of a...
DeepSeek V3
55%
Columbus Crew II
W
With the draw removed, home win probability is slightly higher than away. Columbus's defensive solidity and home support tip the balance, de...
Both teams to score
Consensusyes 3/4
Claude Haiku 4.5
—
GPT-5 Mini
—
GPT-4o Mini
—
Grok 4 Fast
55%
yes
L
Both sides concede regularly and score at decent rates in reserve matches. Defensive vulnerabilities in MLS Next Pro lineups often lead to b...
Gemini 2.5 Flash
60%
Yes
L
Chicago Fire II, while scoring heavily (3.0 goals/game), also concedes an average of 1.8 goals per game. Columbus Crew II averages 1.6 goals...
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
60%
yes
L
Chicago Fire II has a strong offense and has scored in most of their recent games. Columbus Crew II, while having a slightly better defense,...
DeepSeek V3
60%
yes
L
Both teams have scored in most of their recent matches, with Chicago scoring in all last 5 and Columbus in 4 of 5. Defensive lapses are comm...
Spread
Consensushome_ -1 2/4
Claude Haiku 4.5
—
GPT-5 Mini
—
GPT-4o Mini
—
Grok 4 Fast
48%
home_ -1
Columbus Crew II at home can cover a narrow spread against Chicago Fire II. Form splits favor the home side slightly. Training data through...
Gemini 2.5 Flash
70%
Chicago Fire II +1
L
Columbus Crew II would need to win by 2 or more goals for their -1 spread to hit. Given their recent 2W-0D-3L form, this is less likely. Chi...
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
55%
Columbus Crew II
W
Columbus Crew II, playing at home, has shown a slightly better defensive structure than their opponents. While Chicago Fire II has a potent...
DeepSeek V3
30%
home_ -1
Columbus are not strong enough to win by 2+ goals given their inconsistent form. Chicago's attacking output makes covering the spread diffic...
Asian handicap
ConsensusChicago Fire II 0.0 1/4
Claude Haiku 4.5
—
GPT-5 Mini
—
GPT-4o Mini
—
Grok 4 Fast
54%
home_ 0
Home side expected to avoid defeat in this reserve matchup. Similar rest days reduce fatigue edge. Training data through 2025-09 gives home...
Gemini 2.5 Flash
62%
Chicago Fire II 0.0
L
This market, effectively a Draw No Bet, favors Chicago Fire II due to their superior recent form and prolific scoring. If the match ends in...
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
55%
Columbus Crew II -0.25
W
Columbus Crew II has a slight edge at home and a slightly more stable defense in recent games. The -0.25 handicap suggests a belief in them...
DeepSeek V3
50%
away_ +0.25
The away side has a slight edge in form and scoring, while Columbus have struggled to win comfortably. A quarter-goal handicap on the away s...
Correct score
Consensus2-1 3/4
Claude Haiku 4.5
—
GPT-5 Mini
—
GPT-4o Mini
—
Grok 4 Fast
18%
2-1
L
Typical reserve match scoreline leans toward 2-1 or 1-1 given goal trends. Home edge pushes toward narrow home wins. Training data through 2...
Gemini 2.5 Flash
12%
1-3
L
Chicago Fire II averages 3 goals scored and Columbus Crew II averages 1.6 goals scored per game based on recent form. A 1-3 scoreline aligns...
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
15%
2-1
L
Considering Columbus Crew II's slight home advantage and Chicago Fire II's attacking threat, a narrow win for the home side seems most likel...
DeepSeek V3
15%
2-1
L
A 2-1 home win is a common scoreline given both teams' goal trends and Columbus's slight home edge. However, a 1-1 draw is equally likely. T...
Over / Under
Consensusover 3/4
Claude Haiku 4.5
—
GPT-5 Mini
—
GPT-4o Mini
—
Grok 4 Fast
53%
over
W
Reserve-team matches in this league trend toward open play and higher goal counts. Both teams average over 2.5 combined goals in recent outi...
Gemini 2.5 Flash
65%
Over 2.5
W
Chicago Fire II's matches have been high-scoring recently, averaging 4.8 goals per game (15 scored, 9 conceded in 5 matches). Columbus Crew...
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
55%
over
W
Both teams have shown a capacity to score goals in their recent matches, and their defensive records suggest that goals are likely to be con...
DeepSeek V3
55%
over
W
Both teams have been involved in high-scoring games recently, with Chicago averaging 3.0 goals per match and Columbus 3.0. The lack of defen...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winner
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Columbus Crew II
Grok 4 Fast
Columbus Crew II
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Chicago Fire II
DeepSeek V3
Columbus Crew II
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Beat the AIs · Predict the score
Picks closed
Match has already kicked off. Picks are permanent — no late entries.
Team news
ProInjuries and confirmed lineups — the same team news the AIs factored into their reads.
Team news is a Pro feature
see exactly who's out and the XIs the AIs reasoned on, before kickoff.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
1f419d3da2dcee35…
- Kickoff
- Sun, Aug 30 · 17:00 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Draw no bet · Over / Under 2.5 · Both teams to score · Spread -1 · Asian handicap · Half-time / Full-time · Correct score
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 8. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 8, in this order): h2h | draw_no_bet | totals_2.5 | btts | spreads_-1 | asian_handicap | ht_ft | correct_score
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 34395,
"sport": "football",
"venue": "Historic Crew Stadium",
"league": "MLS Next Pro",
"starts_at": "2026-08-30T17:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Sun, 30 Aug 2026 17:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Chicago Fire II",
"home": "Columbus Crew II"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Weight CONFIRMED team news heavily: a missing first-choice striker, creator, or centre-back swings a match more than season-long form.",
"Compare attacking vs defensive quality directly — clean-sheet rate and goals-conceded trend often predict unders/BTTS better than the win line.",
"Set pieces decide tight games: note corner/free-kick threat and aerial mismatches.",
"Account for fixture congestion + likely rotation (midweek European or cup games before this one) and the home/away form split.",
"For outdoor venues, factor heavy rain or strong wind — both suppress goals and favour the under.",
"Tactical style matters: a high-press side vs a possession side, or two defensive setups, shapes the goals expectation."
],
"team_context": {
"note": "Reference data from our settled-results database. Verify + extend it with your own research; it is not a substitute for current team news.",
"away_form": {
"last": "WLWLW",
"record": "3W-0D-2L",
"scored": 15,
"matches": 5,
"conceded": 9
},
"home_form": {
"last": "LWLLW",
"record": "2W-0D-3L",
"scored": 8,
"matches": 5,
"conceded": 7
},
"rest_days": {
"away": 6,
"home": 6
}
},
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"draw_no_bet",
"totals_2.5",
"btts",
"spreads_-1",
"asian_handicap",
"ht_ft",
"correct_score"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Recent recaps
How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.