ChattanoogavsCarolina Core
Chattanooga 5–2 Carolina Core
All 4 AIs backed Chattanooga — and reality agreed.
- AI lean
- Chattanooga 4/4
- Correct calls
- 4/4
- Final
- 5–2
Every pick below was locked before the match and graded automatically against the final score — no hindsight edits.
AI predictions
8 markets · 4 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 8 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
|
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
|
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
|
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
over 3/4 models |
yes 3/4 models |
2-1 2/4 models |
Draw / Draw 1/4 models |
Carolina Core 2/4 models |
Carolina Core +0.25 1/4 models |
Chattanooga 4/4 models |
Chattanooga 4/4 models |
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
No pick on this market.
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
No pick on this market.
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market. |
|||||||||
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
No pick on this market.
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
No pick on this market.
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market. |
|||||||||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
No pick on this market.
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
No pick on this market.
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market. |
|||||||||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
54%
under
L
|
51%
no
L
|
18%
1-0
L
|
38%
Chattanooga / Chattanooga |
48%
Chattanooga -1
W
|
53%
Chattanooga -0.5
W
|
52%
Chattanooga
W
|
62%
Chattanooga
W
|
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
54%
under Home defense strong with only 5 goals conceded while both sides average around 2 goals per game combined. Outdoor venue and set-piece focus...
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
51%
no Chattanooga concedes fewer goals at home reducing BTTS likelihood. Carolina Core scores freely but faces organized home defense. Recent H2H...
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
18%
1-0 Low scoring expected with home defensive strength. 1-0 or 2-0 plausible given form trends. Training data through 2025-09.
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
38%
Chattanooga / Chattanooga Home side likely to control game from start given better form. Strong second half record supports full time home win. Training data through...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
48%
Chattanooga -1 Home edge exists but margin may be narrow given Carolina Core's attacking output. Form suggests close contest where one-goal margin likely....
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
53%
Chattanooga -0.5 Chattanooga favored by home record and defensive stability. Slight edge on Asian line accounts for draw possibility in tight match. Training...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
52%
Chattanooga Chattanooga's home form of LDWWW shows strong defensive record conceding only 5 goals in 5 matches compared to Carolina Core's leaky 11 conc...
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
62%
Chattanooga Home side has superior defensive metrics and recent results at home. Carolina Core's away record is inconsistent with only 2 wins in last 5.... |
|||||||||
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
60%
over
W
|
65%
yes
W
|
18%
2-1
L
|
20%
Draw / Chattanooga |
45%
Carolina Core +1
L
|
55%
Carolina Core +0.5
L
|
45%
Chattanooga
W
|
60%
Chattanooga
W
|
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
over Carolina Core has been involved in high-scoring games recently, scoring 11 and conceding 11 in their last five, averaging 4.4 goals per game...
2 sources cited
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
65%
yes Carolina Core has a potent attack, scoring 2.2 goals per game, and a very leaky defense, conceding 2.2 goals per game. The only head-to-head...
2 sources cited
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
18%
2-1 A 2-1 scoreline for Chattanooga aligns with them being slight favorites at home and both teams likely to score. Carolina Core's defensive st...
2 sources cited
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
20%
Draw / Chattanooga Considering the only head-to-head was a draw and Carolina Core's strong attacking output, a tight first half is plausible. Chattanooga's bet...
2 sources cited
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
45%
Carolina Core +1 While Chattanooga is favored, winning by more than one goal might be challenging against a Carolina Core side that scores frequently. The he...
2 sources cited
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
55%
Carolina Core +0.5 This market is equivalent to betting on the away team to win or draw. Given the H2H result was a draw and Carolina Core's ability to score,...
2 sources cited
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
45%
Chattanooga Chattanooga enters this match with superior recent form (3W-1D-1L) and the advantage of playing at home. While the only head-to-head fixture...
2 sources cited
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
60%
Chattanooga Given Chattanooga's stronger recent form and home advantage, they are the favored side. Removing the draw outcome further strengthens the ho...
2 sources cited
|
|||||||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
53%
over
W
|
55%
yes
W
|
18%
1-1
L
|
30%
Draw / Draw
L
|
52%
Carolina Core
L
|
54%
Chattanooga |
55%
Chattanooga
W
|
58%
Chattanooga
W
|
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
53%
over Both teams have shown scoring potential in their recent matches, with Carolina Core scoring 11 in their last 5 and Chattanooga scoring 9. Th...
3 sources cited
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
55%
yes Carolina Core's recent scoring and conceding record (11 scored, 11 conceded in 5 games) and Chattanooga's home scoring record (9 scored in 5...
3 sources cited
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
18%
1-1 The previous encounter between these two teams ended in a 1-1 draw. Both teams have shown capability to score, and Chattanooga's solid home...
3 sources cited
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
30%
Draw / Draw The recent 1-1 draw between these two teams suggests a potential for a balanced game, possibly ending in a draw at halftime and full-time. C...
3 sources cited
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
52%
Carolina Core Carolina Core's recent away form shows they can score, as evidenced by 11 goals in their last 5 away games. While Chattanooga is strong at h...
3 sources cited
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
54%
Chattanooga Considering Chattanooga's strong home form (3W-1D-1L) and Carolina Core's mixed away form (2W-1D-2L), Chattanooga is more likely to secure a...
3 sources cited
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Chattanooga Chattanooga has superior recent home form (3W-1D-1L, 9 scored, 5 conceded) compared to Carolina Core's away form (2W-1D-2L, 11 scored, 11 co...
3 sources cited
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
58%
Chattanooga Given Chattanooga's stronger home form and the slight edge in overall performance, they are the more probable outcome. The draw no bet marke...
3 sources cited
|
|||||||||
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
50%
over
W
|
55%
yes
W
|
14%
2-1
L
|
25%
draw_home |
30%
Carolina Core
L
|
55%
Carolina Core +0.25
L
|
45%
Chattanooga
W
|
55%
Chattanooga
W
|
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
50%
over Both teams have been involved in high-scoring games recently: Carolina Core have scored 11 and conceded 11 in their last 5, while Chattanoog...
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
55%
yes Carolina Core have scored in all their recent matches, and Chattanooga have also found the net consistently. Both defenses have shown vulner...
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
14%
2-1 Chattanooga are likely to score a couple of goals given their attacking form, while Carolina Core have been scoring too. A 2-1 home win is a...
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
25%
draw_home Matches between these sides tend to be tight, with a draw at halftime likely. Chattanooga's superior second-half performance could see them...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
30%
Carolina Core A -1 spread for the home team is risky given both teams are closely matched. Carolina Core have proven they can compete, as shown by the rec...
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
55%
Carolina Core +0.25 Carolina Core have been competitive and a +0.25 handicap provides some safety against a loss. Their away form is not terrible, and they have...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
45%
Chattanooga Chattanooga have strong home form with 3 wins in their last 5 and conceded only 5 goals, while Carolina Core have been inconsistent on the r...
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
55%
Chattanooga Removing the draw, Chattanooga's stronger form and home advantage make them more likely to win outright. Carolina Core have shown they can s... |
|||||||||
Over / Under
Consensusover 3/4
Claude Haiku 4.5
—
GPT-5 Mini
—
GPT-4o Mini
—
Grok 4 Fast
54%
under
L
Home defense strong with only 5 goals conceded while both sides average around 2 goals per game combined. Outdoor venue and set-piece focus...
Gemini 2.5 Flash
60%
over
W
Carolina Core has been involved in high-scoring games recently, scoring 11 and conceding 11 in their last five, averaging 4.4 goals per game...
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
53%
over
W
Both teams have shown scoring potential in their recent matches, with Carolina Core scoring 11 in their last 5 and Chattanooga scoring 9. Th...
DeepSeek V3
50%
over
W
Both teams have been involved in high-scoring games recently: Carolina Core have scored 11 and conceded 11 in their last 5, while Chattanoog...
Both teams to score
Consensusyes 3/4
Claude Haiku 4.5
—
GPT-5 Mini
—
GPT-4o Mini
—
Grok 4 Fast
51%
no
L
Chattanooga concedes fewer goals at home reducing BTTS likelihood. Carolina Core scores freely but faces organized home defense. Recent H2H...
Gemini 2.5 Flash
65%
yes
W
Carolina Core has a potent attack, scoring 2.2 goals per game, and a very leaky defense, conceding 2.2 goals per game. The only head-to-head...
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
55%
yes
W
Carolina Core's recent scoring and conceding record (11 scored, 11 conceded in 5 games) and Chattanooga's home scoring record (9 scored in 5...
DeepSeek V3
55%
yes
W
Carolina Core have scored in all their recent matches, and Chattanooga have also found the net consistently. Both defenses have shown vulner...
Correct score
Consensus2-1 2/4
Claude Haiku 4.5
—
GPT-5 Mini
—
GPT-4o Mini
—
Grok 4 Fast
18%
1-0
L
Low scoring expected with home defensive strength. 1-0 or 2-0 plausible given form trends. Training data through 2025-09.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
18%
2-1
L
A 2-1 scoreline for Chattanooga aligns with them being slight favorites at home and both teams likely to score. Carolina Core's defensive st...
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
18%
1-1
L
The previous encounter between these two teams ended in a 1-1 draw. Both teams have shown capability to score, and Chattanooga's solid home...
DeepSeek V3
14%
2-1
L
Chattanooga are likely to score a couple of goals given their attacking form, while Carolina Core have been scoring too. A 2-1 home win is a...
Half-time / Full-time
ConsensusDraw / Draw 1/4
Claude Haiku 4.5
—
GPT-5 Mini
—
GPT-4o Mini
—
Grok 4 Fast
38%
Chattanooga / Chattanooga
Home side likely to control game from start given better form. Strong second half record supports full time home win. Training data through...
Gemini 2.5 Flash
20%
Draw / Chattanooga
Considering the only head-to-head was a draw and Carolina Core's strong attacking output, a tight first half is plausible. Chattanooga's bet...
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
30%
Draw / Draw
L
The recent 1-1 draw between these two teams suggests a potential for a balanced game, possibly ending in a draw at halftime and full-time. C...
DeepSeek V3
25%
draw_home
Matches between these sides tend to be tight, with a draw at halftime likely. Chattanooga's superior second-half performance could see them...
Spread
ConsensusCarolina Core 2/4
Claude Haiku 4.5
—
GPT-5 Mini
—
GPT-4o Mini
—
Grok 4 Fast
48%
Chattanooga -1
W
Home edge exists but margin may be narrow given Carolina Core's attacking output. Form suggests close contest where one-goal margin likely....
Gemini 2.5 Flash
45%
Carolina Core +1
L
While Chattanooga is favored, winning by more than one goal might be challenging against a Carolina Core side that scores frequently. The he...
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
52%
Carolina Core
L
Carolina Core's recent away form shows they can score, as evidenced by 11 goals in their last 5 away games. While Chattanooga is strong at h...
DeepSeek V3
30%
Carolina Core
L
A -1 spread for the home team is risky given both teams are closely matched. Carolina Core have proven they can compete, as shown by the rec...
Asian handicap
ConsensusCarolina Core +0.25 1/4
Claude Haiku 4.5
—
GPT-5 Mini
—
GPT-4o Mini
—
Grok 4 Fast
53%
Chattanooga -0.5
W
Chattanooga favored by home record and defensive stability. Slight edge on Asian line accounts for draw possibility in tight match. Training...
Gemini 2.5 Flash
55%
Carolina Core +0.5
L
This market is equivalent to betting on the away team to win or draw. Given the H2H result was a draw and Carolina Core's ability to score,...
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
54%
Chattanooga
Considering Chattanooga's strong home form (3W-1D-1L) and Carolina Core's mixed away form (2W-1D-2L), Chattanooga is more likely to secure a...
DeepSeek V3
55%
Carolina Core +0.25
L
Carolina Core have been competitive and a +0.25 handicap provides some safety against a loss. Their away form is not terrible, and they have...
Match winner
ConsensusChattanooga 4/4
Claude Haiku 4.5
—
GPT-5 Mini
—
GPT-4o Mini
—
Grok 4 Fast
52%
Chattanooga
W
Chattanooga's home form of LDWWW shows strong defensive record conceding only 5 goals in 5 matches compared to Carolina Core's leaky 11 conc...
Gemini 2.5 Flash
45%
Chattanooga
W
Chattanooga enters this match with superior recent form (3W-1D-1L) and the advantage of playing at home. While the only head-to-head fixture...
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
55%
Chattanooga
W
Chattanooga has superior recent home form (3W-1D-1L, 9 scored, 5 conceded) compared to Carolina Core's away form (2W-1D-2L, 11 scored, 11 co...
DeepSeek V3
45%
Chattanooga
W
Chattanooga have strong home form with 3 wins in their last 5 and conceded only 5 goals, while Carolina Core have been inconsistent on the r...
Draw no bet
ConsensusChattanooga 4/4
Claude Haiku 4.5
—
GPT-5 Mini
—
GPT-4o Mini
—
Grok 4 Fast
62%
Chattanooga
W
Home side has superior defensive metrics and recent results at home. Carolina Core's away record is inconsistent with only 2 wins in last 5....
Gemini 2.5 Flash
60%
Chattanooga
W
Given Chattanooga's stronger recent form and home advantage, they are the favored side. Removing the draw outcome further strengthens the ho...
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
58%
Chattanooga
W
Given Chattanooga's stronger home form and the slight edge in overall performance, they are the more probable outcome. The draw no bet marke...
DeepSeek V3
55%
Chattanooga
W
Removing the draw, Chattanooga's stronger form and home advantage make them more likely to win outright. Carolina Core have shown they can s...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winner
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Chattanooga
Grok 4 Fast
Chattanooga
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Chattanooga
DeepSeek V3
Chattanooga
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Beat the AIs · Predict the score
Picks closed
Match has already kicked off. Picks are permanent — no late entries.
Team news
ProInjuries and confirmed lineups — the same team news the AIs factored into their reads.
Team news is a Pro feature
see exactly who's out and the XIs the AIs reasoned on, before kickoff.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
1e78434ba901c640…
- Kickoff
- Sat, Aug 29 · 23:00 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Draw no bet · Over / Under 2.5 · Both teams to score · Spread -1 · Asian handicap · Half-time / Full-time · Correct score
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 8. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 8, in this order): h2h | draw_no_bet | totals_2.5 | btts | spreads_-1 | asian_handicap | ht_ft | correct_score
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 33662,
"sport": "football",
"venue": "Finley Stadium",
"league": "MLS Next Pro",
"starts_at": "2026-08-29T23:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Sat, 29 Aug 2026 23:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Carolina Core",
"home": "Chattanooga"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Weight CONFIRMED team news heavily: a missing first-choice striker, creator, or centre-back swings a match more than season-long form.",
"Compare attacking vs defensive quality directly — clean-sheet rate and goals-conceded trend often predict unders/BTTS better than the win line.",
"Set pieces decide tight games: note corner/free-kick threat and aerial mismatches.",
"Account for fixture congestion + likely rotation (midweek European or cup games before this one) and the home/away form split.",
"For outdoor venues, factor heavy rain or strong wind — both suppress goals and favour the under.",
"Tactical style matters: a high-press side vs a possession side, or two defensive setups, shapes the goals expectation."
],
"team_context": {
"note": "Reference data from our settled-results database. Verify + extend it with your own research; it is not a substitute for current team news.",
"away_form": {
"last": "LWDLW",
"record": "2W-1D-2L",
"scored": 11,
"matches": 5,
"conceded": 11
},
"home_form": {
"last": "LDWWW",
"record": "3W-1D-1L",
"scored": 9,
"matches": 5,
"conceded": 5
},
"rest_days": {
"away": 6,
"home": 6
},
"head_to_head": {
"recent": [
"2026-07-12: Carolina Core 1–1 Chattanooga"
],
"matches": 1
}
},
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"draw_no_bet",
"totals_2.5",
"btts",
"spreads_-1",
"asian_handicap",
"ht_ft",
"correct_score"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Research trail
What each AI looked up before picking
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 3 sources
3 citations captured — unlock with Pro
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 1 source
1 citation captured — unlock with Pro
Recent recaps
How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.