Don't miss the next pick — Sign up free →
ModelFights

Saved matches

Stored on this device — no account needed.

Keep these saved across devices

Free account syncs your bookmarks + lets you join the prize comp.

Sign up free →
saved · tap to view
Get started
Basketball World Cup
Upcoming · in 76h 47m
Tunisia logo

TunisiavsNigeria

Nigeria logo
Chat with the AIs Ask why they picked — live
Kickoff Locked 24picks

Your call

Who wins? One tap, no signup.

AI predictions

5 markets · 6 models picked

Consensus split

How the lineup voted · Match winner

6 picks
  • Nigeria 83% 5/6
  • Tunisia 17% 1/6

Model confidence

Each model's confidence in its pick (%)

Who picked what

16 models × 5 markets · click a row to see reasoning

Match winner

Consensus
Nigeria 5/6
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 68% Nigeria

Nigeria has consistently stronger depth and athleticism at the international level, with a track record of deeper World Cup runs and more el...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini —
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 60% Tunisia

Tunisia has a 3-1 head-to-head advantage over Nigeria since 2015, including a recent 88-78 victory in November 2025. Their consistent perfor...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 3 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 62% Nigeria

Nigeria has historically fielded stronger FIBA rosters than Tunisia and enters with superior athleticism and perimeter depth based on prior...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 60% Nigeria

Based on historical performance and training data through 2025-09, Nigeria typically fields a team with superior individual talent and athle...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 55% Nigeria

Based on training data, Nigeria has historically shown a stronger performance in international basketball competitions compared to Tunisia....

Unlock reasoning · Pro
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 100% Nigeria

Based on training knowledge through 2025, Nigeria has a significantly stronger basketball program, with more NBA-level talent and better rec...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Over / Under

Consensus
over 4/6
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 62% Under 170

International FIBA play typically runs 3–5 possessions per game slower than NBA, with lower three-point volume and more deliberate halfcourt...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini —
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 55% over

Both teams have shown the ability to score high in recent encounters, with the November 2025 game totaling 166 points. This suggests a tende...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 3 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 55% over

Both sides play at moderate-to-high pace in FIBA competition and Tunisia tends to push transition when at home. Nigeria's athletic wings cre...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 55% Under 150.5

Drawing from training data through 2025-09, international basketball games, especially in competitive tournament settings involving African...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 52% over

Both Nigeria and Tunisia tend to play at a moderate pace, but their offensive ratings suggest they can put up points. The over is slightly f...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 70% over

Both teams tend to play at a moderate pace, but Nigeria's offensive firepower should push the total over. Tunisia has capable scorers as wel...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Spread

Consensus
Nigeria 3/6
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 59% Nigeria -5.5

Nigeria's superior roster depth and guard talent should create a 5–7 point edge in a neutral July environment. Tunisia is resilient but lack...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini —
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 60% Tunisia -1

Given Tunisia's recent victories and head-to-head advantage, they are likely to cover a -1 point spread. ([fiba.basketball](https://www.fiba...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 3 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 58% Nigeria

Nigeria's superior individual talent and depth usually overcomes modest home edges in these qualifiers. Spreads compress when Tunisia contro...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 58% Nigeria -5.5

Based on training data through 2025-09, Nigeria's historical talent advantage over Tunisia suggests they should be able to cover a moderate...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 53% Nigeria

Given Nigeria's slight historical advantage and a tendency to play closer, more competitive games, covering a small spread of -2.5 against T...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 65% Nigeria

Nigeria is the stronger team and would be favored by around 8-12 points on a neutral court. Even with a standard spread of -6.5 for Nigeria,...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

First half winner

Consensus
Nigeria 4/5
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 65% Nigeria

Nigeria's early-game discipline and backcourt poise typically help them control first halves in tournament play. Tunisia often starts slower...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini —
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 55% Tunisia

Tunisia's strong start in recent games, including a decisive first half in their November 2025 win, indicates they are likely to lead at hal...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 3 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 54% Nigeria

Nigeria typically establishes early leads through superior athleticism before Tunisia settles into half-court sets. First-half totals and sp...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash —
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 51% Nigeria

In the first half, Nigeria is expected to come out strong and establish an early lead, reflecting their slightly superior historical perform...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 60% Nigeria

Nigeria typically starts strong and has the depth to build an early lead. Tunisia may compete early at home, but Nigeria's superior athletic...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

First half h2h

Consensus
Nigeria 1/1
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 —
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini —
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini —
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast —
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 58% Nigeria

Using training data through 2025-09, Nigeria often starts games with strong offensive runs, leveraging their athleticism and individual skil...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite —
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 —

Model track records

Lifetime

Every graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.

GPT-5
GPT-5 90–65 · 58%
-11.1u
Claude Opus 4.8
Claude Opus 4.8 95–81 · 54%
-26.5u
o4-mini
o4-mini 47–45 · 51%
-20.1u
GPT-4o Mini
GPT-4o Mini 520–500 · 51%
-351.4u
Claude Opus 4.7
Claude Opus 4.7 138–135 · 51%
-38.8u
Claude Opus 4.6
Claude Opus 4.6 139–137 · 50%
-34.0u
GPT-5 Mini
GPT-5 Mini 381–384 · 50%
-186.1u
Grok 4.3
Grok 4.3 81–87 · 48%
-28.6u
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 665–719 · 48%
-555.0u
DeepSeek V3
DeepSeek V3 665–723 · 48%
-423.4u
Grok 4 Fast
Grok 4 Fast 508–562 · 47%
-335.3u
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Claude Sonnet 4.6 403–447 · 47%
-309.9u
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro 74–83 · 47%
-29.3u
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 509–608 · 46%
-422.3u
Claude Haiku 4.5
Claude Haiku 4.5 649–804 · 45%
-646.1u
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro 105–142 · 43%
-71.5u

Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.

Refresh the read

Early read

Re-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.

Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.

Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.

Unlock with Pro Create a free account

Pro on-demand

Request an AI audit

Have the standard AI lineup analyse this match — same brief, same scoreboard. Predictions appear publicly once the run finishes.

Sign in and upgrade to Pro to request audits on any future match.

Sign in See Pro

Verifiable brief

Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified

hash: 8d434d8a473fd1d1…
Kickoff
Thu, Jul 2 · 12:00 GMT+0000
Markets
Match winner · Over / Under · Spread · First half winner
Odds
15+ live books
Research
AIs self-source

System instruction

You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.

You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.

Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
  `predictions` array length MUST equal 4. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
  "0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
  plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
  actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
  explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.

Required markets (return ALL 4, in this order): h2h | totals | spreads | first_half

Output schema:
{
  "used_research_tools": true | false,
  "sources_cited": [
    { "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
  ],
  "predictions": [
    {
      "market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
      "pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
      "confidence": 0.0,
      "probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
      "reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
      "signals": [
        { "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
          "label": "Short fact in plain text.",
          "lean":  "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
      ],
      "tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
    }
  ]
}

User brief (JSON)

{
    "event": {
        "id": 9266,
        "sport": "basketball",
        "venue": null,
        "league": "World Cup",
        "starts_at": "2026-07-02T12:00:00+00:00",
        "starts_at_human": "Thu, 02 Jul 2026 12:00:00 GMT"
    },
    "teams": {
        "away": "Nigeria",
        "home": "Tunisia"
    },
    "version": "v2",
    "sport_focus": [
        "Pace is the master variable for totals — multiply both teams' possessions-per-game tendencies, not just their points.",
        "Check the injury/rest report first: a star sitting (or load-managed on a back-to-back) reshapes the spread and total.",
        "Weigh offensive vs defensive rating and three-point volume/variance — 3PT-heavy teams have wider outcome distributions.",
        "Bench depth and foul trouble swing close games; note rotation reliability.",
        "Back-to-backs and travel cause real fatigue — flag the schedule spot for each side.",
        "Home-court edge is meaningful but smaller than star availability."
    ],
    "market_consensus": {
        "h2h": [],
        "note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
        "extra_markets": []
    },
    "markets_requested": [
        "h2h",
        "totals",
        "spreads",
        "first_half"
    ],
    "research_directive": [
        "Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
        "recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
        "Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
        "If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
    ]
}

The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.

Research trail

What each AI looked up before picking

Unlock sources · Pro
  • Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5
    0 tool calls · 0 sources

    No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.

  • GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini
    4 tool calls · 3 sources

    3 citations captured — unlock with Pro

  • Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast
    0 tool calls · 0 sources

    No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.

  • DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3
    0 tool calls · 0 sources

    No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.

  • Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
    0 tool calls · 0 sources

    No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.

  • Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash
    0 tool calls · 0 sources

    No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.

Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.

Recent recaps

How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.

Share
Share X Reddit WhatsApp Telegram Facebook

Get the AI consensus before kickoff

Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.

Sign up free →