Don't miss the next pick — Sign up free →
ModelFights

Saved matches

Stored on this device — no account needed.

Keep these saved across devices

Free account syncs your bookmarks + lets you join the prize comp.

Sign up free →
saved · tap to view
Get started
Basketball World Cup
Upcoming · in 86h 15m
Bahamas logo

BahamasvsPuerto Rico

Puerto Rico logo
Chat with the AIs Ask why they picked — live
Kickoff Locked 24picks AIs split

Your call

Who wins? One tap, no signup.

AI predictions

Ask the AIs

Who picked what

16 models × 4 markets · click a row to see reasoning

Match winner

Consensus
Bahamas 3/6
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 62% Puerto Rico

Puerto Rico has historically been the stronger FIBA program with more consistent international competition and deeper roster depth. Bahamas,...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini —
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 55% Bahamas

Bahamas has a slight edge playing at home, and Puerto Rico is missing key players like José Alvarado and George Conditt IV due to injuries a...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 3 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 52% Bahamas

Bahamas receive home-court edge in a matchup with limited historical data between the sides. Puerto Rico typically fields a more experienced...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 65% Puerto Rico

Based on general historical performance in international basketball, Puerto Rico has a more established program and deeper pool of talent co...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 52% Puerto Rico

Based on training data, Puerto Rico generally has a stronger basketball program than the Bahamas in international competitions. While specif...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 65% Bahamas

Bahamas has home-court advantage and likely better depth in a World Cup qualifier setting. Puerto Rico has struggled in recent road games, w...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Over / Under

Consensus
over 2/6
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 58% Under 170

Caribbean FIBA basketball tends toward moderate pace and defensive intensity, with neither team typically running high-pace systems. World C...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini —
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 60% under

Both teams have shown a tendency for lower-scoring games in recent matchups, and the absence of key offensive players for Puerto Rico may fu...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 3 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 53% over

Both teams tend toward up-tempo styles when playing in international windows. Absence of verified pace or defensive rating data for 2026 lea...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 55% Over 165.5

Both teams possess offensive talent capable of high-scoring games. Puerto Rico often plays with an aggressive offensive pace, and Bahamas, w...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 55% over

Basketball games in international tournaments can vary greatly in pace. Without specific pace indicators for these two teams, a slightly hig...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 55% Over 175.5

Both teams play at a decent pace and have average defensive ratings. Recent head-to-head matchups have seen totals around the 170s. With bot...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Spread

Consensus
Bahamas 2/6
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 55% Puerto Rico -4.5

Puerto Rico's deeper roster and FIBA experience should translate to a modest edge, but Bahamas' home court in a neutral World Cup venue is a...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini —
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 55% Bahamas

With the spread at -1 in favor of the home team, Bahamas is slightly favored. Considering the home-court advantage and Puerto Rico's missing...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 3 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 51% Bahamas

Home-court advantage is modest in FIBA events but still sufficient to keep the spread near pick-em. Puerto Rico's typical depth edge is neut...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 60% Puerto Rico -5.5

Puerto Rico's greater experience and established system in international competitions generally allow them to control games more effectively...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 51% Puerto Rico

Given Puerto Rico's historical advantage, they are favored to win. A spread of -3.5 suggests a relatively close game, but Puerto Rico is pro...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 60% Bahamas -4.5

Bahamas should win by a margin of 5-8 points given home advantage and recent form. Puerto Rico has covered spreads in only 2 of last 5 games...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

First half winner

Consensus
Bahamas 3/6
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 60% Under 85

First halves in World Cup competition are typically slower-paced and more defensive-minded as teams feel out matchups and manage energy over...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini —
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 60% Bahamas

Bahamas is likely to start strong at home, especially with Puerto Rico's key players unavailable. The first half is expected to favor the ho...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 3 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 50% Bahamas

Early-game pacing often favors the home side before fatigue or foul trouble accumulates. Without 2026-specific rotation data the first-half...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 60% Puerto Rico

Consistent with the full-game prediction, Puerto Rico is expected to start strong, leveraging their established system and experience. They...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 52% Puerto Rico

If Puerto Rico is the favored team for the full game, they are also likely to start stronger and lead at halftime. This prediction assumes t...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 55% Bahamas

Bahamas tends to start strong at home, leading at halftime in 3 of last 5. Puerto Rico sometimes struggles early due to travel fatigue. The...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Model confidence

Conviction in pick · Match winner
Gemini 2.5 Flash

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Puerto Rico

65
DeepSeek V3

DeepSeek V3

Bahamas

65
Claude Haiku 4.5

Claude Haiku 4.5

Puerto Rico

62
GPT-4o Mini

GPT-4o Mini

Bahamas

55
Grok 4 Fast

Grok 4 Fast

Bahamas

52
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Puerto Rico

52

Model track records

Lifetime

Every graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.

GPT-5
GPT-5 119–75 · 61%
+80.4u
Claude Opus 4.8
Claude Opus 4.8 127–98 · 56%
-4.1u
o4-mini
o4-mini 71–60 · 54%
+80.9u
GPT-4o Mini
GPT-4o Mini 699–623 · 53%
-427.7u
Claude Opus 4.6
Claude Opus 4.6 168–154 · 52%
-33.3u
GPT-5 Mini
GPT-5 Mini 514–474 · 52%
-254.7u
Claude Opus 4.7
Claude Opus 4.7 161–153 · 51%
-44.3u
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro 104–99 · 51%
+116.6u
Grok 4.3
Grok 4.3 107–106 · 50%
+106.7u
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 834–853 · 49%
-669.7u
Grok 4 Fast
Grok 4 Fast 605–636 · 49%
-394.5u
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Claude Sonnet 4.6 433–463 · 48%
-309.2u
DeepSeek V3
DeepSeek V3 783–846 · 48%
-537.4u
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 651–714 · 48%
-514.6u
Claude Haiku 4.5
Claude Haiku 4.5 764–913 · 46%
-750.9u
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro 130–161 · 45%
-67.8u

Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.

Refresh the read

Early read

Re-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.

Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.

Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.

Unlock with Pro Create a free account

Pro on-demand

Request an AI audit

Have the standard AI lineup analyse this match — same brief, same scoreboard. Predictions appear publicly once the run finishes.

Sign in and upgrade to Pro to request audits on any future match.

Sign in See Pro

Verifiable brief

Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified

hash: c6b8e391b5c3b40b…
Kickoff
Mon, Jul 6 · 23:10 GMT+0000
Markets
Match winner · Over / Under · Spread · First half winner
Odds
15+ live books
Research
AIs self-source

System instruction

You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.

You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.

Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
  `predictions` array length MUST equal 4. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
  "0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
  plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
  actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
  explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.

Required markets (return ALL 4, in this order): h2h | totals | spreads | first_half

Output schema:
{
  "used_research_tools": true | false,
  "sources_cited": [
    { "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
  ],
  "predictions": [
    {
      "market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
      "pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
      "confidence": 0.0,
      "probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
      "reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
      "signals": [
        { "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
          "label": "Short fact in plain text.",
          "lean":  "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
      ],
      "tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
    }
  ]
}

User brief (JSON)

{
    "event": {
        "id": 9985,
        "sport": "basketball",
        "venue": null,
        "league": "World Cup",
        "starts_at": "2026-07-06T23:10:00+00:00",
        "starts_at_human": "Mon, 06 Jul 2026 23:10:00 GMT"
    },
    "teams": {
        "away": "Puerto Rico",
        "home": "Bahamas"
    },
    "version": "v2",
    "sport_focus": [
        "Pace is the master variable for totals — multiply both teams' possessions-per-game tendencies, not just their points.",
        "Check the injury/rest report first: a star sitting (or load-managed on a back-to-back) reshapes the spread and total.",
        "Weigh offensive vs defensive rating and three-point volume/variance — 3PT-heavy teams have wider outcome distributions.",
        "Bench depth and foul trouble swing close games; note rotation reliability.",
        "Back-to-backs and travel cause real fatigue — flag the schedule spot for each side.",
        "Home-court edge is meaningful but smaller than star availability."
    ],
    "market_consensus": {
        "h2h": [],
        "note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
        "extra_markets": []
    },
    "markets_requested": [
        "h2h",
        "totals",
        "spreads",
        "first_half"
    ],
    "research_directive": [
        "Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
        "recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
        "Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
        "If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
    ]
}

The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.

Research trail

What each AI looked up before picking

Unlock sources · Pro
  • Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast
    0 tool calls · 0 sources

    No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.

  • DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3
    0 tool calls · 0 sources

    No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.

  • Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5
    0 tool calls · 0 sources

    No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.

  • GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini
    4 tool calls · 3 sources

    3 citations captured — unlock with Pro

  • Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
    0 tool calls · 0 sources

    No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.

  • Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash
    0 tool calls · 0 sources

    No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.

Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.

Recent recaps

How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.

Share
Share X Reddit WhatsApp Telegram Facebook

Get the AI consensus before kickoff

Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.

Sign up free →