Toronto TempovsWashington Mystics
WMYour call
Who wins? One tap, no signup.
AI predictions
5 markets · 6 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 5 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
|
First half winner
?
First half winner
First-half winner. Who is ahead at the half-time whistle.
|
First half h2h
?
First half h2h
Market explanation coming soon.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Washington Mystics 4/6 models |
over 3/6 models |
Washington Mystics 2/6 models |
Toronto Tempo 2/5 models |
Washington Mystics 1/1 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
55%
Washington Mystics |
62%
Over 162.5 |
58%
Toronto Tempo -3.5 |
60%
Over 80 |
— | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Washington Mystics Washington won the recent head-to-head matchup (86–85 on 2026-06-12) and carries momentum into this fixture. Both teams are well-rested with...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
62%
Over 162.5 Toronto's recent output (191 and 188 points across 2 matches; 189.5 PPG average) and Washington's 86-point performance on 2026-06-12 suggest...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
58%
Toronto Tempo -3.5 Home-court advantage at Coca-Cola Coliseum, combined with Toronto's higher recent scoring output (189.5 PPG vs Washington's 86 PPG), support...
First half winner
?
First half winner
First-half winner. Who is ahead at the half-time whistle.
60%
Over 80 Toronto's recent full-game totals (191, 188) imply strong first-half scoring; a typical 50–55% split suggests 95–104 points in first halves....
First half h2h
?
First half h2h
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market. |
||||||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | — | — | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
First half winner
?
First half winner
First-half winner. Who is ahead at the half-time whistle.
No pick on this market.
First half h2h
?
First half h2h
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market. |
||||||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
55%
Toronto Tempo |
60%
over |
55%
Toronto Tempo |
55%
Toronto Tempo |
— | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Toronto Tempo The Toronto Tempo have a strong home record (5-5) compared to the Washington Mystics' away record (6-5). Additionally, the Mystics have a re...
🔍 researched
4 sources cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
over Both teams have high-scoring offenses, with the Mystics averaging 81.1 points per game and the Tempo averaging 89.3 points per game. This su...
🔍 researched
4 sources cited
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
55%
Toronto Tempo The Toronto Tempo's home advantage and the Mystics' recent away loss suggest the Tempo may cover the spread. ([sportbusy.com](https://www.sp...
🔍 researched
4 sources cited
First half winner
?
First half winner
First-half winner. Who is ahead at the half-time whistle.
55%
Toronto Tempo The Tempo's home advantage and the Mystics' recent away loss suggest the Tempo may lead at halftime. ([sportbusy.com](https://www.sportbusy....
🔍 researched
4 sources cited
First half h2h
?
First half h2h
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market. |
||||||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
52%
Washington Mystics |
55%
over |
51%
Washington Mystics |
50%
Washington Mystics |
— | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
52%
Washington Mystics Washington Mystics defeated Toronto Tempo 86-85 in their only prior meeting and enter with a clean recent record. Toronto is an expansion si...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over Both clubs posted high-scoring recent games and share long rest that favors full offensive output. Expansion Toronto has shown defensive inc...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
51%
Washington Mystics Mystics hold the head-to-head edge and road form while Toronto remains unproven at home. Long rest equalizes preparation. Training data thro...
First half winner
?
First half winner
First-half winner. Who is ahead at the half-time whistle.
50%
Washington Mystics Early-game variance is high for an expansion home side; Mystics' veteran experience gives a slight edge in the opening 20 minutes. Training...
First half h2h
?
First half h2h
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market. |
||||||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
52%
Toronto Tempo |
52%
Under |
52%
Toronto Tempo -1.5 |
51%
Toronto Tempo |
— | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
52%
Toronto Tempo Based on training data and the provided context for this future event, Toronto Tempo gets a slight edge at home. The single head-to-head mat...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
52%
Under The only head-to-head match between these teams ended with a total of 171 points (86-85), which is exactly on the assumed line of 171.5. Whi...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
52%
Toronto Tempo -1.5 Despite losing the previous H2H by a single point, Toronto Tempo is now playing at home. Home-court advantage is a significant factor in bas...
First half winner
?
First half winner
First-half winner. Who is ahead at the half-time whistle.
51%
Toronto Tempo Aligning with the full-game prediction, I anticipate Toronto Tempo to come out strong at home, aiming to establish an early lead. The tight...
First half h2h
?
First half h2h
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market. |
||||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
65%
Washington Mystics |
55%
over |
58%
Washington Mystics |
— |
60%
Washington Mystics |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Washington Mystics The Washington Mystics won their only head-to-head match against the Toronto Tempo by a single point, indicating a close contest. However, t...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over The Toronto Tempo's recent matches have been extremely high-scoring, with a combined score of 379 points in two games. The Washington Mystic...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
58%
Washington Mystics The only head-to-head result was a one-point victory for the Mystics, suggesting close games. However, the Mystics' recent win was by a sing...
First half winner
?
First half winner
First-half winner. Who is ahead at the half-time whistle.
No pick on this market.
First half h2h
?
First half h2h
Market explanation coming soon.
60%
Washington Mystics The Mystics won their only meeting by a single point. While this was a full game result, it suggests they can close out tight matches. Witho... |
||||||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
55%
Washington Mystics |
52%
over 163.5 |
55%
Washington Mystics +1.5 |
53%
Washington Mystics |
— | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Washington Mystics Washington won the only head-to-head meeting 86-85 earlier this season and has a slight edge in recent form. Toronto's record is just 1-1, a...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
52%
over 163.5 Recent games between these teams and their individual scoring averages suggest a relatively high-scoring matchup. The first meeting totaled...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
55%
Washington Mystics +1.5 Given the close nature of the first matchup and Washington's win, the Mystics should be competitive even as slight underdogs. A +1.5 spread...
First half winner
?
First half winner
First-half winner. Who is ahead at the half-time whistle.
53%
Washington Mystics First half outcomes are often correlated with overall game results but more volatile. Washington's slight edge in form and head-to-head sugg...
First half h2h
?
First half h2h
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market. |
||||||
Match winner
ConsensusWashington Mystics 4/6
Washington won the recent head-to-head matchup (86–85 on 2026-06-12) and carries momentum into this fixture. Both teams are well-rested with...
The Toronto Tempo have a strong home record (5-5) compared to the Washington Mystics' away record (6-5). Additionally, the Mystics have a re...
Washington Mystics defeated Toronto Tempo 86-85 in their only prior meeting and enter with a clean recent record. Toronto is an expansion si...
Based on training data and the provided context for this future event, Toronto Tempo gets a slight edge at home. The single head-to-head mat...
The Washington Mystics won their only head-to-head match against the Toronto Tempo by a single point, indicating a close contest. However, t...
Washington won the only head-to-head meeting 86-85 earlier this season and has a slight edge in recent form. Toronto's record is just 1-1, a...
Over / Under
Consensusover 3/6
Toronto's recent output (191 and 188 points across 2 matches; 189.5 PPG average) and Washington's 86-point performance on 2026-06-12 suggest...
Both teams have high-scoring offenses, with the Mystics averaging 81.1 points per game and the Tempo averaging 89.3 points per game. This su...
Both clubs posted high-scoring recent games and share long rest that favors full offensive output. Expansion Toronto has shown defensive inc...
The only head-to-head match between these teams ended with a total of 171 points (86-85), which is exactly on the assumed line of 171.5. Whi...
The Toronto Tempo's recent matches have been extremely high-scoring, with a combined score of 379 points in two games. The Washington Mystic...
Recent games between these teams and their individual scoring averages suggest a relatively high-scoring matchup. The first meeting totaled...
Spread
ConsensusWashington Mystics 2/6
Home-court advantage at Coca-Cola Coliseum, combined with Toronto's higher recent scoring output (189.5 PPG vs Washington's 86 PPG), support...
The Toronto Tempo's home advantage and the Mystics' recent away loss suggest the Tempo may cover the spread. ([sportbusy.com](https://www.sp...
Mystics hold the head-to-head edge and road form while Toronto remains unproven at home. Long rest equalizes preparation. Training data thro...
Despite losing the previous H2H by a single point, Toronto Tempo is now playing at home. Home-court advantage is a significant factor in bas...
The only head-to-head result was a one-point victory for the Mystics, suggesting close games. However, the Mystics' recent win was by a sing...
Given the close nature of the first matchup and Washington's win, the Mystics should be competitive even as slight underdogs. A +1.5 spread...
First half winner
ConsensusToronto Tempo 2/5
Toronto's recent full-game totals (191, 188) imply strong first-half scoring; a typical 50–55% split suggests 95–104 points in first halves....
The Tempo's home advantage and the Mystics' recent away loss suggest the Tempo may lead at halftime. ([sportbusy.com](https://www.sportbusy....
Early-game variance is high for an expansion home side; Mystics' veteran experience gives a slight edge in the opening 20 minutes. Training...
Aligning with the full-game prediction, I anticipate Toronto Tempo to come out strong at home, aiming to establish an early lead. The tight...
First half outcomes are often correlated with overall game results but more volatile. Washington's slight edge in form and head-to-head sugg...
First half h2h
ConsensusWashington Mystics 1/1
The Mystics won their only meeting by a single point. While this was a full game result, it suggests they can close out tight matches. Witho...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Washington Mystics
Claude Haiku 4.5
Washington Mystics
GPT-4o Mini
Toronto Tempo
DeepSeek V3
Washington Mystics
Grok 4 Fast
Washington Mystics
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Toronto Tempo
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Refresh the read
Early readRe-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.
Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.
Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
4f1a64ad2e3b81a6…
- Kickoff
- Tue, Jul 14 · 23:00 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Over / Under · Spread · First half winner
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 4. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 4, in this order): h2h | totals | spreads | first_half
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 12543,
"sport": "basketball",
"venue": "Coca-Cola Coliseum",
"league": "WNBA",
"starts_at": "2026-07-14T23:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Tue, 14 Jul 2026 23:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Washington Mystics",
"home": "Toronto Tempo"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Pace is the master variable for totals — multiply both teams' possessions-per-game tendencies, not just their points.",
"Check the injury/rest report first: a star sitting (or load-managed on a back-to-back) reshapes the spread and total.",
"Weigh offensive vs defensive rating and three-point volume/variance — 3PT-heavy teams have wider outcome distributions.",
"Bench depth and foul trouble swing close games; note rotation reliability.",
"Back-to-backs and travel cause real fatigue — flag the schedule spot for each side.",
"Home-court edge is meaningful but smaller than star availability."
],
"team_context": {
"note": "Reference data from our settled-results database. Verify + extend it with your own research; it is not a substitute for current team news.",
"away_form": {
"last": "W",
"record": "1W-0D-0L",
"scored": 86,
"matches": 1,
"conceded": 85
},
"home_form": {
"last": "LW",
"record": "1W-0D-1L",
"scored": 191,
"matches": 2,
"conceded": 188
},
"rest_days": {
"away": 31,
"home": 31
},
"head_to_head": {
"recent": [
"2026-06-12: Washington Mystics 86–85 Toronto Tempo"
],
"matches": 1
}
},
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals",
"spreads",
"first_half"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Research trail
What each AI looked up before picking
-
4 tool calls · 4 sources
4 citations captured — unlock with Pro
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.
Recent recaps
How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.