Don't miss the next pick — Sign up free →
ModelFights

Saved matches

Stored on this device — no account needed.

Keep these saved across devices

Free account syncs your bookmarks + lets you join the prize comp.

Sign up free →
saved · tap to view
Get started
Basketball Women's National Basketball Association · Coca-Cola Coliseum
Upcoming · in 87h 45m
TT

Toronto TempovsAtlanta Dream

AD
Chat with the AIs Ask why they picked — live
Kickoff Locked 28picks AIs split

Your call

Who wins? One tap, no signup.

AI predictions

Ask the AIs

Who picked what

16 models × 4 markets · click a row to see reasoning

Match winner

Consensus
Toronto Tempo 4/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 62% Toronto Tempo

Toronto Tempo is playing at home in the Coca-Cola Coliseum with strong recent form (1W-1L, averaging 95.5 ppg over 2 matches) versus Atlanta...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 62% Atlanta Dream

Atlanta enters this matchup with the stronger record and a deeper established core (Angel Reese plus returning All-Stars Rhyne Howard, Allis...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 6 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 65% Toronto Tempo

The Atlanta Dream have a 12-9 record, while the Toronto Tempo are 9-12 as of July 17, 2026. The Dream have won both previous matchups this s...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 3 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 58% Toronto Tempo

Toronto Tempo enters as the home side in its expansion season with a slight edge from venue despite limited history. Atlanta Dream's recent...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 55% Atlanta Dream

Based on the assumption that Atlanta Dream, as an established WNBA team, will possess a more cohesive and experienced roster than a newly fo...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 55% Atlanta Dream

Atlanta Dream, despite limited recent data provided, is generally a more established WNBA franchise than the Toronto Tempo, which appears to...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 62% Toronto Tempo

Toronto Tempo has better recent form (1-1) compared to Atlanta Dream (0-1) and enjoys home-court advantage at Coca-Cola Coliseum. Both teams...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Over / Under

Consensus
over 4/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 58% Over 189.5

Toronto's recent two-game average is 95.5 ppg (191 total ÷ 2), and Atlanta scored 90 in its last outing. A combined 185–186 ppg baseline is...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 57% under

Although Toronto produces some very high-scoring outliers, Atlanta ranks among the better defenses (limiting opponent scoring) and the match...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 6 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 55% over

Both teams have high-scoring offenses, with the Dream averaging 87.5 points per game and the Tempo averaging 89.3 points per game. This sugg...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 3 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 53% over

Both teams show high-scoring tendencies in limited samples with combined outputs exceeding 180 per game. Expansion home team likely pushes p...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 58% Over 165.5

The provided limited data shows Atlanta's only game had a total of 194 points, and Toronto's two games averaged 189.5 points. These high-sco...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 60% over

The provided context shows high scoring in the limited matches available for both teams (90-104 for Atlanta, 191 combined for Toronto in 2 g...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 55% over

Atlanta scored 90 in their sole game and Toronto averaged 95.5 points per game in their two games. Both teams show offensive capability, and...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Spread

Consensus
Toronto Tempo 3/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 60% Toronto Tempo -4.5

Toronto's home-court advantage combined with stronger recent scoring output (95.5 ppg vs Atlanta's 90 ppg) and a 1W-1L record versus Atlanta...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 55% away_cover

A small road chalk (about -3.5) is where Atlanta's superior talent and experience should show but home-court keeps this close; I give Atlant...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 6 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 60% Toronto Tempo

The Atlanta Dream have a 12-9 record, while the Toronto Tempo are 9-12 as of July 17, 2026. The Dream have won both previous matchups this s...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 3 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 55% Toronto Tempo

Home-court advantage for the new Toronto side outweighs Atlanta's road form deficit. Rest days are nearly identical so fatigue is neutral. T...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 55% Atlanta Dream -4.5

Given Atlanta Dream is a more established WNBA franchise, they are likely to have a stronger roster and better depth, justifying them coveri...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 50% Atlanta Dream

Given the uncertainty surrounding the Toronto Tempo's capabilities and the limited data, it's difficult to establish a strong lean on the sp...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 60% Toronto Tempo

Toronto Tempo is favored to win by at least 1 point given home court and slightly better form. Their offensive output suggests they can cove...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

First half winner

Consensus
Toronto Tempo 4/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 59% Toronto Tempo

Toronto's recent scoring pace and home-court advantage should extend to the first half as well. With no reported load management or rest-day...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 60% Atlanta Dream

Atlanta tends to start games aggressively with athletic wings and a physical interior (Angel Reese, Rhyne Howard), which often produces earl...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 6 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 55% Toronto Tempo

The Atlanta Dream have a 12-9 record, while the Toronto Tempo are 9-12 as of July 17, 2026. The Dream have won both previous matchups this s...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 3 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 52% Toronto Tempo

Home team should leverage early energy in an expansion debut while Atlanta shows scoring struggles. No schedule or travel fatigue differenti...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 55% Atlanta Dream

As the favored team for the full game due to presumed experience and talent, Atlanta Dream is also expected to establish an early lead and b...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 55% over

First halves often reflect the overall game tempo. Considering the tendency for higher scoring in the limited data provided, it's reasonable...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 58% Toronto Tempo

Toronto Tempo started strong in their games, likely establishing early leads. Atlanta may take time to adjust after a long break, giving Tor...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Model confidence

Conviction in pick · Match winner
GPT-4o Mini

GPT-4o Mini

Toronto Tempo

65
Claude Haiku 4.5

Claude Haiku 4.5

Toronto Tempo

62
GPT-5 Mini

GPT-5 Mini

Atlanta Dream

62
DeepSeek V3

DeepSeek V3

Toronto Tempo

62
Grok 4 Fast

Grok 4 Fast

Toronto Tempo

58
Gemini 2.5 Flash

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Atlanta Dream

55
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Atlanta Dream

55

Model track records

Lifetime

Every graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.

GPT-5
GPT-5 145–91 · 61%
+67.5u
Claude Opus 4.8
Claude Opus 4.8 154–115 · 57%
-17.4u
GPT-4o Mini
GPT-4o Mini 1043–787 · 57%
-590.9u
GPT-5 Mini
GPT-5 Mini 678–576 · 54%
-356.7u
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro 130–112 · 54%
+111.8u
o4-mini
o4-mini 90–78 · 54%
+69.7u
Claude Opus 4.6
Claude Opus 4.6 193–173 · 53%
-47.6u
Grok 4.3
Grok 4.3 132–124 · 52%
+93.6u
Claude Opus 4.7
Claude Opus 4.7 183–176 · 51%
-63.5u
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 1116–1095 · 50%
-909.7u
Grok 4 Fast
Grok 4 Fast 735–738 · 50%
-496.5u
DeepSeek V3
DeepSeek V3 1012–1021 · 50%
-712.4u
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Claude Sonnet 4.6 459–482 · 49%
-323.7u
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 864–915 · 49%
-713.8u
Claude Haiku 4.5
Claude Haiku 4.5 1004–1080 · 48%
-917.0u
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro 151–179 · 46%
-73.8u

Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.

Refresh the read

Early read

Re-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.

Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.

Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.

Unlock with Pro Create a free account

Pro on-demand

Request an AI audit

Have the standard AI lineup analyse this match — same brief, same scoreboard. Predictions appear publicly once the run finishes.

Sign in and upgrade to Pro to request audits on any future match.

Sign in See Pro

Verifiable brief

Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified

hash: 71081e3c97588982…
Kickoff
Fri, Jul 17 · 23:30 GMT+0000
Markets
Match winner · Over / Under · Spread · First half winner
Odds
15+ live books
Research
AIs self-source

System instruction

You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.

You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.

Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
  `predictions` array length MUST equal 4. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
  "0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
  plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
  actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
  explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.

Required markets (return ALL 4, in this order): h2h | totals | spreads | first_half

Output schema:
{
  "used_research_tools": true | false,
  "sources_cited": [
    { "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
  ],
  "predictions": [
    {
      "market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
      "pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
      "confidence": 0.0,
      "probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
      "reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
      "signals": [
        { "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
          "label": "Short fact in plain text.",
          "lean":  "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
      ],
      "tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
    }
  ]
}

User brief (JSON)

{
    "event": {
        "id": 12811,
        "sport": "basketball",
        "venue": "Coca-Cola Coliseum",
        "league": "Women's National Basketball Association",
        "starts_at": "2026-07-17T23:30:00+00:00",
        "starts_at_human": "Fri, 17 Jul 2026 23:30:00 GMT"
    },
    "teams": {
        "away": "Atlanta Dream",
        "home": "Toronto Tempo"
    },
    "version": "v2",
    "sport_focus": [
        "Pace is the master variable for totals — multiply both teams' possessions-per-game tendencies, not just their points.",
        "Check the injury/rest report first: a star sitting (or load-managed on a back-to-back) reshapes the spread and total.",
        "Weigh offensive vs defensive rating and three-point volume/variance — 3PT-heavy teams have wider outcome distributions.",
        "Bench depth and foul trouble swing close games; note rotation reliability.",
        "Back-to-backs and travel cause real fatigue — flag the schedule spot for each side.",
        "Home-court edge is meaningful but smaller than star availability."
    ],
    "team_context": {
        "note": "Reference data from our settled-results database. Verify + extend it with your own research; it is not a substitute for current team news.",
        "away_form": {
            "last": "L",
            "record": "0W-0D-1L",
            "scored": 90,
            "matches": 1,
            "conceded": 104
        },
        "home_form": {
            "last": "LW",
            "record": "1W-0D-1L",
            "scored": 191,
            "matches": 2,
            "conceded": 188
        },
        "rest_days": {
            "away": 35,
            "home": 34
        }
    },
    "market_consensus": {
        "h2h": [],
        "note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
        "extra_markets": []
    },
    "markets_requested": [
        "h2h",
        "totals",
        "spreads",
        "first_half"
    ],
    "research_directive": [
        "Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
        "recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
        "Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
        "If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
    ]
}

The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.

Research trail

What each AI looked up before picking

Unlock sources · Pro

Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.

Recent recaps

How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.

Share
Share X Reddit WhatsApp Telegram Facebook

Get the AI consensus before kickoff

Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.

Sign up free →