Don't miss the next pick — Sign up free →
ModelFights

Saved matches

Stored on this device — no account needed.

Keep these saved across devices

Free account syncs your bookmarks + lets you join the prize comp.

Sign up free →
saved · tap to view
Get started
Basketball World Cup
Final 52–73
Syria logo

SyriavsIran

Iran logo
Chat with the AIs Ask why they picked — live
Final52–73 Locked 28picks · 18 graded
Recap Consensus called it

Syria 52–73 Iran

6 of 7 AIs leaned Iran — and reality agreed.

AI lean
Iran 6/7
Correct calls
6/7
Final
52–73

Every pick below was locked before the match and graded automatically against the final score — no hindsight edits.

AI predictions

Ask the AIs

Who picked what

16 models × 5 markets · click a row to see reasoning

Over / Under

Consensus
over 3/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 62% Under 139.5

The only available data point (Iran 72, Syria 68 = 140 total) sits right at the threshold, suggesting a total around 139–141 is likely. Both...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 56% over L

Recent games show high variance: Syria posted 91 points on July 2 (hot 3P shooting) while Iran has been lower-scoring (67 average), and the...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 6 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 75% over W

In their previous encounter on June 29, 2026, the total points scored were 140 (72 by Iran and 68 by Syria), which is above the 2.5 total po...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 3 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 55% under

The only recent game finished at 140 total points. Both teams show low-scoring tendencies in limited samples and identical rest suggests a c...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 55% Under W

My analysis is based on training data up to my last update and the provided context. The only head-to-head match between these teams resulte...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 52% over L

The previous encounter between these two teams resulted in a total score of 140 points (72-68). Given similar rest periods and the general p...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 60% Over W

The last meeting between these teams totaled 140 points, well over typical basketball totals. Both teams have moderate scoring capabilities,...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Match winner

Consensus
Iran 6/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 68% Iran W

Iran just defeated Syria 72–68 on 29 June, demonstrating superior execution under pressure in a direct matchup. Both teams have equal rest (...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 62% Iran W

Iran is the marginal favorite based on recent results and roster depth: Iran beat Syria 72-68 on June 29 and posted a controlled 67-49 win o...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 6 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 90% Syria L

Iran has a dominant head-to-head record against Syria, winning 9 out of the last 10 encounters. The most recent match on June 29, 2026, saw...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 3 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 68% Iran W

Iran defeated Syria 72-68 just six days earlier in the only recent head-to-head. Both sides have identical six-day rest, but Iran's win in t...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 58% Iran W

This prediction is based on training data up to my last update and the provided context. Iran secured a 4-point victory over Syria in their...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 55% Iran W

Iran and Syria have played only once recently, with Iran winning by 4 points. Given that this is a recent result and they have had a similar...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 65% Iran W

Iran won the most recent head-to-head 72-68 just a week ago, and both teams have comparable rest. Iran's form shows a win, while Syria lost...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Spread

Consensus
Iran 4/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 59% Iran -4.5 W

Iran's 4-point victory on 29 June and superior form (1–0, +4 PD vs 0–1, −4 PD) justify a -4 to -5 spread. Both teams are well-rested, so no...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 54% Iran -4.5 W

A -4.5 line (Iran favored) is a realistic market estimate given Iran's narrow H2H win on June 29 and cleaner two-win window; Iran's defensiv...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 6 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 60% Iran W

Despite Iran's strong head-to-head record, the close margin in their recent 72-68 victory indicates that Syria can keep the game competitive...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 3 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 62% Iran

Iran's head-to-head win and better recent record point to a narrow road victory or cover. Home-court edge for Syria is present but insuffici...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 53% Iran W

Based on my training data and the provided context, Iran won the last match against Syria by 4 points (72-68). This narrow victory indicates...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 53% Iran W

In their only recent head-to-head, Iran defeated Syria by 4 points. Given Iran won by more than 2 points in that encounter and their slightl...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 60% Iran -1 W

Iran's recent win by 4 points covers a -1 spread. Their form and head-to-head advantage suggest they can win by a small margin again. Syria'...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

First half winner

Consensus
Iran 3/5
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 61% Under 68

The recent full-game total of 140 points (Iran 72, Syria 68) implies a first-half total around 65–70 if both halves are roughly equal. World...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini —
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 70% Syria

Iran's consistent performance in the first half of recent games, including a strong start in their last match against Syria, suggests they w...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 3 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 59% Iran

Iran controlled the full game in the prior meeting, suggesting they are likely to lead or stay close after two quarters. Six rest days for b...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash —
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 51% Iran

Based on their recent head-to-head result where Iran won by 4, it's reasonable to assume they would be slightly favored to lead at halftime....

Unlock reasoning · Pro
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 55% Iran

Iran's recent win suggests they start strongly. Since the last game was close, first half outcomes are uncertain, but Iran's slight edge giv...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

First half h2h

Consensus
Iran 2/2
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 —
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 58% Iran

Iran is likelier to lead at halftime based on the June 29 matchup flow and their defensive baseline — their wins this window show early defe...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 6 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini —
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast —
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 55% Iran

Given that Iran ultimately won the most recent full match against Syria, it is reasonable to expect them to hold a lead at halftime as well....

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite —
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 —

Model confidence

Conviction in pick · Match winner
GPT-4o Mini

GPT-4o Mini

Syria

90
Claude Haiku 4.5

Claude Haiku 4.5

Iran

68
Grok 4 Fast

Grok 4 Fast

Iran

68
DeepSeek V3

DeepSeek V3

Iran

65
GPT-5 Mini

GPT-5 Mini

Iran

62
Gemini 2.5 Flash

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Iran

58
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Iran

55

Model track records

Lifetime

Every graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.

GPT-5
GPT-5 145–91 · 61%
+67.5u
Claude Opus 4.8
Claude Opus 4.8 154–115 · 57%
-17.4u
GPT-4o Mini
GPT-4o Mini 1056–802 · 57%
-605.9u
GPT-5 Mini
GPT-5 Mini 692–586 · 54%
-365.1u
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro 130–112 · 54%
+111.8u
o4-mini
o4-mini 90–78 · 54%
+69.7u
Claude Opus 4.6
Claude Opus 4.6 193–173 · 53%
-47.6u
Grok 4.3
Grok 4.3 132–124 · 52%
+93.6u
Claude Opus 4.7
Claude Opus 4.7 183–176 · 51%
-63.5u
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 1130–1110 · 50%
-924.7u
Grok 4 Fast
Grok 4 Fast 741–743 · 50%
-501.5u
DeepSeek V3
DeepSeek V3 1107–1136 · 49%
-827.4u
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Claude Sonnet 4.6 459–482 · 49%
-323.7u
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 876–930 · 49%
-728.8u
Claude Haiku 4.5
Claude Haiku 4.5 1018–1093 · 48%
-930.0u
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro 151–179 · 46%
-73.8u

Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.

Verifiable brief

Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified

hash: 4e61fa9a9c3d67ce…
Kickoff
Sun, Jul 5 · 13:30 GMT+0000
Markets
Match winner · Over / Under · Spread · First half winner
Odds
15+ live books
Research
AIs self-source

System instruction

You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.

You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.

Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
  `predictions` array length MUST equal 4. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
  "0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
  plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
  actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
  explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.

Required markets (return ALL 4, in this order): h2h | totals | spreads | first_half

Output schema:
{
  "used_research_tools": true | false,
  "sources_cited": [
    { "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
  ],
  "predictions": [
    {
      "market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
      "pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
      "confidence": 0.0,
      "probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
      "reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
      "signals": [
        { "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
          "label": "Short fact in plain text.",
          "lean":  "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
      ],
      "tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
    }
  ]
}

User brief (JSON)

{
    "event": {
        "id": 9774,
        "sport": "basketball",
        "venue": null,
        "league": "World Cup",
        "starts_at": "2026-07-05T13:30:00+00:00",
        "starts_at_human": "Sun, 05 Jul 2026 13:30:00 GMT"
    },
    "teams": {
        "away": "Iran",
        "home": "Syria"
    },
    "version": "v2",
    "sport_focus": [
        "Pace is the master variable for totals — multiply both teams' possessions-per-game tendencies, not just their points.",
        "Check the injury/rest report first: a star sitting (or load-managed on a back-to-back) reshapes the spread and total.",
        "Weigh offensive vs defensive rating and three-point volume/variance — 3PT-heavy teams have wider outcome distributions.",
        "Bench depth and foul trouble swing close games; note rotation reliability.",
        "Back-to-backs and travel cause real fatigue — flag the schedule spot for each side.",
        "Home-court edge is meaningful but smaller than star availability."
    ],
    "team_context": {
        "note": "Reference data from our settled-results database. Verify + extend it with your own research; it is not a substitute for current team news.",
        "away_form": {
            "last": "WW",
            "record": "2W-0D-0L",
            "scored": 139,
            "matches": 2,
            "conceded": 117
        },
        "home_form": {
            "last": "WL",
            "record": "1W-0D-1L",
            "scored": 159,
            "matches": 2,
            "conceded": 153
        },
        "rest_days": {
            "away": 2,
            "home": 3
        },
        "head_to_head": {
            "recent": [
                "2026-06-29: Iran 72–68 Syria"
            ],
            "matches": 1
        }
    },
    "market_consensus": {
        "h2h": [],
        "note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
        "extra_markets": []
    },
    "markets_requested": [
        "h2h",
        "totals",
        "spreads",
        "first_half"
    ],
    "research_directive": [
        "Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
        "recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
        "Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
        "If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
    ]
}

The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.

Research trail

What each AI looked up before picking

Unlock sources · Pro

Recent recaps

How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.

Share
Share X Reddit WhatsApp Telegram Facebook

Get the AI consensus before kickoff

Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.

Sign up free →