South SudanvsCape Verde
Your call
Who wins? One tap, no signup.
AI predictions
4 markets · 6 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 4 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
|
First half winner
?
First half winner
First-half winner. Who is ahead at the half-time whistle.
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Over 2/6 models |
South Sudan 2/6 models |
South Sudan 6/6 models |
South Sudan 6/6 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
62%
Under 160 |
59%
South Sudan -7.5 |
66%
South Sudan |
68%
South Sudan |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
62%
Under 160 Both South Sudan and Cape Verde are African programs with limited high-pace offensive systems and three-point volume relative to top-tier co...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
59%
South Sudan -7.5 South Sudan's home court and superior program maturity suggest a modest margin victory. A 7–9 point spread is reasonable given the quality g...
First half winner
?
First half winner
First-half winner. Who is ahead at the half-time whistle.
66%
South Sudan South Sudan's home court and program strength should manifest early; Cape Verde typically starts slow in international competition. First-ha...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
68%
South Sudan South Sudan has emerged as a stronger basketball program in recent FIBA competition cycles, with more consistent roster development and tour... |
|||||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | — | — | |
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
First half winner
?
First half winner
First-half winner. Who is ahead at the half-time whistle.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market. |
|||||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
70%
over |
65%
South Sudan |
60%
South Sudan |
60%
South Sudan |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
70%
over Both teams have shown high-scoring games in recent matchups, indicating a tendency for over 2.5 total points.
🔍 researched
4 sources cited
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
65%
South Sudan South Sudan's home advantage and recent performance suggest they will cover the -1 point spread.
🔍 researched
4 sources cited
First half winner
?
First half winner
First-half winner. Who is ahead at the half-time whistle.
60%
South Sudan South Sudan's home-court advantage and recent performance suggest they will lead at halftime.
🔍 researched
4 sources cited
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
60%
South Sudan South Sudan has a strong home-court advantage and a recent victory over Cape Verde, suggesting a higher likelihood of winning at home.
🔍 researched
4 sources cited
|
|||||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
55%
over |
62%
South Sudan -6.5 |
64%
South Sudan |
68%
South Sudan |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over Both teams play up-tempo styles in FIBA events; historical matchups between African sides trend toward higher possessions and open three-poi...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
62%
South Sudan -6.5 Talent differential and home-court factor support a 6-10 point margin; South Sudan's athleticism creates transition advantages that Cape Ver...
First half winner
?
First half winner
First-half winner. Who is ahead at the half-time whistle.
64%
South Sudan South Sudan typically establishes early leads through superior athleticism and transition play before fatigue sets in later; Cape Verde need...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
68%
South Sudan South Sudan fields multiple NBA-level athletes while Cape Verde relies on a smaller roster; training data through 2023 shows South Sudan dom... |
|||||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
60%
Over |
65%
South Sudan -7.5 |
68%
South Sudan |
70%
South Sudan |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
Over South Sudan tends to play with a higher pace, which often leads to more possessions and scoring opportunities. While Cape Verde might try to...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
65%
South Sudan -7.5 South Sudan's superior athleticism, deeper roster, and overall offensive firepower are expected to give them a comfortable lead against Cape...
First half winner
?
First half winner
First-half winner. Who is ahead at the half-time whistle.
68%
South Sudan South Sudan's energetic start and athletic advantage should allow them to establish an early lead. They are known for their strong opening q...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
70%
South Sudan South Sudan has emerged as a formidable force in international basketball, showcasing a deep roster with NBA-caliber talent and strong athle... |
|||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
55%
Over |
58%
South Sudan |
57%
South Sudan |
60%
South Sudan |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Over Both South Sudan and Cape Verde have demonstrated capable offenses in international play, often leading to moderately high-scoring games. Th...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
58%
South Sudan Considering South Sudan's perceived advantage and home-court benefit, they are likely to cover a modest spread. Cape Verde has potential but...
First half winner
?
First half winner
First-half winner. Who is ahead at the half-time whistle.
57%
South Sudan South Sudan is expected to start strong at home, leveraging the crowd energy and their offensive capabilities. They are likely to establish...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
60%
South Sudan Based on general knowledge of international basketball, South Sudan has shown more consistent recent success and a stronger overall program... |
|||||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
55%
Over 150.5 |
55%
South Sudan -3.5 |
55%
South Sudan |
60%
South Sudan |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Over 150.5 Both teams have moderate pace and offensive capabilities based on their regional competitions. South Sudan's athleticism may push the tempo,...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
55%
South Sudan -3.5 South Sudan's talent advantage should translate to a win by a few possessions. A -3.5 spread is reasonable given their likely edge in athlet...
First half winner
?
First half winner
First-half winner. Who is ahead at the half-time whistle.
55%
South Sudan South Sudan's athletic advantage may be particularly evident early as they set the pace. Cape Verde could keep it close, but South Sudan's f...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
60%
South Sudan South Sudan has been improving in international basketball with athleticism and recent growth, while Cape Verde is less established. The gam... |
|||||
Over / Under
ConsensusOver 2/6
Both South Sudan and Cape Verde are African programs with limited high-pace offensive systems and three-point volume relative to top-tier co...
Both teams have shown high-scoring games in recent matchups, indicating a tendency for over 2.5 total points.
Both teams play up-tempo styles in FIBA events; historical matchups between African sides trend toward higher possessions and open three-poi...
South Sudan tends to play with a higher pace, which often leads to more possessions and scoring opportunities. While Cape Verde might try to...
Both South Sudan and Cape Verde have demonstrated capable offenses in international play, often leading to moderately high-scoring games. Th...
Both teams have moderate pace and offensive capabilities based on their regional competitions. South Sudan's athleticism may push the tempo,...
Spread
ConsensusSouth Sudan 2/6
South Sudan's home court and superior program maturity suggest a modest margin victory. A 7–9 point spread is reasonable given the quality g...
South Sudan's home advantage and recent performance suggest they will cover the -1 point spread.
Talent differential and home-court factor support a 6-10 point margin; South Sudan's athleticism creates transition advantages that Cape Ver...
South Sudan's superior athleticism, deeper roster, and overall offensive firepower are expected to give them a comfortable lead against Cape...
Considering South Sudan's perceived advantage and home-court benefit, they are likely to cover a modest spread. Cape Verde has potential but...
South Sudan's talent advantage should translate to a win by a few possessions. A -3.5 spread is reasonable given their likely edge in athlet...
First half winner
ConsensusSouth Sudan 6/6
South Sudan's home court and program strength should manifest early; Cape Verde typically starts slow in international competition. First-ha...
South Sudan's home-court advantage and recent performance suggest they will lead at halftime.
South Sudan typically establishes early leads through superior athleticism and transition play before fatigue sets in later; Cape Verde need...
South Sudan's energetic start and athletic advantage should allow them to establish an early lead. They are known for their strong opening q...
South Sudan is expected to start strong at home, leveraging the crowd energy and their offensive capabilities. They are likely to establish...
South Sudan's athletic advantage may be particularly evident early as they set the pace. Cape Verde could keep it close, but South Sudan's f...
Match winner
ConsensusSouth Sudan 6/6
South Sudan has emerged as a stronger basketball program in recent FIBA competition cycles, with more consistent roster development and tour...
South Sudan has a strong home-court advantage and a recent victory over Cape Verde, suggesting a higher likelihood of winning at home.
South Sudan fields multiple NBA-level athletes while Cape Verde relies on a smaller roster; training data through 2023 shows South Sudan dom...
South Sudan has emerged as a formidable force in international basketball, showcasing a deep roster with NBA-caliber talent and strong athle...
Based on general knowledge of international basketball, South Sudan has shown more consistent recent success and a stronger overall program...
South Sudan has been improving in international basketball with athleticism and recent growth, while Cape Verde is less established. The gam...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGemini 2.5 Flash
South Sudan
Claude Haiku 4.5
South Sudan
Grok 4 Fast
South Sudan
GPT-4o Mini
South Sudan
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
South Sudan
DeepSeek V3
South Sudan
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Refresh the read
Early readRe-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.
Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.
Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
491fcb4a4287ee2b…
- Kickoff
- Sat, Jul 4 · 14:00 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Over / Under · Spread · First half winner
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 4. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 4, in this order): h2h | totals | spreads | first_half
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 9576,
"sport": "basketball",
"venue": null,
"league": "World Cup",
"starts_at": "2026-07-04T14:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Sat, 04 Jul 2026 14:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Cape Verde",
"home": "South Sudan"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Pace is the master variable for totals — multiply both teams' possessions-per-game tendencies, not just their points.",
"Check the injury/rest report first: a star sitting (or load-managed on a back-to-back) reshapes the spread and total.",
"Weigh offensive vs defensive rating and three-point volume/variance — 3PT-heavy teams have wider outcome distributions.",
"Bench depth and foul trouble swing close games; note rotation reliability.",
"Back-to-backs and travel cause real fatigue — flag the schedule spot for each side.",
"Home-court edge is meaningful but smaller than star availability."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals",
"spreads",
"first_half"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Research trail
What each AI looked up before picking
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
4 tool calls · 4 sources
4 citations captured — unlock with Pro
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.
Recent recaps
How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.