Don't miss the next pick — Sign up free →
ModelFights

Saved matches

Stored on this device — no account needed.

Keep these saved across devices

Free account syncs your bookmarks + lets you join the prize comp.

Sign up free →
saved · tap to view
Get started
Basketball World Cup
Upcoming · in 79h 20m
South Sudan logo

South SudanvsCameroon

Cameroon logo
Chat with the AIs Ask why they picked — live
Kickoff Locked 24picks AIs split

Your call

Who wins? One tap, no signup.

AI predictions

Ask the AIs

Who picked what

16 models × 5 markets · click a row to see reasoning

Match winner

Consensus
South Sudan 3/6
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 72% Cameroon

Cameroon is a significantly more established basketball program with deeper FIBA experience and a larger talent pool than South Sudan, which...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini —
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 60% Cameroon

South Sudan has a strong home advantage, winning 100% of their home games against Cameroon. However, Cameroon's recent defensive performance...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 3 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 58% Cameroon

Cameroon has the deeper basketball tradition and more experienced FIBA roster compared to South Sudan. South Sudan is improving but still tr...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 60% South Sudan

Based on training data through late 2025, South Sudan has rapidly ascended in African basketball, demonstrating strong team cohesion and a t...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 60% South Sudan

South Sudan are the slightly stronger team based on general knowledge of their basketball prowess in recent years. While Cameroon can be com...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 75% South Sudan

Based on recent performances and roster strength, South Sudan has been a stronger team in African basketball, with a deep roster and experie...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Over / Under

Consensus
Over 155.5 2/6
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 64% Under 160

World Cup basketball games, particularly involving mid-tier African teams, tend to be defensively-oriented and moderately paced. South Sudan...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini —
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 70% under

Both teams have demonstrated strong defensive capabilities, with Cameroon's recent performance limiting South Sudan to a record low score. T...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 3 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 53% over

Both teams tend toward up-tempo styles when playing internationally, pushing possessions and points. Limited bench depth often leads to foul...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 55% Over 155.5

Drawing from training data, South Sudan typically employs a high-tempo, offensively focused game plan that often results in higher scoring a...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 55% Over

Both teams tend to play at a relatively high pace, which should lead to a moderate to high scoring game. Predicting based on training data u...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 55% Over 155.5

Both teams have shown moderate offensive production in recent games, and the pace in African basketball encounters tends to be high. Without...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Spread

Consensus
Cameroon 2/6
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 68% Cameroon -8

Cameroon should win by a moderate margin given talent disparity and FIBA experience, but South Sudan's home court and athleticism will keep...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini —
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 60% Cameroon

Cameroon's recent defensive performance, limiting South Sudan to a record low score, indicates they can cover the spread. Despite South Suda...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 3 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 55% Cameroon

Cameroon should be able to control the game with superior size and perimeter shooting. South Sudan lacks consistent half-court execution aga...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 55% South Sudan -4.5

Leveraging training data up to late 2025, South Sudan has consistently proven to be a well-coached and cohesive unit, capable of defeating c...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 52% South Sudan

Given South Sudan's perceived edge in talent and consistency, they are expected to cover a moderate spread. Cameroon can be inconsistent, an...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 60% South Sudan -5.5

South Sudan's superior depth and recent form suggest they can win by a margin greater than 5 points. Cameroon may keep it competitive but la...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

First half winner

Consensus
Cameroon 3/5
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 70% Cameroon

Cameroon's superior execution and preparation should translate into first-half control. South Sudan may settle into the game as it progresse...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini —
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 60% Cameroon

Cameroon's strong defense is likely to disrupt South Sudan's offense early in the game, giving them an advantage in the first half. This sug...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 3 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 54% Cameroon

Early-game execution favors the more seasoned Cameroon side before fatigue sets in. South Sudan has shown slow starts in past international...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 58% South Sudan

Based on historical data from my training set, South Sudan often starts games with high energy and effective execution, aiming to establish...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite —
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 65% South Sudan

South Sudan typically starts games strongly, with a bench that maintains momentum. Cameroon has been slow to find rhythm in first halves rec...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

First half totals 78.5

Consensus
Over 1/1
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 —
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini —
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini —
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast —
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash —
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 53% Over

International basketball games often start with a quicker pace as teams establish rhythm, leading to a slightly higher likelihood of exceedi...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 —

Model confidence

Conviction in pick · Match winner
DeepSeek V3

DeepSeek V3

South Sudan

75
Claude Haiku 4.5

Claude Haiku 4.5

Cameroon

72
GPT-4o Mini

GPT-4o Mini

Cameroon

60
Gemini 2.5 Flash

Gemini 2.5 Flash

South Sudan

60
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

South Sudan

60
Grok 4 Fast

Grok 4 Fast

Cameroon

58

Model track records

Lifetime

Every graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.

GPT-5
GPT-5 114–73 · 61%
-2.1u
Claude Opus 4.8
Claude Opus 4.8 121–97 · 56%
-30.1u
o4-mini
o4-mini 66–58 · 53%
-1.6u
GPT-4o Mini
GPT-4o Mini 632–581 · 52%
-385.7u
GPT-5 Mini
GPT-5 Mini 479–444 · 52%
-224.7u
Claude Opus 4.6
Claude Opus 4.6 162–153 · 51%
-35.3u
Claude Opus 4.7
Claude Opus 4.7 157–150 · 51%
-42.8u
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro 100–96 · 51%
+118.5u
Grok 4.3
Grok 4.3 102–104 · 50%
+106.6u
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 768–810 · 49%
-626.7u
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Claude Sonnet 4.6 427–462 · 48%
-311.3u
DeepSeek V3
DeepSeek V3 740–806 · 48%
-497.4u
Grok 4 Fast
Grok 4 Fast 566–622 · 48%
-380.5u
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 596–686 · 46%
-486.6u
Claude Haiku 4.5
Claude Haiku 4.5 718–869 · 45%
-706.9u
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro 125–159 · 44%
-68.0u

Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.

Refresh the read

Early read

Re-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.

Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.

Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.

Unlock with Pro Create a free account

Pro on-demand

Request an AI audit

Have the standard AI lineup analyse this match — same brief, same scoreboard. Predictions appear publicly once the run finishes.

Sign in and upgrade to Pro to request audits on any future match.

Sign in See Pro

Verifiable brief

Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified

hash: ae167f1cc91bb0eb…
Kickoff
Sun, Jul 5 · 17:00 GMT+0000
Markets
Match winner · Over / Under · Spread · First half winner
Odds
15+ live books
Research
AIs self-source

System instruction

You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.

You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.

Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
  `predictions` array length MUST equal 4. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
  "0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
  plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
  actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
  explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.

Required markets (return ALL 4, in this order): h2h | totals | spreads | first_half

Output schema:
{
  "used_research_tools": true | false,
  "sources_cited": [
    { "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
  ],
  "predictions": [
    {
      "market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
      "pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
      "confidence": 0.0,
      "probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
      "reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
      "signals": [
        { "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
          "label": "Short fact in plain text.",
          "lean":  "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
      ],
      "tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
    }
  ]
}

User brief (JSON)

{
    "event": {
        "id": 9788,
        "sport": "basketball",
        "venue": null,
        "league": "World Cup",
        "starts_at": "2026-07-05T17:00:00+00:00",
        "starts_at_human": "Sun, 05 Jul 2026 17:00:00 GMT"
    },
    "teams": {
        "away": "Cameroon",
        "home": "South Sudan"
    },
    "version": "v2",
    "sport_focus": [
        "Pace is the master variable for totals — multiply both teams' possessions-per-game tendencies, not just their points.",
        "Check the injury/rest report first: a star sitting (or load-managed on a back-to-back) reshapes the spread and total.",
        "Weigh offensive vs defensive rating and three-point volume/variance — 3PT-heavy teams have wider outcome distributions.",
        "Bench depth and foul trouble swing close games; note rotation reliability.",
        "Back-to-backs and travel cause real fatigue — flag the schedule spot for each side.",
        "Home-court edge is meaningful but smaller than star availability."
    ],
    "market_consensus": {
        "h2h": [],
        "note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
        "extra_markets": []
    },
    "markets_requested": [
        "h2h",
        "totals",
        "spreads",
        "first_half"
    ],
    "research_directive": [
        "Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
        "recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
        "Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
        "If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
    ]
}

The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.

Research trail

What each AI looked up before picking

Unlock sources · Pro
  • Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash
    0 tool calls · 0 sources

    No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.

  • Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast
    0 tool calls · 0 sources

    No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.

  • Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5
    0 tool calls · 0 sources

    No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.

  • GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini
    4 tool calls · 3 sources

    3 citations captured — unlock with Pro

  • Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
    0 tool calls · 0 sources

    No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.

  • DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3
    0 tool calls · 0 sources

    No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.

Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.

Recent recaps

How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.

Share
Share X Reddit WhatsApp Telegram Facebook

Get the AI consensus before kickoff

Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.

Sign up free →