SloveniavsSweden
Your call
Who wins? One tap, no signup.
AI predictions
4 markets · 6 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 4 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
|
First half winner
?
First half winner
First-half winner. Who is ahead at the half-time whistle.
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Slovenia 3/6 models |
Slovenia 5/6 models |
Slovenia 5/6 models |
over 3/6 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
56%
Sweden -5.5 |
52%
Under 80.5 |
58%
Sweden |
54%
Under 165.5 |
|
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
56%
Sweden -5.5 Sweden's stronger programme depth and international experience justify a modest spread in their favour. Slovenia's 1L start and 83-point sho...
First half winner
?
First half winner
First-half winner. Who is ahead at the half-time whistle.
52%
Under 80.5 First-half totals in tournament basketball reflect cautious opening-period pace and defensive familiarity. Slovenia's 83 total in regulation...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Sweden Sweden has historically been the stronger international basketball programme with deeper NBA/EuroLeague talent and more consistent competiti...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
54%
Under 165.5 International basketball tournament play, especially in group stages, tends toward methodical pace and defensive intensity. Slovenia's openi... |
|||||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | — | — | |
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
First half winner
?
First half winner
First-half winner. Who is ahead at the half-time whistle.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
70%
Slovenia |
65%
Slovenia |
75%
Slovenia |
60%
over |
|
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
70%
Slovenia Given Slovenia's home advantage and superior head-to-head record, they are likely to cover a -1 point spread. Their recent performances sugg...
🔍 researched
3 sources cited
First half winner
?
First half winner
First-half winner. Who is ahead at the half-time whistle.
65%
Slovenia Slovenia's strong start in recent games, including a decisive first half against Czechia, suggests they are likely to lead at halftime again...
🔍 researched
3 sources cited
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
75%
Slovenia Slovenia has a strong home-court advantage and a superior head-to-head record against Sweden, winning all three previous encounters. Their r...
🔍 researched
3 sources cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
over Both teams have shown a tendency for high-scoring games in recent matches. Slovenia's offensive capabilities, highlighted by their 99-point...
🔍 researched
3 sources cited
|
|||||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
71%
Slovenia |
76%
Slovenia |
82%
Slovenia |
58%
over |
|
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
71%
Slovenia The talent gap favors Slovenia by double digits in most similar FIBA matchups. Home rest advantage and lack of Swedish star power support a...
First half winner
?
First half winner
First-half winner. Who is ahead at the half-time whistle.
76%
Slovenia Early-game execution usually favors the more talented side before fatigue or foul trouble sets in. Slovenia's superior depth and creation sh...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
82%
Slovenia Slovenia possesses the superior roster anchored by an NBA superstar while Sweden lacks comparable talent at this level. Training data throug...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
over Slovenia plays at a high pace with heavy three-point volume that inflates scoring distributions. Sweden's defensive rating is weak on the pe... |
|||||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
65%
Slovenia -12.5 |
80%
Slovenia |
85%
Slovenia |
58%
Over 158.5 |
|
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
65%
Slovenia -12.5 Slovenia's superior talent and established national program suggest they should be able to win by a significant margin against Sweden. While...
First half winner
?
First half winner
First-half winner. Who is ahead at the half-time whistle.
80%
Slovenia Slovenia is expected to assert its dominance early in the game, leveraging their superior talent and tactical execution. They are likely to...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
85%
Slovenia Slovenia has historically been a much stronger basketball nation, boasting top-tier NBA talent. Without any current team news for 2026, thei...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
Over 158.5 Slovenia typically plays an up-tempo, high-scoring style, especially against teams they significantly outmatch. While Sweden's offense might... |
|||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
55%
Slovenia |
55%
Slovenia |
60%
Slovenia |
55%
over |
|
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
55%
Slovenia Given Slovenia's favored status in the head-to-head, they are also expected to cover a modest spread. Their historical performance suggests...
First half winner
?
First half winner
First-half winner. Who is ahead at the half-time whistle.
55%
Slovenia Slovenia is expected to come out strong and establish an early lead, reflecting their favored status. Their ability to perform consistently...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
60%
Slovenia Based on historical data and general team strengths, Slovenia is favored in this matchup. Slovenia has a stronger basketball pedigree and ha...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over The total points are difficult to predict without specific team scoring and pace data for the current tournament. However, international bas... |
|||||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
52%
Slovenia -10.5 |
58%
Slovenia |
62%
Slovenia |
55%
over 176.5 |
|
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
52%
Slovenia -10.5 Slovenia's talent advantage should translate to a double-digit win, but without recent form data, the margin is uncertain. Sweden could keep...
First half winner
?
First half winner
First-half winner. Who is ahead at the half-time whistle.
58%
Slovenia Slovenia usually starts strong with Dončić controlling the game. Sweden may take time to adjust, giving Slovenia a first-half lead. Home adv...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Slovenia Slovenia has a strong basketball tradition led by Luka Dončić, and Sweden is not a traditional basketball power. With Slovenia playing at ho...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over 176.5 Both teams have moderate offensive outputs, but Slovenia's pace with Dončić can push the total. Sweden may struggle to score, but Slovenia's... |
|||||
Spread
ConsensusSlovenia 3/6
Sweden's stronger programme depth and international experience justify a modest spread in their favour. Slovenia's 1L start and 83-point sho...
Given Slovenia's home advantage and superior head-to-head record, they are likely to cover a -1 point spread. Their recent performances sugg...
The talent gap favors Slovenia by double digits in most similar FIBA matchups. Home rest advantage and lack of Swedish star power support a...
Slovenia's superior talent and established national program suggest they should be able to win by a significant margin against Sweden. While...
Given Slovenia's favored status in the head-to-head, they are also expected to cover a modest spread. Their historical performance suggests...
Slovenia's talent advantage should translate to a double-digit win, but without recent form data, the margin is uncertain. Sweden could keep...
First half winner
ConsensusSlovenia 5/6
First-half totals in tournament basketball reflect cautious opening-period pace and defensive familiarity. Slovenia's 83 total in regulation...
Slovenia's strong start in recent games, including a decisive first half against Czechia, suggests they are likely to lead at halftime again...
Early-game execution usually favors the more talented side before fatigue or foul trouble sets in. Slovenia's superior depth and creation sh...
Slovenia is expected to assert its dominance early in the game, leveraging their superior talent and tactical execution. They are likely to...
Slovenia is expected to come out strong and establish an early lead, reflecting their favored status. Their ability to perform consistently...
Slovenia usually starts strong with Dončić controlling the game. Sweden may take time to adjust, giving Slovenia a first-half lead. Home adv...
Match winner
ConsensusSlovenia 5/6
Sweden has historically been the stronger international basketball programme with deeper NBA/EuroLeague talent and more consistent competiti...
Slovenia has a strong home-court advantage and a superior head-to-head record against Sweden, winning all three previous encounters. Their r...
Slovenia possesses the superior roster anchored by an NBA superstar while Sweden lacks comparable talent at this level. Training data throug...
Slovenia has historically been a much stronger basketball nation, boasting top-tier NBA talent. Without any current team news for 2026, thei...
Based on historical data and general team strengths, Slovenia is favored in this matchup. Slovenia has a stronger basketball pedigree and ha...
Slovenia has a strong basketball tradition led by Luka Dončić, and Sweden is not a traditional basketball power. With Slovenia playing at ho...
Over / Under
Consensusover 3/6
International basketball tournament play, especially in group stages, tends toward methodical pace and defensive intensity. Slovenia's openi...
Both teams have shown a tendency for high-scoring games in recent matches. Slovenia's offensive capabilities, highlighted by their 99-point...
Slovenia plays at a high pace with heavy three-point volume that inflates scoring distributions. Sweden's defensive rating is weak on the pe...
Slovenia typically plays an up-tempo, high-scoring style, especially against teams they significantly outmatch. While Sweden's offense might...
The total points are difficult to predict without specific team scoring and pace data for the current tournament. However, international bas...
Both teams have moderate offensive outputs, but Slovenia's pace with Dončić can push the total. Sweden may struggle to score, but Slovenia's...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGemini 2.5 Flash
Slovenia
Grok 4 Fast
Slovenia
GPT-4o Mini
Slovenia
DeepSeek V3
Slovenia
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Slovenia
Claude Haiku 4.5
Sweden
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Refresh the read
Early readRe-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.
Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.
Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
83d97560d78de21b…
- Kickoff
- Mon, Jul 6 · 18:00 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Over / Under · Spread · First half winner
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 4. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 4, in this order): h2h | totals | spreads | first_half
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 9979,
"sport": "basketball",
"venue": null,
"league": "World Cup",
"starts_at": "2026-07-06T18:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Mon, 06 Jul 2026 18:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Sweden",
"home": "Slovenia"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Pace is the master variable for totals — multiply both teams' possessions-per-game tendencies, not just their points.",
"Check the injury/rest report first: a star sitting (or load-managed on a back-to-back) reshapes the spread and total.",
"Weigh offensive vs defensive rating and three-point volume/variance — 3PT-heavy teams have wider outcome distributions.",
"Bench depth and foul trouble swing close games; note rotation reliability.",
"Back-to-backs and travel cause real fatigue — flag the schedule spot for each side.",
"Home-court edge is meaningful but smaller than star availability."
],
"team_context": {
"note": "Reference data from our settled-results database. Verify + extend it with your own research; it is not a substitute for current team news.",
"home_form": {
"last": "L",
"record": "0W-0D-1L",
"scored": 83,
"matches": 1,
"conceded": 86
},
"rest_days": {
"home": 9
}
},
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals",
"spreads",
"first_half"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Research trail
What each AI looked up before picking
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
4 tool calls · 3 sources
3 citations captured — unlock with Pro
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.
Recent recaps
How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.