RwandavsTunisia
Your call
Who wins? One tap, no signup.
AI predictions
4 markets · 5 models picked
Consensus split
How the lineup voted · Match winner
- Tunisia 80% 4/5
- Rwanda 20% 1/5
Model confidence
Each model's confidence in its pick (%)
Who picked what
16 models × 4 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
|
First half winner
?
First half winner
First-half winner. Who is ahead at the half-time whistle.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
68%
Tunisia |
62%
Under 160.5 |
58%
Tunisia -8.5 |
60%
Tunisia -4 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
68%
Tunisia Tunisia has historically been one of Africa's strongest basketball programs with deeper talent pipelines and international experience. Rwand...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
62%
Under 160.5 Both Rwanda and Tunisia play in lower-tier African basketball environments with less emphasis on three-point volume and pace-and-space offen...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
58%
Tunisia -8.5 Tunisia's superior talent depth and international experience should translate to a mid-single-digit advantage in a neutral or near-neutral e...
First half winner
?
First half winner
First-half winner. Who is ahead at the half-time whistle.
60%
Tunisia -4 Tunisia's superior talent and experience should be evident early; a 4-point first-half spread is roughly half the full-game differential and... |
|||||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | — | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
First half winner
?
First half winner
First-half winner. Who is ahead at the half-time whistle.
No pick on this market. |
|||||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
85%
Tunisia |
70%
Under |
80%
Tunisia -1 |
75%
Tunisia |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
85%
Tunisia Tunisia has a strong record against Rwanda, winning all their previous encounters. Their superior performance in recent qualifiers and overa...
🔍 researched
4 sources cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
70%
Under Both teams have shown a tendency to play low-scoring games in recent encounters, suggesting a total score under 2.5 goals is more likely.
🔍 researched
4 sources cited
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
80%
Tunisia -1 Given Tunisia's superior record and form, they are expected to win by at least one goal, covering the spread comfortably.
🔍 researched
4 sources cited
First half winner
?
First half winner
First-half winner. Who is ahead at the half-time whistle.
75%
Tunisia Tunisia's strong start in previous matches suggests they will lead at halftime in this encounter.
🔍 researched
4 sources cited
|
|||||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
72%
Tunisia |
58%
over |
68%
Tunisia |
65%
Tunisia |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
72%
Tunisia Tunisia has historically been the stronger African side in FIBA competition and should dominate Rwanda. Training data through 2023 shows con...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
over Pace-driven World Cup qualifiers often produce higher totals when one side is outmatched. Rwanda tends to play fast but leaky defense, infla...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
68%
Tunisia Tunisia should cover comfortably given superior depth and execution. Rwanda lacks the size to stay close against experienced African opponen...
First half winner
?
First half winner
First-half winner. Who is ahead at the half-time whistle.
65%
Tunisia Tunisia typically establishes control early through physicality and half-court execution. Rwanda struggles with turnovers against pressure i... |
|||||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
75%
Tunisia |
58%
under |
65%
Tunisia |
70%
Tunisia |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
75%
Tunisia Based on training data up to 2025-09, Tunisia has historically been one of Africa's strongest basketball nations, with multiple AfroBasket t...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
under Tunisia often plays a disciplined, defensive-minded game which tends to keep scores lower. Against a less experienced team like Rwanda, they...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
65%
Tunisia Given Tunisia's superior talent and experience, they are likely to cover a reasonable spread against Rwanda. Their ability to execute on bot...
First half winner
?
First half winner
First-half winner. Who is ahead at the half-time whistle.
70%
Tunisia Tunisia is expected to establish their dominance early in the game, capitalizing on their superior talent and tactical discipline. They ofte... |
|||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
— | — | — | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
First half winner
?
First half winner
First-half winner. Who is ahead at the half-time whistle.
No pick on this market. |
|||||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
55%
Rwanda |
55%
Over 147.5 |
50%
Rwanda -2.5 |
55%
Rwanda |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Rwanda Rwanda has home-court advantage and potential crowd support. However, Tunisia has a stronger historical basketball program. Recent form is u...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Over 147.5 World Cup games often see moderate scoring. Both teams may push pace to compete. No injury or pace data available, but typical totals for su...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
50%
Rwanda -2.5 Home-court advantage usually worth 3-4 points in basketball. Without specific team strength data, a small spread is a coin flip. Training da...
First half winner
?
First half winner
First-half winner. Who is ahead at the half-time whistle.
55%
Rwanda Teams often start strong at home. First-half results correlate with home advantage. Without specific data, slight home lean. Training data t... |
|||||
|
Consensus |
Tunisia 4/5 |
over 1/5 |
Tunisia 2/5 |
Tunisia 3/5 |
|
Match winner
ConsensusTunisia 4/5
Tunisia has historically been one of Africa's strongest basketball programs with deeper talent pipelines and international experience. Rwand...
Tunisia has a strong record against Rwanda, winning all their previous encounters. Their superior performance in recent qualifiers and overa...
Tunisia has historically been the stronger African side in FIBA competition and should dominate Rwanda. Training data through 2023 shows con...
Based on training data up to 2025-09, Tunisia has historically been one of Africa's strongest basketball nations, with multiple AfroBasket t...
Rwanda has home-court advantage and potential crowd support. However, Tunisia has a stronger historical basketball program. Recent form is u...
Over / Under
Consensusover 1/5
Both Rwanda and Tunisia play in lower-tier African basketball environments with less emphasis on three-point volume and pace-and-space offen...
Both teams have shown a tendency to play low-scoring games in recent encounters, suggesting a total score under 2.5 goals is more likely.
Pace-driven World Cup qualifiers often produce higher totals when one side is outmatched. Rwanda tends to play fast but leaky defense, infla...
Tunisia often plays a disciplined, defensive-minded game which tends to keep scores lower. Against a less experienced team like Rwanda, they...
World Cup games often see moderate scoring. Both teams may push pace to compete. No injury or pace data available, but typical totals for su...
Spread
ConsensusTunisia 2/5
Tunisia's superior talent depth and international experience should translate to a mid-single-digit advantage in a neutral or near-neutral e...
Given Tunisia's superior record and form, they are expected to win by at least one goal, covering the spread comfortably.
Tunisia should cover comfortably given superior depth and execution. Rwanda lacks the size to stay close against experienced African opponen...
Given Tunisia's superior talent and experience, they are likely to cover a reasonable spread against Rwanda. Their ability to execute on bot...
Home-court advantage usually worth 3-4 points in basketball. Without specific team strength data, a small spread is a coin flip. Training da...
First half winner
ConsensusTunisia 3/5
Tunisia's superior talent and experience should be evident early; a 4-point first-half spread is roughly half the full-game differential and...
Tunisia's strong start in previous matches suggests they will lead at halftime in this encounter.
Tunisia typically establishes control early through physicality and half-court execution. Rwanda struggles with turnovers against pressure i...
Tunisia is expected to establish their dominance early in the game, capitalizing on their superior talent and tactical discipline. They ofte...
Teams often start strong at home. First-half results correlate with home advantage. Without specific data, slight home lean. Training data t...
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Refresh the read
Early readRe-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.
Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.
Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
c27e3c33f5f97352…
- Kickoff
- Fri, Jul 3 · 18:00 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Over / Under · Spread · First half winner
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 4. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 4, in this order): h2h | totals | spreads | first_half
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 9327,
"sport": "basketball",
"venue": null,
"league": "World Cup",
"starts_at": "2026-07-03T18:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Fri, 03 Jul 2026 18:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Tunisia",
"home": "Rwanda"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Pace is the master variable for totals — multiply both teams' possessions-per-game tendencies, not just their points.",
"Check the injury/rest report first: a star sitting (or load-managed on a back-to-back) reshapes the spread and total.",
"Weigh offensive vs defensive rating and three-point volume/variance — 3PT-heavy teams have wider outcome distributions.",
"Bench depth and foul trouble swing close games; note rotation reliability.",
"Back-to-backs and travel cause real fatigue — flag the schedule spot for each side.",
"Home-court edge is meaningful but smaller than star availability."
],
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals",
"spreads",
"first_half"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Research trail
What each AI looked up before picking
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
4 tool calls · 3 sources
3 citations captured — unlock with Pro
Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.
Recent recaps
How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.