Portland FirevsSeattle Storm
SSYour call
Who wins? One tap, no signup.
AI predictions
4 markets · 6 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 4 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
|
First half winner
?
First half winner
First-half winner. Who is ahead at the half-time whistle.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Seattle Storm 3/6 models |
over 4/6 models |
Portland Fire -4.5 2/6 models |
Portland Fire 4/6 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
58%
Portland Fire |
52%
Over 155.5 |
55%
Portland Fire -4.5 |
56%
Portland Fire |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Portland Fire Portland Fire has home court at Moda Center and shows 1W-1L recent form with 173 points scored across 2 matches, while Seattle Storm is 0W-2...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
52%
Over 155.5 Portland and Seattle combined for 328 points across 2 matches each (164 PPG average). WNBA games typically total 150–170 points; this matchu...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
55%
Portland Fire -4.5 Portland Fire's 1W-1L form, home court, and 18-point average scoring edge over Seattle's recent 0W-2L slump supports a modest spread favorin...
First half winner
?
First half winner
First-half winner. Who is ahead at the half-time whistle.
56%
Portland Fire First-half markets in WNBA typically reflect full-game trends with slightly tighter margins. Portland's recent offensive output and home cou... |
|||||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | — | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
First half winner
?
First half winner
First-half winner. Who is ahead at the half-time whistle.
No pick on this market. |
|||||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
65%
Seattle Storm |
60%
over |
70%
Seattle Storm |
55%
Seattle Storm |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Seattle Storm The Seattle Storm have a strong track record against the Portland Fire, with a 7-3 head-to-head record in their last 10 meetings. Additional...
🔍 researched
3 sources cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
over Both teams have shown a tendency to engage in high-scoring games. The Seattle Storm have averaged 85 points per game in their last 5 outings...
🔍 researched
3 sources cited
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
70%
Seattle Storm The Seattle Storm's recent form and head-to-head advantage suggest they will cover the -1 point spread. Their superior performance in recent...
🔍 researched
3 sources cited
First half winner
?
First half winner
First-half winner. Who is ahead at the half-time whistle.
55%
Seattle Storm The Seattle Storm have been strong in the first half of games, often establishing early leads. Their ability to start games aggressively giv...
🔍 researched
3 sources cited
|
|||||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
52%
Portland Fire |
51%
over |
53%
Portland Fire |
51%
Portland Fire |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
52%
Portland Fire Training data through 2025-09. Portland Fire plays at home in Moda Center with a slight edge over the visiting Seattle Storm. Limited recent...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
51%
over Training data through 2025-09. Pace tendencies and scoring averages from both teams point to a moderate total. Long rest periods reduce fati...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
53%
Portland Fire Training data through 2025-09. Portland as home side receives a small spread advantage. Seattle's recent losses suggest vulnerability on the...
First half winner
?
First half winner
First-half winner. Who is ahead at the half-time whistle.
51%
Portland Fire Training data through 2025-09. Home team typically controls early pace in WNBA contests at Moda Center. Limited bench data favors the side w... |
|||||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
55%
Portland Fire |
53%
Over 169.5 |
52%
Portland Fire -4.5 |
54%
Portland Fire |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Portland Fire Portland Fire has a 1-1 record compared to Seattle Storm's 0-2, indicating slightly better early-season form. Their home advantage and highe...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
53%
Over 169.5 Portland Fire's two games averaged 180.5 points combined, indicating a tendency for higher-scoring affairs. While Seattle Storm's games aver...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
52%
Portland Fire -4.5 Portland Fire's better record (1-1 vs 0-2) and superior offensive output (86.5 PPG) make them a solid favorite. The home-court advantage is...
First half winner
?
First half winner
First-half winner. Who is ahead at the half-time whistle.
54%
Portland Fire Portland Fire's tendency for higher-scoring games and their home-court advantage suggest they are more likely to establish an early lead. Th... |
|||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
65%
Seattle Storm |
55%
over |
58%
Seattle Storm |
52%
Seattle Storm |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Seattle Storm The Seattle Storm have a slightly better recent record than the Portland Fire, despite both teams having identical rest periods. The Storm's...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over Both teams have shown a tendency to score and concede a high number of points in their recent matches. The combined average points scored an...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
58%
Seattle Storm The Portland Fire have a slightly higher scoring average in their recent games, but their defense is weaker. The Seattle Storm's more consis...
First half winner
?
First half winner
First-half winner. Who is ahead at the half-time whistle.
52%
Seattle Storm Given the Seattle Storm's slightly better defensive record and their tendency to start games more consistently, they are favored to lead at... |
|||||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
42%
Seattle Storm |
62%
over |
55%
Portland Fire -1 |
52%
Portland Fire |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
42%
Seattle Storm Based on training data through 2025-09, Portland Fire has a stronger recent record and home-court advantage, while Seattle Storm has struggl...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
62%
over The combined recent scoring average for these teams is around 170 points, which suggests a high-scoring game. Both teams have shown the abil...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
55%
Portland Fire -1 Portland Fire's recent form and home-court advantage make them the likely winner by a small margin. The spread of -1 is minimal, and Portlan...
First half winner
?
First half winner
First-half winner. Who is ahead at the half-time whistle.
52%
Portland Fire Portland Fire's stronger recent form and home advantage could give them an early lead. However, the game is expected to be close, so the fir... |
|||||
Match winner
ConsensusSeattle Storm 3/6
Portland Fire has home court at Moda Center and shows 1W-1L recent form with 173 points scored across 2 matches, while Seattle Storm is 0W-2...
The Seattle Storm have a strong track record against the Portland Fire, with a 7-3 head-to-head record in their last 10 meetings. Additional...
Training data through 2025-09. Portland Fire plays at home in Moda Center with a slight edge over the visiting Seattle Storm. Limited recent...
Portland Fire has a 1-1 record compared to Seattle Storm's 0-2, indicating slightly better early-season form. Their home advantage and highe...
The Seattle Storm have a slightly better recent record than the Portland Fire, despite both teams having identical rest periods. The Storm's...
Based on training data through 2025-09, Portland Fire has a stronger recent record and home-court advantage, while Seattle Storm has struggl...
Over / Under
Consensusover 4/6
Portland and Seattle combined for 328 points across 2 matches each (164 PPG average). WNBA games typically total 150–170 points; this matchu...
Both teams have shown a tendency to engage in high-scoring games. The Seattle Storm have averaged 85 points per game in their last 5 outings...
Training data through 2025-09. Pace tendencies and scoring averages from both teams point to a moderate total. Long rest periods reduce fati...
Portland Fire's two games averaged 180.5 points combined, indicating a tendency for higher-scoring affairs. While Seattle Storm's games aver...
Both teams have shown a tendency to score and concede a high number of points in their recent matches. The combined average points scored an...
The combined recent scoring average for these teams is around 170 points, which suggests a high-scoring game. Both teams have shown the abil...
Spread
ConsensusPortland Fire -4.5 2/6
Portland Fire's 1W-1L form, home court, and 18-point average scoring edge over Seattle's recent 0W-2L slump supports a modest spread favorin...
The Seattle Storm's recent form and head-to-head advantage suggest they will cover the -1 point spread. Their superior performance in recent...
Training data through 2025-09. Portland as home side receives a small spread advantage. Seattle's recent losses suggest vulnerability on the...
Portland Fire's better record (1-1 vs 0-2) and superior offensive output (86.5 PPG) make them a solid favorite. The home-court advantage is...
The Portland Fire have a slightly higher scoring average in their recent games, but their defense is weaker. The Seattle Storm's more consis...
Portland Fire's recent form and home-court advantage make them the likely winner by a small margin. The spread of -1 is minimal, and Portlan...
First half winner
ConsensusPortland Fire 4/6
First-half markets in WNBA typically reflect full-game trends with slightly tighter margins. Portland's recent offensive output and home cou...
The Seattle Storm have been strong in the first half of games, often establishing early leads. Their ability to start games aggressively giv...
Training data through 2025-09. Home team typically controls early pace in WNBA contests at Moda Center. Limited bench data favors the side w...
Portland Fire's tendency for higher-scoring games and their home-court advantage suggest they are more likely to establish an early lead. Th...
Given the Seattle Storm's slightly better defensive record and their tendency to start games more consistently, they are favored to lead at...
Portland Fire's stronger recent form and home advantage could give them an early lead. However, the game is expected to be close, so the fir...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGPT-4o Mini
Seattle Storm
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Seattle Storm
Claude Haiku 4.5
Portland Fire
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Portland Fire
Grok 4 Fast
Portland Fire
DeepSeek V3
Seattle Storm
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Refresh the read
Early readRe-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.
Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.
Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
2b95505002af0618…
- Kickoff
- Sun, Aug 9 · 00:30 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Over / Under · Spread · First half winner
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 4. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 4, in this order): h2h | totals | spreads | first_half
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 21666,
"sport": "basketball",
"venue": "Moda Center",
"league": "Women's National Basketball Association",
"starts_at": "2026-08-09T00:30:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Sun, 09 Aug 2026 00:30:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Seattle Storm",
"home": "Portland Fire"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Pace is the master variable for totals — multiply both teams' possessions-per-game tendencies, not just their points.",
"Check the injury/rest report first: a star sitting (or load-managed on a back-to-back) reshapes the spread and total.",
"Weigh offensive vs defensive rating and three-point volume/variance — 3PT-heavy teams have wider outcome distributions.",
"Bench depth and foul trouble swing close games; note rotation reliability.",
"Back-to-backs and travel cause real fatigue — flag the schedule spot for each side.",
"Home-court edge is meaningful but smaller than star availability."
],
"team_context": {
"note": "Reference data from our settled-results database. Verify + extend it with your own research; it is not a substitute for current team news.",
"away_form": {
"last": "LL",
"record": "0W-0D-2L",
"scored": 155,
"matches": 2,
"conceded": 164
},
"home_form": {
"last": "WL",
"record": "1W-0D-1L",
"scored": 173,
"matches": 2,
"conceded": 188
},
"rest_days": {
"away": 56,
"home": 55
}
},
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals",
"spreads",
"first_half"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Research trail
What each AI looked up before picking
-
4 tool calls · 3 sources
3 citations captured — unlock with Pro
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.
Recent recaps
How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.