Portland FirevsLos Angeles Sparks
LAYour call
Who wins? One tap, no signup.
AI predictions
5 markets · 6 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 5 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
|
First half winner
?
First half winner
First-half winner. Who is ahead at the half-time whistle.
|
First half h2h
?
First half h2h
Market explanation coming soon.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Portland Fire 3/6 models |
over 3/6 models |
Los Angeles Sparks 2/6 models |
Los Angeles Sparks 3/5 models |
Away Lead 1/1 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
62%
Portland Fire |
58%
Under 170 |
60%
Portland Fire -4.5 |
59%
Portland Fire |
— | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Portland Fire Portland Fire plays at home (Moda Center) with a marginal rest advantage (49 vs 52 days) and recent mixed form (1-1). Los Angeles Sparks sho...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
Under 170 Portland's recent average is 86.5 ppg (173 in 2 games); LA's single recent game shows 88 points. Combined implicit total is ~174–176, sugges...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
60%
Portland Fire -4.5 Home-court edge in WNBA is typically 3–4 points; Portland's 1-1 form is marginally better than LA's single-game 1-0 record. Portland also ho...
First half winner
?
First half winner
First-half winner. Who is ahead at the half-time whistle.
59%
Portland Fire First-half outcomes often mirror full-game spreads with slightly higher variance due to early rotations and quarter-specific pace. Portland'...
First half h2h
?
First half h2h
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market. |
||||||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | — | — | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
First half winner
?
First half winner
First-half winner. Who is ahead at the half-time whistle.
No pick on this market.
First half h2h
?
First half h2h
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market. |
||||||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
60%
Portland Fire |
55%
over |
55%
Los Angeles Sparks |
60%
Los Angeles Sparks |
— | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
60%
Portland Fire The Portland Fire have home-court advantage and have shown resilience in close contests, despite an 11-14 record. The Sparks have dealt with...
🔍 researched
4 sources cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over Both teams have shown offensive capabilities, with the Sparks averaging 88.3 points per game and the Fire averaging 85.3 points per game. Th...
🔍 researched
4 sources cited
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
55%
Los Angeles Sparks The Los Angeles Sparks have a strong lineup with All-Stars Kelsey Plum and Nneka Ogwumike, which could help them cover the spread despite pl...
🔍 researched
4 sources cited
First half winner
?
First half winner
First-half winner. Who is ahead at the half-time whistle.
60%
Los Angeles Sparks The Sparks have shown strong performances in the first half of games, which could give them an edge in the opening period. ([latimes.com](ht...
🔍 researched
4 sources cited
First half h2h
?
First half h2h
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market. |
||||||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
53%
Portland Fire |
52%
over |
51%
Portland Fire |
50%
Portland Fire |
— | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
53%
Portland Fire Portland Fire enters with a recent win and more rest than the Sparks. Home-court advantage at Moda Center provides a slight edge in a matchu...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
52%
over Both teams show moderate scoring in limited recent samples. Pace tendencies in WNBA typically produce totals near league average. Limited in...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
51%
Portland Fire Home team holds a narrow projected edge after adjusting for rest and venue. Spread markets in future WNBA games often tighten around new or...
First half winner
?
First half winner
First-half winner. Who is ahead at the half-time whistle.
50%
Portland Fire First-half outcomes track closely with full-game projections in basketball. Equal rest and unknown lineups produce a near coin-flip for the...
First half h2h
?
First half h2h
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market. |
||||||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
55%
Away Win |
52%
Over |
53%
Los Angeles Sparks -3.5 |
— |
50%
Away Lead |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Away Win Based on the extremely limited form data provided, the Los Angeles Sparks show a more positive point differential and allowed fewer points i...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
52%
Over The Portland Fire's early season matches averaged 180.5 total points, indicating higher-scoring affairs based on the brief. Coupled with the...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
53%
Los Angeles Sparks -3.5 The Los Angeles Sparks demonstrated a positive point differential of +5 in their only outing, indicating solid performance. Conversely, the...
First half winner
?
First half winner
First-half winner. Who is ahead at the half-time whistle.
No pick on this market.
First half h2h
?
First half h2h
Market explanation coming soon.
50%
Away Lead Extending the slight performance edge observed for the Los Angeles Sparks in the full-game analysis, it's anticipated they will hold a lead... |
||||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
60%
Los Angeles Sparks |
55%
over |
53%
Los Angeles Sparks |
58%
Los Angeles Sparks |
— | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
60%
Los Angeles Sparks Given that the provided team data indicates the Los Angeles Sparks have had a better recent record (1W-0L) compared to the Portland Fire (1W...
2 sources cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over The combined points scored by both teams in their limited recent matches are high (Sparks 88, Fire 173 total over 2 games). The Portland Fir...
2 sources cited
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
53%
Los Angeles Sparks Given the Sparks' slightly better form and more rest, they are projected to cover a moderate spread. While the Fire's scoring can be high, t...
2 sources cited
First half winner
?
First half winner
First-half winner. Who is ahead at the half-time whistle.
58%
Los Angeles Sparks The Los Angeles Sparks' stronger recent form and greater rest advantage suggest they are likely to start the game strong and lead at halftim...
2 sources cited
First half h2h
?
First half h2h
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market. |
||||||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
55%
Los Angeles Sparks |
60%
Over 162.5 |
52%
Los Angeles Sparks -3.5 |
53%
Los Angeles Sparks |
— | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Los Angeles Sparks Based on training data through early 2024, the Sparks have a stronger roster and historically better performance than the Fire, who are an e...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
Over 162.5 Both teams have shown high-scoring tendencies in their recent games, with combined points averaging above 165 in their last outings. Portlan...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
52%
Los Angeles Sparks -3.5 The spread suggests a close game, but the Sparks' talent advantage and Portland's defensive issues give LA a slight edge to cover. Sparks ar...
First half winner
?
First half winner
First-half winner. Who is ahead at the half-time whistle.
53%
Los Angeles Sparks The Sparks typically start strong and have a more experienced backcourt, which can control the first half tempo. Portland may need time to s...
First half h2h
?
First half h2h
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market. |
||||||
Match winner
ConsensusPortland Fire 3/6
Portland Fire plays at home (Moda Center) with a marginal rest advantage (49 vs 52 days) and recent mixed form (1-1). Los Angeles Sparks sho...
The Portland Fire have home-court advantage and have shown resilience in close contests, despite an 11-14 record. The Sparks have dealt with...
Portland Fire enters with a recent win and more rest than the Sparks. Home-court advantage at Moda Center provides a slight edge in a matchu...
Based on the extremely limited form data provided, the Los Angeles Sparks show a more positive point differential and allowed fewer points i...
Given that the provided team data indicates the Los Angeles Sparks have had a better recent record (1W-0L) compared to the Portland Fire (1W...
Based on training data through early 2024, the Sparks have a stronger roster and historically better performance than the Fire, who are an e...
Over / Under
Consensusover 3/6
Portland's recent average is 86.5 ppg (173 in 2 games); LA's single recent game shows 88 points. Combined implicit total is ~174–176, sugges...
Both teams have shown offensive capabilities, with the Sparks averaging 88.3 points per game and the Fire averaging 85.3 points per game. Th...
Both teams show moderate scoring in limited recent samples. Pace tendencies in WNBA typically produce totals near league average. Limited in...
The Portland Fire's early season matches averaged 180.5 total points, indicating higher-scoring affairs based on the brief. Coupled with the...
The combined points scored by both teams in their limited recent matches are high (Sparks 88, Fire 173 total over 2 games). The Portland Fir...
Both teams have shown high-scoring tendencies in their recent games, with combined points averaging above 165 in their last outings. Portlan...
Spread
ConsensusLos Angeles Sparks 2/6
Home-court edge in WNBA is typically 3–4 points; Portland's 1-1 form is marginally better than LA's single-game 1-0 record. Portland also ho...
The Los Angeles Sparks have a strong lineup with All-Stars Kelsey Plum and Nneka Ogwumike, which could help them cover the spread despite pl...
Home team holds a narrow projected edge after adjusting for rest and venue. Spread markets in future WNBA games often tighten around new or...
The Los Angeles Sparks demonstrated a positive point differential of +5 in their only outing, indicating solid performance. Conversely, the...
Given the Sparks' slightly better form and more rest, they are projected to cover a moderate spread. While the Fire's scoring can be high, t...
The spread suggests a close game, but the Sparks' talent advantage and Portland's defensive issues give LA a slight edge to cover. Sparks ar...
First half winner
ConsensusLos Angeles Sparks 3/5
First-half outcomes often mirror full-game spreads with slightly higher variance due to early rotations and quarter-specific pace. Portland'...
The Sparks have shown strong performances in the first half of games, which could give them an edge in the opening period. ([latimes.com](ht...
First-half outcomes track closely with full-game projections in basketball. Equal rest and unknown lineups produce a near coin-flip for the...
The Los Angeles Sparks' stronger recent form and greater rest advantage suggest they are likely to start the game strong and lead at halftim...
The Sparks typically start strong and have a more experienced backcourt, which can control the first half tempo. Portland may need time to s...
First half h2h
ConsensusAway Lead 1/1
Extending the slight performance edge observed for the Los Angeles Sparks in the full-game analysis, it's anticipated they will hold a lead...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerClaude Haiku 4.5
Portland Fire
GPT-4o Mini
Portland Fire
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Los Angeles Sparks
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Away Win
DeepSeek V3
Los Angeles Sparks
Grok 4 Fast
Portland Fire
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Refresh the read
Early readRe-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.
Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.
Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
c8ae61456a377b28…
- Kickoff
- Sun, Aug 2 · 19:30 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Over / Under · Spread · First half winner
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 4. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 4, in this order): h2h | totals | spreads | first_half
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 18524,
"sport": "basketball",
"venue": "Moda Center",
"league": "Women's National Basketball Association",
"starts_at": "2026-08-02T19:30:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Sun, 02 Aug 2026 19:30:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Los Angeles Sparks",
"home": "Portland Fire"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Pace is the master variable for totals — multiply both teams' possessions-per-game tendencies, not just their points.",
"Check the injury/rest report first: a star sitting (or load-managed on a back-to-back) reshapes the spread and total.",
"Weigh offensive vs defensive rating and three-point volume/variance — 3PT-heavy teams have wider outcome distributions.",
"Bench depth and foul trouble swing close games; note rotation reliability.",
"Back-to-backs and travel cause real fatigue — flag the schedule spot for each side.",
"Home-court edge is meaningful but smaller than star availability."
],
"team_context": {
"note": "Reference data from our settled-results database. Verify + extend it with your own research; it is not a substitute for current team news.",
"away_form": {
"last": "W",
"record": "1W-0D-0L",
"scored": 88,
"matches": 1,
"conceded": 83
},
"home_form": {
"last": "WL",
"record": "1W-0D-1L",
"scored": 173,
"matches": 2,
"conceded": 188
},
"rest_days": {
"away": 52,
"home": 49
}
},
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals",
"spreads",
"first_half"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Research trail
What each AI looked up before picking
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 2 sources
2 citations captured — unlock with Pro
-
4 tool calls · 4 sources
4 citations captured — unlock with Pro
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.
Recent recaps
How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.