Portland FirevsIndiana Fever
IFYour call
Who wins? One tap, no signup.
AI predictions
5 markets · 6 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 5 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
|
First half winner
?
First half winner
First-half winner. Who is ahead at the half-time whistle.
|
First half total
?
First half total
Market explanation coming soon.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Indiana Fever 6/6 models |
over 3/6 models |
Indiana Fever 3/6 models |
Indiana Fever 5/5 models |
over 1/1 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
62%
Indiana Fever |
57%
Under 162.5 |
60%
Indiana Fever -2.5 |
58%
Indiana Fever |
— | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Indiana Fever Indiana enters on a 2-game win streak with superior recent scoring output (199 vs 173 PPG) and a tighter defensive profile (181 conceded vs...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
57%
Under 162.5 Combined scoring in the two reference matches was 173 (Portland) + 199 (Indiana) = 372 across two games. Averaging 186 per team per game sug...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
60%
Indiana Fever -2.5 Indiana's +18 scoring differential (199 scored − 181 conceded) and 2-game win streak outweigh Portland's home-court advantage. A 2.5-point l...
First half winner
?
First half winner
First-half winner. Who is ahead at the half-time whistle.
58%
Indiana Fever Indiana's offensive consistency (199 PPG) and defensive intensity (181 conceded) should translate to a strong first-half performance, especi...
First half total
?
First half total
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market. |
||||||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | — | — | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
First half winner
?
First half winner
First-half winner. Who is ahead at the half-time whistle.
No pick on this market.
First half total
?
First half total
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market. |
||||||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
60%
Indiana Fever |
70%
over |
65%
Indiana Fever |
60%
Indiana Fever |
— | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
60%
Indiana Fever The Indiana Fever have shown strong recent form with two consecutive wins, scoring 199 points and conceding 181 over their last two matches....
🔍 researched
1 source cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
70%
over Both teams have demonstrated high-scoring games recently, with the Fever scoring 199 points and the Fire scoring 173 in their last two match...
🔍 researched
1 source cited
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
65%
Indiana Fever Given the Fever's recent strong performance and the Fire's mixed record, the Fever are likely to cover a -1 point spread. Their superior off...
🔍 researched
1 source cited
First half winner
?
First half winner
First-half winner. Who is ahead at the half-time whistle.
60%
Indiana Fever The Fever's strong offensive performance in recent games suggests they are likely to lead at halftime. Their recent form and scoring ability...
🔍 researched
1 source cited
First half total
?
First half total
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market. |
||||||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
58%
Indiana Fever |
53%
over |
52%
Indiana Fever |
54%
Indiana Fever |
— | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Indiana Fever Indiana Fever enter with a perfect 2-0 record and superior recent scoring differential compared to Portland Fire's split results. Both teams...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
53%
over Pace emphasis in WNBA games favors higher totals when rested teams meet. Fever's offensive output in recent matches projects well above aver...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
52%
Indiana Fever Fever's recent scoring edge and roster stability suggest they cover a modest spread despite road status. Home team shows defensive vulnerabi...
First half winner
?
First half winner
First-half winner. Who is ahead at the half-time whistle.
54%
Indiana Fever Fever's early-game efficiency in available samples carries into first-half projections. Both clubs have long rest, reducing second-half fati...
First half total
?
First half total
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market. |
||||||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
60%
Indiana Fever |
53%
Over 178.5 |
55%
Indiana Fever -6.5 |
58%
Indiana Fever |
— | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
60%
Indiana Fever Based on the provided early season form, Indiana Fever has started 2-0 with a strong positive point differential (+18), indicating solid per...
1 source cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
53%
Over 178.5 The provided form data shows both teams involved in high-scoring affairs, with Indiana's games averaging 190 total points and Portland's ave...
1 source cited
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
55%
Indiana Fever -6.5 Indiana Fever exhibits a significant advantage in early season point differential (+9 per game) compared to Portland Fire (-7.5 per game). E...
1 source cited
First half winner
?
First half winner
First-half winner. Who is ahead at the half-time whistle.
58%
Indiana Fever Building on their stronger overall form and more potent offensive output in their initial games, Indiana Fever is expected to start this mat...
1 source cited
First half total
?
First half total
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market. |
||||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
58%
Indiana Fever |
55%
over |
52%
Indiana Fever |
— |
51%
over |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Indiana Fever The Indiana Fever have a superior recent record, winning their last two games while the Portland Fire have a mixed 1-1 record. The Fever hav...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over Both teams have demonstrated capable offense in their recent games, with the Indiana Fever averaging 99.5 points per game and the Portland F...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
52%
Indiana Fever The Indiana Fever have shown better form and offensive consistency, scoring more points and winning their recent games. While the spread is...
First half winner
?
First half winner
First-half winner. Who is ahead at the half-time whistle.
No pick on this market.
First half total
?
First half total
Market explanation coming soon.
51%
over Given the offensive capabilities demonstrated by both teams in their recent games, it's reasonable to expect a competitive first half. The I... |
||||||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
55%
Indiana Fever |
60%
Over |
55%
Indiana Fever -1 |
55%
Indiana Fever |
— | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Indiana Fever Indiana begins the season with two road wins, showing strong offensive output (99.5 PPG) and defensive solidity. Portland splits their first...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
Over Both teams have scored over 170 combined points in their games so far (Fever 199, Fire 173 in two games). Given the Fever's pace and Portlan...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
55%
Indiana Fever -1 Fever's early dominance on the road suggests they can cover a small spread against a home team that has been inconsistent. Portland's losses...
First half winner
?
First half winner
First-half winner. Who is ahead at the half-time whistle.
55%
Indiana Fever Fever have started games strong, leading at halftime in both victories. Portland has shown vulnerability early, trailing in halves of their...
First half total
?
First half total
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market. |
||||||
Match winner
ConsensusIndiana Fever 6/6
Indiana enters on a 2-game win streak with superior recent scoring output (199 vs 173 PPG) and a tighter defensive profile (181 conceded vs...
The Indiana Fever have shown strong recent form with two consecutive wins, scoring 199 points and conceding 181 over their last two matches....
Indiana Fever enter with a perfect 2-0 record and superior recent scoring differential compared to Portland Fire's split results. Both teams...
Based on the provided early season form, Indiana Fever has started 2-0 with a strong positive point differential (+18), indicating solid per...
The Indiana Fever have a superior recent record, winning their last two games while the Portland Fire have a mixed 1-1 record. The Fever hav...
Indiana begins the season with two road wins, showing strong offensive output (99.5 PPG) and defensive solidity. Portland splits their first...
Over / Under
Consensusover 3/6
Combined scoring in the two reference matches was 173 (Portland) + 199 (Indiana) = 372 across two games. Averaging 186 per team per game sug...
Both teams have demonstrated high-scoring games recently, with the Fever scoring 199 points and the Fire scoring 173 in their last two match...
Pace emphasis in WNBA games favors higher totals when rested teams meet. Fever's offensive output in recent matches projects well above aver...
The provided form data shows both teams involved in high-scoring affairs, with Indiana's games averaging 190 total points and Portland's ave...
Both teams have demonstrated capable offense in their recent games, with the Indiana Fever averaging 99.5 points per game and the Portland F...
Both teams have scored over 170 combined points in their games so far (Fever 199, Fire 173 in two games). Given the Fever's pace and Portlan...
Spread
ConsensusIndiana Fever 3/6
Indiana's +18 scoring differential (199 scored − 181 conceded) and 2-game win streak outweigh Portland's home-court advantage. A 2.5-point l...
Given the Fever's recent strong performance and the Fire's mixed record, the Fever are likely to cover a -1 point spread. Their superior off...
Fever's recent scoring edge and roster stability suggest they cover a modest spread despite road status. Home team shows defensive vulnerabi...
Indiana Fever exhibits a significant advantage in early season point differential (+9 per game) compared to Portland Fire (-7.5 per game). E...
The Indiana Fever have shown better form and offensive consistency, scoring more points and winning their recent games. While the spread is...
Fever's early dominance on the road suggests they can cover a small spread against a home team that has been inconsistent. Portland's losses...
First half winner
ConsensusIndiana Fever 5/5
Indiana's offensive consistency (199 PPG) and defensive intensity (181 conceded) should translate to a strong first-half performance, especi...
The Fever's strong offensive performance in recent games suggests they are likely to lead at halftime. Their recent form and scoring ability...
Fever's early-game efficiency in available samples carries into first-half projections. Both clubs have long rest, reducing second-half fati...
Building on their stronger overall form and more potent offensive output in their initial games, Indiana Fever is expected to start this mat...
Fever have started games strong, leading at halftime in both victories. Portland has shown vulnerability early, trailing in halves of their...
First half total
Consensusover 1/1
Given the offensive capabilities demonstrated by both teams in their recent games, it's reasonable to expect a competitive first half. The I...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerClaude Haiku 4.5
Indiana Fever
GPT-4o Mini
Indiana Fever
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Indiana Fever
Grok 4 Fast
Indiana Fever
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Indiana Fever
DeepSeek V3
Indiana Fever
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Refresh the read
Early readRe-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.
Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.
Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
199627c92974ad9b…
- Kickoff
- Sat, Aug 1 · 02:00 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Over / Under · Spread · First half winner
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 4. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 4, in this order): h2h | totals | spreads | first_half
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 18012,
"sport": "basketball",
"venue": "Moda Center",
"league": "Women's National Basketball Association",
"starts_at": "2026-08-01T02:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Sat, 01 Aug 2026 02:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Indiana Fever",
"home": "Portland Fire"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Pace is the master variable for totals — multiply both teams' possessions-per-game tendencies, not just their points.",
"Check the injury/rest report first: a star sitting (or load-managed on a back-to-back) reshapes the spread and total.",
"Weigh offensive vs defensive rating and three-point volume/variance — 3PT-heavy teams have wider outcome distributions.",
"Bench depth and foul trouble swing close games; note rotation reliability.",
"Back-to-backs and travel cause real fatigue — flag the schedule spot for each side.",
"Home-court edge is meaningful but smaller than star availability."
],
"team_context": {
"note": "Reference data from our settled-results database. Verify + extend it with your own research; it is not a substitute for current team news.",
"away_form": {
"last": "WW",
"record": "2W-0D-0L",
"scored": 199,
"matches": 2,
"conceded": 181
},
"home_form": {
"last": "WL",
"record": "1W-0D-1L",
"scored": 173,
"matches": 2,
"conceded": 188
},
"rest_days": {
"away": 48,
"home": 48
}
},
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals",
"spreads",
"first_half"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Research trail
What each AI looked up before picking
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
4 tool calls · 1 source
1 citation captured — unlock with Pro
-
0 tool calls · 1 source
1 citation captured — unlock with Pro
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.
Recent recaps
How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.