Pittsburgh PiratesvsMilwaukee Brewers
Your call
Who wins? One tap, no signup.
AI predictions
4 markets · 6 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 4 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
|
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Milwaukee Brewers 4/6 models |
over 3/6 models |
Milwaukee Brewers 2/6 models |
Milwaukee Brewers 4/6 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
58%
Milwaukee Brewers |
52%
Over 8.5 |
48%
Milwaukee Brewers -1.5 |
55%
Milwaukee Brewers |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Milwaukee Brewers Milwaukee enters on a 4-1 run (LWWWW) with stronger recent offensive consistency and better pitching discipline, while Pittsburgh has droppe...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
52%
Over 8.5 Pittsburgh's recent form shows 35 runs across 5 matches (7.0 RPG) and Milwaukee 22 runs in 5 (4.4 RPG), but both offenses are moderately act...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
48%
Milwaukee Brewers -1.5 Milwaukee's stronger recent form (4-1 vs Pittsburgh's 3-2) and superior run differential over the last five games (7 runs conceded vs 22) wo...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
55%
Milwaukee Brewers First-five-innings markets are dominated by starting pitcher form and early bullpen deployment. Milwaukee's recent form trajectory (4-1) and... |
|||||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | — | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
No pick on this market. |
|||||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
65%
Pittsburgh Pirates |
60%
over |
65%
Pittsburgh Pirates |
55%
Pittsburgh Pirates |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Pittsburgh Pirates The Pittsburgh Pirates have a home advantage at PNC Park and have shown a balanced performance with a 23-22 home record. The Brewers, while...
🔍 researched
3 sources cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
over Both teams have shown offensive capabilities, with the Brewers averaging 5.2 runs per game and the Pirates averaging 5.2 runs per game. The...
🔍 researched
3 sources cited
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
65%
Pittsburgh Pirates The Pirates' home advantage and recent form suggest they are likely to cover a -1 spread. Their balanced home record and the Brewers' slight...
🔍 researched
3 sources cited
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
55%
Pittsburgh Pirates Considering the Pirates' home advantage and the Brewers' away performance, the Pirates are slightly favored to lead after the first five inn...
🔍 researched
3 sources cited
|
|||||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
52%
Milwaukee Brewers |
53%
over |
51%
Milwaukee Brewers |
52%
over |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
52%
Milwaukee Brewers Brewers recent form (4W-1L) edges Pirates (3W-2L) and Milwaukee maintains stronger overall roster profile. Both clubs have identical 3 rest...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
53%
over Combined recent scoring (Brewers 22/5, Pirates 35/5) points to elevated run environment. Neutral rest and typical July conditions favor over...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
51%
Milwaukee Brewers Brewers superior recent record and pitching depth give them a narrow edge on the run line. Pirates higher concession rate (22 in 5 games) cr...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
52%
over Early-inning run scoring trends mirror the full-game lean with both offenses showing recent potency. Neutral rest days keep bullpen usage st... |
|||||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
53%
Milwaukee Brewers |
52%
Over 8.5 |
60%
Pittsburgh Pirates +1.5 |
51%
Milwaukee Brewers |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
53%
Milwaukee Brewers This prediction relies on training data through early 2026 and the provided team form, as live future data is unavailable. The Milwaukee Bre...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
52%
Over 8.5 Based on training data and the provided team context, this pick leans towards the Over. Pittsburgh's recent games have been higher scoring,...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
60%
Pittsburgh Pirates +1.5 This prediction relies on training data and general MLB trends, given the lack of specific future event details. While Milwaukee is slightly...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
51%
Milwaukee Brewers Based on training data and the provided team form, the Milwaukee Brewers are marginally favored for the first five innings. This market is h... |
|||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
53%
Milwaukee Brewers |
55%
over |
52%
Milwaukee Brewers |
51%
Milwaukee Brewers |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
53%
Milwaukee Brewers The Milwaukee Brewers have a slightly better recent form (4 wins in last 5) compared to the Pittsburgh Pirates (3 wins in last 5). While bot...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over Given the offensive output in the recent games for both teams (Brewers scored 22, Pirates scored 35 in their last 5 matches), and without sp...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
52%
Milwaukee Brewers While the Pirates have shown a higher scoring ability recently, the Brewers' slightly more consistent winning record and overall better defe...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
51%
Milwaukee Brewers Without specific starting pitcher data, it's difficult to make a definitive pick. However, based on the Brewers' slightly better recent form... |
|||||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
53%
Pittsburgh Pirates |
52%
Over 8.5 |
30%
Pittsburgh Pirates -1.5 |
48%
Milwaukee Brewers |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
53%
Pittsburgh Pirates Both teams have comparable recent form, but the Pirates have home-field advantage. The Brewers' bullpen has been overworked recently, which...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
52%
Over 8.5 Both teams have scored frequently recently (Brewers 22 runs, Pirates 35 runs in last 5). Expected starters are backend rotation arms, which...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
30%
Pittsburgh Pirates -1.5 The Pirates are slight favorites, but covering -1.5 requires a multi-run win. Given the competitive nature of these teams, a one-run game is...
First 5 innings
?
First 5 innings
First five innings result. Standings after five innings, regardless of late drama.
48%
Milwaukee Brewers Without confirmed starters, assuming a neutral matchup. The Brewers have a slightly better recent record in early innings. However, home adv... |
|||||
Match winner
ConsensusMilwaukee Brewers 4/6
Milwaukee enters on a 4-1 run (LWWWW) with stronger recent offensive consistency and better pitching discipline, while Pittsburgh has droppe...
The Pittsburgh Pirates have a home advantage at PNC Park and have shown a balanced performance with a 23-22 home record. The Brewers, while...
Brewers recent form (4W-1L) edges Pirates (3W-2L) and Milwaukee maintains stronger overall roster profile. Both clubs have identical 3 rest...
This prediction relies on training data through early 2026 and the provided team form, as live future data is unavailable. The Milwaukee Bre...
The Milwaukee Brewers have a slightly better recent form (4 wins in last 5) compared to the Pittsburgh Pirates (3 wins in last 5). While bot...
Both teams have comparable recent form, but the Pirates have home-field advantage. The Brewers' bullpen has been overworked recently, which...
Over / Under
Consensusover 3/6
Pittsburgh's recent form shows 35 runs across 5 matches (7.0 RPG) and Milwaukee 22 runs in 5 (4.4 RPG), but both offenses are moderately act...
Both teams have shown offensive capabilities, with the Brewers averaging 5.2 runs per game and the Pirates averaging 5.2 runs per game. The...
Combined recent scoring (Brewers 22/5, Pirates 35/5) points to elevated run environment. Neutral rest and typical July conditions favor over...
Based on training data and the provided team context, this pick leans towards the Over. Pittsburgh's recent games have been higher scoring,...
Given the offensive output in the recent games for both teams (Brewers scored 22, Pirates scored 35 in their last 5 matches), and without sp...
Both teams have scored frequently recently (Brewers 22 runs, Pirates 35 runs in last 5). Expected starters are backend rotation arms, which...
Spread
ConsensusMilwaukee Brewers 2/6
Milwaukee's stronger recent form (4-1 vs Pittsburgh's 3-2) and superior run differential over the last five games (7 runs conceded vs 22) wo...
The Pirates' home advantage and recent form suggest they are likely to cover a -1 spread. Their balanced home record and the Brewers' slight...
Brewers superior recent record and pitching depth give them a narrow edge on the run line. Pirates higher concession rate (22 in 5 games) cr...
This prediction relies on training data and general MLB trends, given the lack of specific future event details. While Milwaukee is slightly...
While the Pirates have shown a higher scoring ability recently, the Brewers' slightly more consistent winning record and overall better defe...
The Pirates are slight favorites, but covering -1.5 requires a multi-run win. Given the competitive nature of these teams, a one-run game is...
First 5 innings
ConsensusMilwaukee Brewers 4/6
First-five-innings markets are dominated by starting pitcher form and early bullpen deployment. Milwaukee's recent form trajectory (4-1) and...
Considering the Pirates' home advantage and the Brewers' away performance, the Pirates are slightly favored to lead after the first five inn...
Early-inning run scoring trends mirror the full-game lean with both offenses showing recent potency. Neutral rest days keep bullpen usage st...
Based on training data and the provided team form, the Milwaukee Brewers are marginally favored for the first five innings. This market is h...
Without specific starting pitcher data, it's difficult to make a definitive pick. However, based on the Brewers' slightly better recent form...
Without confirmed starters, assuming a neutral matchup. The Brewers have a slightly better recent record in early innings. However, home adv...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGPT-4o Mini
Pittsburgh Pirates
Claude Haiku 4.5
Milwaukee Brewers
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Milwaukee Brewers
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Milwaukee Brewers
DeepSeek V3
Pittsburgh Pirates
Grok 4 Fast
Milwaukee Brewers
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Refresh the read
Early readRe-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.
Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.
Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
67a8a71abe4efe8c…
- Kickoff
- Sun, Jul 12 · 16:15 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Over / Under · Spread · First 5 innings
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 4. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 4, in this order): h2h | totals | spreads | first_five_innings
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 12086,
"sport": "baseball",
"venue": null,
"league": "MLB",
"starts_at": "2026-07-12T16:15:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Sun, 12 Jul 2026 16:15:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Milwaukee Brewers",
"home": "Pittsburgh Pirates"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"The starting-pitcher matchup is the single biggest factor — compare each starter's recent form, not just season ERA.",
"Bullpen rest and usage over the last few days drives late-game and total outcomes.",
"Ballpark factors matter: dimensions, altitude (e.g. Coors), and especially wind direction (out = more runs, in = fewer).",
"Lineup handedness vs the opposing starter (L/R platoon splits) shifts the run expectation.",
"Weather (wind, temperature, humidity) measurably affects carry and totals."
],
"team_context": {
"note": "Reference data from our settled-results database. Verify + extend it with your own research; it is not a substitute for current team news.",
"away_form": {
"last": "LWWWW",
"record": "4W-0D-1L",
"scored": 22,
"matches": 5,
"conceded": 15
},
"home_form": {
"last": "LWWWL",
"record": "3W-0D-2L",
"scored": 35,
"matches": 5,
"conceded": 22
},
"rest_days": {
"away": 3,
"home": 3
}
},
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals",
"spreads",
"first_five_innings"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Research trail
What each AI looked up before picking
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
4 tool calls · 3 sources
3 citations captured — unlock with Pro
Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.
Recent recaps
How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.