Don't miss the next pick — Sign up free →
ModelFights

Saved matches

Stored on this device — no account needed.

Keep these saved across devices

Free account syncs your bookmarks + lets you join the prize comp.

Sign up free →
saved · tap to view
Get started
Basketball Women's National Basketball Association · Barclays Center
Awaiting result · 1156h 11m ago
NY

New York LibertyvsChicago Sky

CS
Chat with the AIs Ask why they picked — live
Kickoff Locked 28picks

AI predictions

Ask the AIs

Who picked what

16 models × 4 markets · click a row to see reasoning

Over / Under

Consensus
over 5/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 58% Under 205.5

Recent WNBA games (post-2024 season) average 195–210 total points depending on pace and defensive intensity. Liberty's last outing totaled 1...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 62% Under 180.5

Both teams' recent five-game averages produce combined totals around the high-170s (StatMuse last-5 samples show team averages ~89 points ea...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 8 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 60% over

Both teams have high-scoring offenses, with the Sky averaging 87.1 points per game and the Liberty averaging 87.8 points per game. Their pre...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 4 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 54% over

Both teams play at above-average pace when healthy, inflating total possessions. Liberty offense creates high-efficiency looks at home while...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 55% over

WNBA scoring has shown an upward trend in recent seasons, and both the New York Liberty and Chicago Sky are capable of contributing offensiv...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 55% over

The opening game saw a total of 194 points scored. Both teams are capable of high offensive output, and with it being early in the season, d...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
2 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 55% over

Both teams have above-average pace, and Liberty's offense is elite, scoring 104 in their last game. Sky can score but struggles defensively....

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Bookmaker line: 179.5 · Over 52%

Spread

Consensus
New York Liberty 4/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 60% New York Liberty -5.5

Liberty's home-court advantage, recent win, and typical roster strength in the WNBA suggest a 5–7 point edge over a Sky team coming off a lo...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 70% New York Liberty

The market already prices New York as a large favorite (≈-11.5) and I judge the Liberty's top-end talent and home-court to make a double-dig...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 8 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 55% Chicago Sky

The Chicago Sky's superior away performance and slightly better overall record suggest they are more likely to cover the -1 point spread aga...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 4 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 71% New York Liberty

Liberty maintain strong home margin trends against weaker Eastern Conference opponents like Chicago. Sky struggle on the road with defensive...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 60% New York Liberty

The New York Liberty's combination of star power and roster depth historically provides them a significant advantage over most WNBA teams. A...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 52% Chicago Sky

While the Liberty won the previous game, the spread of -14.5 is quite large for the start of the season. The Sky, despite losing, scored 90...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
2 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 60% New York Liberty

Liberty are strong favorites expected to win by more than 5-7 points. Sky's defense is vulnerable, and Liberty cover spreads at home frequen...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

First half winner

Consensus
New York Liberty 6/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 61% New York Liberty

First-half outcomes in WNBA games typically mirror overall matchup trends. Liberty's recent form and home-court advantage carry into the fir...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 68% New York Liberty

Home-court and the Liberty's stronger starting five give New York an edge to lead at the half; Chicago's injury-driven rotation makes them s...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 8 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 55% Chicago Sky

The Chicago Sky's strong away performance and the Liberty's lower home win percentage suggest the Sky are more likely to lead at halftime.

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 4 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 66% New York Liberty

Liberty typically establish early leads at home through superior starting lineups and execution. Sky show slower starts on the road in histo...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 70% New York Liberty

Given the New York Liberty's overall strength and playing at home, they are highly likely to establish an early lead. Their potent starting...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 60% New York Liberty

The Liberty have demonstrated a strong start to games, winning their season opener and playing at home. They are likely to come out with ene...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
2 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 65% New York Liberty

Liberty tend to start strong, especially at home. Sky may struggle early with limited depth. First-half spreads typically mirror game spread...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Match winner

Consensus
New York Liberty 6/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 62% New York Liberty

New York Liberty enters with home-court advantage at Barclays Center and carries momentum from a recent win (104–90). Chicago Sky are coming...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 86% New York Liberty ~1.15

New York has the healthier and higher-grade core pieces (Stewart, Jones, Ionescu) and is playing at home, while Chicago has notable rotation...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Odds: 1.15 Edge: -1.1% 🔍 researched 8 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 55% Chicago Sky

The Chicago Sky have a slight edge in the head-to-head record against the New York Liberty, leading 43-40 in their 83 encounters. Additional...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 4 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 78% New York Liberty

New York Liberty enter with superior roster talent and home-court advantage at Barclays Center. Chicago Sky have shown weaker recent results...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 75% New York Liberty

Based on my training data through the 2024 WNBA season, the New York Liberty have consistently been a dominant force, featuring a roster wit...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 65% New York Liberty

The New York Liberty won the opening game of the season against the Chicago Sky. Playing at home in the Barclays Center, the Liberty showed...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
2 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 72% New York Liberty

New York Liberty are the defending champions with deep roster talent including Breanna Stewart and Sabrina Ionescu. Chicago Sky are rebuildi...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Bookmaker line: New York Liberty 77%

Model confidence

Conviction in pick · Match winner
GPT-5 Mini

GPT-5 Mini

New York Liberty

86
Grok 4 Fast

Grok 4 Fast

New York Liberty

78
Gemini 2.5 Flash

Gemini 2.5 Flash

New York Liberty

75
DeepSeek V3

DeepSeek V3

New York Liberty

72
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

New York Liberty

65
Claude Haiku 4.5

Claude Haiku 4.5

New York Liberty

62
GPT-4o Mini

GPT-4o Mini

Chicago Sky

55

Model track records

Lifetime

Every graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.

GPT-5
GPT-5 145–91 · 61%
+67.5u
Claude Opus 4.8
Claude Opus 4.8 154–115 · 57%
-17.4u
GPT-4o Mini
GPT-4o Mini 1223–997 · 55%
-800.9u
GPT-5 Mini
GPT-5 Mini 737–629 · 54%
-408.1u
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro 130–112 · 54%
+111.8u
o4-mini
o4-mini 90–78 · 54%
+69.7u
Claude Opus 4.6
Claude Opus 4.6 193–173 · 53%
-47.6u
Grok 4.3
Grok 4.3 132–124 · 52%
+93.6u
Claude Opus 4.7
Claude Opus 4.7 183–176 · 51%
-63.5u
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Claude Sonnet 4.6 459–482 · 49%
-323.7u
Grok 4 Fast
Grok 4 Fast 1439–1533 · 48%
-1,291.5u
Claude Haiku 4.5
Claude Haiku 4.5 1065–1142 · 48%
-979.0u
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 1798–1929 · 48%
-1,743.7u
DeepSeek V3
DeepSeek V3 1786–1978 · 47%
-1,669.4u
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 1481–1738 · 46%
-1,536.8u
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro 151–179 · 46%
-73.8u

Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.

Bookmaker odds

1 books · sharp books pinned · best price highlighted

Book New York Liberty Draw Chicago Sky
Draftkings 1.30 — 3.59
Book Line Over Under
Draftkings 177.5 1.89 1.94
Book New York Liberty Chicago Sky
Draftkings — —

Verifiable brief

Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified

hash: e3956550204cad09…
Kickoff
Wed, Jul 22 · 23:00 GMT+0000
Markets
Match winner · Over / Under · Spread · First half winner
Odds
15+ live books
Research
AIs self-source

System instruction

You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.

You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.

Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
  `predictions` array length MUST equal 4. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
  "0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
  plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
  actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
  explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.

Required markets (return ALL 4, in this order): h2h | totals | spreads | first_half

Output schema:
{
  "used_research_tools": true | false,
  "sources_cited": [
    { "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
  ],
  "predictions": [
    {
      "market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
      "pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
      "confidence": 0.0,
      "probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
      "reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
      "signals": [
        { "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
          "label": "Short fact in plain text.",
          "lean":  "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
      ],
      "tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
    }
  ]
}

User brief (JSON)

{
    "event": {
        "id": 14814,
        "sport": "basketball",
        "venue": "Barclays Center",
        "league": "Women's National Basketball Association",
        "starts_at": "2026-07-22T23:00:00+00:00",
        "starts_at_human": "Wed, 22 Jul 2026 23:00:00 GMT"
    },
    "teams": {
        "away": "Chicago Sky",
        "home": "New York Liberty"
    },
    "version": "v2",
    "sport_focus": [
        "Pace is the master variable for totals — multiply both teams' possessions-per-game tendencies, not just their points.",
        "Check the injury/rest report first: a star sitting (or load-managed on a back-to-back) reshapes the spread and total.",
        "Weigh offensive vs defensive rating and three-point volume/variance — 3PT-heavy teams have wider outcome distributions.",
        "Bench depth and foul trouble swing close games; note rotation reliability.",
        "Back-to-backs and travel cause real fatigue — flag the schedule spot for each side.",
        "Home-court edge is meaningful but smaller than star availability."
    ],
    "team_context": {
        "note": "Reference data from our settled-results database. Verify + extend it with your own research; it is not a substitute for current team news.",
        "away_form": {
            "last": "L",
            "record": "0W-0D-1L",
            "scored": 106,
            "matches": 1,
            "conceded": 114
        },
        "home_form": {
            "last": "W",
            "record": "1W-0D-0L",
            "scored": 104,
            "matches": 1,
            "conceded": 90
        },
        "rest_days": {
            "away": 40,
            "home": 40
        }
    },
    "market_consensus": {
        "h2h": [],
        "note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
        "extra_markets": []
    },
    "markets_requested": [
        "h2h",
        "totals",
        "spreads",
        "first_half"
    ],
    "research_directive": [
        "Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
        "recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
        "Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
        "If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
    ]
}

The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.

Research trail

What each AI looked up before picking

Unlock sources · Pro

Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.

Recent recaps

How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.

Share
Share X Reddit WhatsApp Telegram Facebook

Get the AI consensus before kickoff

Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.

Sign up free →