NetherlandsvsLatvia
Netherlands 69–72 Latvia
5 of 6 AIs leaned Latvia — and reality agreed.
- AI lean
- Latvia 5/6
- Correct calls
- 5/6
- Final
- 69–72
Every pick below was locked before the match and graded automatically against the final score — no hindsight edits.
AI predictions
5 markets · 6 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 5 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
First half winner
?
First half winner
First-half winner. Who is ahead at the half-time whistle.
|
First half h2h
?
First half h2h
Market explanation coming soon.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Latvia 3/6 models |
over 2/6 models |
Latvia 5/6 models |
Latvia 4/5 models |
Latvia 1/1 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
65%
Netherlands -10
L
|
58%
Under 160
W
|
72%
Netherlands
L
|
70%
Netherlands |
— | |
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
65%
Netherlands -10 Latvia conceded 87 and scored only 77 in its opener, a 10-point deficit that mirrors expected spread here. Netherlands at home with superior...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
Under 160 Latvia's opening match total was 164 points (77+87), suggesting a moderate-pace qualifier environment. Netherlands-Latvia is unlikely to be...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
72%
Netherlands Netherlands is a stronger basketball program with deeper international experience and better roster depth than Latvia. Home court advantage...
First half winner
?
First half winner
First-half winner. Who is ahead at the half-time whistle.
70%
Netherlands First-half lines typically mirror H2H but with slightly tighter margins due to smaller sample (20 minutes vs 40). Netherlands' superior tale...
First half h2h
?
First half h2h
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market. |
||||||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | — | — | — | |
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
First half winner
?
First half winner
First-half winner. Who is ahead at the half-time whistle.
No pick on this market.
First half h2h
?
First half h2h
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market. |
||||||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
60%
Latvia
W
|
55%
over
W
|
60%
Latvia
W
|
55%
Latvia |
— | |
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
60%
Latvia Given Latvia's recent form and their victory in the last encounter, they are likely to cover a -1 point spread. The Netherlands' inconsisten...
🔍 researched
4 sources cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over Both teams have shown a tendency to engage in high-scoring games. In their most recent match, Latvia scored 78 points, and the Netherlands s...
🔍 researched
4 sources cited
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
60%
Latvia Latvia has a stronger recent form, with a 2-4 record in their last six matches, while the Netherlands has a 3-3 record in the same period. A...
🔍 researched
4 sources cited
First half winner
?
First half winner
First-half winner. Who is ahead at the half-time whistle.
55%
Latvia Latvia's recent form and their previous victory suggest they may lead at halftime. The Netherlands' inconsistent performance in recent match...
🔍 researched
4 sources cited
First half h2h
?
First half h2h
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market. |
||||||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
62%
Latvia |
55%
under |
68%
Latvia
W
|
59%
Latvia |
— | |
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
62%
Latvia Latvia's talent edge translates to a likely double-digit margin despite playing away. Netherlands has shown vulnerability in World Cup quali...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
under Both sides play at moderate-to-slow pace in FIBA events and defensive schemes limit transition opportunities. Limited rest differential does...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
68%
Latvia Latvia possesses superior talent including NBA-level players and has outperformed Netherlands in recent international cycles. Netherlands la...
First half winner
?
First half winner
First-half winner. Who is ahead at the half-time whistle.
59%
Latvia Latvia tends to start games with higher intensity and better execution in FIBA competition. Early-game fatigue factors are minimal given res...
First half h2h
?
First half h2h
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market. |
||||||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
65%
Latvia -8.5
L
|
58%
Over
L
|
70%
Latvia
W
|
— |
68%
Latvia |
|
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
65%
Latvia -8.5 Latvia's superior talent pool and recent international tournament success, as understood from my training data up to 2025-09, indicate a sig...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
Over Latvia's style of play, known for aggressive offense and three-point shooting, often contributes to higher scoring games. While the Netherla...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
70%
Latvia Based on historical performance and national team strength in my training data (up to early 2024), Latvia has consistently shown to be a sig...
First half winner
?
First half winner
First-half winner. Who is ahead at the half-time whistle.
No pick on this market.
First half h2h
?
First half h2h
Market explanation coming soon.
68%
Latvia As the stronger team, Latvia is expected to establish dominance early in the game. Their offensive prowess and overall team cohesion should... |
||||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
75%
Latvia |
60%
over |
85%
Latvia
W
|
70%
Latvia |
— | |
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
75%
Latvia Given Latvia's superior international standing and recent performance, they are expected to win by a significant margin. The Netherlands is...
3 sources cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
over While specific game pace information is unavailable, Latvia's competitive nature and the general offensive potential in international tourna...
3 sources cited
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
85%
Latvia Latvia has a significantly stronger recent international basketball pedigree, having reached the quarterfinals of the 2023 FIBA World Cup, w...
3 sources cited
First half winner
?
First half winner
First-half winner. Who is ahead at the half-time whistle.
70%
Latvia Latvia's stronger overall team quality suggests they will likely establish a lead early in the game. Their ability to execute and potentiall...
3 sources cited
First half h2h
?
First half h2h
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market. |
||||||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
68%
Latvia -5.5
L
|
60%
under 150.5 |
72%
Latvia
W
|
70%
Latvia |
— | |
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
68%
Latvia -5.5 Latvia is a clear favorite and should cover a moderate spread given their talent advantage. Netherlands' lack of form and depth suggests the...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
under 150.5 Both teams are not known for high-scoring offenses; Netherlands scored 77 in their last game and Latvia typically plays controlled pace. Exp...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
72%
Latvia Latvia is a stronger basketball nation historically, with better recent performances in international competitions. Netherlands lacks top-ti...
First half winner
?
First half winner
First-half winner. Who is ahead at the half-time whistle.
70%
Latvia Latvia typically starts strong and establishes early leads, while Netherlands may take time to adjust. Latvia's superior talent and experien...
First half h2h
?
First half h2h
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market. |
||||||
Spread
ConsensusLatvia 3/6
Latvia conceded 87 and scored only 77 in its opener, a 10-point deficit that mirrors expected spread here. Netherlands at home with superior...
Given Latvia's recent form and their victory in the last encounter, they are likely to cover a -1 point spread. The Netherlands' inconsisten...
Latvia's talent edge translates to a likely double-digit margin despite playing away. Netherlands has shown vulnerability in World Cup quali...
Latvia's superior talent pool and recent international tournament success, as understood from my training data up to 2025-09, indicate a sig...
Given Latvia's superior international standing and recent performance, they are expected to win by a significant margin. The Netherlands is...
Latvia is a clear favorite and should cover a moderate spread given their talent advantage. Netherlands' lack of form and depth suggests the...
Over / Under
Consensusover 2/6
Latvia's opening match total was 164 points (77+87), suggesting a moderate-pace qualifier environment. Netherlands-Latvia is unlikely to be...
Both teams have shown a tendency to engage in high-scoring games. In their most recent match, Latvia scored 78 points, and the Netherlands s...
Both sides play at moderate-to-slow pace in FIBA events and defensive schemes limit transition opportunities. Limited rest differential does...
Latvia's style of play, known for aggressive offense and three-point shooting, often contributes to higher scoring games. While the Netherla...
While specific game pace information is unavailable, Latvia's competitive nature and the general offensive potential in international tourna...
Both teams are not known for high-scoring offenses; Netherlands scored 77 in their last game and Latvia typically plays controlled pace. Exp...
Match winner
ConsensusLatvia 5/6
Netherlands is a stronger basketball program with deeper international experience and better roster depth than Latvia. Home court advantage...
Latvia has a stronger recent form, with a 2-4 record in their last six matches, while the Netherlands has a 3-3 record in the same period. A...
Latvia possesses superior talent including NBA-level players and has outperformed Netherlands in recent international cycles. Netherlands la...
Based on historical performance and national team strength in my training data (up to early 2024), Latvia has consistently shown to be a sig...
Latvia has a significantly stronger recent international basketball pedigree, having reached the quarterfinals of the 2023 FIBA World Cup, w...
Latvia is a stronger basketball nation historically, with better recent performances in international competitions. Netherlands lacks top-ti...
First half winner
ConsensusLatvia 4/5
First-half lines typically mirror H2H but with slightly tighter margins due to smaller sample (20 minutes vs 40). Netherlands' superior tale...
Latvia's recent form and their previous victory suggest they may lead at halftime. The Netherlands' inconsistent performance in recent match...
Latvia tends to start games with higher intensity and better execution in FIBA competition. Early-game fatigue factors are minimal given res...
Latvia's stronger overall team quality suggests they will likely establish a lead early in the game. Their ability to execute and potentiall...
Latvia typically starts strong and establishes early leads, while Netherlands may take time to adjust. Latvia's superior talent and experien...
First half h2h
ConsensusLatvia 1/1
As the stronger team, Latvia is expected to establish dominance early in the game. Their offensive prowess and overall team cohesion should...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Latvia
Claude Haiku 4.5
Netherlands
DeepSeek V3
Latvia
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Latvia
Grok 4 Fast
Latvia
GPT-4o Mini
Latvia
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
69fefe29f36af424…
- Kickoff
- Fri, Jul 3 · 17:30 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Over / Under · Spread · First half winner
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 4. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 4, in this order): h2h | totals | spreads | first_half
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 9326,
"sport": "basketball",
"venue": null,
"league": "World Cup",
"starts_at": "2026-07-03T17:30:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Fri, 03 Jul 2026 17:30:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Latvia",
"home": "Netherlands"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Pace is the master variable for totals — multiply both teams' possessions-per-game tendencies, not just their points.",
"Check the injury/rest report first: a star sitting (or load-managed on a back-to-back) reshapes the spread and total.",
"Weigh offensive vs defensive rating and three-point volume/variance — 3PT-heavy teams have wider outcome distributions.",
"Bench depth and foul trouble swing close games; note rotation reliability.",
"Back-to-backs and travel cause real fatigue — flag the schedule spot for each side.",
"Home-court edge is meaningful but smaller than star availability."
],
"team_context": {
"note": "Reference data from our settled-results database. Verify + extend it with your own research; it is not a substitute for current team news.",
"away_form": {
"last": "L",
"record": "0W-0D-1L",
"scored": 77,
"matches": 1,
"conceded": 87
},
"rest_days": {
"away": 5
}
},
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals",
"spreads",
"first_half"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Research trail
What each AI looked up before picking
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 3 sources
3 citations captured — unlock with Pro
-
4 tool calls · 4 sources
4 citations captured — unlock with Pro
Recent recaps
How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.