Minnesota LynxvsLos Angeles Sparks
LAYour call
Who wins? One tap, no signup.
AI predictions
4 markets · 6 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 4 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
First half winner
?
First half winner
First-half winner. Who is ahead at the half-time whistle.
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Minnesota Lynx 5/6 models |
Minnesota Lynx 2/6 models |
over 4/6 models |
Minnesota Lynx 5/6 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
60%
Minnesota Lynx |
59%
Minnesota Lynx -4.5 |
58%
Over 162.5 |
62%
Minnesota Lynx |
|
|
First half winner
?
First half winner
First-half winner. Who is ahead at the half-time whistle.
60%
Minnesota Lynx First-half play in WNBA often mirrors full-game trends, especially when pace is a differentiator. Lynx's higher-tempo approach (evidenced by...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
59%
Minnesota Lynx -4.5 Home-court edge in WNBA typically 2–3 points; Lynx's deeper roster and higher-pace offense support a moderate spread advantage over the Spar...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
Over 162.5 Lynx's recent 97-point effort in a loss suggests they play at a higher pace (likely 80+ possessions per game), whereas Sparks' 88-point rece...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Minnesota Lynx Minnesota Lynx hold a strong home-court advantage at Target Center and have a deeper recent roster with established stars (Kayla McBride, Na... |
|||||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | — | — | |
|
First half winner
?
First half winner
First-half winner. Who is ahead at the half-time whistle.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market. |
|||||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
55%
Minnesota Lynx |
60%
Minnesota Lynx |
55%
over |
60%
Minnesota Lynx |
|
|
First half winner
?
First half winner
First-half winner. Who is ahead at the half-time whistle.
55%
Minnesota Lynx The Minnesota Lynx are expected to start strong at home, potentially leading at halftime. Their home performance in the 2026 season supports...
🔍 researched
3 sources cited
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
60%
Minnesota Lynx The Minnesota Lynx's home-court advantage and the Los Angeles Sparks' road struggles suggest the Lynx are likely to cover the -1 point sprea...
🔍 researched
3 sources cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over Both teams have shown offensive capabilities in recent games, suggesting a higher-scoring matchup. The over 2.5 total points line is likely...
🔍 researched
3 sources cited
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
60%
Minnesota Lynx The Minnesota Lynx have a strong home-court advantage, with a solid home record in the 2026 season. The Los Angeles Sparks have struggled on...
🔍 researched
3 sources cited
|
|||||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
59%
Minnesota Lynx |
62%
Minnesota Lynx |
55%
over |
68%
Minnesota Lynx |
|
|
First half winner
?
First half winner
First-half winner. Who is ahead at the half-time whistle.
59%
Minnesota Lynx Lynx tend to start strong at home with early defensive intensity. Sparks have shown slower first-half starts in past seasons. Training data...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
62%
Minnesota Lynx Lynx typically cover modest home spreads due to defensive rating and crowd support. Sparks struggle to cover on the road against top-half op...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over Pace tends to be moderate in Lynx home games but Sparks push transition offense. Historical averages for these teams produce totals near or...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
68%
Minnesota Lynx Minnesota Lynx have historically been the stronger franchise with better depth and home-court advantage at Target Center. Los Angeles Sparks... |
|||||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
56%
Minnesota Lynx |
53%
Minnesota Lynx -5.5 |
55%
Over |
58%
Minnesota Lynx |
|
|
First half winner
?
First half winner
First-half winner. Who is ahead at the half-time whistle.
56%
Minnesota Lynx Home teams in the WNBA often start strong, fueled by the crowd energy and familiarity with their court. The Minnesota Lynx, in particular, t...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
53%
Minnesota Lynx -5.5 The Minnesota Lynx typically perform well at home and are known for their strong overall team play. A -5.5 point spread suggests they are fa...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Over WNBA games frequently feature high scoring, especially with dynamic offensive players. Both the Lynx and Sparks have historically fielded te...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Minnesota Lynx Based on general WNBA team strength and historical performance, the Minnesota Lynx often leverage their home-court advantage effectively. Wh... |
|||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
51%
Minnesota Lynx |
53%
Los Angeles Sparks |
52%
over |
55%
Minnesota Lynx |
|
|
First half winner
?
First half winner
First-half winner. Who is ahead at the half-time whistle.
51%
Minnesota Lynx The Minnesota Lynx often start strong at home, leveraging their crowd and established game plan. While the Sparks can be competitive, the Ly...
3 sources cited
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
53%
Los Angeles Sparks While the Lynx are favored at home, the Sparks have demonstrated an ability to keep games closer than their conference standing might sugges...
3 sources cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
52%
over Both teams have shown the capacity to score, with the Lynx having a higher scoring average. The Sparks, despite inconsistencies, can put up...
3 sources cited
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Minnesota Lynx The Minnesota Lynx hold a better position in the Western Conference and benefit from home-court advantage at the Target Center. While the Sp...
3 sources cited
|
|||||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
55%
Los Angeles Sparks |
55%
Los Angeles Sparks |
55%
over |
60%
Los Angeles Sparks |
|
|
First half winner
?
First half winner
First-half winner. Who is ahead at the half-time whistle.
55%
Los Angeles Sparks The Sparks tend to start games strongly, often taking early leads due to their fast-paced offense. The Lynx have been slow starters, which c...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
55%
Los Angeles Sparks The Sparks' recent form and overall roster strength suggest they can cover a typical road spread. The Lynx have had defensive lapses, and ev...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over Both teams have shown high-scoring tendencies in recent games, and the Sparks' fast pace combined with the Lynx's streak shooting suggests t...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
60%
Los Angeles Sparks Based on training data through 2025-09, the Sparks have been more consistent and have a stronger overall roster, especially in offensive eff... |
|||||
First half winner
ConsensusMinnesota Lynx 5/6
First-half play in WNBA often mirrors full-game trends, especially when pace is a differentiator. Lynx's higher-tempo approach (evidenced by...
The Minnesota Lynx are expected to start strong at home, potentially leading at halftime. Their home performance in the 2026 season supports...
Lynx tend to start strong at home with early defensive intensity. Sparks have shown slower first-half starts in past seasons. Training data...
Home teams in the WNBA often start strong, fueled by the crowd energy and familiarity with their court. The Minnesota Lynx, in particular, t...
The Minnesota Lynx often start strong at home, leveraging their crowd and established game plan. While the Sparks can be competitive, the Ly...
The Sparks tend to start games strongly, often taking early leads due to their fast-paced offense. The Lynx have been slow starters, which c...
Spread
ConsensusMinnesota Lynx 2/6
Home-court edge in WNBA typically 2–3 points; Lynx's deeper roster and higher-pace offense support a moderate spread advantage over the Spar...
The Minnesota Lynx's home-court advantage and the Los Angeles Sparks' road struggles suggest the Lynx are likely to cover the -1 point sprea...
Lynx typically cover modest home spreads due to defensive rating and crowd support. Sparks struggle to cover on the road against top-half op...
The Minnesota Lynx typically perform well at home and are known for their strong overall team play. A -5.5 point spread suggests they are fa...
While the Lynx are favored at home, the Sparks have demonstrated an ability to keep games closer than their conference standing might sugges...
The Sparks' recent form and overall roster strength suggest they can cover a typical road spread. The Lynx have had defensive lapses, and ev...
Over / Under
Consensusover 4/6
Lynx's recent 97-point effort in a loss suggests they play at a higher pace (likely 80+ possessions per game), whereas Sparks' 88-point rece...
Both teams have shown offensive capabilities in recent games, suggesting a higher-scoring matchup. The over 2.5 total points line is likely...
Pace tends to be moderate in Lynx home games but Sparks push transition offense. Historical averages for these teams produce totals near or...
WNBA games frequently feature high scoring, especially with dynamic offensive players. Both the Lynx and Sparks have historically fielded te...
Both teams have shown the capacity to score, with the Lynx having a higher scoring average. The Sparks, despite inconsistencies, can put up...
Both teams have shown high-scoring tendencies in recent games, and the Sparks' fast pace combined with the Lynx's streak shooting suggests t...
Match winner
ConsensusMinnesota Lynx 5/6
Minnesota Lynx hold a strong home-court advantage at Target Center and have a deeper recent roster with established stars (Kayla McBride, Na...
The Minnesota Lynx have a strong home-court advantage, with a solid home record in the 2026 season. The Los Angeles Sparks have struggled on...
Minnesota Lynx have historically been the stronger franchise with better depth and home-court advantage at Target Center. Los Angeles Sparks...
Based on general WNBA team strength and historical performance, the Minnesota Lynx often leverage their home-court advantage effectively. Wh...
The Minnesota Lynx hold a better position in the Western Conference and benefit from home-court advantage at the Target Center. While the Sp...
Based on training data through 2025-09, the Sparks have been more consistent and have a stronger overall roster, especially in offensive eff...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGrok 4 Fast
Minnesota Lynx
Claude Haiku 4.5
Minnesota Lynx
GPT-4o Mini
Minnesota Lynx
DeepSeek V3
Los Angeles Sparks
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Minnesota Lynx
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Minnesota Lynx
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Refresh the read
Early readRe-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.
Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.
Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
2f22f21076351057…
- Kickoff
- Fri, Aug 7 · 01:00 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Over / Under · Spread · First half winner
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 4. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 4, in this order): h2h | totals | spreads | first_half
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 20926,
"sport": "basketball",
"venue": "Target Center",
"league": "Women's National Basketball Association",
"starts_at": "2026-08-07T01:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Fri, 07 Aug 2026 01:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Los Angeles Sparks",
"home": "Minnesota Lynx"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Pace is the master variable for totals — multiply both teams' possessions-per-game tendencies, not just their points.",
"Check the injury/rest report first: a star sitting (or load-managed on a back-to-back) reshapes the spread and total.",
"Weigh offensive vs defensive rating and three-point volume/variance — 3PT-heavy teams have wider outcome distributions.",
"Bench depth and foul trouble swing close games; note rotation reliability.",
"Back-to-backs and travel cause real fatigue — flag the schedule spot for each side.",
"Home-court edge is meaningful but smaller than star availability."
],
"team_context": {
"note": "Reference data from our settled-results database. Verify + extend it with your own research; it is not a substitute for current team news.",
"away_form": {
"last": "W",
"record": "1W-0D-0L",
"scored": 88,
"matches": 1,
"conceded": 83
},
"home_form": {
"last": "L",
"record": "0W-0D-1L",
"scored": 97,
"matches": 1,
"conceded": 100
},
"rest_days": {
"away": 56,
"home": 54
}
},
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals",
"spreads",
"first_half"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Research trail
What each AI looked up before picking
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 3 sources
3 citations captured — unlock with Pro
-
4 tool calls · 3 sources
3 citations captured — unlock with Pro
Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.
Recent recaps
How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.