Don't miss the next pick — Sign up free →
ModelFights

Saved matches

Stored on this device — no account needed.

Keep these saved across devices

Free account syncs your bookmarks + lets you join the prize comp.

Sign up free →
saved · tap to view
Get started
Basketball Women's National Basketball Association · Target Center
Upcoming · in 79h 13m
ML

Minnesota LynxvsIndiana Fever

IF
Chat with the AIs Ask why they picked — live
Kickoff Locked 28picks

Your call

Who wins? One tap, no signup.

AI predictions

Ask the AIs

Who picked what

16 models × 5 markets · click a row to see reasoning

Over / Under

Consensus
over 4/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 55% Over

Indiana's two-game sample shows strong offensive efficiency (199 combined points across 2 matches = 99.5 PPG average), and Minnesota posted...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 57% over

Indiana is among the league's most-productive offenses in 2026 and has shown the ability to put up 110+ points; Minnesota typically plays at...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 10 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 60% over

Both teams have high-scoring offenses, with the Fever averaging 95.5 PPG and the Lynx 91.5 PPG. Their recent games have also been high-scori...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 3 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 53% over

Pace tendencies for both teams suggest a higher possession game at Target Center. Fever offensive rating supports pushing the total upward w...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 52% Over 168.5

With no bookmaker total provided, I've set a representative line of 168.5 points. WNBA scoring has shown an upward trend in recent seasons....

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 52% over

The provided form data shows a combined score of 296 in 3 games (199 for away, 97 for home). Extrapolating this trend, especially considerin...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 55% over 160.5

Both teams have offensive talent and have shown ability to score quickly. Fever average high scoring games, and Lynx at home tend to push pa...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Spread

Consensus
Indiana Fever 3/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 54% Indiana Fever

Indiana's two-game winning momentum and superior offensive output (99.5 PPG average) edge Minnesota's home-court advantage. A -3.5 spread fo...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 59% Minnesota Lynx -5.5

Minnesota should be favored at home and can cover a mid-single-digit spread with their balanced roster and superior defensive/bench depth wh...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 10 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 55% Indiana Fever

The Fever's recent form and away performance give them a slight edge, making them likely to cover a -1 point spread.

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 3 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 55% Minnesota Lynx

Lynx home advantage typically translates to a modest spread cover. Fever recent form is positive but travel and venue reduce their edge on t...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 55% Minnesota Lynx -6.5

Assuming a spread of -6.5 for the Minnesota Lynx at home, this pick aligns with the expectation of them being the stronger team. Home-court...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 53% Indiana Fever

The Indiana Fever's offensive output in their two recent games (199 total points) suggests they might have a stronger start to the season th...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 55% Minnesota Lynx -3.5

Lynx have home court and historical defensive advantage, but Fever's recent form suggests they can keep game close. Spread of 3.5 is tight;...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Match winner

Consensus
Minnesota Lynx 5/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 58% Indiana Fever

Indiana arrives on a 2-game winning streak with strong offensive output (avg 99.5 PPG across two wins) while Minnesota suffered a narrow 3-p...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 62% Minnesota Lynx

Minnesota is the stronger team on paper this season and they have the home-court edge at Target Center, while Indiana has been higher-varian...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 10 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 55% Indiana Fever

The Indiana Fever have a strong away record of 6-5 and have won their last two games, indicating good form. The Minnesota Lynx, while having...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 3 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 58% Minnesota Lynx

Minnesota Lynx play at home in Target Center where they historically hold an edge. Indiana Fever have shown offensive firepower but road res...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 58% Minnesota Lynx

Given the match date is in the future (2026-08-02), current real-time data like team form, lineups, and injuries are unavailable. This predi...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 55% Minnesota Lynx

The Minnesota Lynx are playing at home and have a slightly better recent form despite the small sample size. While both teams have had a lon...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 65% Minnesota Lynx

Minnesota Lynx have historically been strong at home, and their defensive ratings are superior to Indiana Fever. Fever have shown inconsiste...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

First half winner

Consensus
Minnesota Lynx 3/6
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 56% Indiana Fever

Indiana's offensive consistency and Minnesota's opening-game defensive vulnerability suggest the Fever maintain their scoring edge in the fi...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini —
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 55% Indiana Fever

The Fever's strong away performance and recent form suggest they will start strong in the first half, giving them an edge over the Lynx.

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 3 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 56% Minnesota Lynx

Lynx tend to start strong at home leveraging early defensive intensity. Fever need time to adjust on the road which often leads to slower fi...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 56% Minnesota Lynx

Consistent with the full-game prediction, the Minnesota Lynx are expected to start strong at home. Teams often come out with high energy in...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 51% over

Given the long layoff for both teams, it's plausible that the first half might see less stringent defense as players shake off rust. The Ind...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 60% Minnesota Lynx

Lynx typically start strong at home, and Fever may need time to adjust on road. Lynx's defensive intensity in first half should give them ea...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

First half leader

Consensus
Minnesota Lynx 1/1
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 —
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 60% Minnesota Lynx

Minnesota's home court, disciplined offensive sets and earlier-season defensive identity make them likelier to lead at halftime, and Indiana...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 10 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini —
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast —
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash —
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite —
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 —

Model confidence

Conviction in pick · Match winner
DeepSeek V3

DeepSeek V3

Minnesota Lynx

65
GPT-5 Mini

GPT-5 Mini

Minnesota Lynx

62
Claude Haiku 4.5

Claude Haiku 4.5

Indiana Fever

58
Grok 4 Fast

Grok 4 Fast

Minnesota Lynx

58
Gemini 2.5 Flash

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Minnesota Lynx

58
GPT-4o Mini

GPT-4o Mini

Indiana Fever

55
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Minnesota Lynx

55

Model track records

Lifetime

Every graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.

GPT-5
GPT-5 145–91 · 61%
+67.5u
Claude Opus 4.8
Claude Opus 4.8 154–115 · 57%
-17.4u
GPT-4o Mini
GPT-4o Mini 1056–799 · 57%
-602.9u
GPT-5 Mini
GPT-5 Mini 690–586 · 54%
-365.1u
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro 130–112 · 54%
+111.8u
o4-mini
o4-mini 90–78 · 54%
+69.7u
Claude Opus 4.6
Claude Opus 4.6 193–173 · 53%
-47.6u
Grok 4.3
Grok 4.3 132–124 · 52%
+93.6u
Claude Opus 4.7
Claude Opus 4.7 183–176 · 51%
-63.5u
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 1128–1109 · 50%
-923.7u
Grok 4 Fast
Grok 4 Fast 740–743 · 50%
-501.5u
DeepSeek V3
DeepSeek V3 1031–1055 · 49%
-746.4u
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Claude Sonnet 4.6 459–482 · 49%
-323.7u
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 876–927 · 49%
-725.8u
Claude Haiku 4.5
Claude Haiku 4.5 1017–1091 · 48%
-928.0u
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro 151–179 · 46%
-73.8u

Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.

Refresh the read

Early read

Re-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.

Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.

Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.

Unlock with Pro Create a free account

Pro on-demand

Request an AI audit

Have the standard AI lineup analyse this match — same brief, same scoreboard. Predictions appear publicly once the run finishes.

Sign in and upgrade to Pro to request audits on any future match.

Sign in See Pro

Verifiable brief

Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified

hash: 3f98784d802b381d…
Kickoff
Sun, Aug 2 · 17:00 GMT+0000
Markets
Match winner · Over / Under · Spread · First half winner
Odds
15+ live books
Research
AIs self-source

System instruction

You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.

You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.

Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
  `predictions` array length MUST equal 4. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
  "0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
  plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
  actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
  explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.

Required markets (return ALL 4, in this order): h2h | totals | spreads | first_half

Output schema:
{
  "used_research_tools": true | false,
  "sources_cited": [
    { "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
  ],
  "predictions": [
    {
      "market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
      "pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
      "confidence": 0.0,
      "probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
      "reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
      "signals": [
        { "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
          "label": "Short fact in plain text.",
          "lean":  "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
      ],
      "tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
    }
  ]
}

User brief (JSON)

{
    "event": {
        "id": 18496,
        "sport": "basketball",
        "venue": "Target Center",
        "league": "Women's National Basketball Association",
        "starts_at": "2026-08-02T17:00:00+00:00",
        "starts_at_human": "Sun, 02 Aug 2026 17:00:00 GMT"
    },
    "teams": {
        "away": "Indiana Fever",
        "home": "Minnesota Lynx"
    },
    "version": "v2",
    "sport_focus": [
        "Pace is the master variable for totals — multiply both teams' possessions-per-game tendencies, not just their points.",
        "Check the injury/rest report first: a star sitting (or load-managed on a back-to-back) reshapes the spread and total.",
        "Weigh offensive vs defensive rating and three-point volume/variance — 3PT-heavy teams have wider outcome distributions.",
        "Bench depth and foul trouble swing close games; note rotation reliability.",
        "Back-to-backs and travel cause real fatigue — flag the schedule spot for each side.",
        "Home-court edge is meaningful but smaller than star availability."
    ],
    "team_context": {
        "note": "Reference data from our settled-results database. Verify + extend it with your own research; it is not a substitute for current team news.",
        "away_form": {
            "last": "WW",
            "record": "2W-0D-0L",
            "scored": 199,
            "matches": 2,
            "conceded": 181
        },
        "home_form": {
            "last": "L",
            "record": "0W-0D-1L",
            "scored": 97,
            "matches": 1,
            "conceded": 100
        },
        "rest_days": {
            "away": 49,
            "home": 49
        }
    },
    "market_consensus": {
        "h2h": [],
        "note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
        "extra_markets": []
    },
    "markets_requested": [
        "h2h",
        "totals",
        "spreads",
        "first_half"
    ],
    "research_directive": [
        "Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
        "recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
        "Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
        "If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
    ]
}

The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.

Research trail

What each AI looked up before picking

Unlock sources · Pro

Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.

Recent recaps

How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.

Share
Share X Reddit WhatsApp Telegram Facebook

Get the AI consensus before kickoff

Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.

Sign up free →