Los Angeles SparksvsPhoenix Mercury
PMYour call
Who wins? One tap, no signup.
AI predictions
5 markets · 6 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 5 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
|
First half h2h
?
First half h2h
Market explanation coming soon.
|
First half winner
?
First half winner
First-half winner. Who is ahead at the half-time whistle.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Los Angeles Sparks 5/6 models |
over 3/6 models |
Los Angeles Sparks 2/6 models |
Los Angeles Sparks 1/1 models |
Los Angeles Sparks 4/5 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
62%
Los Angeles Sparks |
58%
Under 165 |
56%
Los Angeles Sparks -5.5 |
— |
60%
Los Angeles Sparks |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Los Angeles Sparks The Sparks enter with recent momentum (1-0 record, +5 point differential) and home-court advantage at Crypto.com Arena. Phoenix is coming of...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
Under 165 Phoenix's recent output (70 points) and defensive efficiency (85 allowed) suggest a lower-pace offensive environment, while the Sparks' 88-p...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
56%
Los Angeles Sparks -5.5 The Sparks' +5 point differential at home combined with Phoenix's -15 differential on the road creates a rough 10-point talent/form gap. A 5...
First half h2h
?
First half h2h
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market.
First half winner
?
First half winner
First-half winner. Who is ahead at the half-time whistle.
60%
Los Angeles Sparks First-half momentum often reflects overall game patterns, and the Sparks' recent form (88 PPG, +5 differential) suggests they will come out... |
||||||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | — | — | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
First half h2h
?
First half h2h
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market.
First half winner
?
First half winner
First-half winner. Who is ahead at the half-time whistle.
No pick on this market. |
||||||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
65%
Los Angeles Sparks |
55%
over |
60%
Los Angeles Sparks |
— |
55%
Los Angeles Sparks |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Los Angeles Sparks The Los Angeles Sparks have a strong home-court advantage and have been performing well recently, while the Phoenix Mercury have struggled i...
🔍 researched
1 source cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over Both teams have shown a tendency to engage in high-scoring games, suggesting a total points over 2.5 is likely.
🔍 researched
1 source cited
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
60%
Los Angeles Sparks The Sparks' home-court advantage and recent form make them likely to cover a -1 point spread.
🔍 researched
1 source cited
First half h2h
?
First half h2h
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market.
First half winner
?
First half winner
First-half winner. Who is ahead at the half-time whistle.
55%
Los Angeles Sparks The Sparks have been strong in the first half of recent games, suggesting they will lead at halftime.
🔍 researched
1 source cited
|
||||||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
53%
Los Angeles Sparks |
51%
over |
52%
Los Angeles Sparks |
— |
51%
Los Angeles Sparks |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
53%
Los Angeles Sparks Predicted from training knowledge through 2023; game is in 2026 with no live data. Home Sparks hold slight edge at Crypto.com Arena per hist...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
51%
over Predicted from training knowledge through 2023; game is in 2026 with no live data. WNBA pace and scoring trends favor totals slightly above...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
52%
Los Angeles Sparks Predicted from training knowledge through 2023; game is in 2026 with no live data. Modest home-court edge for Sparks outweighs minimal form...
First half h2h
?
First half h2h
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market.
First half winner
?
First half winner
First-half winner. Who is ahead at the half-time whistle.
51%
Los Angeles Sparks Predicted from training knowledge through 2023; game is in 2026 with no live data. First-half trends mirror full-game home lean with limited... |
||||||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
60%
Los Angeles Sparks |
55%
Under 165.5 |
58%
Los Angeles Sparks -4.5 |
58%
Los Angeles Sparks |
— | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
60%
Los Angeles Sparks Given this game's future date (2026-07-22), this prediction relies on the model's general training data and the very limited form provided....
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Under 165.5 With the game scheduled for 2026, this prediction is based on general WNBA scoring trends and the available limited data. The Phoenix Mercur...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
58%
Los Angeles Sparks -4.5 As this game is set in 2026, the prediction relies on internal model data and the provided limited team context. The Los Angeles Sparks won...
First half h2h
?
First half h2h
Market explanation coming soon.
58%
Los Angeles Sparks Due to the distant future date, this prediction is based on the model's general WNBA knowledge. Given the overall favoritism for the Los Ang...
First half winner
?
First half winner
First-half winner. Who is ahead at the half-time whistle.
No pick on this market. |
||||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
55%
Phoenix Mercury |
60%
over |
52%
Phoenix Mercury |
— |
58%
over |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Phoenix Mercury The Los Angeles Sparks are playing at home, which typically provides an advantage. However, the Phoenix Mercury have shown slightly better r...
3 sources cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
over Both teams have shown the ability to score, and with significant rest, they should be able to maintain a higher pace. The Sparks' offensive...
3 sources cited
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
52%
Phoenix Mercury While the Sparks are favored at home, the Mercury's recent form and competitive spirit, especially with extended rest, suggest they can keep...
3 sources cited
First half h2h
?
First half h2h
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market.
First half winner
?
First half winner
First-half winner. Who is ahead at the half-time whistle.
58%
over Given the extended rest and the offensive capabilities of both teams, the first half is likely to see a higher scoring output. Teams often s...
3 sources cited
|
||||||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
62%
Los Angeles Sparks |
55%
Over 164.5 |
58%
Los Angeles Sparks -1.5 |
— |
56%
Los Angeles Sparks |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Los Angeles Sparks The Sparks have home-court advantage and won their only game this season, while the Mercury lost their opener. Sparks' roster depth and rece...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Over 164.5 Both teams have offensive firepower; Sparks scored 88, Mercury scored 70 but faced a strong defense. With limited data, I lean over based on...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
58%
Los Angeles Sparks -1.5 Sparks at home with better recent form should cover a small spread. Mercury's loss was discouraging, and Sparks have momentum. Home-court ad...
First half h2h
?
First half h2h
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market.
First half winner
?
First half winner
First-half winner. Who is ahead at the half-time whistle.
56%
Los Angeles Sparks Sparks have home-court advantage and started strong in their opener. Mercury may take time to gel. Slight edge to Sparks in the first half d... |
||||||
Match winner
ConsensusLos Angeles Sparks 5/6
The Sparks enter with recent momentum (1-0 record, +5 point differential) and home-court advantage at Crypto.com Arena. Phoenix is coming of...
The Los Angeles Sparks have a strong home-court advantage and have been performing well recently, while the Phoenix Mercury have struggled i...
Predicted from training knowledge through 2023; game is in 2026 with no live data. Home Sparks hold slight edge at Crypto.com Arena per hist...
Given this game's future date (2026-07-22), this prediction relies on the model's general training data and the very limited form provided....
The Los Angeles Sparks are playing at home, which typically provides an advantage. However, the Phoenix Mercury have shown slightly better r...
The Sparks have home-court advantage and won their only game this season, while the Mercury lost their opener. Sparks' roster depth and rece...
Over / Under
Consensusover 3/6
Phoenix's recent output (70 points) and defensive efficiency (85 allowed) suggest a lower-pace offensive environment, while the Sparks' 88-p...
Both teams have shown a tendency to engage in high-scoring games, suggesting a total points over 2.5 is likely.
Predicted from training knowledge through 2023; game is in 2026 with no live data. WNBA pace and scoring trends favor totals slightly above...
With the game scheduled for 2026, this prediction is based on general WNBA scoring trends and the available limited data. The Phoenix Mercur...
Both teams have shown the ability to score, and with significant rest, they should be able to maintain a higher pace. The Sparks' offensive...
Both teams have offensive firepower; Sparks scored 88, Mercury scored 70 but faced a strong defense. With limited data, I lean over based on...
Spread
ConsensusLos Angeles Sparks 2/6
The Sparks' +5 point differential at home combined with Phoenix's -15 differential on the road creates a rough 10-point talent/form gap. A 5...
The Sparks' home-court advantage and recent form make them likely to cover a -1 point spread.
Predicted from training knowledge through 2023; game is in 2026 with no live data. Modest home-court edge for Sparks outweighs minimal form...
As this game is set in 2026, the prediction relies on internal model data and the provided limited team context. The Los Angeles Sparks won...
While the Sparks are favored at home, the Mercury's recent form and competitive spirit, especially with extended rest, suggest they can keep...
Sparks at home with better recent form should cover a small spread. Mercury's loss was discouraging, and Sparks have momentum. Home-court ad...
First half h2h
ConsensusLos Angeles Sparks 1/1
Due to the distant future date, this prediction is based on the model's general WNBA knowledge. Given the overall favoritism for the Los Ang...
First half winner
ConsensusLos Angeles Sparks 4/5
First-half momentum often reflects overall game patterns, and the Sparks' recent form (88 PPG, +5 differential) suggests they will come out...
The Sparks have been strong in the first half of recent games, suggesting they will lead at halftime.
Predicted from training knowledge through 2023; game is in 2026 with no live data. First-half trends mirror full-game home lean with limited...
Given the extended rest and the offensive capabilities of both teams, the first half is likely to see a higher scoring output. Teams often s...
Sparks have home-court advantage and started strong in their opener. Mercury may take time to gel. Slight edge to Sparks in the first half d...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGPT-4o Mini
Los Angeles Sparks
Claude Haiku 4.5
Los Angeles Sparks
DeepSeek V3
Los Angeles Sparks
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Los Angeles Sparks
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Phoenix Mercury
Grok 4 Fast
Los Angeles Sparks
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Refresh the read
Early readRe-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.
Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.
Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
fd628e7134831d70…
- Kickoff
- Wed, Jul 22 · 19:00 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Over / Under · Spread · First half winner
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 4. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 4, in this order): h2h | totals | spreads | first_half
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 14801,
"sport": "basketball",
"venue": "crypto.com Arena",
"league": "Women's National Basketball Association",
"starts_at": "2026-07-22T19:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Wed, 22 Jul 2026 19:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Phoenix Mercury",
"home": "Los Angeles Sparks"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Pace is the master variable for totals — multiply both teams' possessions-per-game tendencies, not just their points.",
"Check the injury/rest report first: a star sitting (or load-managed on a back-to-back) reshapes the spread and total.",
"Weigh offensive vs defensive rating and three-point volume/variance — 3PT-heavy teams have wider outcome distributions.",
"Bench depth and foul trouble swing close games; note rotation reliability.",
"Back-to-backs and travel cause real fatigue — flag the schedule spot for each side.",
"Home-court edge is meaningful but smaller than star availability."
],
"team_context": {
"note": "Reference data from our settled-results database. Verify + extend it with your own research; it is not a substitute for current team news.",
"away_form": {
"last": "L",
"record": "0W-0D-1L",
"scored": 70,
"matches": 1,
"conceded": 85
},
"home_form": {
"last": "W",
"record": "1W-0D-0L",
"scored": 88,
"matches": 1,
"conceded": 83
},
"rest_days": {
"away": 40,
"home": 41
}
},
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals",
"spreads",
"first_half"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Research trail
What each AI looked up before picking
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
4 tool calls · 1 source
1 citation captured — unlock with Pro
-
0 tool calls · 3 sources
3 citations captured — unlock with Pro
Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.
Recent recaps
How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.