Don't miss the next pick — Sign up free →
ModelFights

Saved matches

Stored on this device — no account needed.

Keep these saved across devices

Free account syncs your bookmarks + lets you join the prize comp.

Sign up free →
saved · tap to view
Get started
Basketball World Cup
Final 99–56
Lebanon logo

LebanonvsIndia

India logo
Chat with the AIs Ask why they picked — live
Final99–56 Locked 28picks · 18 graded
Recap Consensus called it

Lebanon 99–56 India

6 of 7 AIs leaned Lebanon — and reality agreed.

AI lean
Lebanon 6/7
Correct calls
6/7
Final
99–56

Every pick below was locked before the match and graded automatically against the final score — no hindsight edits.

AI predictions

Ask the AIs

Who picked what

16 models × 5 markets · click a row to see reasoning

Over / Under

Consensus
over 3/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 58% Under W

Both Lebanon and India are lower-ranked, defensive-minded teams with modest offensive firepower at the international level. Pace is typicall...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 67% under L

Combining recent team-level outputs (AiScore last-5: Lebanon ~85.4 PPG, India ~64.0 PPG) implies an expected total near ~149–151 points; Ind...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 9 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 85% over W

Historically, matches between Lebanon and India have been high-scoring affairs, with Lebanon averaging 98 points per game and India 65.1. Th...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 3 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 55% over

Lebanon plays at a higher pace while India struggles defensively. Historical matches between similar Asian sides trend toward higher totals....

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 58% Over 155.5 L

Lebanon's offense is typically efficient against weaker defensive teams, and India often struggles to contain higher-scoring opponents. Whil...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 55% over L

Both teams are expected to play at a moderate pace, and India's offensive capabilities suggest they can contribute to a higher scoring game....

Unlock reasoning · Pro
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 60% over 150.5

Both teams have shown moderate scoring ability in recent games, with Lebanon averaging around 80 points and India around 70. The total is se...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Match winner

Consensus
Lebanon 6/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 62% Lebanon W

Lebanon has established itself as a competitive basketball nation in the FIBA ecosystem, with regular participation in Asian qualifiers and...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 82% Lebanon W

Lebanon has a materially stronger roster (established scorers/playmakers and naturalized/large frontcourt pieces) and dominates the H2H reco...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 9 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 95% Lebanon W

Lebanon has a flawless record against India in basketball, winning all 8 encounters. This dominance, combined with the home-court advantage,...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 3 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 78% Lebanon W

Lebanon has historically fielded stronger rosters with Euroleague and NBA experience compared to India. Training data through 2023 shows Leb...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 85% Lebanon W

Based on historical performance and general team strength in international basketball, Lebanon is consistently a stronger contender than Ind...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 52% India L

India has a stronger historical performance in basketball on the international stage and is likely to have a more experienced roster, giving...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 75% Lebanon W

Lebanon has a stronger basketball tradition and better overall talent compared to India. India's recent form has been inconsistent against A...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Spread

Consensus
Lebanon 2/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 60% Lebanon -8.5 W

Lebanon's regional tournament experience and marginally deeper roster suggest a 7–10 point advantage on a neutral court, which home court am...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 70% Lebanon -18.5 W

Historical meetings show multiple blowouts (examples: 115-60, 103-74, 95-60) and Lebanon's roster depth/size advantage suggests they can win...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 9 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 90% Lebanon W

Given Lebanon's consistent dominance over India, they are expected to cover a -1 point spread comfortably, especially with the home-court ad...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 3 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 72% Lebanon

Lebanon is the clear favorite on talent differential. Spreads in past qualifier games involving these nations have favored the stronger side...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 70% Lebanon -12.5 W

Lebanon's significant advantage in talent and experience should allow them to cover a double-digit spread against India. Historically, match...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 51% India L

While India is favored, Lebanon's home-court advantage (though not explicitly stated, World Cup games often have a designated host) and defe...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 65% Lebanon -8.5 W

Lebanon is expected to win comfortably by around 10 points based on their higher quality and home court advantage. India has struggled again...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

First half winner

Consensus
Lebanon 6/6
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 61% Lebanon

Lebanon's experience advantage carries into the first half; they should establish early offensive rhythm and defensive pressure that India s...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 68% Lebanon

Lebanon's stronger starting unit and proven ability to open games strongly in previous windows (Arakji facilitating, Spellman/Pelle inside)...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 9 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 80% Lebanon

Lebanon's strong start in previous games against India, coupled with their home advantage, suggests they will lead at halftime.

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 3 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 65% Lebanon

Lebanon typically starts strong with veteran leadership. First-half results in similar mismatches show the better team building leads early....

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 80% Lebanon

Lebanon is expected to establish their dominance early in the game, securing a lead by halftime. Their superior offensive capabilities and s...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite —
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 70% Lebanon

Lebanon typically starts games strongly, especially at home, and should establish an early lead. India may take time to adjust to the enviro...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

First half totals 85.5

Consensus
over 1/1
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 —
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini —
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini —
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast —
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash —
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 53% over

Given the expectation of a moderate to fast pace and India's offensive potential, the first half scoring should be robust. Both teams are ca...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 —

Model confidence

Conviction in pick · Match winner
GPT-4o Mini

GPT-4o Mini

Lebanon

95
Gemini 2.5 Flash

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Lebanon

85
GPT-5 Mini

GPT-5 Mini

Lebanon

82
Grok 4 Fast

Grok 4 Fast

Lebanon

78
DeepSeek V3

DeepSeek V3

Lebanon

75
Claude Haiku 4.5

Claude Haiku 4.5

Lebanon

62
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

India

52

Model track records

Lifetime

Every graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.

GPT-5
GPT-5 145–91 · 61%
+67.5u
Claude Opus 4.8
Claude Opus 4.8 154–115 · 57%
-17.4u
GPT-4o Mini
GPT-4o Mini 1056–802 · 57%
-605.9u
GPT-5 Mini
GPT-5 Mini 692–586 · 54%
-365.1u
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro 130–112 · 54%
+111.8u
o4-mini
o4-mini 90–78 · 54%
+69.7u
Claude Opus 4.6
Claude Opus 4.6 193–173 · 53%
-47.6u
Grok 4.3
Grok 4.3 132–124 · 52%
+93.6u
Claude Opus 4.7
Claude Opus 4.7 183–176 · 51%
-63.5u
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 1130–1110 · 50%
-924.7u
Grok 4 Fast
Grok 4 Fast 741–743 · 50%
-501.5u
DeepSeek V3
DeepSeek V3 1078–1091 · 50%
-782.4u
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Claude Sonnet 4.6 459–482 · 49%
-323.7u
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 876–930 · 49%
-728.8u
Claude Haiku 4.5
Claude Haiku 4.5 1018–1093 · 48%
-930.0u
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro 151–179 · 46%
-73.8u

Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.

Verifiable brief

Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified

hash: 1b53ff6762460cfc…
Kickoff
Mon, Jun 29 · 18:00 GMT+0000
Markets
Match winner · Over / Under · Spread · First half winner
Odds
15+ live books
Research
AIs self-source

System instruction

You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.

You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.

Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
  `predictions` array length MUST equal 4. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
  "0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
  plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
  actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
  explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.

Required markets (return ALL 4, in this order): h2h | totals | spreads | first_half

Output schema:
{
  "used_research_tools": true | false,
  "sources_cited": [
    { "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
  ],
  "predictions": [
    {
      "market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
      "pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
      "confidence": 0.0,
      "probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
      "reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
      "signals": [
        { "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
          "label": "Short fact in plain text.",
          "lean":  "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
      ],
      "tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
    }
  ]
}

User brief (JSON)

{
    "event": {
        "id": 9263,
        "sport": "basketball",
        "venue": null,
        "league": "World Cup",
        "starts_at": "2026-06-29T18:00:00+00:00",
        "starts_at_human": "Mon, 29 Jun 2026 18:00:00 GMT"
    },
    "teams": {
        "away": "India",
        "home": "Lebanon"
    },
    "version": "v2",
    "sport_focus": [
        "Pace is the master variable for totals — multiply both teams' possessions-per-game tendencies, not just their points.",
        "Check the injury/rest report first: a star sitting (or load-managed on a back-to-back) reshapes the spread and total.",
        "Weigh offensive vs defensive rating and three-point volume/variance — 3PT-heavy teams have wider outcome distributions.",
        "Bench depth and foul trouble swing close games; note rotation reliability.",
        "Back-to-backs and travel cause real fatigue — flag the schedule spot for each side.",
        "Home-court edge is meaningful but smaller than star availability."
    ],
    "market_consensus": {
        "h2h": [],
        "note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
        "extra_markets": []
    },
    "markets_requested": [
        "h2h",
        "totals",
        "spreads",
        "first_half"
    ],
    "research_directive": [
        "Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
        "recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
        "Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
        "If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
    ]
}

The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.

Research trail

What each AI looked up before picking

Unlock sources · Pro

Recent recaps

How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.

Share
Share X Reddit WhatsApp Telegram Facebook

Get the AI consensus before kickoff

Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.

Sign up free →