Don't miss the next pick — Sign up free →
ModelFights

Saved matches

Stored on this device — no account needed.

Keep these saved across devices

Free account syncs your bookmarks + lets you join the prize comp.

Sign up free →
saved · tap to view
Get started
Basketball World Cup
Final 106–67
Jordan logo

JordanvsIraq

Iraq logo
Chat with the AIs Ask why they picked — live
Final106–67 Locked 28picks · 14 graded
Recap Consensus called it

Jordan 106–67 Iraq

All 7 AIs backed Jordan — and reality agreed.

AI lean
Jordan 7/7
Correct calls
7/7
Final
106–67

Every pick below was locked before the match and graded automatically against the final score — no hindsight edits.

AI predictions

Ask the AIs

Who picked what

16 models × 5 markets · click a row to see reasoning

Over / Under

Consensus
over 4/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 72% Under 165

The most recent meeting between these teams produced a combined 167 points (108 + 59), suggesting a total near or slightly above 165. Given...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 62% over W

Recent head-to-head produced 167 total points (108–59) and both teams have shown ability to produce high totals (Iraq 81 in a July 2 game; J...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 5 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 70% over W

Both teams have shown a tendency for high-scoring games, with Jordan averaging 82.33 points per game and Iraq 69.67 points per game in recen...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 4 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 62% over

The June 29 game produced 167 total points and Jordan's offense should again exploit Iraq's defense. Both sides play at a relatively open pa...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 55% Under 169.5 L

The previous game between these teams resulted in a total of 167 points. While Jordan's offense was strong, Iraq's low score indicates offen...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 70% over

The previous head-to-head match saw a very high score of 167 points (108-59). Given Jordan's offensive output in that game and the possibili...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 75% over 150.5

The previous meeting produced 167 points despite Iraq only scoring 59. Jordan's offense is potent and Iraq's defense is weak, so Jordan shou...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Spread

Consensus
Jordan 3/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 75% Jordan -20 W

Jordan's 49-point victory margin (108–59) in the head-to-head just 6 days ago establishes a strong baseline for the spread. Both teams carry...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 72% home_cover

Jordan's 49-point win in the direct meeting and a deeper, more experienced rotation suggest they can cover a double-digit spread at home. Ir...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 5 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 85% Jordan W

Given Jordan's dominant performance in recent encounters and their home advantage, they are likely to cover a -1 point spread. ([aiscore.com...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 4 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 81% Jordan

Jordan's 49-point win in the reverse fixture indicates a large spread is likely to be covered again. Iraq lack the personnel to stay competi...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 70% Jordan -24.5 W

Jordan previously defeated Iraq by an astonishing 49-point margin. While covering such a large spread again is difficult, a 24.5-point sprea...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 75% Jordan

Jordan's dominant 49-point victory in the last meeting indicates a significant skill gap. It is highly probable they will cover a moderate s...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 80% Jordan -20.5 W

Jordan crushed Iraq by 49 points in their last meeting. Even with a slight adjustment, Jordan's superior talent and home court should cover...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

First half winner

Consensus
Jordan 6/6
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 74% Jordan

The first half typically establishes early momentum and defensive tone. Jordan's dominant defensive setup (59 total points allowed across th...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 70% Jordan

In the June 29 meeting Jordan started strongly (first-half scoring was lopsided) and their quarter scores show they establish leads early; t...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 5 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 80% Jordan

Jordan's strong start in recent games, including a 28-23 lead in the first half against Iraq on June 30, 2026, suggests they will lead at ha...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 4 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 79% Jordan

Jordan's superior athleticism and size create immediate mismatches that usually produce a first-half lead. Iraq struggled to score at all in...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash —
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 70% Jordan

Given Jordan's clear superiority in the previous encounter, they are expected to establish a lead early. Their strong offensive performance...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 80% Jordan

Jordan's fast start in the previous game led to a large halftime lead. Iraq is unlikely to keep pace, and Jordan's home court advantage will...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

First half h2h

Consensus
Jordan 1/1
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 —
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini —
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini —
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast —
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 85% Jordan

Given Jordan's overwhelming full-game victory recently, they are expected to establish dominance early in the match. Their superior talent a...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite —
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 —

Match winner

Consensus
Jordan 7/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 78% Jordan W

Jordan defeated Iraq 108–59 just 6 days ago in what appears to be a World Cup group-stage match. Both teams have equal rest (6 days), elimin...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 88% Jordan W

Jordan have a clear recent edge: they thrashed Iraq 108–59 on June 29 and have a deeper rotation and higher ceiling against similarly ranked...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 5 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 90% Jordan W

Jordan has a strong home-court advantage and has dominated recent matchups against Iraq, including a decisive 108-59 victory on June 30, 202...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 4 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 88% Jordan W

Jordan destroyed Iraq 108-59 just six days earlier and enter as the clear class of the matchup. Iraq have shown no ability to compete at thi...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 90% Jordan W

Jordan recently secured a dominant 108-59 victory over Iraq just six days prior to this match, demonstrating clear superiority. There is no...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 80% Jordan W

Based on the provided recent form, Jordan decisively beat Iraq in their last encounter with a score of 108-59. This significant margin sugge...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 85% Jordan W

Jordan won the recent head-to-head 108-59, indicating a massive talent gap. Iraq has been poor, and Jordan has home court advantage in this...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Model confidence

Conviction in pick · Match winner
GPT-4o Mini

GPT-4o Mini

Jordan

90
Gemini 2.5 Flash

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Jordan

90
GPT-5 Mini

GPT-5 Mini

Jordan

88
Grok 4 Fast

Grok 4 Fast

Jordan

88
DeepSeek V3

DeepSeek V3

Jordan

85
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Jordan

80
Claude Haiku 4.5

Claude Haiku 4.5

Jordan

78

Model track records

Lifetime

Every graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.

GPT-5
GPT-5 145–91 · 61%
+67.5u
Claude Opus 4.8
Claude Opus 4.8 154–115 · 57%
-17.4u
GPT-4o Mini
GPT-4o Mini 1056–802 · 57%
-605.9u
GPT-5 Mini
GPT-5 Mini 692–586 · 54%
-365.1u
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro 130–112 · 54%
+111.8u
o4-mini
o4-mini 90–78 · 54%
+69.7u
Claude Opus 4.6
Claude Opus 4.6 193–173 · 53%
-47.6u
Grok 4.3
Grok 4.3 132–124 · 52%
+93.6u
Claude Opus 4.7
Claude Opus 4.7 183–176 · 51%
-63.5u
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 1130–1110 · 50%
-924.7u
Grok 4 Fast
Grok 4 Fast 741–743 · 50%
-501.5u
DeepSeek V3
DeepSeek V3 1107–1136 · 49%
-827.4u
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Claude Sonnet 4.6 459–482 · 49%
-323.7u
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 876–930 · 49%
-728.8u
Claude Haiku 4.5
Claude Haiku 4.5 1018–1093 · 48%
-930.0u
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro 151–179 · 46%
-73.8u

Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.

Verifiable brief

Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified

hash: 0fdd0994354df793…
Kickoff
Sun, Jul 5 · 16:30 GMT+0000
Markets
Match winner · Over / Under · Spread · First half winner
Odds
15+ live books
Research
AIs self-source

System instruction

You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.

You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.

Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
  `predictions` array length MUST equal 4. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
  "0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
  plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
  actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
  explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.

Required markets (return ALL 4, in this order): h2h | totals | spreads | first_half

Output schema:
{
  "used_research_tools": true | false,
  "sources_cited": [
    { "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
  ],
  "predictions": [
    {
      "market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
      "pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
      "confidence": 0.0,
      "probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
      "reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
      "signals": [
        { "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
          "label": "Short fact in plain text.",
          "lean":  "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
      ],
      "tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
    }
  ]
}

User brief (JSON)

{
    "event": {
        "id": 9785,
        "sport": "basketball",
        "venue": null,
        "league": "World Cup",
        "starts_at": "2026-07-05T16:30:00+00:00",
        "starts_at_human": "Sun, 05 Jul 2026 16:30:00 GMT"
    },
    "teams": {
        "away": "Iraq",
        "home": "Jordan"
    },
    "version": "v2",
    "sport_focus": [
        "Pace is the master variable for totals — multiply both teams' possessions-per-game tendencies, not just their points.",
        "Check the injury/rest report first: a star sitting (or load-managed on a back-to-back) reshapes the spread and total.",
        "Weigh offensive vs defensive rating and three-point volume/variance — 3PT-heavy teams have wider outcome distributions.",
        "Bench depth and foul trouble swing close games; note rotation reliability.",
        "Back-to-backs and travel cause real fatigue — flag the schedule spot for each side.",
        "Home-court edge is meaningful but smaller than star availability."
    ],
    "team_context": {
        "note": "Reference data from our settled-results database. Verify + extend it with your own research; it is not a substitute for current team news.",
        "away_form": {
            "last": "L",
            "record": "0W-0D-1L",
            "scored": 59,
            "matches": 1,
            "conceded": 108
        },
        "home_form": {
            "last": "W",
            "record": "1W-0D-0L",
            "scored": 108,
            "matches": 1,
            "conceded": 59
        },
        "rest_days": {
            "away": 6,
            "home": 6
        },
        "head_to_head": {
            "recent": [
                "2026-06-29: Iraq 59–108 Jordan"
            ],
            "matches": 1
        }
    },
    "market_consensus": {
        "h2h": [],
        "note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
        "extra_markets": []
    },
    "markets_requested": [
        "h2h",
        "totals",
        "spreads",
        "first_half"
    ],
    "research_directive": [
        "Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
        "recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
        "Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
        "If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
    ]
}

The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.

Research trail

What each AI looked up before picking

Unlock sources · Pro

Recent recaps

How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.

Share
Share X Reddit WhatsApp Telegram Facebook

Get the AI consensus before kickoff

Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.

Sign up free →