ItalyvsLithuania
Your call
Who wins? One tap, no signup.
AI predictions
5 markets · 6 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 5 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
|
First half winner
?
First half winner
First-half winner. Who is ahead at the half-time whistle.
|
First half h2h
?
First half h2h
Market explanation coming soon.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Italy 5/6 models |
over 3/6 models |
Italy 2/6 models |
Italy 5/5 models |
Lithuania 1/1 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
78%
Italy |
62%
Over |
71%
Italy -15.5 |
73%
Italy |
— | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
78%
Italy Italy enters as heavy favourites with 2 wins and a +15 point differential in recent form, while Lithuania has dropped their only recorded ma...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
62%
Over Italy's recent matches averaged 189 total points across 2 games, indicating a pace-driven or high-scoring environment. Even accounting for L...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
71%
Italy -15.5 Italy's +15 differential in recent form, combined with home-court advantage and a significantly stronger competitive profile, supports a 15–...
First half winner
?
First half winner
First-half winner. Who is ahead at the half-time whistle.
73%
Italy Italy's strong overall form and higher offensive consistency should manifest early. First halves in World Cup basketball typically reflect t...
First half h2h
?
First half h2h
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market. |
||||||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | — | — | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
First half winner
?
First half winner
First-half winner. Who is ahead at the half-time whistle.
No pick on this market.
First half h2h
?
First half h2h
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market. |
||||||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
60%
Italy |
55%
over |
65%
Italy |
60%
Italy |
— | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
60%
Italy Italy has a strong home-court advantage and a better recent form, with a 3-1 record in the FIBA World Cup European Pre-Qualifiers. Lithuania...
🔍 researched
4 sources cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over Both teams have shown high-scoring tendencies in recent matches, with Italy averaging 83.75 points scored and Lithuania averaging 88.50 poin...
🔍 researched
4 sources cited
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
65%
Italy Italy's home advantage and superior recent form make them likely to cover a -1 point spread. Their 3-1 record in the FIBA World Cup European...
🔍 researched
4 sources cited
First half winner
?
First half winner
First-half winner. Who is ahead at the half-time whistle.
60%
Italy Italy's strong start in recent games, including a 93-57 victory over Great Britain, suggests they are likely to lead at halftime. ([sportytr...
🔍 researched
4 sources cited
First half h2h
?
First half h2h
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market. |
||||||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
53%
Italy |
52%
over |
51%
Italy |
52%
Italy |
— | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
53%
Italy Italy holds home advantage and recent form edge from training data. Lithuania remains competitive but has shown inconsistency on the road. T...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
52%
over Both teams play at above-average pace in international play. Defensive ratings are middling, favoring totals above the expected line. Traini...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
51%
Italy Home-court edge for Italy is modest but consistent in World Cup qualifiers. Lithuania travels with limited rest differential. Training data...
First half winner
?
First half winner
First-half winner. Who is ahead at the half-time whistle.
52%
Italy Italy typically starts strong at home with early defensive intensity. Lithuania needs time to adjust to pace. Training data through 2025-09...
First half h2h
?
First half h2h
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market. |
||||||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
65%
Italy |
58%
Over 168.5 |
55%
Italy -5.5 |
60%
Italy |
— | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Italy Based on the provided team context, Italy enters this match with a strong 2-0 record and a healthy scoring average from their recent games....
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
Over 168.5 Italy's two games averaged a total of 181.5 points (94.5 scored, 87 conceded), while Lithuania's single game totaled 188 points (92 scored,...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
55%
Italy -5.5 Italy's perfect record and consistent scoring average of 94.5 points per game suggest they have the offensive firepower to create a signific...
First half winner
?
First half winner
First-half winner. Who is ahead at the half-time whistle.
60%
Italy Given Italy's superior recent form and higher offensive output, they are expected to start the game strong and establish an early lead. Lith...
First half h2h
?
First half h2h
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market. |
||||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
60%
Lithuania |
55%
over |
53%
Lithuania |
— |
52%
Lithuania |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
60%
Lithuania Lithuania has a stronger historical record in international basketball tournaments and generally fields a more competitive team than Italy....
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over Both teams have shown offensive capabilities, and international tournament games can often be high-scoring due to varying defensive efforts...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
53%
Lithuania While Lithuania is favored, Italy has shown decent offensive output at home. The spread is narrow, suggesting a close game, but Lithuania's...
First half winner
?
First half winner
First-half winner. Who is ahead at the half-time whistle.
No pick on this market.
First half h2h
?
First half h2h
Market explanation coming soon.
52%
Lithuania Lithuania's tendency to start strong in tournaments and their overall superior talent should translate to a lead in the first half. While It... |
||||||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
65%
Italy |
55%
over 165.5 |
58%
Italy -3.5 |
60%
Italy |
— | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Italy Italy has better recent form (2 wins) compared to Lithuania's loss, and both teams have comparable rest. Italy's home-court advantage in a W...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over 165.5 Both teams have high scoring averages (Italy 94.5 ppg, Lithuania 92 ppg) and the pace in international basketball tends to be high. The tota...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
58%
Italy -3.5 Italy's home advantage and recent form suggest they can cover a modest spread. Lithuania is a strong team but their recent loss indicates po...
First half winner
?
First half winner
First-half winner. Who is ahead at the half-time whistle.
60%
Italy Italy starts games strongly as evidenced by their recent high-scoring first halves. Lithuania may need time to adjust after a loss. Home cro...
First half h2h
?
First half h2h
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market. |
||||||
Match winner
ConsensusItaly 5/6
Italy enters as heavy favourites with 2 wins and a +15 point differential in recent form, while Lithuania has dropped their only recorded ma...
Italy has a strong home-court advantage and a better recent form, with a 3-1 record in the FIBA World Cup European Pre-Qualifiers. Lithuania...
Italy holds home advantage and recent form edge from training data. Lithuania remains competitive but has shown inconsistency on the road. T...
Based on the provided team context, Italy enters this match with a strong 2-0 record and a healthy scoring average from their recent games....
Lithuania has a stronger historical record in international basketball tournaments and generally fields a more competitive team than Italy....
Italy has better recent form (2 wins) compared to Lithuania's loss, and both teams have comparable rest. Italy's home-court advantage in a W...
Over / Under
Consensusover 3/6
Italy's recent matches averaged 189 total points across 2 games, indicating a pace-driven or high-scoring environment. Even accounting for L...
Both teams have shown high-scoring tendencies in recent matches, with Italy averaging 83.75 points scored and Lithuania averaging 88.50 poin...
Both teams play at above-average pace in international play. Defensive ratings are middling, favoring totals above the expected line. Traini...
Italy's two games averaged a total of 181.5 points (94.5 scored, 87 conceded), while Lithuania's single game totaled 188 points (92 scored,...
Both teams have shown offensive capabilities, and international tournament games can often be high-scoring due to varying defensive efforts...
Both teams have high scoring averages (Italy 94.5 ppg, Lithuania 92 ppg) and the pace in international basketball tends to be high. The tota...
Spread
ConsensusItaly 2/6
Italy's +15 differential in recent form, combined with home-court advantage and a significantly stronger competitive profile, supports a 15–...
Italy's home advantage and superior recent form make them likely to cover a -1 point spread. Their 3-1 record in the FIBA World Cup European...
Home-court edge for Italy is modest but consistent in World Cup qualifiers. Lithuania travels with limited rest differential. Training data...
Italy's perfect record and consistent scoring average of 94.5 points per game suggest they have the offensive firepower to create a signific...
While Lithuania is favored, Italy has shown decent offensive output at home. The spread is narrow, suggesting a close game, but Lithuania's...
Italy's home advantage and recent form suggest they can cover a modest spread. Lithuania is a strong team but their recent loss indicates po...
First half winner
ConsensusItaly 5/5
Italy's strong overall form and higher offensive consistency should manifest early. First halves in World Cup basketball typically reflect t...
Italy's strong start in recent games, including a 93-57 victory over Great Britain, suggests they are likely to lead at halftime. ([sportytr...
Italy typically starts strong at home with early defensive intensity. Lithuania needs time to adjust to pace. Training data through 2025-09...
Given Italy's superior recent form and higher offensive output, they are expected to start the game strong and establish an early lead. Lith...
Italy starts games strongly as evidenced by their recent high-scoring first halves. Lithuania may need time to adjust after a loss. Home cro...
First half h2h
ConsensusLithuania 1/1
Lithuania's tendency to start strong in tournaments and their overall superior talent should translate to a lead in the first half. While It...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerClaude Haiku 4.5
Italy
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Italy
DeepSeek V3
Italy
GPT-4o Mini
Italy
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Lithuania
Grok 4 Fast
Italy
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Refresh the read
Early readRe-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.
Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.
Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
53912b942aab8755…
- Kickoff
- Sun, Jul 5 · 18:00 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Over / Under · Spread · First half winner
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 4. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 4, in this order): h2h | totals | spreads | first_half
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 9792,
"sport": "basketball",
"venue": null,
"league": "World Cup",
"starts_at": "2026-07-05T18:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Sun, 05 Jul 2026 18:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Lithuania",
"home": "Italy"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Pace is the master variable for totals — multiply both teams' possessions-per-game tendencies, not just their points.",
"Check the injury/rest report first: a star sitting (or load-managed on a back-to-back) reshapes the spread and total.",
"Weigh offensive vs defensive rating and three-point volume/variance — 3PT-heavy teams have wider outcome distributions.",
"Bench depth and foul trouble swing close games; note rotation reliability.",
"Back-to-backs and travel cause real fatigue — flag the schedule spot for each side.",
"Home-court edge is meaningful but smaller than star availability."
],
"team_context": {
"note": "Reference data from our settled-results database. Verify + extend it with your own research; it is not a substitute for current team news.",
"away_form": {
"last": "L",
"record": "0W-0D-1L",
"scored": 92,
"matches": 1,
"conceded": 96
},
"home_form": {
"last": "WW",
"record": "2W-0D-0L",
"scored": 189,
"matches": 2,
"conceded": 174
},
"rest_days": {
"away": 7,
"home": 8
}
},
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals",
"spreads",
"first_half"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Research trail
What each AI looked up before picking
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
4 tool calls · 4 sources
4 citations captured — unlock with Pro
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.
Recent recaps
How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.