Indiana Fever vs Toronto Tempo
TTKickoff · Tue, Jun 16 · 23:10 GMT+0000
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
b080b76526794af4…
- Kickoff
- Tue, Jun 16 · 23:10 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Over / Under · Spread · First half winner
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 4. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 4, in this order): h2h | totals | spreads | first_half
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 4987,
"sport": "basketball",
"venue": null,
"league": "WNBA",
"starts_at": "2026-06-16T23:10:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Tue, 16 Jun 2026 23:10:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Toronto Tempo",
"home": "Indiana Fever"
},
"version": "v1",
"built_at": "2026-06-16T18:16:00+00:00",
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals",
"spreads",
"first_half"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Your call
Who wins? One tap, no signup.
AI predictions
4 markets · 6 models picked
Who picked what
15 models × 4 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
|
First half winner
?
First half winner
First-half winner. Who is ahead at the half-time whistle.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
62%
Indiana Fever |
58%
Under 165.5 |
60%
Indiana Fever -4.5 |
61%
Indiana Fever |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Indiana Fever Indiana Fever is the home team with a historical advantage in WNBA matchups. Toronto Tempo, as a newer or less established franchise in my t...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
Under 165.5 WNBA games in mid-June typically see defensive intensity ramp up as the season progresses. Both Indiana Fever and Toronto Tempo are unlikely...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
60%
Indiana Fever -4.5 A 4.5-point spread favoring the home Fever is reasonable given Indiana's typical roster strength and home-court advantage in the WNBA. Toron...
First half winner
?
First half winner
First-half winner. Who is ahead at the half-time whistle.
61%
Indiana Fever First-half winners often mirror the eventual game winner, especially when the home team has roster superiority. Indiana Fever should establi... |
|||||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | — | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
First half winner
?
First half winner
First-half winner. Who is ahead at the half-time whistle.
No pick on this market. |
|||||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
68%
Indiana Fever |
56%
under |
54%
Indiana Fever |
60%
Indiana Fever |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
68%
Indiana Fever Indiana Fever have won four of their last five games and have a strong home record of 5-2. Toronto Tempo have lost two straight games and ar...
🔍 researched
4 sources cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
56%
under Both teams have shown variability in scoring, and with Toronto's potential fatigue and Indiana's home-court advantage, the game is expected...
🔍 researched
4 sources cited
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
54%
Indiana Fever Indiana's home advantage and recent form make them likely to cover the spread. However, Toronto's ability to score from the perimeter and po...
🔍 researched
4 sources cited
First half winner
?
First half winner
First-half winner. Who is ahead at the half-time whistle.
60%
Indiana Fever Indiana's strong home performance and recent momentum suggest they will lead at halftime. Toronto's potential fatigue and travel schedule ma...
🔍 researched
4 sources cited
|
|||||
|
o3 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
82%
Indiana Fever |
61%
over |
71%
Indiana Fever -6.5 |
79%
Indiana Fever |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
82%
Indiana Fever Indiana Fever is an established WNBA franchise while Toronto Tempo appears to be a 2026 expansion side with unknown roster quality. Historic...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
61%
over WNBA games in June trend toward higher possessions and scoring. New teams often play at a faster uncontrolled pace early in seasons leading...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
71%
Indiana Fever -6.5 Talent gap between an existing roster and an expansion side typically exceeds 6-8 points in season openers. Fever home-court advantage furth...
First half winner
?
First half winner
First-half winner. Who is ahead at the half-time whistle.
79%
Indiana Fever Early-game execution favors the more cohesive veteran group. Tempo will need time to gel on both ends of the floor. Fever should build a lea... |
|||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
60%
Indiana Fever |
52%
Under 165.5 |
55%
Indiana Fever -6.5 |
58%
Indiana Fever |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
60%
Indiana Fever Based on my training data, the Indiana Fever are an established WNBA franchise with known players and league experience. Toronto Tempo is as...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
52%
Under 165.5 WNBA games generally feature a lower scoring pace compared to the NBA, and 165.5 points is a common line for competitive matches. Given the...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
55%
Indiana Fever -6.5 Aligning with the head-to-head prediction, the Indiana Fever are expected to be the stronger team due to their established presence in the l...
First half winner
?
First half winner
First-half winner. Who is ahead at the half-time whistle.
58%
Indiana Fever The Indiana Fever, playing at home and possessing more league experience, are expected to assert control early in the game. An unproven Toro... |
|||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
65%
Toronto Tempo |
55%
over |
52%
Toronto Tempo |
53%
over |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Toronto Tempo The Indiana Fever have a stronger historical record and are generally considered a more established franchise in the WNBA. However, the Toro...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over Basketball games, especially in professional leagues like the WNBA, tend to have a high number of scoring opportunities. Without specific ov...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
52%
Toronto Tempo Given the slight preference for the Toronto Tempo in the head-to-head market and the general assumption of a competitive game, the spread is...
First half winner
?
First half winner
First-half winner. Who is ahead at the half-time whistle.
53%
over Similar to the total game score, the first half of a basketball game often sees significant scoring as teams establish their rhythm and offe... |
|||||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
55%
Indiana Fever |
60%
Over |
50%
Indiana Fever -1 |
55%
Indiana Fever |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Indiana Fever Indiana Fever have a stronger roster on paper with Aliyah Boston and Kelsey Mitchell, while Toronto Tempo are a first-year expansion team st...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
Over Both teams have been playing at a moderately high pace, averaging combined 160+ points per game. Indiana's offense is efficient, and Toronto...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
50%
Indiana Fever -1 Indiana's slight talent advantage and home court make them narrow favorites. However, Toronto's grit keeps the margin close. A -1 line is es...
First half winner
?
First half winner
First-half winner. Who is ahead at the half-time whistle.
55%
Indiana Fever Indiana tends to start games well, especially at home, with strong first-quarter performances. Toronto may take time to settle in early. The... |
|||||
|
Consensus |
Indiana Fever 5/6 |
Under 165.5 2/6 |
Indiana Fever -6.5 2/6 |
Indiana Fever 5/6 |
|
Pro on-demand
Request an AI audit
Have the frontier lineup analyse this match — same brief, same scoreboard. Predictions appear publicly once the run finishes.
Ask the AIs · Locked until kickoff
In-play AI call
In-play calls unlock the moment this match goes live.
Sign in to ask the AIs about this match. Pro adds in-play + post-match calls, alerts, and the reasoning behind every pick.
Research trail
What each AI looked up before picking
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
4 tool calls · 4 sources
4 citations captured — unlock with Pro
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.