IcelandvsItaly
Your call
Who wins? One tap, no signup.
AI predictions
4 markets · 6 models picked
Consensus split
How the lineup voted · Match winner
- Italy 83% 5/6
- Iceland 17% 1/6
Model confidence
Each model's confidence in its pick (%)
Who picked what
16 models × 4 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
|
First half winner
?
First half winner
First-half winner. Who is ahead at the half-time whistle.
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
62%
Under 160 |
59%
Italy -8 |
65%
Italy |
68%
Italy |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
62%
Under 160 International basketball, particularly World Cup group/qualifying stages, tends toward lower pace and efficiency than NBA. Italy plays delib...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
59%
Italy -8 Italy's talent, experience, and defensive intensity justify a moderate spread advantage. An 8-point margin reflects the quality gap without...
First half winner
?
First half winner
First-half winner. Who is ahead at the half-time whistle.
65%
Italy Italy's superior roster depth and defensive scheme should establish control early, particularly in the first half when lineups are fresh and...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
68%
Italy Italy is a significantly stronger basketball nation with deeper roster talent, superior international experience, and a proven track record... |
|||||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | — | — | |
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
First half winner
?
First half winner
First-half winner. Who is ahead at the half-time whistle.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market. |
|||||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
60%
over |
55%
Italy |
60%
Italy |
55%
Iceland |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
over Both teams have demonstrated high-scoring capabilities in recent matches. Iceland's average points scored per game is 81.4, while Italy's is...
🔍 researched
3 sources cited
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
55%
Italy Italy's overall performance in the qualifiers, with a 3-1 record, suggests they have the edge over Iceland. Despite Iceland's home advantage...
🔍 researched
3 sources cited
First half winner
?
First half winner
First-half winner. Who is ahead at the half-time whistle.
60%
Italy Italy's strong start in recent qualifiers, including a 3-1 record, suggests they are likely to lead at halftime. Their consistent performanc...
🔍 researched
3 sources cited
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Iceland Iceland has a slight edge in recent head-to-head matchups, including a 76-81 victory over Italy in November 2025. However, Italy's overall p...
🔍 researched
3 sources cited
|
|||||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
58%
over |
79%
Italy |
76%
Italy |
82%
Italy |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
over Italy's offensive rating and three-point volume typically push game totals higher even against weaker opponents. Iceland plays at a slower p...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
79%
Italy Italy should cover a standard spread in this mismatch given superior depth and shooting. Home-court edge for Iceland is minimal at this leve...
First half winner
?
First half winner
First-half winner. Who is ahead at the half-time whistle.
76%
Italy Italy's starting unit and early defensive pressure usually establish leads by halftime against lesser competition. Iceland lacks the perimet...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
82%
Italy Italy is a significantly stronger basketball nation with superior talent and international experience compared to Iceland. Training data thr... |
|||||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
70%
over |
65%
Italy -12.5 |
75%
Italy_win |
85%
Italy |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
70%
over Italy's recent two matches (provided in the brief) averaged 181.5 total points, significantly above the 165.5 line. Given their offensive pr...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
65%
Italy -12.5 Italy is expected to dominate this matchup due to their superior talent and experience in international basketball. Covering a -12.5 point s...
First half winner
?
First half winner
First-half winner. Who is ahead at the half-time whistle.
75%
Italy_win Italy's superior skill and offensive output should enable them to gain a decisive advantage early in the game. They are highly expected to l...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
85%
Italy Italy is historically a stronger basketball team compared to Iceland, possessing a deeper talent pool and more experience in major tournamen... |
|||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
55%
over |
60%
Italy |
58%
Italy |
65%
Italy |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over Given Italy's strong offensive record (189 points in 2 matches), they are likely to contribute significantly to the total score. While speci...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
60%
Italy Italy's superior recent form and scoring ability make them a strong candidate to cover any reasonable spread. Their offensive output suggest...
First half winner
?
First half winner
First-half winner. Who is ahead at the half-time whistle.
58%
Italy Italy's strong offensive capabilities are likely to manifest early in the game. Their consistent scoring form suggests they can establish a...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Italy Italy has a superior recent form (2 wins, 0 losses) compared to Iceland, suggesting they are in better current performance. The longer rest... |
|||||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
55%
over |
60%
Italy -6.5 |
65%
Italy |
70%
Italy |
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over Italy's recent matches have seen high scoring (189 points in 2 games), and while Iceland may be weaker, the total line is likely set around...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
60%
Italy -6.5 Italy's talent advantage and recent form suggest they can cover a modest spread against Iceland, likely around 6-10 points. Historical misma...
First half winner
?
First half winner
First-half winner. Who is ahead at the half-time whistle.
65%
Italy Italy's superior depth and experience should allow them to establish an early lead. Recent games show Italy starts strong, outscoring oppone...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
70%
Italy Italy is a historically stronger basketball nation than Iceland, and their recent form (2 wins with high scoring) suggests good momentum. Ic... |
|||||
|
Consensus |
over 5/6 |
Italy 3/6 |
Italy 5/6 |
Italy 5/6 |
|
Over / Under
Consensusover 5/6
International basketball, particularly World Cup group/qualifying stages, tends toward lower pace and efficiency than NBA. Italy plays delib...
Both teams have demonstrated high-scoring capabilities in recent matches. Iceland's average points scored per game is 81.4, while Italy's is...
Italy's offensive rating and three-point volume typically push game totals higher even against weaker opponents. Iceland plays at a slower p...
Italy's recent two matches (provided in the brief) averaged 181.5 total points, significantly above the 165.5 line. Given their offensive pr...
Given Italy's strong offensive record (189 points in 2 matches), they are likely to contribute significantly to the total score. While speci...
Italy's recent matches have seen high scoring (189 points in 2 games), and while Iceland may be weaker, the total line is likely set around...
Spread
ConsensusItaly 3/6
Italy's talent, experience, and defensive intensity justify a moderate spread advantage. An 8-point margin reflects the quality gap without...
Italy's overall performance in the qualifiers, with a 3-1 record, suggests they have the edge over Iceland. Despite Iceland's home advantage...
Italy should cover a standard spread in this mismatch given superior depth and shooting. Home-court edge for Iceland is minimal at this leve...
Italy is expected to dominate this matchup due to their superior talent and experience in international basketball. Covering a -12.5 point s...
Italy's superior recent form and scoring ability make them a strong candidate to cover any reasonable spread. Their offensive output suggest...
Italy's talent advantage and recent form suggest they can cover a modest spread against Iceland, likely around 6-10 points. Historical misma...
First half winner
ConsensusItaly 5/6
Italy's superior roster depth and defensive scheme should establish control early, particularly in the first half when lineups are fresh and...
Italy's strong start in recent qualifiers, including a 3-1 record, suggests they are likely to lead at halftime. Their consistent performanc...
Italy's starting unit and early defensive pressure usually establish leads by halftime against lesser competition. Iceland lacks the perimet...
Italy's superior skill and offensive output should enable them to gain a decisive advantage early in the game. They are highly expected to l...
Italy's strong offensive capabilities are likely to manifest early in the game. Their consistent scoring form suggests they can establish a...
Italy's superior depth and experience should allow them to establish an early lead. Recent games show Italy starts strong, outscoring oppone...
Match winner
ConsensusItaly 5/6
Italy is a significantly stronger basketball nation with deeper roster talent, superior international experience, and a proven track record...
Iceland has a slight edge in recent head-to-head matchups, including a 76-81 victory over Italy in November 2025. However, Italy's overall p...
Italy is a significantly stronger basketball nation with superior talent and international experience compared to Iceland. Training data thr...
Italy is historically a stronger basketball team compared to Iceland, possessing a deeper talent pool and more experience in major tournamen...
Italy has a superior recent form (2 wins, 0 losses) compared to Iceland, suggesting they are in better current performance. The longer rest...
Italy is a historically stronger basketball nation than Iceland, and their recent form (2 wins with high scoring) suggests good momentum. Ic...
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Refresh the read
Early readRe-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.
Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.
Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
e4917bf477557c8c…
- Kickoff
- Thu, Jul 2 · 19:45 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Over / Under · Spread · First half winner
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 4. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 4, in this order): h2h | totals | spreads | first_half
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 9284,
"sport": "basketball",
"venue": null,
"league": "World Cup",
"starts_at": "2026-07-02T19:45:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Thu, 02 Jul 2026 19:45:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Italy",
"home": "Iceland"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Pace is the master variable for totals — multiply both teams' possessions-per-game tendencies, not just their points.",
"Check the injury/rest report first: a star sitting (or load-managed on a back-to-back) reshapes the spread and total.",
"Weigh offensive vs defensive rating and three-point volume/variance — 3PT-heavy teams have wider outcome distributions.",
"Bench depth and foul trouble swing close games; note rotation reliability.",
"Back-to-backs and travel cause real fatigue — flag the schedule spot for each side.",
"Home-court edge is meaningful but smaller than star availability."
],
"team_context": {
"note": "Reference data from our settled-results database. Verify + extend it with your own research; it is not a substitute for current team news.",
"away_form": {
"last": "WW",
"record": "2W-0D-0L",
"scored": 189,
"matches": 2,
"conceded": 174
},
"rest_days": {
"away": 5
}
},
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals",
"spreads",
"first_half"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Research trail
What each AI looked up before picking
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
4 tool calls · 3 sources
3 citations captured — unlock with Pro
Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.
Recent recaps
How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.