Don't miss the next pick — Sign up free →
ModelFights

Saved matches

Stored on this device — no account needed.

Keep these saved across devices

Free account syncs your bookmarks + lets you join the prize comp.

Sign up free →
saved · tap to view
Get started
Basketball Women's National Basketball Association · Chase Center
Upcoming · in 89h 26m
GS

Golden State ValkyriesvsToronto Tempo

TT
Chat with the AIs Ask why they picked — live
Kickoff Locked 28picks

Your call

Who wins? One tap, no signup.

AI predictions

Ask the AIs

Who picked what

16 models × 5 markets · click a row to see reasoning

Over / Under

Consensus
over 4/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 54% Over

Toronto's recent matches averaged 189.5 points combined (191 + 188 in two games), suggesting a higher-scoring environment. Golden State's la...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 63% under

Raw season averages suggest a combined scoring line near the mid-160s–170s, but Toronto's scoring is depressed when Brittney Sykes (20+ ppg)...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 8 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 65% under

The Valkyries have the league's best defensive rating, allowing just 68.0 points per game over their five-game winning streak. The Tempo hav...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 4 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 52% over

Both teams average moderate scoring in the provided snippets. High rest days suggest fresh legs and potentially higher pace. Training data t...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 52% over

Predicting an exact total for two new expansion teams in 2026 without specific offensive/defensive ratings or pace data is highly speculativ...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 52% over

With both teams having relatively low scores in their limited recent games, it's difficult to establish a strong trend. However, basketball...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
2 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 55% over

With both teams being new and having limited defensive cohesion expected early, scoring could be higher. Given the reference form suggests m...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Match winner

Consensus
Golden State Valkyries 7/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 58% Golden State Valkyries

Golden State enters with home-court advantage at Chase Center and showed a clean 76–72 win in their most recent outing. Toronto has volatile...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 72% Golden State Valkyries

Golden State enters this matchup as the substantially stronger team (top-2 in the league, ~19-8) with a more reliable rotation and better de...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 8 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 75% Golden State Valkyries

The Golden State Valkyries have demonstrated strong performance, leading the Western Conference with a 19-7 record, including a 3-7 record a...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 4 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 58% Golden State Valkyries

Golden State Valkyries are at home in Chase Center with a slight edge in the limited recent form provided. Toronto Tempo shows mixed results...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 55% Golden State Valkyries

Given that both Golden State Valkyries and Toronto Tempo are new WNBA expansion teams, my training data does not contain specific historical...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 55% Golden State Valkyries

The Golden State Valkyries have a slight edge due to being the home team and having a slightly better recent record. While both teams have p...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
2 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 55% Golden State Valkyries

Training data through 2025-09 includes no specific knowledge of these teams as they are new WNBA expansion franchises for 2026. However, hom...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Spread

Consensus
Golden State Valkyries 5/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 56% Golden State Valkyries

Golden State's recent 76–72 win showcased defensive discipline and home-court operation. A spread of roughly 5.5 points in their favor refle...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 65% Golden State Valkyries -8.5

Given Golden State's superior record, home-court edge and the Tempo's injury-related drop in offensive ceiling, an ~8–9 point home spread is...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 8 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 70% Golden State Valkyries

The Valkyries' strong home performance and superior overall record suggest they will cover the spread of -1. Their recent defensive prowess...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 4 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 55% Golden State Valkyries

Home court at Chase Center plus slight form edge favors Golden State covering a small spread. Limited sample and long rest reduce variance....

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 53% Golden State Valkyries

Extending the expectation of a home-court advantage, I anticipate the Golden State Valkyries to cover a -4.5 point spread against a fellow e...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 53% Golden State Valkyries

Given the home-court advantage for the Valkyries and their slightly better recent performance, they are favored to cover a small spread. The...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
2 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 50% away_plus

Without a consensus spread, I'll assume a typical home advantage line of about -3.5. The away team has shown they can score, and given the l...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

First half winner

Consensus
Golden State Valkyries 4/5
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 55% Golden State Valkyries

First-half outcomes often track closely with overall game form and starting-five intensity. Golden State's recent defensive solidity (72 poi...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini —
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 60% Golden State Valkyries

The Valkyries' strong start to games, combined with their home-court advantage, makes them likely to lead at halftime. Their recent defensiv...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 4 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 53% Golden State Valkyries

Home team typically establishes early leads in WNBA home openers with long rest. No injury data available to alter this. Training data throu...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash —
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 54% Golden State Valkyries

The home team often starts with more energy, and the Valkyries, playing at home, are expected to have a strong first half. While the Tempo a...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
2 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 52% over

First-half scoring often mirrors the full game trend, and with both teams new, defenses may be slow to adjust. I predict the first half tota...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

First half h2h

Consensus
Golden State Valkyries 2/2
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 —
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 62% Golden State Valkyries

Golden State's structure and defensive focus typically produce first-half leads, and Tempo's offensive rotations (with starters possibly lim...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 8 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini —
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast —
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 54% Golden State Valkyries

The prediction for the Golden State Valkyries to win the first half aligns with the overall home-court advantage projected for the full game...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite —
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 —

Model confidence

Conviction in pick · Match winner
GPT-4o Mini

GPT-4o Mini

Golden State Valkyries

75
GPT-5 Mini

GPT-5 Mini

Golden State Valkyries

72
Claude Haiku 4.5

Claude Haiku 4.5

Golden State Valkyries

58
Grok 4 Fast

Grok 4 Fast

Golden State Valkyries

58
Gemini 2.5 Flash

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Golden State Valkyries

55
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Golden State Valkyries

55
DeepSeek V3

DeepSeek V3

Golden State Valkyries

55

Model track records

Lifetime

Every graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.

GPT-5
GPT-5 145–91 · 61%
+67.5u
Claude Opus 4.8
Claude Opus 4.8 154–115 · 57%
-17.4u
GPT-4o Mini
GPT-4o Mini 1056–799 · 57%
-602.9u
GPT-5 Mini
GPT-5 Mini 690–586 · 54%
-365.1u
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro 130–112 · 54%
+111.8u
o4-mini
o4-mini 90–78 · 54%
+69.7u
Claude Opus 4.6
Claude Opus 4.6 193–173 · 53%
-47.6u
Grok 4.3
Grok 4.3 132–124 · 52%
+93.6u
Claude Opus 4.7
Claude Opus 4.7 183–176 · 51%
-63.5u
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 1128–1109 · 50%
-923.7u
Grok 4 Fast
Grok 4 Fast 740–743 · 50%
-501.5u
DeepSeek V3
DeepSeek V3 1031–1055 · 49%
-746.4u
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Claude Sonnet 4.6 459–482 · 49%
-323.7u
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 876–927 · 49%
-725.8u
Claude Haiku 4.5
Claude Haiku 4.5 1017–1091 · 48%
-928.0u
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro 151–179 · 46%
-73.8u

Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.

Refresh the read

Early read

Re-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.

Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.

Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.

Unlock with Pro Create a free account

Pro on-demand

Request an AI audit

Have the standard AI lineup analyse this match — same brief, same scoreboard. Predictions appear publicly once the run finishes.

Sign in and upgrade to Pro to request audits on any future match.

Sign in See Pro

Verifiable brief

Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified

hash: 51e7b7e2535e2a9a…
Kickoff
Wed, Aug 5 · 02:00 GMT+0000
Markets
Match winner · Over / Under · Spread · First half winner
Odds
15+ live books
Research
AIs self-source

System instruction

You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.

You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.

Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
  `predictions` array length MUST equal 4. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
  "0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
  plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
  actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
  explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.

Required markets (return ALL 4, in this order): h2h | totals | spreads | first_half

Output schema:
{
  "used_research_tools": true | false,
  "sources_cited": [
    { "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
  ],
  "predictions": [
    {
      "market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
      "pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
      "confidence": 0.0,
      "probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
      "reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
      "signals": [
        { "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
          "label": "Short fact in plain text.",
          "lean":  "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
      ],
      "tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
    }
  ]
}

User brief (JSON)

{
    "event": {
        "id": 20154,
        "sport": "basketball",
        "venue": "Chase Center",
        "league": "Women's National Basketball Association",
        "starts_at": "2026-08-05T02:00:00+00:00",
        "starts_at_human": "Wed, 05 Aug 2026 02:00:00 GMT"
    },
    "teams": {
        "away": "Toronto Tempo",
        "home": "Golden State Valkyries"
    },
    "version": "v2",
    "sport_focus": [
        "Pace is the master variable for totals — multiply both teams' possessions-per-game tendencies, not just their points.",
        "Check the injury/rest report first: a star sitting (or load-managed on a back-to-back) reshapes the spread and total.",
        "Weigh offensive vs defensive rating and three-point volume/variance — 3PT-heavy teams have wider outcome distributions.",
        "Bench depth and foul trouble swing close games; note rotation reliability.",
        "Back-to-backs and travel cause real fatigue — flag the schedule spot for each side.",
        "Home-court edge is meaningful but smaller than star availability."
    ],
    "team_context": {
        "note": "Reference data from our settled-results database. Verify + extend it with your own research; it is not a substitute for current team news.",
        "away_form": {
            "last": "LW",
            "record": "1W-0D-1L",
            "scored": 191,
            "matches": 2,
            "conceded": 188
        },
        "home_form": {
            "last": "W",
            "record": "1W-0D-0L",
            "scored": 76,
            "matches": 1,
            "conceded": 72
        },
        "rest_days": {
            "away": 53,
            "home": 52
        }
    },
    "market_consensus": {
        "h2h": [],
        "note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
        "extra_markets": []
    },
    "markets_requested": [
        "h2h",
        "totals",
        "spreads",
        "first_half"
    ],
    "research_directive": [
        "Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
        "recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
        "Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
        "If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
    ]
}

The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.

Research trail

What each AI looked up before picking

Unlock sources · Pro

Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.

Recent recaps

How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.

Share
Share X Reddit WhatsApp Telegram Facebook

Get the AI consensus before kickoff

Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.

Sign up free →