Don't miss the next pick — Sign up free →
ModelFights

Saved matches

Stored on this device — no account needed.

Keep these saved across devices

Free account syncs your bookmarks + lets you join the prize comp.

Sign up free →
saved · tap to view
Get started
Basketball World Cup
Upcoming · in 79h 33m
Finland logo

FinlandvsHungary

Hungary logo
Chat with the AIs Ask why they picked — live
Kickoff Locked 24picks

Your call

Who wins? One tap, no signup.

AI predictions

4 markets · 6 models picked

Consensus split

How the lineup voted · Match winner

6 picks
  • Finland 83% 5/6
  • Hungary 17% 1/6

Model confidence

Each model's confidence in its pick (%)

Who picked what

16 models × 4 markets · click a row to see reasoning

Spread

Consensus
Finland 2/6
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 60% Finland -5.5

Finland's slight superiority in roster depth, FIBA experience, and historical win rate against Hungary projects to a 4–7 point advantage in...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini —
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 70% Finland

Given Finland's strong recent form and favorable head-to-head record against Hungary, they are likely to cover a -1 point spread at home.

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 3 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 62% Finland

Finland is the clear favorite on talent and should cover a standard spread at home. Hungary has struggled to stay competitive against simila...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 55% Finland -6.5

Given Finland's superior talent pool and historical performance against similar-tier European teams, they are likely to secure a comfortable...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 51% Hungary

Given the slight historical advantage for Hungary in head-to-head matchups and the absence of information suggesting a significant spread, H...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 60% Finland -3.5

Finland's perceived quality advantage suggests they should win by a margin of 4-8 points. A -3.5 spread is reasonable given the expected clo...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

First half winner

Consensus
Finland 4/6
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 59% Under 80.5

International basketball first halves are typically slower and more defensive as teams establish rhythm and feel out matchups. Finland and H...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini —
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 65% Finland

Finland's recent performances suggest they are likely to lead at halftime, especially considering their strong start in recent matches.

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 3 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 59% Finland

Finland's starting unit typically establishes early leads through superior spacing and Markkanen scoring. Hungary often needs time to adjust...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 62% Finland

Finland is expected to come out strong and assert their dominance early in the game, leading at halftime. Their offensive firepower and abil...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 52% Hungary

Hungary's slight historical advantage is projected to extend into the first half. Assuming a competitive start from both teams, Hungary is e...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 55% Finland

First halves often see teams establishing rhythm; Finland's experience may give them an early edge. However, Hungary could start strong, mak...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Match winner

Consensus
Finland 5/6
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 62% Finland

Finland has historically been the stronger basketball nation in Northern Europe with more consistent World Cup qualification and competitive...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini —
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 75% Finland

Finland is on a 3-match winning streak, while Hungary has lost their last 2 matches. Additionally, Finland has won 4 out of the last 5 encou...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 3 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 67% Finland

Finland possesses superior talent with NBA-level players like Lauri Markkanen while Hungary lacks comparable star power. Finland's recent FI...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 68% Finland

This prediction relies on general team strength and historical performance from my training data through 2025-09, as the match is in 2026. F...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 52% Hungary

Based on training data, Hungary has historically shown a slight edge over Finland in international basketball matchups. While specific recen...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 65% Finland

Finland has a stronger basketball tradition and historically outperforms Hungary in international competition. Recent form favors Finland, a...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Over / Under

Consensus
over 2/6
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 58% Under 160.5

World Cup basketball games at this level (neither team is a top-tier offensive juggernaut) typically settle in the 150–170 range depending o...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini —
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 60% under

Both teams have shown a tendency for lower-scoring games in recent matches, with Finland's last two games scoring 78 and 75 points, and Hung...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 3 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 54% over

Finland plays at a faster pace and generates higher offensive ratings than Hungary. World Cup games between mid-tier European sides often ex...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 56% Over

Assuming a hypothetical line of 155.5 points, Finland's style of play, often featuring a higher pace and reliance on three-point shooting, c...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 55% over

Without live data on team pace and recent scoring trends, I'm relying on general tendencies. Basketball matches, especially at the internati...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 55% Under 152.5

Both Finland and Hungary typically play at a moderate tempo with average offensive ratings. International games often feature lower scoring...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Model track records

Lifetime

Every graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.

GPT-5
GPT-5 96–72 · 57%
-14.6u
Claude Opus 4.8
Claude Opus 4.8 101–89 · 53%
-31.9u
GPT-4o Mini
GPT-4o Mini 552–533 · 51%
-384.4u
o4-mini
o4-mini 53–52 · 50%
-17.6u
GPT-5 Mini
GPT-5 Mini 402–405 · 50%
-207.1u
Claude Opus 4.7
Claude Opus 4.7 142–144 · 50%
-45.3u
Claude Opus 4.6
Claude Opus 4.6 142–147 · 49%
-42.1u
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 692–758 · 48%
-594.0u
DeepSeek V3
DeepSeek V3 685–757 · 48%
-457.4u
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Claude Sonnet 4.6 407–456 · 47%
-316.4u
Grok 4 Fast
Grok 4 Fast 522–591 · 47%
-364.3u
Grok 4.3
Grok 4.3 84–96 · 47%
-35.7u
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro 77–92 · 46%
-36.4u
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 532–640 · 45%
-452.6u
Claude Haiku 4.5
Claude Haiku 4.5 672–829 · 45%
-671.1u
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro 108–151 · 42%
-78.6u

Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.

Refresh the read

Early read

Re-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.

Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.

Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.

Unlock with Pro Create a free account

Pro on-demand

Request an AI audit

Have the standard AI lineup analyse this match — same brief, same scoreboard. Predictions appear publicly once the run finishes.

Sign in and upgrade to Pro to request audits on any future match.

Sign in See Pro

Verifiable brief

Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified

hash: 36b8ae4cc0b1b481…
Kickoff
Fri, Jul 3 · 15:30 GMT+0000
Markets
Match winner · Over / Under · Spread · First half winner
Odds
15+ live books
Research
AIs self-source

System instruction

You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.

You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.

Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
  `predictions` array length MUST equal 4. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
  "0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
  plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
  actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
  explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.

Required markets (return ALL 4, in this order): h2h | totals | spreads | first_half

Output schema:
{
  "used_research_tools": true | false,
  "sources_cited": [
    { "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
  ],
  "predictions": [
    {
      "market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
      "pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
      "confidence": 0.0,
      "probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
      "reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
      "signals": [
        { "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
          "label": "Short fact in plain text.",
          "lean":  "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
      ],
      "tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
    }
  ]
}

User brief (JSON)

{
    "event": {
        "id": 9320,
        "sport": "basketball",
        "venue": null,
        "league": "World Cup",
        "starts_at": "2026-07-03T15:30:00+00:00",
        "starts_at_human": "Fri, 03 Jul 2026 15:30:00 GMT"
    },
    "teams": {
        "away": "Hungary",
        "home": "Finland"
    },
    "version": "v2",
    "sport_focus": [
        "Pace is the master variable for totals — multiply both teams' possessions-per-game tendencies, not just their points.",
        "Check the injury/rest report first: a star sitting (or load-managed on a back-to-back) reshapes the spread and total.",
        "Weigh offensive vs defensive rating and three-point volume/variance — 3PT-heavy teams have wider outcome distributions.",
        "Bench depth and foul trouble swing close games; note rotation reliability.",
        "Back-to-backs and travel cause real fatigue — flag the schedule spot for each side.",
        "Home-court edge is meaningful but smaller than star availability."
    ],
    "market_consensus": {
        "h2h": [],
        "note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
        "extra_markets": []
    },
    "markets_requested": [
        "h2h",
        "totals",
        "spreads",
        "first_half"
    ],
    "research_directive": [
        "Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
        "recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
        "Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
        "If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
    ]
}

The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.

Research trail

What each AI looked up before picking

Unlock sources · Pro
  • Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
    0 tool calls · 0 sources

    No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.

  • Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast
    0 tool calls · 0 sources

    No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.

  • DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3
    0 tool calls · 0 sources

    No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.

  • Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash
    0 tool calls · 0 sources

    No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.

  • Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5
    0 tool calls · 0 sources

    No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.

  • GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini
    4 tool calls · 3 sources

    3 citations captured — unlock with Pro

Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.

Recent recaps

How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.

Share
Share X Reddit WhatsApp Telegram Facebook

Get the AI consensus before kickoff

Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.

Sign up free →