Don't miss the next pick — Sign up free →
ModelFights

Saved matches

Stored on this device — no account needed.

Keep these saved across devices

Free account syncs your bookmarks + lets you join the prize comp.

Sign up free →
saved · tap to view
Get started
Basketball World Cup
Upcoming · in 78h 56m
D.R. Congo logo

D.R. CongovsIvory Coast

Ivory Coast logo
Chat with the AIs Ask why they picked — live
Kickoff Locked 24picks AIs split

Your call

Who wins? One tap, no signup.

AI predictions

Ask the AIs

Who picked what

16 models × 5 markets · click a row to see reasoning

Spread

Consensus
D.R. Congo 3/6
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 59% Ivory Coast -6.5

Ivory Coast's superior roster talent and international experience should yield a 6–10 point margin in a neutral venue World Cup setting. D.R...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini —
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 60% D.R. Congo

Given Ivory Coast's recent strong performance and head-to-head advantage, they are likely to cover a -1 point spread against D.R. Congo.

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 4 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 53% D.R. Congo

Home court and familiarity give DR Congo a 3-5 point projected edge. Ivory Coast has shown vulnerability on the road in prior cycles.

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 58% Ivory Coast -8.5

Ivory Coast's superior talent pool and tactical discipline, observed in past competitions up to 2025-09, suggest they can comfortably cover...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 58% Ivory Coast

Given the slight edge predicted for Ivory Coast in head-to-head, they are also favored to cover a small spread. This assumes a typical sprea...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 55% D.R. Congo

Home-court advantage typically worth 3-5 points in international basketball. D.R. Congo has superior size and athleticism. Ivory Coast can k...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

First half winner

Consensus
D.R. Congo 3/5
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 65% Ivory Coast

Ivory Coast's superiority in half-court execution and three-point shooting should be evident early; they typically start strong and impose t...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini —
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 55% D.R. Congo

Ivory Coast's strong start in recent matches suggests they are likely to lead at halftime against D.R. Congo.

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 4 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 51% D.R. Congo

Early game energy favors the home side before fatigue sets in. First-half totals historically run slightly lower than full game averages.

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash —
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 55% Ivory Coast

Teams that are favored overall often perform well in the first half as well. The slight advantage projected for Ivory Coast is likely to man...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 53% D.R. Congo

D.R. Congo often starts strong with home crowd energy. Ivory Coast may take time to adjust. Slight edge to home team in first half.

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Match winner

Consensus
D.R. Congo 3/6
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 68% Ivory Coast

Ivory Coast has historically been the stronger basketball nation in Central/West Africa, with more consistent international tournament perfo...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini —
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 65% D.R. Congo

Ivory Coast has demonstrated strong form in recent World Cup Qualifiers, winning 3 consecutive matches, while D.R. Congo has lost 2 of their...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 4 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 55% D.R. Congo

Both teams are African qualifiers with limited recent international data available through 2023. Home venue provides a modest edge in FIBA e...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 65% Ivory Coast

Based on historical performance data through 2025-09, Ivory Coast possesses a more experienced and consistently competitive basketball progr...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 60% Ivory Coast

Based on general basketball knowledge, Ivory Coast is typically a stronger team in international competitions compared to D.R. Congo. Withou...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 55% D.R. Congo

D.R. Congo likely has home-court advantage and a slightly stronger roster based on recent FIBA rankings. Ivory Coast has competitive depth b...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Over / Under

Consensus
over 3/6
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 61% Over

World Cup group-stage basketball games typically feature moderate pace and scoring as teams balance aggression with defensive discipline ear...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini —
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 55% over

Both teams have shown a tendency to score high in recent matches, with Ivory Coast averaging 85 points per game in their last 3 World Cup Qu...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 4 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 52% over

African teams in FIBA qualifiers average around 150-160 combined points. Pace tends to be high in these matchups with limited defensive stru...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 60% Under 145.5

International basketball contests, particularly among African nations, often feature a slower pace and physical, defense-focused play. This...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 55% over

Basketball games can be high-scoring, and without specific over/under lines or team pace information, assuming a moderate to high-scoring ga...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 52% under

Both teams tend to play at moderate paces in FIBA competitions. Defensive intensity in World Cup qualifiers often leads to lower scoring. Tr...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

First half winner

Consensus
Ivory Coast 1/1
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 —
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini —
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini —
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast —
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 62% Ivory Coast

Historically, stronger teams tend to establish their dominance early in basketball games, especially in tournament play where starting stron...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite —
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 —

Model confidence

Conviction in pick · Match winner
Claude Haiku 4.5

Claude Haiku 4.5

Ivory Coast

68
GPT-4o Mini

GPT-4o Mini

D.R. Congo

65
Gemini 2.5 Flash

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Ivory Coast

65
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Ivory Coast

60
Grok 4 Fast

Grok 4 Fast

D.R. Congo

55
DeepSeek V3

DeepSeek V3

D.R. Congo

55

Model track records

Lifetime

Every graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.

GPT-5
GPT-5 109–72 · 60%
-6.4u
Claude Opus 4.8
Claude Opus 4.8 111–93 · 54%
-30.7u
GPT-5 Mini
GPT-5 Mini 451–420 · 52%
-212.6u
GPT-4o Mini
GPT-4o Mini 595–556 · 52%
-390.8u
Claude Opus 4.6
Claude Opus 4.6 153–149 · 51%
-36.2u
o4-mini
o4-mini 56–55 · 50%
-17.1u
Claude Opus 4.7
Claude Opus 4.7 147–146 · 50%
-44.9u
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro 89–94 · 49%
+54.1u
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 734–784 · 48%
-605.3u
Grok 4.3
Grok 4.3 93–100 · 48%
+49.1u
DeepSeek V3
DeepSeek V3 717–782 · 48%
-476.9u
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Claude Sonnet 4.6 417–459 · 48%
-313.4u
Grok 4 Fast
Grok 4 Fast 547–607 · 47%
-371.1u
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 571–661 · 46%
-469.2u
Claude Haiku 4.5
Claude Haiku 4.5 701–850 · 45%
-687.9u
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro 119–152 · 44%
-64.7u

Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.

Refresh the read

Early read

Re-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.

Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.

Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.

Unlock with Pro Create a free account

Pro on-demand

Request an AI audit

Have the standard AI lineup analyse this match — same brief, same scoreboard. Predictions appear publicly once the run finishes.

Sign in and upgrade to Pro to request audits on any future match.

Sign in See Pro

Verifiable brief

Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified

hash: 3560611a739f8d04…
Kickoff
Sat, Jul 4 · 15:00 GMT+0000
Markets
Match winner · Over / Under · Spread · First half winner
Odds
15+ live books
Research
AIs self-source

System instruction

You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.

You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.

Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
  `predictions` array length MUST equal 4. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
  "0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
  plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
  actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
  explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.

Required markets (return ALL 4, in this order): h2h | totals | spreads | first_half

Output schema:
{
  "used_research_tools": true | false,
  "sources_cited": [
    { "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
  ],
  "predictions": [
    {
      "market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
      "pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
      "confidence": 0.0,
      "probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
      "reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
      "signals": [
        { "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
          "label": "Short fact in plain text.",
          "lean":  "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
      ],
      "tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
    }
  ]
}

User brief (JSON)

{
    "event": {
        "id": 9578,
        "sport": "basketball",
        "venue": null,
        "league": "World Cup",
        "starts_at": "2026-07-04T15:00:00+00:00",
        "starts_at_human": "Sat, 04 Jul 2026 15:00:00 GMT"
    },
    "teams": {
        "away": "Ivory Coast",
        "home": "D.R. Congo"
    },
    "version": "v2",
    "sport_focus": [
        "Pace is the master variable for totals — multiply both teams' possessions-per-game tendencies, not just their points.",
        "Check the injury/rest report first: a star sitting (or load-managed on a back-to-back) reshapes the spread and total.",
        "Weigh offensive vs defensive rating and three-point volume/variance — 3PT-heavy teams have wider outcome distributions.",
        "Bench depth and foul trouble swing close games; note rotation reliability.",
        "Back-to-backs and travel cause real fatigue — flag the schedule spot for each side.",
        "Home-court edge is meaningful but smaller than star availability."
    ],
    "market_consensus": {
        "h2h": [],
        "note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
        "extra_markets": []
    },
    "markets_requested": [
        "h2h",
        "totals",
        "spreads",
        "first_half"
    ],
    "research_directive": [
        "Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
        "recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
        "Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
        "If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
    ]
}

The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.

Research trail

What each AI looked up before picking

Unlock sources · Pro
  • Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast
    0 tool calls · 0 sources

    No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.

  • DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3
    0 tool calls · 0 sources

    No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.

  • GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini
    4 tool calls · 4 sources

    4 citations captured — unlock with Pro

  • Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash
    0 tool calls · 0 sources

    No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.

  • Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5
    0 tool calls · 0 sources

    No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.

  • Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
    0 tool calls · 0 sources

    No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.

Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.

Recent recaps

How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.

Share
Share X Reddit WhatsApp Telegram Facebook

Get the AI consensus before kickoff

Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.

Sign up free →