DenmarkvsUkraine
Your call
Who wins? One tap, no signup.
AI predictions
4 markets · 6 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 4 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
|
First half winner
?
First half winner
First-half winner. Who is ahead at the half-time whistle.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Denmark 4/6 models |
over 2/6 models |
Ukraine 2/6 models |
Denmark 4/6 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
62%
Denmark |
58%
Over 155.5 |
55%
Denmark -4.5 |
60%
Denmark |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
Denmark Denmark is a stronger basketball nation with established FIBA infrastructure and recent qualification success; Ukraine's basketball program...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
Over 155.5 Ukraine's one recorded match totaled 188 points (96+92), suggesting a moderately brisk pace. International basketball World Cup matches typi...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
55%
Denmark -4.5 Denmark's home-court advantage and stronger basketball infrastructure suggest a modest edge; a 4–5 point spread is typical for a home favori...
First half winner
?
First half winner
First-half winner. Who is ahead at the half-time whistle.
60%
Denmark First-half advantages typically mirror full-game prediction, with home-court confidence and program strength favoring Denmark. International... |
|||||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | — | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
First half winner
?
First half winner
First-half winner. Who is ahead at the half-time whistle.
No pick on this market. |
|||||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
75%
Ukraine |
65%
under |
70%
Ukraine |
60%
Ukraine |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
75%
Ukraine Ukraine has a recent win against Denmark and a stronger overall form, while Denmark is on a losing streak.
🔍 researched
4 sources cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
65%
under Previous encounters have been low-scoring, suggesting a tendency for under 2.5 total goals.
🔍 researched
4 sources cited
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
70%
Ukraine Ukraine's superior form and recent win against Denmark make them likely to cover a -1 point spread.
🔍 researched
4 sources cited
First half winner
?
First half winner
First-half winner. Who is ahead at the half-time whistle.
60%
Ukraine Ukraine's recent form and Denmark's struggles suggest Ukraine may lead at halftime.
🔍 researched
4 sources cited
|
|||||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
53%
Denmark |
51%
over |
52%
Denmark |
51%
Denmark |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
53%
Denmark Denmark holds home advantage on 2026-07-05 against a Ukraine side with similar mid-tier FIBA ranking. Training data through 2025-09 shows De...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
51%
over Both teams play at moderate pace per historical FIBA data. Training data through 2025-09 indicates totals trend slightly over in similar Eur...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
52%
Denmark Home-court edge for Denmark is modest but consistent in training data through 2025-09 for World Cup qualifiers. Ukraine shows no dominant ro...
First half winner
?
First half winner
First-half winner. Who is ahead at the half-time whistle.
51%
Denmark Early quarters typically reflect home energy and familiarity. Training data through 2025-09 shows Denmark starting stronger in home European... |
|||||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 4 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
75%
Ukraine |
55%
Over 152.5 |
60%
Ukraine -9.5 |
65%
Ukraine |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
75%
Ukraine Based on historical performance in international basketball, Ukraine has consistently fielded a stronger team than Denmark, often competing...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Over 152.5 Modern international basketball often features higher scoring, and Ukraine, as the stronger offensive team, is likely to contribute signific...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
60%
Ukraine -9.5 Ukraine's historical superiority in terms of talent and international experience suggests they are likely to win by a comfortable margin aga...
First half winner
?
First half winner
First-half winner. Who is ahead at the half-time whistle.
65%
Ukraine As the stronger team overall, Ukraine is expected to start strongly and establish an early advantage. Their superior talent and tactical app... |
|||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
55%
Denmark |
60%
over |
52%
Ukraine |
53%
Denmark |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Denmark Denmark is predicted to win at home. While specific current form and head-to-head data are not available, home advantage in basketball often...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
over The total is predicted to go over 180.5 points. Without specific team offensive and defensive ratings or pace data, it's difficult to make a...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
52%
Ukraine Ukraine is favored to cover the spread of -4.5 points. This pick is made with low confidence due to a lack of detailed information on team s...
First half winner
?
First half winner
First-half winner. Who is ahead at the half-time whistle.
53%
Denmark Denmark is predicted to lead at halftime. Home teams often start games with more energy and momentum, which can translate to an early lead.... |
|||||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
65%
Denmark |
55%
Under 167.5 |
60%
Denmark -5.5 |
58%
Denmark |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Denmark Denmark has a stronger overall roster and home-court advantage in a World Cup setting. Ukraine's recent win over a weaker opponent is not in...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Under 167.5 Both teams have moderate pace and defensive oriented styles based on training data through 2025. Ukraine's offense is inconsistent, while De...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
60%
Denmark -5.5 Denmark's home advantage and superior talent should lead to a comfortable win by more than 5 points. Ukraine lacks depth and has not faced e...
First half winner
?
First half winner
First-half winner. Who is ahead at the half-time whistle.
58%
Denmark Denmark traditionally starts strongly in home games, establishing an early lead. Ukraine may take time to adjust to the atmosphere and Denma... |
|||||
Match winner
ConsensusDenmark 4/6
Denmark is a stronger basketball nation with established FIBA infrastructure and recent qualification success; Ukraine's basketball program...
Ukraine has a recent win against Denmark and a stronger overall form, while Denmark is on a losing streak.
Denmark holds home advantage on 2026-07-05 against a Ukraine side with similar mid-tier FIBA ranking. Training data through 2025-09 shows De...
Based on historical performance in international basketball, Ukraine has consistently fielded a stronger team than Denmark, often competing...
Denmark is predicted to win at home. While specific current form and head-to-head data are not available, home advantage in basketball often...
Denmark has a stronger overall roster and home-court advantage in a World Cup setting. Ukraine's recent win over a weaker opponent is not in...
Over / Under
Consensusover 2/6
Ukraine's one recorded match totaled 188 points (96+92), suggesting a moderately brisk pace. International basketball World Cup matches typi...
Previous encounters have been low-scoring, suggesting a tendency for under 2.5 total goals.
Both teams play at moderate pace per historical FIBA data. Training data through 2025-09 indicates totals trend slightly over in similar Eur...
Modern international basketball often features higher scoring, and Ukraine, as the stronger offensive team, is likely to contribute signific...
The total is predicted to go over 180.5 points. Without specific team offensive and defensive ratings or pace data, it's difficult to make a...
Both teams have moderate pace and defensive oriented styles based on training data through 2025. Ukraine's offense is inconsistent, while De...
Spread
ConsensusUkraine 2/6
Denmark's home-court advantage and stronger basketball infrastructure suggest a modest edge; a 4–5 point spread is typical for a home favori...
Ukraine's superior form and recent win against Denmark make them likely to cover a -1 point spread.
Home-court edge for Denmark is modest but consistent in training data through 2025-09 for World Cup qualifiers. Ukraine shows no dominant ro...
Ukraine's historical superiority in terms of talent and international experience suggests they are likely to win by a comfortable margin aga...
Ukraine is favored to cover the spread of -4.5 points. This pick is made with low confidence due to a lack of detailed information on team s...
Denmark's home advantage and superior talent should lead to a comfortable win by more than 5 points. Ukraine lacks depth and has not faced e...
First half winner
ConsensusDenmark 4/6
First-half advantages typically mirror full-game prediction, with home-court confidence and program strength favoring Denmark. International...
Ukraine's recent form and Denmark's struggles suggest Ukraine may lead at halftime.
Early quarters typically reflect home energy and familiarity. Training data through 2025-09 shows Denmark starting stronger in home European...
As the stronger team overall, Ukraine is expected to start strongly and establish an early advantage. Their superior talent and tactical app...
Denmark is predicted to lead at halftime. Home teams often start games with more energy and momentum, which can translate to an early lead....
Denmark traditionally starts strongly in home games, establishing an early lead. Ukraine may take time to adjust to the atmosphere and Denma...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGPT-4o Mini
Ukraine
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Ukraine
DeepSeek V3
Denmark
Claude Haiku 4.5
Denmark
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Denmark
Grok 4 Fast
Denmark
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Refresh the read
Early readRe-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.
Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.
Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
a2827fe9ad7042ef…
- Kickoff
- Sun, Jul 5 · 13:00 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Over / Under · Spread · First half winner
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 4. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 4, in this order): h2h | totals | spreads | first_half
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 9772,
"sport": "basketball",
"venue": null,
"league": "World Cup",
"starts_at": "2026-07-05T13:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Sun, 05 Jul 2026 13:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Ukraine",
"home": "Denmark"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Pace is the master variable for totals — multiply both teams' possessions-per-game tendencies, not just their points.",
"Check the injury/rest report first: a star sitting (or load-managed on a back-to-back) reshapes the spread and total.",
"Weigh offensive vs defensive rating and three-point volume/variance — 3PT-heavy teams have wider outcome distributions.",
"Bench depth and foul trouble swing close games; note rotation reliability.",
"Back-to-backs and travel cause real fatigue — flag the schedule spot for each side.",
"Home-court edge is meaningful but smaller than star availability."
],
"team_context": {
"note": "Reference data from our settled-results database. Verify + extend it with your own research; it is not a substitute for current team news.",
"away_form": {
"last": "W",
"record": "1W-0D-0L",
"scored": 96,
"matches": 1,
"conceded": 92
},
"rest_days": {
"away": 6
}
},
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals",
"spreads",
"first_half"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Research trail
What each AI looked up before picking
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
4 tool calls · 4 sources
4 citations captured — unlock with Pro
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.
Recent recaps
How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.