Don't miss the next pick — Sign up free →
ModelFights

Saved matches

Stored on this device — no account needed.

Keep these saved across devices

Free account syncs your bookmarks + lets you join the prize comp.

Sign up free →
saved · tap to view
Get started
Basketball Women's National Basketball Association · College Park Center
Upcoming · in 87h 46m
DW

Dallas WingsvsNew York Liberty

NY
Chat with the AIs Ask why they picked — live
Kickoff Locked 28picks

Your call

Who wins? One tap, no signup.

AI predictions

Ask the AIs

Who picked what

16 models × 4 markets · click a row to see reasoning

Match winner

Consensus
New York Liberty 6/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 58% New York Liberty

New York Liberty enters with stronger recent form (1-0 with 104 PPG in last match) versus Dallas's mixed record (1-1 with inconsistent outpu...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 62% Dallas Wings

Dallas enters this matchup with better recent form and home-court (Wings had several high-scoring wins in July while New York has been incon...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 8 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 60% New York Liberty

The New York Liberty have been in strong form recently, with Sabrina Ionescu leading the team with 28 points in their last game. The Dallas...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 6 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 72% New York Liberty

New York Liberty are the stronger roster with superior offensive rating and perimeter shooting. Dallas Wings have shown inconsistent defense...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 65% New York Liberty

Based on historical WNBA trends and team performance from training data, the New York Liberty have consistently been a top-tier team with st...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 60% New York Liberty

The New York Liberty have a stronger overall record and are in better recent form, winning their last match convincingly. While the Dallas W...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
2 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 60% New York Liberty

New York Liberty are reigning champions with a strong core including Breanna Stewart and Sabrina Ionescu. Dallas Wings are rebuilding after...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Over / Under

Consensus
over 6/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 54% Over

Dallas's last two games averaged 161 PPG (168+154)/2, signaling offensive pace and volume. Liberty's 104 PPG in their last match is modest b...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 62% over

Both teams play at a relatively high pace (~78 possessions) and have offensive firepower — Dallas has posted multiple 100+ outings recently...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 8 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 55% over

Both teams have potent offenses, with the Liberty averaging 87.8 points per game and the Wings scoring 85.4 points per game. Their previous...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 6 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 61% over

Both teams play at above-average pace and Liberty generate high three-point volume that inflates scoring variance. Home defense for Dallas h...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 58% over

Considering historical offensive capabilities of both teams from training data and general WNBA scoring trends, a total around 165.5 points...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 55% over

Both teams have demonstrated significant scoring potential in their early games. The Liberty's high-scoring win and the Wings' combined high...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
2 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 65% over

Liberty averaged a league-best 89.4 points in 2024 and Wings gave up 87.8 points per game. Liberty's potent offense and Wings' defensive str...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Spread

Consensus
New York Liberty 3/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 56% New York Liberty -4.5

Liberty's talent advantage and recent form justify a moderate spread. Dallas at home cuts into the spread by ~2–3 points, but Liberty's fres...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 60% home_cover

A -4.5 Dallas line looks hittable given the Wings' stronger record, home-court, and hotter offensive form; Dallas has already taken a head-t...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 8 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 60% New York Liberty

The Liberty's recent form, including a strong performance from Sabrina Ionescu, and the Wings' challenges in recent matchups suggest the Lib...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 6 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 68% New York Liberty

Liberty hold clear talent edge and travel rest is manageable on this date. Dallas have historically struggled to cover at home versus elite...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 62% away_cover

The New York Liberty consistently performs well against non-contenders and often covers moderate spreads due to their dominant play and abil...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 52% New York Liberty

Given the Liberty's perceived strength and better form, they are favored to cover a reasonable spread. The Wings have shown scoring ability,...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
2 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 60% New York Liberty -1

Liberty are the stronger team and should cover a small spread. Wings' roster turnover makes them less cohesive. However, Liberty's rest adva...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

First half winner

Consensus
New York Liberty 5/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 55% New York Liberty

First-half play is typically determined by early-game execution, defensive intensity, and bench rotations. Liberty's stronger recent form an...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 57% Dallas Wings

Dallas tends to open aggressively and has produced strong first-half scoring in several recent games; combined with the Liberty's uneven sta...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 8 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 55% New York Liberty

The Liberty's strong offensive start, led by Sabrina Ionescu, and the Wings' recent struggles suggest the Liberty are likely to lead at half...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 6 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 65% New York Liberty

Liberty typically establish early leads through transition and three-point shooting before half. Dallas slow starts have been a recurring is...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 60% away_lead

Elite WNBA teams like the New York Liberty typically establish early dominance, taking leads into halftime. Their strong starting lineups an...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 51% New York Liberty

The New York Liberty are expected to start strong, carrying momentum from their recent performance. While the Dallas Wings can score, the Li...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
2 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 55% New York Liberty

Liberty have strong starters and often build early leads. Wings may start competitively at home but Liberty's experience should give them a...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Model confidence

Conviction in pick · Match winner
Grok 4 Fast

Grok 4 Fast

New York Liberty

72
Gemini 2.5 Flash

Gemini 2.5 Flash

New York Liberty

65
GPT-5 Mini

GPT-5 Mini

Dallas Wings

62
GPT-4o Mini

GPT-4o Mini

New York Liberty

60
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

New York Liberty

60
DeepSeek V3

DeepSeek V3

New York Liberty

60
Claude Haiku 4.5

Claude Haiku 4.5

New York Liberty

58

Model track records

Lifetime

Every graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.

GPT-5
GPT-5 145–91 · 61%
+67.5u
Claude Opus 4.8
Claude Opus 4.8 154–115 · 57%
-17.4u
GPT-4o Mini
GPT-4o Mini 1043–787 · 57%
-590.9u
GPT-5 Mini
GPT-5 Mini 678–576 · 54%
-356.7u
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro 130–112 · 54%
+111.8u
o4-mini
o4-mini 90–78 · 54%
+69.7u
Claude Opus 4.6
Claude Opus 4.6 193–173 · 53%
-47.6u
Grok 4.3
Grok 4.3 132–124 · 52%
+93.6u
Claude Opus 4.7
Claude Opus 4.7 183–176 · 51%
-63.5u
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 1116–1095 · 50%
-909.7u
Grok 4 Fast
Grok 4 Fast 735–738 · 50%
-496.5u
DeepSeek V3
DeepSeek V3 1017–1031 · 50%
-722.4u
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Claude Sonnet 4.6 459–482 · 49%
-323.7u
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 864–915 · 49%
-713.8u
Claude Haiku 4.5
Claude Haiku 4.5 1004–1080 · 48%
-917.0u
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro 151–179 · 46%
-73.8u

Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.

Refresh the read

Early read

Re-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.

Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.

Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.

Unlock with Pro Create a free account

Pro on-demand

Request an AI audit

Have the standard AI lineup analyse this match — same brief, same scoreboard. Predictions appear publicly once the run finishes.

Sign in and upgrade to Pro to request audits on any future match.

Sign in See Pro

Verifiable brief

Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified

hash: a4f9ceb23c7bcdbf…
Kickoff
Tue, Jul 21 · 00:00 GMT+0000
Markets
Match winner · Over / Under · Spread · First half winner
Odds
15+ live books
Research
AIs self-source

System instruction

You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.

You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.

Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
  `predictions` array length MUST equal 4. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
  "0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
  plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
  actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
  explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.

Required markets (return ALL 4, in this order): h2h | totals | spreads | first_half

Output schema:
{
  "used_research_tools": true | false,
  "sources_cited": [
    { "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
  ],
  "predictions": [
    {
      "market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
      "pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
      "confidence": 0.0,
      "probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
      "reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
      "signals": [
        { "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
          "label": "Short fact in plain text.",
          "lean":  "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
      ],
      "tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
    }
  ]
}

User brief (JSON)

{
    "event": {
        "id": 13745,
        "sport": "basketball",
        "venue": "College Park Center",
        "league": "Women's National Basketball Association",
        "starts_at": "2026-07-21T00:00:00+00:00",
        "starts_at_human": "Tue, 21 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT"
    },
    "teams": {
        "away": "New York Liberty",
        "home": "Dallas Wings"
    },
    "version": "v2",
    "sport_focus": [
        "Pace is the master variable for totals — multiply both teams' possessions-per-game tendencies, not just their points.",
        "Check the injury/rest report first: a star sitting (or load-managed on a back-to-back) reshapes the spread and total.",
        "Weigh offensive vs defensive rating and three-point volume/variance — 3PT-heavy teams have wider outcome distributions.",
        "Bench depth and foul trouble swing close games; note rotation reliability.",
        "Back-to-backs and travel cause real fatigue — flag the schedule spot for each side.",
        "Home-court edge is meaningful but smaller than star availability."
    ],
    "team_context": {
        "note": "Reference data from our settled-results database. Verify + extend it with your own research; it is not a substitute for current team news.",
        "away_form": {
            "last": "W",
            "record": "1W-0D-0L",
            "scored": 104,
            "matches": 1,
            "conceded": 90
        },
        "home_form": {
            "last": "LW",
            "record": "1W-0D-1L",
            "scored": 168,
            "matches": 2,
            "conceded": 154
        },
        "rest_days": {
            "away": 39,
            "home": 36
        }
    },
    "market_consensus": {
        "h2h": [],
        "note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
        "extra_markets": []
    },
    "markets_requested": [
        "h2h",
        "totals",
        "spreads",
        "first_half"
    ],
    "research_directive": [
        "Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
        "recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
        "Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
        "If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
    ]
}

The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.

Research trail

What each AI looked up before picking

Unlock sources · Pro

Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.

Recent recaps

How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.

Share
Share X Reddit WhatsApp Telegram Facebook

Get the AI consensus before kickoff

Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.

Sign up free →