Chicago SkyvsSeattle Storm
SSYour call
Who wins? One tap, no signup.
AI predictions
5 markets · 6 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 5 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
|
First half winner
?
First half winner
First-half winner. Who is ahead at the half-time whistle.
|
First half h2h
?
First half h2h
Market explanation coming soon.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Seattle Storm 3/6 models |
over 4/6 models |
Seattle Storm 2/6 models |
Seattle Storm 3/5 models |
Chicago Sky 1/1 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
58%
Chicago Sky |
61%
Over 210 |
56%
Chicago Sky -3.5 |
55%
Chicago Sky |
— | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Chicago Sky Chicago plays at home (Wintrust Arena) with a 33-day rest advantage over Seattle's 32, though both teams have had ample recovery. Seattle en...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
61%
Over 210 Seattle averaged 77.5 PPG across 2 matches (155 total) and allowed 82 PPG (164 conceded), suggesting pace-heavy, high-scoring play. Chicago...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
56%
Chicago Sky -3.5 Chicago's home-court advantage, marginally better rest, and Seattle's consecutive losses support a modest 3–4 point home spread. However, Se...
First half winner
?
First half winner
First-half winner. Who is ahead at the half-time whistle.
55%
Chicago Sky First-half markets amplify home-court and early-game momentum. Chicago's rest edge and home venue should translate into a slight first-half...
First half h2h
?
First half h2h
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market. |
||||||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | — | — | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
First half winner
?
First half winner
First-half winner. Who is ahead at the half-time whistle.
No pick on this market.
First half h2h
?
First half h2h
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market. |
||||||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
65%
Chicago Sky |
55%
over |
60%
Chicago Sky |
55%
Chicago Sky |
— | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Chicago Sky The Chicago Sky have a strong home-court advantage and have been performing well recently, while the Seattle Storm have struggled in their r...
🔍 researched
2 sources cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over Both teams have shown offensive capabilities, and the over/under line is set at a reasonable level considering their recent performances.
🔍 researched
2 sources cited
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
60%
Chicago Sky The Chicago Sky's home-court advantage and recent form make them likely to cover the -1 point spread.
🔍 researched
2 sources cited
First half winner
?
First half winner
First-half winner. Who is ahead at the half-time whistle.
55%
Chicago Sky The Chicago Sky have been strong in the first half of games, and their home-court advantage may contribute to an early lead.
🔍 researched
2 sources cited
First half h2h
?
First half h2h
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market. |
||||||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
52%
Seattle Storm |
51%
over |
53%
Seattle Storm |
51%
Seattle Storm |
— | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
52%
Seattle Storm Seattle Storm have historically been the stronger franchise; training data through 2023 shows them winning the majority of meetings against...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
51%
over Both teams play at above-average pace; Storm especially push tempo. Long rest periods often produce cleaner, higher-scoring games. Chicago's...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
53%
Seattle Storm Seattle's talent edge typically overcomes road disadvantage in WNBA. Chicago Sky have shown poor closing ability in recent form. Spreads com...
First half winner
?
First half winner
First-half winner. Who is ahead at the half-time whistle.
51%
Seattle Storm First-half results track closely with full-game talent gap. Storm usually start strong on the road. Limited 2026 data forces reliance on his...
First half h2h
?
First half h2h
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market. |
||||||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 5 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
58%
Chicago Sky |
55%
Under 165.5 |
54%
Chicago Sky -4.5 |
— |
57%
Chicago Sky |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Chicago Sky Based on general WNBA trends and historical team strengths up to my training data cutoff (no live data for 2026), the Chicago Sky at home ar...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
Under 165.5 Assuming a total line of 165.5 for this match, I lean towards the under. WNBA scoring can vary, but without specific 2026 roster offensive r...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
54%
Chicago Sky -4.5 Consistent with the H2H prediction, I anticipate the Chicago Sky to cover a -4.5 spread at home. WNBA home teams often win by a margin that...
First half winner
?
First half winner
First-half winner. Who is ahead at the half-time whistle.
No pick on this market.
First half h2h
?
First half h2h
Market explanation coming soon.
57%
Chicago Sky Building on the full-game H2H analysis, the Chicago Sky are expected to establish an early lead on their home court. WNBA teams often come o... |
||||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
60%
Seattle Storm |
55%
over |
58%
Seattle Storm |
55%
Seattle Storm |
— | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
60%
Seattle Storm The Seattle Storm have a slightly better recent record than the Chicago Sky, despite both teams having poor recent form. The Storm's away fo...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over Both teams have shown a tendency to be involved in high-scoring games based on their limited recent data. The average combined score from th...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
58%
Seattle Storm Given the slight edge in recent performance and rest days, the Seattle Storm are favored to cover the spread. Chicago's home performance has...
First half winner
?
First half winner
First-half winner. Who is ahead at the half-time whistle.
55%
Seattle Storm Seattle has shown a slightly better ability to start games strong compared to Chicago's recent struggles. Their ability to score on the road...
First half h2h
?
First half h2h
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market. |
||||||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
65%
Seattle Storm |
60%
over |
55%
Chicago Sky +4.5 |
60%
Seattle Storm |
— | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
Seattle Storm Seattle Storm have historically been stronger and have offensive firepower, though recent form shows back-to-back losses. Chicago Sky have h...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
over Storm are capable of high-scoring games, and Sky can also score, though recent totals have been moderate. With no major defensive stars miss...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
55%
Chicago Sky +4.5 Home-court advantage and a likely close game make the Sky covering a small spread plausible. Storm are favorites, but the margin may be narr...
First half winner
?
First half winner
First-half winner. Who is ahead at the half-time whistle.
60%
Seattle Storm Storm have started games strong historically and may jump out early. Sky could struggle off the bat against Seattle's depth.
First half h2h
?
First half h2h
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market. |
||||||
Match winner
ConsensusSeattle Storm 3/6
Chicago plays at home (Wintrust Arena) with a 33-day rest advantage over Seattle's 32, though both teams have had ample recovery. Seattle en...
The Chicago Sky have a strong home-court advantage and have been performing well recently, while the Seattle Storm have struggled in their r...
Seattle Storm have historically been the stronger franchise; training data through 2023 shows them winning the majority of meetings against...
Based on general WNBA trends and historical team strengths up to my training data cutoff (no live data for 2026), the Chicago Sky at home ar...
The Seattle Storm have a slightly better recent record than the Chicago Sky, despite both teams having poor recent form. The Storm's away fo...
Seattle Storm have historically been stronger and have offensive firepower, though recent form shows back-to-back losses. Chicago Sky have h...
Over / Under
Consensusover 4/6
Seattle averaged 77.5 PPG across 2 matches (155 total) and allowed 82 PPG (164 conceded), suggesting pace-heavy, high-scoring play. Chicago...
Both teams have shown offensive capabilities, and the over/under line is set at a reasonable level considering their recent performances.
Both teams play at above-average pace; Storm especially push tempo. Long rest periods often produce cleaner, higher-scoring games. Chicago's...
Assuming a total line of 165.5 for this match, I lean towards the under. WNBA scoring can vary, but without specific 2026 roster offensive r...
Both teams have shown a tendency to be involved in high-scoring games based on their limited recent data. The average combined score from th...
Storm are capable of high-scoring games, and Sky can also score, though recent totals have been moderate. With no major defensive stars miss...
Spread
ConsensusSeattle Storm 2/6
Chicago's home-court advantage, marginally better rest, and Seattle's consecutive losses support a modest 3–4 point home spread. However, Se...
The Chicago Sky's home-court advantage and recent form make them likely to cover the -1 point spread.
Seattle's talent edge typically overcomes road disadvantage in WNBA. Chicago Sky have shown poor closing ability in recent form. Spreads com...
Consistent with the H2H prediction, I anticipate the Chicago Sky to cover a -4.5 spread at home. WNBA home teams often win by a margin that...
Given the slight edge in recent performance and rest days, the Seattle Storm are favored to cover the spread. Chicago's home performance has...
Home-court advantage and a likely close game make the Sky covering a small spread plausible. Storm are favorites, but the margin may be narr...
First half winner
ConsensusSeattle Storm 3/5
First-half markets amplify home-court and early-game momentum. Chicago's rest edge and home venue should translate into a slight first-half...
The Chicago Sky have been strong in the first half of games, and their home-court advantage may contribute to an early lead.
First-half results track closely with full-game talent gap. Storm usually start strong on the road. Limited 2026 data forces reliance on his...
Seattle has shown a slightly better ability to start games strong compared to Chicago's recent struggles. Their ability to score on the road...
Storm have started games strong historically and may jump out early. Sky could struggle off the bat against Seattle's depth.
First half h2h
ConsensusChicago Sky 1/1
Building on the full-game H2H analysis, the Chicago Sky are expected to establish an early lead on their home court. WNBA teams often come o...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerGPT-4o Mini
Chicago Sky
DeepSeek V3
Seattle Storm
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Seattle Storm
Claude Haiku 4.5
Chicago Sky
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Chicago Sky
Grok 4 Fast
Seattle Storm
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Refresh the read
Early readRe-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.
Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.
Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
fa5b465630358d02…
- Kickoff
- Wed, Jul 15 · 16:00 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Over / Under · Spread · First half winner
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 4. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 4, in this order): h2h | totals | spreads | first_half
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 12547,
"sport": "basketball",
"venue": "Wintrust Arena",
"league": "WNBA",
"starts_at": "2026-07-15T16:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Wed, 15 Jul 2026 16:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Seattle Storm",
"home": "Chicago Sky"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Pace is the master variable for totals — multiply both teams' possessions-per-game tendencies, not just their points.",
"Check the injury/rest report first: a star sitting (or load-managed on a back-to-back) reshapes the spread and total.",
"Weigh offensive vs defensive rating and three-point volume/variance — 3PT-heavy teams have wider outcome distributions.",
"Bench depth and foul trouble swing close games; note rotation reliability.",
"Back-to-backs and travel cause real fatigue — flag the schedule spot for each side.",
"Home-court edge is meaningful but smaller than star availability."
],
"team_context": {
"note": "Reference data from our settled-results database. Verify + extend it with your own research; it is not a substitute for current team news.",
"away_form": {
"last": "LL",
"record": "0W-0D-2L",
"scored": 155,
"matches": 2,
"conceded": 164
},
"home_form": {
"last": "L",
"record": "0W-0D-1L",
"scored": 106,
"matches": 1,
"conceded": 114
},
"rest_days": {
"away": 32,
"home": 33
}
},
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals",
"spreads",
"first_half"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Research trail
What each AI looked up before picking
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
4 tool calls · 2 sources
2 citations captured — unlock with Pro
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.
Recent recaps
How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.