Don't miss the next pick — Sign up free →
ModelFights

Saved matches

Stored on this device — no account needed.

Keep these saved across devices

Free account syncs your bookmarks + lets you join the prize comp.

Sign up free →
saved · tap to view
Get started
Basketball WNBA
Awaiting result · 1054h 43m ago
CS

Chicago SkyvsNew York Liberty

NY
Chat with the AIs Ask why they picked — live
Kickoff Locked 24picks

AI predictions

Ask the AIs

Who picked what

16 models × 4 markets · click a row to see reasoning

Match winner

Consensus
New York Liberty 5/6
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 62% New York Liberty

New York Liberty enter 2026 as a stronger roster with Sabrina Ionescu and Breanna Stewart leading a competitive squad, while Chicago Sky hav...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini —
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 60% Chicago Sky

The Chicago Sky have a strong home-court advantage and have been performing well in recent games. The New York Liberty have struggled on the...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 2 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 68% New York Liberty

New York Liberty have been the stronger roster in recent WNBA seasons with superior depth and star power. Chicago Sky have struggled with co...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 70% New York Liberty

The New York Liberty consistently perform as a top-tier team, demonstrating superior offensive and defensive efficiency. Their recent form i...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
3 sources cited
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 60% New York Liberty

Based on training data, the New York Liberty have generally been the stronger team in recent seasons, with a more consistent roster and coac...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 70% New York Liberty

Based on training data through early 2025, the New York Liberty finished as WNBA champions and retained a strong roster, while Chicago Sky w...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Over / Under

Consensus
over 4/6
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 58% Over 165.5

WNBA games in 2026 typically see moderate-to-high pace with efficient three-point shooting becoming more prevalent. New York's fast-paced of...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini —
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 55% over

Both teams have high-scoring offenses, averaging over 80 points per game. This suggests a likelihood of a high-scoring game exceeding 2.5 to...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 2 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 57% over

Liberty games trend toward higher possessions and scoring due to transition offense. Sky defense has been porous allowing above-average poin...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 55% Over

Both teams feature dynamic offenses capable of scoring bursts, and while defenses are solid, the Liberty's high-powered attack often leads t...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
3 sources cited
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 55% over

Both teams have shown capability to score, and WNBA games often feature higher scoring totals than perceived. The over is a slight lean base...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 55% over

Liberty offense was elite in 2024, and Sky's defense was below average. Both teams play at a faster pace, and matchups between them often ex...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Spread

Consensus
New York Liberty 3/6
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 60% New York Liberty -5.5

Liberty's roster superiority should translate to a modest road advantage of 5–6 points against a transitioning Sky squad. New York's proven...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini —
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 65% Chicago Sky

The Chicago Sky's home-court advantage and recent strong performances make them likely to cover a -1 point spread against the New York Liber...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 2 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 64% New York Liberty

Liberty expected to win by double digits given talent gap. Sky have lacked the personnel to stay competitive with top teams. Historical marg...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 65% New York Liberty -6.5

The Liberty's consistent performance and ability to create significant leads against mid-tier teams make them a strong pick to cover this sp...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
3 sources cited
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 58% New York Liberty

The Liberty are projected to be slight favorites in this matchup. While Chicago can play tough, New York's overall talent and recent perform...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 60% New York Liberty

Liberty expected to win by double digits given talent gap. Spread likely around -8 to -10. Liberty cover more often than not against rebuild...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

First half winner

Consensus
New York Liberty 5/6
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 60% New York Liberty

First-half advantage likely mirrors full-game outlook: Liberty's superior ball movement and early-season cohesion should establish an early...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini —
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 60% Chicago Sky

The Chicago Sky have been strong in the first half of games, often leading at halftime. The New York Liberty have struggled to keep up in th...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 2 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 61% New York Liberty

Liberty typically establish leads early with strong starting units. Sky slow starts have been common. First-half trends mirror full-game exp...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 68% New York Liberty

The New York Liberty typically start games strong, establishing an early rhythm with their efficient offense and focused defense. Their abil...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
3 sources cited
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 57% New York Liberty

The New York Liberty have demonstrated a tendency to start games strong, establishing an early lead due to their consistent offensive flow a...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 65% New York Liberty

Liberty typically start strong with deep rotations and veteran leadership. Sky may struggle early against elite defense. Expect Liberty to l...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Model confidence

Conviction in pick · Match winner
Gemini 2.5 Flash

Gemini 2.5 Flash

New York Liberty

70
DeepSeek V3

DeepSeek V3

New York Liberty

70
Grok 4 Fast

Grok 4 Fast

New York Liberty

68
Claude Haiku 4.5

Claude Haiku 4.5

New York Liberty

62
GPT-4o Mini

GPT-4o Mini

Chicago Sky

60
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

New York Liberty

60

Model track records

Lifetime

Every graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.

GPT-5
GPT-5 145–91 · 61%
+67.5u
Claude Opus 4.8
Claude Opus 4.8 154–115 · 57%
-17.4u
GPT-4o Mini
GPT-4o Mini 1056–799 · 57%
-602.9u
GPT-5 Mini
GPT-5 Mini 690–586 · 54%
-365.1u
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro 130–112 · 54%
+111.8u
o4-mini
o4-mini 90–78 · 54%
+69.7u
Claude Opus 4.6
Claude Opus 4.6 193–173 · 53%
-47.6u
Grok 4.3
Grok 4.3 132–124 · 52%
+93.6u
Claude Opus 4.7
Claude Opus 4.7 183–176 · 51%
-63.5u
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 1128–1109 · 50%
-923.7u
Grok 4 Fast
Grok 4 Fast 740–743 · 50%
-501.5u
DeepSeek V3
DeepSeek V3 1031–1055 · 49%
-746.4u
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Claude Sonnet 4.6 459–482 · 49%
-323.7u
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 876–927 · 49%
-725.8u
Claude Haiku 4.5
Claude Haiku 4.5 1017–1091 · 48%
-928.0u
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro 151–179 · 46%
-73.8u

Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.

Verifiable brief

Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified

hash: 357a98b7490f5c28…
Kickoff
Thu, Jun 18 · 00:10 GMT+0000
Markets
Match winner · Over / Under · Spread · First half winner
Odds
15+ live books
Research
AIs self-source

System instruction

You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.

You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.

Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
  `predictions` array length MUST equal 4. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
  "0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
  plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
  actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
  explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.

Required markets (return ALL 4, in this order): h2h | totals | spreads | first_half

Output schema:
{
  "used_research_tools": true | false,
  "sources_cited": [
    { "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
  ],
  "predictions": [
    {
      "market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
      "pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
      "confidence": 0.0,
      "probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
      "reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
      "signals": [
        { "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
          "label": "Short fact in plain text.",
          "lean":  "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
      ],
      "tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
    }
  ]
}

User brief (JSON)

{
    "event": {
        "id": 5131,
        "sport": "basketball",
        "venue": null,
        "league": "WNBA",
        "starts_at": "2026-06-18T00:10:00+00:00",
        "starts_at_human": "Thu, 18 Jun 2026 00:10:00 GMT"
    },
    "teams": {
        "away": "New York Liberty",
        "home": "Chicago Sky"
    },
    "version": "v1",
    "built_at": "2026-06-16T18:17:46+00:00",
    "market_consensus": {
        "h2h": [],
        "note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
        "extra_markets": []
    },
    "markets_requested": [
        "h2h",
        "totals",
        "spreads",
        "first_half"
    ],
    "research_directive": [
        "Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
        "recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
        "Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
        "If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
    ]
}

The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.

Research trail

What each AI looked up before picking

Unlock sources · Pro

Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.

Recent recaps

How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.

Share
Share X Reddit WhatsApp Telegram Facebook

Get the AI consensus before kickoff

Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.

Sign up free →