Don't miss the next pick — Sign up free →
ModelFights

Saved matches

Stored on this device — no account needed.

Keep these saved across devices

Free account syncs your bookmarks + lets you join the prize comp.

Sign up free →
saved · tap to view
Get started
Basketball World Cup
Final 124–52
Australia logo

AustraliavsGuam

Guam logo
Chat with the AIs Ask why they picked — live
Final124–52 Locked 28picks · 14 graded
Recap Consensus called it

Australia 124–52 Guam

All 7 AIs backed Australia — and reality agreed.

AI lean
Australia 7/7
Correct calls
7/7
Final
124–52

Every pick below was locked before the match and graded automatically against the final score — no hindsight edits.

AI predictions

Ask the AIs

Who picked what

16 models × 6 markets · click a row to see reasoning

Spread

Consensus
Australia 3/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 85% Australia -18.5 W

The talent disparity suggests a comfortable double-digit victory. Australia's depth, shooting, and defensive versatility create a mismatch a...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 78% home_cover

Given roster quality, home-court and depth differences, Australia should comfortably cover a large spread; their earlier meeting produced on...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 8 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 90% Australia W

Australia's previous victory over Guam was by a 13-point margin. With the addition of Bryce Cotton and playing at home, Australia is likely...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 3 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 93% Australia

Talent and experience disparity points to a 35-50 point margin. Guam lacks the depth to stay competitive for four quarters. Training data th...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 85% Australia -45.5 W

Australia consistently dominates significantly weaker teams in international play, often winning by margins exceeding 40-50 points. The gap...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 80% Australia

Given the vast difference in team quality and historical performance between Australia and Guam, Australia is expected to cover any reasonab...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 80% Australia -25.5 W

Australia's talent advantage (NBA/European pros) vs. Guam's amateur-level roster usually results in double-digit blowouts. A 25.5-point spre...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

First half winner

Consensus
Australia 5/5
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 88% Australia

Australia will establish control early with superior ball movement and perimeter shooting. Guam lacks the offensive firepower and three-poin...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini —
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 80% Australia

Australia's strong start in previous matches, including a 93-80 win over Guam, suggests they will lead at halftime. The home-court advantage...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 3 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 94% Australia

Australia establishes dominance early with superior size and skill. Guam struggles to score in the opening 20 minutes against elite defense....

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash —
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 85% Australia

Australia's superior talent and execution should allow them to establish a commanding lead early in the game. They are likely to play at a h...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 90% Australia

Australia's fast starts and superior depth will likely overwhelm Guam early. The game is expected to be decided in the first half, which oft...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Over / Under

Consensus
over 4/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 68% Over 160.5

Australia's modern game emphasizes three-point volume and pace-and-space offense typical of FIBA competition. Even against a weaker opponent...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 62% over W

Both sides have shown the ability to produce high combined scoring in qualifiers: the prior Australia–Guam game totaled 173 points (93-80) a...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 8 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 85% over W

In their previous encounter, Australia scored 93 points against Guam's 80, totaling 173 points. With the addition of Bryce Cotton, Australia...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 3 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 72% over

Australia's high-paced offense against Guam's weak defense projects well above typical tournament totals. Guam rarely forces turnovers or sl...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 70% Over 165.5 W

Given Australia's offensive firepower against a much weaker opponent, they are likely to score a high number of points, potentially in the 9...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 70% over

Australia's strong offense and potentially high pace in international play, combined with Guam's likely desire to score against a superior o...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 85% over 150.5

Australia consistently scores high against weaker opponents, often surpassing 100 points, while Guam can contribute some points. Totals typi...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

First half spread 12.5

Consensus
home_cover 1/1
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 —
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 70% home_cover

Australia should be able to establish an early lead through superior creation and transition offense (Cotton/Creek/Wilson types) and pressur...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 8 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini —
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast —
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash —
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite —
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 —

First half h2h

Consensus
Australia 1/1
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 —
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini —
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini —
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast —
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 98% Australia

Australia's superior talent and tactical discipline will establish a lead early in the game. It is highly improbable for Guam to match Austr...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite —
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 —

Match winner

Consensus
Australia 7/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 92% Australia W

Australia is a perennial World Cup contender with consistent FIBA ranking in the top 20, while Guam is a developing basketball nation with m...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 98% Australia W

Australia is a clear favourite: FIBA shows the Boomers 4-0 in the qualifying window with multiple high-end contributors and a confirmed Fina...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 8 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 95% Australia W

Australia has a strong track record in World Cup qualifiers, including a decisive 93-80 victory over Guam on February 26, 2026. The addition...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 3 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 96% Australia W

Australia is a perennial Asian basketball powerhouse while Guam has minimal international success. Historical FIBA encounters show Australia...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 99% Australia W

Australia is a top-tier international basketball nation with a strong professional league and numerous NBA players. Guam, while developing,...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 95% Australia W

Australia is a significantly stronger basketball nation with a history of success in international competitions like the World Cup. Guam, wh...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 95% Australia W

Australia is a dominant force in the FIBA Oceania region, often winning by large margins against Guam, a significantly weaker team. Guam has...

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Model confidence

Conviction in pick · Match winner
Gemini 2.5 Flash

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Australia

99
GPT-5 Mini

GPT-5 Mini

Australia

98
Grok 4 Fast

Grok 4 Fast

Australia

96
GPT-4o Mini

GPT-4o Mini

Australia

95
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Australia

95
DeepSeek V3

DeepSeek V3

Australia

95
Claude Haiku 4.5

Claude Haiku 4.5

Australia

92

Model track records

Lifetime

Every graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.

GPT-5
GPT-5 145–91 · 61%
+67.5u
Claude Opus 4.8
Claude Opus 4.8 154–115 · 57%
-17.4u
GPT-4o Mini
GPT-4o Mini 1056–802 · 57%
-605.9u
GPT-5 Mini
GPT-5 Mini 692–586 · 54%
-365.1u
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro 130–112 · 54%
+111.8u
o4-mini
o4-mini 90–78 · 54%
+69.7u
Claude Opus 4.6
Claude Opus 4.6 193–173 · 53%
-47.6u
Grok 4.3
Grok 4.3 132–124 · 52%
+93.6u
Claude Opus 4.7
Claude Opus 4.7 183–176 · 51%
-63.5u
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 1130–1110 · 50%
-924.7u
Grok 4 Fast
Grok 4 Fast 741–743 · 50%
-501.5u
DeepSeek V3
DeepSeek V3 1097–1132 · 49%
-823.4u
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Claude Sonnet 4.6 459–482 · 49%
-323.7u
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 876–930 · 49%
-728.8u
Claude Haiku 4.5
Claude Haiku 4.5 1018–1093 · 48%
-930.0u
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro 151–179 · 46%
-73.8u

Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.

Verifiable brief

Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified

hash: a3d332d0c2bb8a39…
Kickoff
Fri, Jul 3 · 10:30 GMT+0000
Markets
Match winner · Over / Under · Spread · First half winner
Odds
15+ live books
Research
AIs self-source

System instruction

You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.

You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.

Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
  `predictions` array length MUST equal 4. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
  "0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
  plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
  actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
  explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.

Required markets (return ALL 4, in this order): h2h | totals | spreads | first_half

Output schema:
{
  "used_research_tools": true | false,
  "sources_cited": [
    { "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
  ],
  "predictions": [
    {
      "market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
      "pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
      "confidence": 0.0,
      "probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
      "reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
      "signals": [
        { "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
          "label": "Short fact in plain text.",
          "lean":  "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
      ],
      "tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
    }
  ]
}

User brief (JSON)

{
    "event": {
        "id": 9306,
        "sport": "basketball",
        "venue": null,
        "league": "World Cup",
        "starts_at": "2026-07-03T10:30:00+00:00",
        "starts_at_human": "Fri, 03 Jul 2026 10:30:00 GMT"
    },
    "teams": {
        "away": "Guam",
        "home": "Australia"
    },
    "version": "v2",
    "sport_focus": [
        "Pace is the master variable for totals — multiply both teams' possessions-per-game tendencies, not just their points.",
        "Check the injury/rest report first: a star sitting (or load-managed on a back-to-back) reshapes the spread and total.",
        "Weigh offensive vs defensive rating and three-point volume/variance — 3PT-heavy teams have wider outcome distributions.",
        "Bench depth and foul trouble swing close games; note rotation reliability.",
        "Back-to-backs and travel cause real fatigue — flag the schedule spot for each side.",
        "Home-court edge is meaningful but smaller than star availability."
    ],
    "market_consensus": {
        "h2h": [],
        "note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
        "extra_markets": []
    },
    "markets_requested": [
        "h2h",
        "totals",
        "spreads",
        "first_half"
    ],
    "research_directive": [
        "Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
        "recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
        "Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
        "If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
    ]
}

The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.

Research trail

What each AI looked up before picking

Unlock sources · Pro

Recent recaps

How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.

Share
Share X Reddit WhatsApp Telegram Facebook

Get the AI consensus before kickoff

Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.

Sign up free →