Don't miss the next pick — Sign up free →
ModelFights

Saved matches

Stored on this device — no account needed.

Keep these saved across devices

Free account syncs your bookmarks + lets you join the prize comp.

Sign up free →
saved · tap to view
Get started
Basketball Women's National Basketball Association · Gateway Center
Awaiting result · 994h 34m ago
AD

Atlanta DreamvsSeattle Storm

SS
Chat with the AIs Ask why they picked — live
Kickoff Locked 28picks

AI predictions

Ask the AIs

Who picked what

16 models × 4 markets · click a row to see reasoning

Spread

Consensus
Seattle Storm 3/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 56% Atlanta Dream -4

Atlanta's home advantage plus Seattle's 0–2 record and defensive leaks (9-point and 4-point losses) support a modest spread favoring the hom...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 57% Atlanta Dream

The spread (~11.5) is large but Atlanta's season net differential vs Seattle's is roughly a 9-point swing; home-court and Atlanta's deeper,...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 5 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 60% Seattle Storm

The Atlanta Dream's superior record and current form suggest they are likely to cover a -1 point spread. Their recent victories and home-cou...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 4 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 55% Seattle Storm

Seattle's projected margin aligns with a small road favorite role given roster quality. Atlanta's defensive rating historically lags, allowi...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 54% Seattle Storm -4.5

Given Seattle's historical edge in quality, they are more likely to win by a comfortable margin against most teams, even on the road. The -4...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 58% Seattle Storm

The Seattle Storm are the superior team based on current form and overall season performance. Their ability to score consistently and their...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
4 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 60% Seattle Storm -3.5

Storm's roster depth should cover a small spread; Atlanta's inconsistency makes them unlikely to keep it close.

Unlock reasoning · Pro

First half winner

Consensus
Seattle Storm 4/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 52% Under 78

If the full game totals ~155, the first half would typically run 73–78 points in women's basketball, where second-half pace and scoring ofte...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 70% Atlanta Dream

Atlanta is likely to start stronger at home (stable starting five and better half-game offensive output on the season) and Seattle's offense...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 5 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 55% Atlanta Dream

The Atlanta Dream have the best first-quarter record in the WNBA at 21-10, including an impressive 13-4 road mark. This strong start suggest...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 4 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 54% Seattle Storm

Seattle typically establishes early leads through transition play and guard creation. First-half totals and spreads often mirror full-game l...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 52% Seattle Storm

Stronger teams often establish their dominance early in games. Based on available training data, the Seattle Storm possess the quality to ta...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 57% Seattle Storm

Seattle Storm typically starts games strong, driven by their better overall team performance and key offensive players. They are more likely...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
4 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 62% Seattle Storm

Seattle often starts strong; Atlanta may struggle early. Storm's superior experience gives first-half edge.

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Match winner

Consensus
Seattle Storm 5/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 58% Atlanta Dream

Atlanta Dream play at home with 49 days rest vs Seattle's 48, removing fatigue as a differentiator. Both teams are in early-season form with...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 88% Atlanta Dream ~1.14

Atlanta enters this matchup as the materially better team on paper (season scoring ~89.3 PPG vs Seattle ~81.9 PPG) and have home-court at Ga...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Odds: 1.14 Edge: +0.1% 🔍 researched 5 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 65% Seattle Storm

The Atlanta Dream have a superior record of 16-10 compared to the Seattle Storm's 6-21, indicating a stronger team performance. Additionally...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 4 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 58% Seattle Storm

Seattle Storm enter with superior roster talent and perimeter scoring depth relative to Atlanta Dream based on historical WNBA patterns thro...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 55% Seattle Storm

Based on historical team performance from training data up to 2025, the Seattle Storm typically exhibit stronger overall team quality and co...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 60% Seattle Storm

The Seattle Storm are performing significantly better this season with a superior record compared to the Atlanta Dream. They also have a his...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
4 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 68% Seattle Storm

Seattle has a stronger roster and history; Atlanta is in a rebuild. Despite limited recent form data, Storm's talent advantage prevails.

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Bookmaker line: Atlanta Dream 86%

Over / Under

Consensus
over 4/7
Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 Pro
Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Claude Haiku 4.5 54% Over 155

Seattle scored 77.5 PPG across 2 matches while conceding 82 PPG; Atlanta scored 90 in 1 match. Combined scoring in Seattle's recent games (7...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 GPT-5 Pro
GPT-5 Mini GPT-5 Mini 62% Under 175.5

Season-level possessions and scoring point to a combined expectation around ~171 points (Atlanta ~89.3 + Seattle ~81.9 = ~171.2), and estima...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 5 sources cited
GPT-4o Mini GPT-4o Mini 55% over

Both teams have high-scoring offenses, with the Dream averaging 89.3 points per game and the Storm averaging 81.4 points per game. Their com...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
🔍 researched 4 sources cited
o4-mini o4-mini Pro
Grok 4.3 Grok 4.3 Pro
Grok 4 Fast Grok 4 Fast 53% over

Pace tends to be moderate in WNBA road games but both teams historically generate enough possessions for totals near or above league average...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro Gemini 3.1 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Gemini 2.5 Flash 55% Over

WNBA games often feature high scoring due to fast pace and efficient offenses. Both the Atlanta Dream and Seattle Storm, based on historical...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 55% over

Both teams have capable offenses, and the Seattle Storm tend to play at a faster pace. While Atlanta's defense can be inconsistent, their of...

Unlock reasoning · Pro
4 sources cited
DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 55% over

Both teams have moderate offensive pace; recent average totals around 160. Slight lean to over due to defensive vulnerabilities.

Unlock reasoning · Pro

Bookmaker line: 175.5 · Over 52%

Model confidence

Conviction in pick · Match winner
GPT-5 Mini

GPT-5 Mini

Atlanta Dream

88
DeepSeek V3

DeepSeek V3

Seattle Storm

68
GPT-4o Mini

GPT-4o Mini

Seattle Storm

65
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Seattle Storm

60
Claude Haiku 4.5

Claude Haiku 4.5

Atlanta Dream

58
Grok 4 Fast

Grok 4 Fast

Seattle Storm

58
Gemini 2.5 Flash

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Seattle Storm

55

Model track records

Lifetime

Every graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.

GPT-5
GPT-5 145–91 · 61%
+67.5u
Claude Opus 4.8
Claude Opus 4.8 154–115 · 57%
-17.4u
GPT-4o Mini
GPT-4o Mini 1223–997 · 55%
-800.9u
GPT-5 Mini
GPT-5 Mini 737–629 · 54%
-408.1u
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Gemini 3.1 Pro 130–112 · 54%
+111.8u
o4-mini
o4-mini 90–78 · 54%
+69.7u
Claude Opus 4.6
Claude Opus 4.6 193–173 · 53%
-47.6u
Grok 4.3
Grok 4.3 132–124 · 52%
+93.6u
Claude Opus 4.7
Claude Opus 4.7 183–176 · 51%
-63.5u
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Claude Sonnet 4.6 459–482 · 49%
-323.7u
Grok 4 Fast
Grok 4 Fast 1516–1610 · 49%
-1,368.5u
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 1874–2000 · 48%
-1,814.7u
Claude Haiku 4.5
Claude Haiku 4.5 1066–1149 · 48%
-986.0u
DeepSeek V3
DeepSeek V3 1864–2047 · 48%
-1,738.4u
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite 1556–1800 · 46%
-1,598.8u
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro 151–179 · 46%
-73.8u

Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.

Bookmaker odds

1 books · sharp books pinned · best price highlighted

Book Atlanta Dream Draw Seattle Storm
Draftkings 1.16 — 5.55
Book Line Over Under
Draftkings 175.5 1.91 1.91
Book Atlanta Dream Seattle Storm
Draftkings — —

Verifiable brief

Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified

hash: a7c3fe792b6db6d3…
Kickoff
Fri, Jul 31 · 23:30 GMT+0000
Markets
Match winner · Over / Under · Spread · First half winner
Odds
15+ live books
Research
AIs self-source

System instruction

You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.

You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.

Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
  `predictions` array length MUST equal 4. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
  "0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
  plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
  actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
  explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.

Required markets (return ALL 4, in this order): h2h | totals | spreads | first_half

Output schema:
{
  "used_research_tools": true | false,
  "sources_cited": [
    { "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
  ],
  "predictions": [
    {
      "market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
      "pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
      "confidence": 0.0,
      "probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
      "reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
      "signals": [
        { "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
          "label": "Short fact in plain text.",
          "lean":  "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
      ],
      "tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
    }
  ]
}

User brief (JSON)

{
    "event": {
        "id": 17992,
        "sport": "basketball",
        "venue": "Gateway Center",
        "league": "Women's National Basketball Association",
        "starts_at": "2026-07-31T23:30:00+00:00",
        "starts_at_human": "Fri, 31 Jul 2026 23:30:00 GMT"
    },
    "teams": {
        "away": "Seattle Storm",
        "home": "Atlanta Dream"
    },
    "version": "v2",
    "sport_focus": [
        "Pace is the master variable for totals — multiply both teams' possessions-per-game tendencies, not just their points.",
        "Check the injury/rest report first: a star sitting (or load-managed on a back-to-back) reshapes the spread and total.",
        "Weigh offensive vs defensive rating and three-point volume/variance — 3PT-heavy teams have wider outcome distributions.",
        "Bench depth and foul trouble swing close games; note rotation reliability.",
        "Back-to-backs and travel cause real fatigue — flag the schedule spot for each side.",
        "Home-court edge is meaningful but smaller than star availability."
    ],
    "team_context": {
        "note": "Reference data from our settled-results database. Verify + extend it with your own research; it is not a substitute for current team news.",
        "away_form": {
            "last": "LL",
            "record": "0W-0D-2L",
            "scored": 155,
            "matches": 2,
            "conceded": 164
        },
        "home_form": {
            "last": "L",
            "record": "0W-0D-1L",
            "scored": 90,
            "matches": 1,
            "conceded": 104
        },
        "rest_days": {
            "away": 48,
            "home": 49
        }
    },
    "market_consensus": {
        "h2h": [],
        "note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
        "extra_markets": []
    },
    "markets_requested": [
        "h2h",
        "totals",
        "spreads",
        "first_half"
    ],
    "research_directive": [
        "Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
        "recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
        "Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
        "If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
    ]
}

The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.

Research trail

What each AI looked up before picking

Unlock sources · Pro

Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.

Recent recaps

How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.

Share
Share X Reddit WhatsApp Telegram Facebook

Get the AI consensus before kickoff

Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.

Sign up free →