TP MazembevsJSK
TP Mazembe 2–0 JSK
All 3 AIs backed TP Mazembe — and reality agreed.
- AI lean
- TP Mazembe 3/3
- Correct calls
- 3/3
- Final
- 2–0
Every pick below was locked before the match and graded automatically against the final score — no hindsight edits.
AI predictions
6 markets · 3 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 6 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
|
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
|
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
Over 2.5 1/3 models |
JSK +1 1/3 models |
TP Mazembe / TP Mazembe 2/3 models |
TP Mazembe 3/3 models |
No 2/3 models |
TP Mazembe -0.5 2/3 models |
|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 6 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 6 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 6 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 6 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
58%
Over 2.5
L
|
54%
TP Mazembe
W
|
48%
TP Mazembe / TP Mazembe |
62%
TP Mazembe
W
|
56%
No
W
|
54%
TP Mazembe -1
W
|
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
Over 2.5 TP Mazembe's recent form shows consistent attacking output with victories featuring 2+ goals. Their dominance in possession (60%) and number...
🔍 researched
2 sources cited
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
54%
TP Mazembe TP Mazembe's documented dominance (league leaders, 7-match winning streak, consistent 2+ goal victories) supports covering a -1 spread. Howe...
🔍 researched
2 sources cited
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
48%
TP Mazembe / TP Mazembe TP Mazembe's overall dominance suggests they are likely to lead at both half-time and full-time. However, without detailed half-time/full-ti...
🔍 researched
2 sources cited
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
62%
TP Mazembe TP Mazembe holds a 3-2 advantage in recent head-to-head record and entered June 2026 on strong winning form. Home advantage, superior league...
🔍 researched
2 sources cited
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
56%
No TP Mazembe showed defensive solidity with 3 clean sheets in 5 matches. Home advantage and superior defensive discipline make it likely they...
🔍 researched
2 sources cited
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
54%
TP Mazembe -1 Asian handicap -1 aligns with TP Mazembe's recent pattern of 2+ goal victories. Home advantage and superior form support this, though withou...
🔍 researched
2 sources cited
|
|||||||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 6 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
62%
under
W
|
70%
JSK +1
L
|
45%
Draw / TP Mazembe |
55%
TP Mazembe
W
|
68%
no
W
|
58%
TP Mazembe -0.5
W
|
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
62%
under Public match data and recent results for both sides show a run of low-scoring games (multiple 0-0 and 1-0 results in May–June 2026), and pas...
🔍 researched
5 sources cited
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
70%
JSK +1 While TP Mazembe are favored to win, the recent low margins in head-to-head and league form suggest they are unlikely to beat JSK by two or...
🔍 researched
5 sources cited
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
45%
Draw / TP Mazembe Matches in this matchup and league frequently show tight first halves (often scoreless) with the home side breaking through later; HT draw/F...
🔍 researched
5 sources cited
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
TP Mazembe TP Mazembe have the home advantage in Lubumbashi and the recent head-to-head and form data show Mazembe edging these meetings; JSK’s recent...
🔍 researched
5 sources cited
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
68%
no Given the pattern of recent 0-0/1-0 scorelines for JSK and conservative results between these clubs, both-teams-to-score looks unlikely; the...
🔍 researched
5 sources cited
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
58%
TP Mazembe -0.5 A -0.5 AH pick (TP Mazembe to win) captures home advantage and slightly favors the stronger side while recognizing low-scoring tendencies; M...
🔍 researched
5 sources cited
|
|||||||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | — | — | — | — | |
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
No pick on this market.
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
No pick on this market. |
|||||||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 6 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||
|
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 6 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
— | — | — | — | — | — | |
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
No pick on this market.
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
No pick on this market. |
|||||||
|
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 6 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 6 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
— | — | — | — | — | — | |
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
No pick on this market.
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
No pick on this market. |
|||||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
— | — | — | — | — | — | |
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
No pick on this market.
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
No pick on this market. |
|||||||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
— | — | — | — | — | — | |
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
No pick on this market.
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
No pick on this market. |
|||||||
Over / Under
ConsensusOver 2.5 1/3
TP Mazembe's recent form shows consistent attacking output with victories featuring 2+ goals. Their dominance in possession (60%) and number...
Public match data and recent results for both sides show a run of low-scoring games (multiple 0-0 and 1-0 results in May–June 2026), and pas...
Spread
ConsensusJSK +1 1/3
TP Mazembe's documented dominance (league leaders, 7-match winning streak, consistent 2+ goal victories) supports covering a -1 spread. Howe...
While TP Mazembe are favored to win, the recent low margins in head-to-head and league form suggest they are unlikely to beat JSK by two or...
Half-time / Full-time
ConsensusTP Mazembe / TP Mazembe 2/3
TP Mazembe's overall dominance suggests they are likely to lead at both half-time and full-time. However, without detailed half-time/full-ti...
Matches in this matchup and league frequently show tight first halves (often scoreless) with the home side breaking through later; HT draw/F...
Match winner
ConsensusTP Mazembe 3/3
TP Mazembe holds a 3-2 advantage in recent head-to-head record and entered June 2026 on strong winning form. Home advantage, superior league...
TP Mazembe have the home advantage in Lubumbashi and the recent head-to-head and form data show Mazembe edging these meetings; JSK’s recent...
Both teams to score
ConsensusNo 2/3
TP Mazembe showed defensive solidity with 3 clean sheets in 5 matches. Home advantage and superior defensive discipline make it likely they...
Given the pattern of recent 0-0/1-0 scorelines for JSK and conservative results between these clubs, both-teams-to-score looks unlikely; the...
Asian handicap
ConsensusTP Mazembe -0.5 2/3
Asian handicap -1 aligns with TP Mazembe's recent pattern of 2+ goal victories. Home advantage and superior form support this, though withou...
A -0.5 AH pick (TP Mazembe to win) captures home advantage and slightly favors the stronger side while recognizing low-scoring tendencies; M...
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winnerClaude Sonnet 4.6
TP Mazembe
Claude Haiku 4.5
TP Mazembe
GPT-5 Mini
TP Mazembe
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Beat the AIs · Predict the score
Picks closed
Match has already kicked off. Picks are permanent — no late entries.
Team news
ProInjuries and confirmed lineups — the same team news the AIs factored into their reads.
Team news is a Pro feature
see exactly who's out and the XIs the AIs reasoned on, before kickoff.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
fc0aeeaaa88f0e16…
- Kickoff
- Thu, Jun 11 · 13:00 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Over / Under 2.5 · Both teams to score · Spread -1 · Asian handicap · Half-time / Full-time
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 6. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 6, in this order): h2h | totals_2.5 | btts | spreads_-1 | asian_handicap | ht_ft
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 717,
"sport": "football",
"venue": null,
"league": "Ligue 1",
"starts_at": "2026-06-11T13:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Thu, 11 Jun 2026 13:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "JSK",
"home": "TP Mazembe"
},
"version": "v1",
"built_at": "2026-06-11T12:41:37+00:00",
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_2.5",
"btts",
"spreads_-1",
"asian_handicap",
"ht_ft"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Research trail
What each AI looked up before picking
-
24 tool calls · 2 sources
2 citations captured — unlock with Pro
-
24 tool calls · 5 sources
5 citations captured — unlock with Pro
-
18 tool calls · 9 sources
9 citations captured — unlock with Pro
Recent recaps
How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.