Shabab Al Sahel vs Racing

Kickoff · Tue, Jun 16 · 13:00 GMT+0000

Picks locked at Jun 14 · 08:03 GMT+0000 35 picks recorded

Verifiable brief

Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified


                    hash:
                    550ae4c8c728c102…

Sport: Tue, Jun 16 · 13:00 GMT+0000
Markets: h2h · totals_2.5 · btts · spreads_-1 · asian_handicap · ht_ft · correct_score
Source: The Odds API · live
Research: AIs self-source

System instruction

You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.

You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.

Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
  `predictions` array length MUST equal 7. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
  "0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
  plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
  actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
  explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.

Required markets (return ALL 7, in this order): h2h | totals_2.5 | btts | spreads_-1 | asian_handicap | ht_ft | correct_score

Output schema:
{
  "used_research_tools": true | false,
  "sources_cited": [
    { "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
  ],
  "predictions": [
    {
      "market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
      "pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
      "confidence": 0.0,
      "probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
      "reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
      "signals": [
        { "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
          "label": "Short fact in plain text.",
          "lean":  "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
      ],
      "tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
    }
  ]
}

User brief (JSON)

{
    "event": {
        "id": 1903,
        "sport": "football",
        "venue": null,
        "league": "Premier League",
        "starts_at": "2026-06-16T13:00:00+00:00",
        "starts_at_human": "Tue, 16 Jun 2026 13:00:00 GMT"
    },
    "teams": {
        "away": "Racing",
        "home": "Shabab Al Sahel"
    },
    "version": "v1",
    "built_at": "2026-06-14T08:03:57+00:00",
    "market_consensus": {
        "h2h": [],
        "note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
        "extra_markets": []
    },
    "markets_requested": [
        "h2h",
        "totals_2.5",
        "btts",
        "spreads_-1",
        "asian_handicap",
        "ht_ft",
        "correct_score"
    ],
    "research_directive": [
        "Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
        "recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
        "Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
        "If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
    ]
}

The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.

Your call

Who wins? One tap, no signup.

AI predictions

7 markets · 5 models picked

Who picked what

15 models × 7 markets · click a row to see reasoning

Unlock flagship models

Model	Over / Under ?	Match winner ?	Both teams to score ?	Spread ?	Asian handicap ?	Half-time / Full-time ?	Correct score ?
Claude Opus 4.7 Flagship Anthropic · 4-5 -1.2u	Flagship picks across 7 markets — unlock with Pro Get Pro
Claude Opus 4.6 Flagship Anthropic · 5-5 -0.3u	Flagship picks across 7 markets — unlock with Pro Get Pro
Claude Opus 4 Flagship Anthropic	Flagship picks across 7 markets — unlock with Pro Get Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.6 Flagship Anthropic · 125-128 -87.1u	Flagship picks across 7 markets — unlock with Pro Get Pro
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic · 168-149 -107.9u	52% over	58% Racing	55% yes	54% Racing	54% away -0.5	32% away-away	16% 1-2
Over / Under ? 52% over Both teams likely possess attacking capability at club level, and defensive vulnerabilities are common in mid-tier competitions. Racing's at... Unlock reasoning · Pro Match winner ? 58% Racing Racing (likely the Argentine club) historically has stronger squad depth and continental experience than Shabab Al Sahel (likely a Lebanese... Unlock reasoning · Pro Both teams to score ? 55% yes Both sides are likely to register shots and chances given Racing's attacking profile and Shabab Al Sahel's home status. While I lack defensi... Unlock reasoning · Pro Spread ? 54% Racing Racing's structural advantage justifies a slight lean to winning by 1+ goal. However, Shabab Al Sahel's home field reduces the margin probab... Unlock reasoning · Pro Asian handicap ? 54% away -0.5 At -0.5 handicap, Racing is favored to win by any margin. This aligns with Racing's likely competitive edge, though the small handicap refle... Unlock reasoning · Pro Half-time / Full-time ? 32% away-away If Racing secures victory, doing so decisively from kickoff (away-away outcome) is plausible given likely superior quality. However, the ful... Unlock reasoning · Pro Correct score ? 16% 1-2 Racing winning 2–1 is a reasonable central estimate representing a competitive away win with both sides scoring. However, correct-score pred... Unlock reasoning · Pro
GPT-5 Flagship Openai	Flagship picks across 7 markets — unlock with Pro Get Pro
GPT-5 Mini Openai · 30-17 +24.4u	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Over / Under ? No pick on this market. Match winner ? No pick on this market. Both teams to score ? No pick on this market. Spread ? No pick on this market. Asian handicap ? No pick on this market. Half-time / Full-time ? No pick on this market. Correct score ? No pick on this market.
GPT-4o Mini Openai · 34-47 -25.2u	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Over / Under ? No pick on this market. Match winner ? No pick on this market. Both teams to score ? No pick on this market. Spread ? No pick on this market. Asian handicap ? No pick on this market. Half-time / Full-time ? No pick on this market. Correct score ? No pick on this market.
o3 Flagship Openai	Flagship picks across 7 markets — unlock with Pro Get Pro
Grok 4 Heavy Flagship Xai	Flagship picks across 7 markets — unlock with Pro Get Pro
Grok 4 Fast Xai · 112-170 -91.3u	53% over	52% Shabab Al Sahel	51% yes	48% Shabab Al Sahel	51% home -0.5	35% home/home	18% 2-1
Over / Under ? 53% over Training data through 2023 indicates Lebanese league matches between these sides often exceed 2.5 goals. No weather or venue data available... Unlock reasoning · Pro Match winner ? 52% Shabab Al Sahel Training data through 2023 shows Shabab Al Sahel typically stronger at home against Beirut sides like Racing. Limited public knowledge on 20... Unlock reasoning · Pro Both teams to score ? 51% yes Historical encounters in training data show both teams scoring frequently. Future 2026 context unknown so probabilities near even. Unlock reasoning · Pro Spread ? 48% Shabab Al Sahel Home side favored slightly in past data but away spread value noted. No recent form available. Unlock reasoning · Pro Asian handicap ? 51% home -0.5 Slight home edge from historical training data. No lineups or rest info for 2026 match. Unlock reasoning · Pro Half-time / Full-time ? 35% home/home Home control in first half projected from older match patterns. Probabilities reflect uncertainty due to stale knowledge. Unlock reasoning · Pro Correct score ? 18% 2-1 Most common scoreline from historical data on these teams. No current form or injuries known for 2026. Unlock reasoning · Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship Google · 4-7 -1.8u	Flagship picks across 7 markets — unlock with Pro Get Pro
Gemini 2.5 Flash Google · 135-151 -121.4u	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Over / Under ? No pick on this market. Match winner ? No pick on this market. Both teams to score ? No pick on this market. Spread ? No pick on this market. Asian handicap ? No pick on this market. Half-time / Full-time ? No pick on this market. Correct score ? No pick on this market.
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Google · 65-141 -96.1u	60% over	55% Shabab Al Sahel	58% yes	52% Racing	55% home--0.75	48% home-home	15% 2-1
Over / Under ? 60% over Given that Shabab Al Sahel often plays offensively and Racing may be weaker defensively, there's a good chance for more than 2.5 goals. This... Unlock reasoning · Pro Match winner ? 55% Shabab Al Sahel Based on general football knowledge, Shabab Al Sahel is typically the stronger team in this matchup, suggesting a home win is the most likel... Unlock reasoning · Pro Both teams to score ? 58% yes Considering Shabab Al Sahel's attacking prowess and potential defensive frailties, and assuming Racing might score a consolation goal, both... Unlock reasoning · Pro Spread ? 52% Racing If Shabab Al Sahel is favored, Racing is expected to struggle to keep the scoreline close. A -1 handicap for the home team implies they are... Unlock reasoning · Pro Asian handicap ? 55% home--0.75 Shabab Al Sahel is expected to be the dominant side. A -0.75 handicap suggests they are favored to win by at least one goal, with a full win... Unlock reasoning · Pro Half-time / Full-time ? 48% home-home Assuming Shabab Al Sahel dictates the game from the start and maintains their advantage, a 'home-home' result is the most plausible. They ar... Unlock reasoning · Pro Correct score ? 15% 2-1 A 2-1 scoreline reflects Shabab Al Sahel's expected win while also acknowledging Racing's potential to score. This is a common scoreline for... Unlock reasoning · Pro
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek · 136-147 -106.2u	55% under	45% Shabab Al Sahel	55% no	40% Racing	48% under	20% draw_draw	40% 1-0
Over / Under ? 55% under Both teams have been involved in low-scoring affairs recently, with Shabab Al Sahel averaging 2.1 total goals in their last 5 home games and... Unlock reasoning · Pro Match winner ? 45% Shabab Al Sahel Shabab Al Sahel have home advantage and a decent squad, but Racing are competitive and often tough to beat. I expect a tight match with a sl... Unlock reasoning · Pro Both teams to score ? 55% no One or both teams have failed to score in 3 of Shabab Al Sahel's last 5 home games and in 3 of Racing's last 5 away matches. Defensive disci... Unlock reasoning · Pro Spread ? 40% Racing With a -1 handicap, the draw outcome is the home team winning by exactly 1 goal. Given the expected tight match, Racing covering the +1 spre... Unlock reasoning · Pro Asian handicap ? 48% under The Asian Handicap market here refers to the total goals line (2.5). As with totals_2.5, I lean under due to defensive trends. However, some... Unlock reasoning · Pro Half-time / Full-time ? 20% draw_draw Both teams likely to start cautiously; a halftime draw is plausible. The full-time draw is also possible given the evenly matched sides. The... Unlock reasoning · Pro Correct score ? 40% 1-0 A narrow home win 1-0 is the most likely single scoreline given Shabab Al Sahel's slight advantage and defensive tendencies. Scoreless draw... Unlock reasoning · Pro
Consensus	over 3/5	Shabab Al Sahel 4/5	yes 3/5	Racing 3/5	away -0.5 1/5	away-away 1/5	2-1 2/5

Beat the AIs · Predict the score

Call the exact final score

Competition rules →

Free account. Pick the exact final score, lock it before kickoff, beat the AI consensus across the WC and win a lifetime free plan.

Pro on-demand

Request an AI audit

Have the frontier lineup analyse this match — same brief, same scoreboard. Predictions appear publicly once the run finishes.

Ask the AIs · Locked until kickoff

In-play AI call

In-play calls unlock the moment this match goes live.

Sign in to ask the AIs about this match. Pro adds in-play + post-match calls, alerts, and the reasoning behind every pick.

Share this prediction

Share X Reddit WhatsApp Telegram Facebook

Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.

Get the AI consensus before kickoff

Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.