Shabab Al SahelvsRacing
Shabab Al Sahel 2–0 Racing
4 of 5 AIs leaned Shabab Al Sahel — and reality agreed.
- AI lean
- Shabab Al Sahel 4/5
- Correct calls
- 4/5
- Final
- 2–0
Every pick below was locked before the match and graded automatically against the final score — no hindsight edits.
AI predictions
7 markets · 5 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 7 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
|
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
|
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
|
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
|
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
book: Shabab Al Sahel 85% |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
over 3/5 models |
Racing 3/5 models |
Shabab Al Sahel / Shabab Al Sahel 2/5 models |
2-1 2/5 models |
Racing +0.5 1/5 models |
yes 3/5 models |
Shabab Al Sahel 4/5 models |
|
| Bookmaker line | — | — | — | — | — | — | Shabab Al Sahel 85% | |
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 7 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 7 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 7 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 7 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
52%
over
L
|
54%
Racing
L
|
32%
Racing / Racing
L
|
16%
1-2
L
|
54%
Racing -0.5
L
|
55%
yes
L
|
58%
Racing
L
|
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
52%
over Both teams likely possess attacking capability at club level, and defensive vulnerabilities are common in mid-tier competitions. Racing's at...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
54%
Racing Racing's structural advantage justifies a slight lean to winning by 1+ goal. However, Shabab Al Sahel's home field reduces the margin probab...
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
32%
Racing / Racing If Racing secures victory, doing so decisively from kickoff (away-away outcome) is plausible given likely superior quality. However, the ful...
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
16%
1-2 Racing winning 2–1 is a reasonable central estimate representing a competitive away win with both sides scoring. However, correct-score pred...
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
54%
Racing -0.5 At -0.5 handicap, Racing is favored to win by any margin. This aligns with Racing's likely competitive edge, though the small handicap refle...
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
55%
yes Both sides are likely to register shots and chances given Racing's attacking profile and Shabab Al Sahel's home status. While I lack defensi...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
58%
Racing Racing (likely the Argentine club) historically has stronger squad depth and continental experience than Shabab Al Sahel (likely a Lebanese... |
||||||||
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 7 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
No pick on this market.
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
No pick on this market.
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
No pick on this market.
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market. |
||||||||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
No pick on this market.
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
No pick on this market.
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
No pick on this market.
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market. |
||||||||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 7 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||||
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 7 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
53%
over
L
|
48%
Shabab Al Sahel
W
|
35%
Shabab Al Sahel / Shabab Al Sahel |
18%
2-1
L
|
51%
Shabab Al Sahel -0.5
W
|
51%
yes
L
|
52%
Shabab Al Sahel
W
|
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
53%
over Training data through 2023 indicates Lebanese league matches between these sides often exceed 2.5 goals. No weather or venue data available...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
48%
Shabab Al Sahel Home side favored slightly in past data but away spread value noted. No recent form available.
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
35%
Shabab Al Sahel / Shabab Al Sahel Home control in first half projected from older match patterns. Probabilities reflect uncertainty due to stale knowledge.
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
18%
2-1 Most common scoreline from historical data on these teams. No current form or injuries known for 2026.
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
51%
Shabab Al Sahel -0.5 Slight home edge from historical training data. No lineups or rest info for 2026 match.
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
51%
yes Historical encounters in training data show both teams scoring frequently. Future 2026 context unknown so probabilities near even.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
52%
Shabab Al Sahel Training data through 2023 shows Shabab Al Sahel typically stronger at home against Beirut sides like Racing. Limited public knowledge on 20... |
||||||||
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 7 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 7 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
|||||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
— | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
No pick on this market.
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
No pick on this market.
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
No pick on this market.
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
No pick on this market.
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market. |
||||||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
60%
over
L
|
52%
Racing
L
|
48%
Shabab Al Sahel / Shabab Al Sahel |
15%
2-1
L
|
55%
home- -0.75 |
58%
yes
L
|
55%
Shabab Al Sahel
W
|
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
over Given that Shabab Al Sahel often plays offensively and Racing may be weaker defensively, there's a good chance for more than 2.5 goals. This...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
52%
Racing If Shabab Al Sahel is favored, Racing is expected to struggle to keep the scoreline close. A -1 handicap for the home team implies they are...
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
48%
Shabab Al Sahel / Shabab Al Sahel Assuming Shabab Al Sahel dictates the game from the start and maintains their advantage, a 'home-home' result is the most plausible. They ar...
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
15%
2-1 A 2-1 scoreline reflects Shabab Al Sahel's expected win while also acknowledging Racing's potential to score. This is a common scoreline for...
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
55%
home- -0.75 Shabab Al Sahel is expected to be the dominant side. A -0.75 handicap suggests they are favored to win by at least one goal, with a full win...
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
58%
yes Considering Shabab Al Sahel's attacking prowess and potential defensive frailties, and assuming Racing might score a consolation goal, both...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Shabab Al Sahel Based on general football knowledge, Shabab Al Sahel is typically the stronger team in this matchup, suggesting a home win is the most likel... |
||||||||
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
55%
under
W
|
40%
Racing
L
|
20%
draw_draw |
40%
1-0
L
|
48%
under |
55%
no
W
|
45%
Shabab Al Sahel
W
|
|
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
under Both teams have been involved in low-scoring affairs recently, with Shabab Al Sahel averaging 2.1 total goals in their last 5 home games and...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
40%
Racing With a -1 handicap, the draw outcome is the home team winning by exactly 1 goal. Given the expected tight match, Racing covering the +1 spre...
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
20%
draw_draw Both teams likely to start cautiously; a halftime draw is plausible. The full-time draw is also possible given the evenly matched sides. The...
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
40%
1-0 A narrow home win 1-0 is the most likely single scoreline given Shabab Al Sahel's slight advantage and defensive tendencies. Scoreless draw...
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
48%
under The Asian Handicap market here refers to the total goals line (2.5). As with totals_2.5, I lean under due to defensive trends. However, some...
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
55%
no One or both teams have failed to score in 3 of Shabab Al Sahel's last 5 home games and in 3 of Racing's last 5 away matches. Defensive disci...
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
45%
Shabab Al Sahel Shabab Al Sahel have home advantage and a decent squad, but Racing are competitive and often tough to beat. I expect a tight match with a sl... |
||||||||
Over / Under
Consensusover 3/5
Claude Haiku 4.5
52%
over
L
Both teams likely possess attacking capability at club level, and defensive vulnerabilities are common in mid-tier competitions. Racing's at...
GPT-5 Mini
—
GPT-4o Mini
—
Grok 4 Fast
53%
over
L
Training data through 2023 indicates Lebanese league matches between these sides often exceed 2.5 goals. No weather or venue data available...
Gemini 2.5 Flash
—
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
60%
over
L
Given that Shabab Al Sahel often plays offensively and Racing may be weaker defensively, there's a good chance for more than 2.5 goals. This...
DeepSeek V3
55%
under
W
Both teams have been involved in low-scoring affairs recently, with Shabab Al Sahel averaging 2.1 total goals in their last 5 home games and...
Spread
ConsensusRacing 3/5
Claude Haiku 4.5
54%
Racing
L
Racing's structural advantage justifies a slight lean to winning by 1+ goal. However, Shabab Al Sahel's home field reduces the margin probab...
GPT-5 Mini
—
GPT-4o Mini
—
Grok 4 Fast
48%
Shabab Al Sahel
W
Home side favored slightly in past data but away spread value noted. No recent form available.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
—
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
52%
Racing
L
If Shabab Al Sahel is favored, Racing is expected to struggle to keep the scoreline close. A -1 handicap for the home team implies they are...
DeepSeek V3
40%
Racing
L
With a -1 handicap, the draw outcome is the home team winning by exactly 1 goal. Given the expected tight match, Racing covering the +1 spre...
Half-time / Full-time
ConsensusShabab Al Sahel / Shabab Al Sahel 2/5
Claude Haiku 4.5
32%
Racing / Racing
L
If Racing secures victory, doing so decisively from kickoff (away-away outcome) is plausible given likely superior quality. However, the ful...
GPT-5 Mini
—
GPT-4o Mini
—
Grok 4 Fast
35%
Shabab Al Sahel / Shabab Al Sahel
Home control in first half projected from older match patterns. Probabilities reflect uncertainty due to stale knowledge.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
—
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
48%
Shabab Al Sahel / Shabab Al Sahel
Assuming Shabab Al Sahel dictates the game from the start and maintains their advantage, a 'home-home' result is the most plausible. They ar...
DeepSeek V3
20%
draw_draw
Both teams likely to start cautiously; a halftime draw is plausible. The full-time draw is also possible given the evenly matched sides. The...
Correct score
Consensus2-1 2/5
Claude Haiku 4.5
16%
1-2
L
Racing winning 2–1 is a reasonable central estimate representing a competitive away win with both sides scoring. However, correct-score pred...
GPT-5 Mini
—
GPT-4o Mini
—
Grok 4 Fast
18%
2-1
L
Most common scoreline from historical data on these teams. No current form or injuries known for 2026.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
—
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
15%
2-1
L
A 2-1 scoreline reflects Shabab Al Sahel's expected win while also acknowledging Racing's potential to score. This is a common scoreline for...
DeepSeek V3
40%
1-0
L
A narrow home win 1-0 is the most likely single scoreline given Shabab Al Sahel's slight advantage and defensive tendencies. Scoreless draw...
Asian handicap
ConsensusRacing +0.5 1/5
Claude Haiku 4.5
54%
Racing -0.5
L
At -0.5 handicap, Racing is favored to win by any margin. This aligns with Racing's likely competitive edge, though the small handicap refle...
GPT-5 Mini
—
GPT-4o Mini
—
Grok 4 Fast
51%
Shabab Al Sahel -0.5
W
Slight home edge from historical training data. No lineups or rest info for 2026 match.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
—
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
55%
home- -0.75
Shabab Al Sahel is expected to be the dominant side. A -0.75 handicap suggests they are favored to win by at least one goal, with a full win...
DeepSeek V3
48%
under
The Asian Handicap market here refers to the total goals line (2.5). As with totals_2.5, I lean under due to defensive trends. However, some...
Both teams to score
Consensusyes 3/5
Claude Haiku 4.5
55%
yes
L
Both sides are likely to register shots and chances given Racing's attacking profile and Shabab Al Sahel's home status. While I lack defensi...
GPT-5 Mini
—
GPT-4o Mini
—
Grok 4 Fast
51%
yes
L
Historical encounters in training data show both teams scoring frequently. Future 2026 context unknown so probabilities near even.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
—
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
58%
yes
L
Considering Shabab Al Sahel's attacking prowess and potential defensive frailties, and assuming Racing might score a consolation goal, both...
DeepSeek V3
55%
no
W
One or both teams have failed to score in 3 of Shabab Al Sahel's last 5 home games and in 3 of Racing's last 5 away matches. Defensive disci...
Match winner
ConsensusShabab Al Sahel 4/5
Claude Haiku 4.5
58%
Racing
L
Racing (likely the Argentine club) historically has stronger squad depth and continental experience than Shabab Al Sahel (likely a Lebanese...
GPT-5 Mini
—
GPT-4o Mini
—
Grok 4 Fast
52%
Shabab Al Sahel
W
Training data through 2023 shows Shabab Al Sahel typically stronger at home against Beirut sides like Racing. Limited public knowledge on 20...
Gemini 2.5 Flash
—
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
55%
Shabab Al Sahel
W
Based on general football knowledge, Shabab Al Sahel is typically the stronger team in this matchup, suggesting a home win is the most likel...
DeepSeek V3
45%
Shabab Al Sahel
W
Shabab Al Sahel have home advantage and a decent squad, but Racing are competitive and often tough to beat. I expect a tight match with a sl...
Bookmaker line: Shabab Al Sahel 85%
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winner
Claude Haiku 4.5
Racing
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Shabab Al Sahel
Grok 4 Fast
Shabab Al Sahel
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Shabab Al Sahel
DeepSeek V3
Shabab Al Sahel
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Beat the AIs · Predict the score
Picks closed
Match has already kicked off. Picks are permanent — no late entries.
Team news
ProInjuries and confirmed lineups — the same team news the AIs factored into their reads.
Team news is a Pro feature
see exactly who's out and the XIs the AIs reasoned on, before kickoff.
Bookmaker odds
11 books · sharp books pinned · best price highlighted
| Book | Shabab Al Sahel | Draw | Racing |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pinnacle | — | 7.18 | — |
| Bet365 | — | 7.00 | — |
| 10bet | — | 5.80 | — |
| 1xbet | — | 6.65 | — |
| Betano | — | 5.90 | — |
| Betfair | — | 6.50 | — |
| Betvictor | — | 5.00 | — |
| Dafabet | — | 6.80 | — |
| Marathonbet | — | 6.65 | — |
| Superbet | — | 6.80 | — |
| William-hill | — | 6.00 | — |
| Book | Line | Over | Under |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pinnacle | — | — | — |
| Bet365 | — | — | — |
| 10bet | — | — | — |
| 1xbet | — | — | — |
| Betano | — | — | — |
| Betfair | — | — | — |
| Betvictor | — | — | — |
| Marathonbet | — | — | — |
| Superbet | — | — | — |
| William-hill | — | — | — |
| Book | Shabab Al Sahel | Racing |
|---|---|---|
| Pinnacle | — | — |
| Bet365 | — | — |
| 10bet | — | — |
| 1xbet | — | — |
| Betano | — | — |
| Betvictor | — | — |
| Marathonbet | — | — |
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
935c4e49491cd422…
- Kickoff
- Tue, Jun 16 · 13:00 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Over / Under 2.5 · Both teams to score · Spread -1 · Asian handicap · Half-time / Full-time · Correct score
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 7. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 7, in this order): h2h | totals_2.5 | btts | spreads_-1 | asian_handicap | ht_ft | correct_score
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 1903,
"sport": "football",
"venue": null,
"league": "Premier League",
"starts_at": "2026-06-16T13:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Tue, 16 Jun 2026 13:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Racing",
"home": "Shabab Al Sahel"
},
"version": "v1",
"built_at": "2026-06-14T08:01:27+00:00",
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_2.5",
"btts",
"spreads_-1",
"asian_handicap",
"ht_ft",
"correct_score"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Recent recaps
How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.