Reyady Abaseya vs Al Hikma
Final: 0 – 1
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
6d7f913a6d97c3ad…
- Sport
- Fri, Jun 12 · 13:00 GMT+0000
- Markets
- h2h · totals_2.5 · btts · spreads_-1 · asian_handicap · ht_ft
- Source
- The Odds API · live
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 6. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 6, in this order): h2h | totals_2.5 | btts | spreads_-1 | asian_handicap | ht_ft
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 798,
"sport": "football",
"venue": null,
"league": "Premier League",
"starts_at": "2026-06-12T13:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Fri, 12 Jun 2026 13:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "Al Hikma",
"home": "Reyady Abaseya"
},
"version": "v1",
"built_at": "2026-06-12T03:39:27+00:00",
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": {
"h2h": [
{
"point": null,
"price": 2,
"outcome": "Away"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 3.2,
"outcome": "Draw"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 3.6,
"outcome": "Home"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.42,
"outcome": "Away"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 2.47,
"outcome": "Home"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 2,
"outcome": "Away"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 3.15,
"outcome": "Draw"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 3.45,
"outcome": "Home"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.42,
"outcome": "Away"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 2.45,
"outcome": "Home"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.98,
"outcome": "Away"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 3.1,
"outcome": "Draw"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 3.5,
"outcome": "Home"
}
],
"btts": [
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.24,
"outcome": "No"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 3.5,
"outcome": "Yes"
}
],
"totals": [
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.21,
"outcome": "Under 3.5"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 3.55,
"outcome": "Over 3.5"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.64,
"outcome": "Under 2.5"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 2.1,
"outcome": "Over 2.5"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 2.82,
"outcome": "Under 1.5"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.33,
"outcome": "Over 1.5"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.95,
"outcome": "Under 0.75"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.62,
"outcome": "Over 0.75"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 2.3,
"outcome": "Under 0.5"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.44,
"outcome": "Over 0.5"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.62,
"outcome": "Under 2.5"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 2.02,
"outcome": "Over 2.5"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.82,
"outcome": "Under 2.25"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.82,
"outcome": "Over 2.25"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.78,
"outcome": "Under 1.25"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.9,
"outcome": "Over 1.25"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 2.27,
"outcome": "Under 1.0"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.52,
"outcome": "Over 1.0"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 2.8,
"outcome": "Under 0.75"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.37,
"outcome": "Over 0.75"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 3.6,
"outcome": "Under 0.5"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.25,
"outcome": "Over 0.5"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.14,
"outcome": "Under 2.5"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 4.8,
"outcome": "Over 2.5"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.18,
"outcome": "Under 2.0"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 3.96,
"outcome": "Over 2.0"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.37,
"outcome": "Under 1.75"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 2.8,
"outcome": "Over 1.75"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.55,
"outcome": "Under 1.5"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 2.26,
"outcome": "Over 1.5"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.42,
"outcome": "Under 1.25"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 2.52,
"outcome": "Over 1.25"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.68,
"outcome": "Under 1.0"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 2.03,
"outcome": "Over 1.0"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 2.08,
"outcome": "Under 0.75"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.62,
"outcome": "Over 0.75"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 2.5,
"outcome": "Under 0.5"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.43,
"outcome": "Over 0.5"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 21,
"outcome": "Over 3.5"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.05,
"outcome": "Under 2.5"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 7.2,
"outcome": "Over 2.5"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.31,
"outcome": "Under 1.5"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 2.97,
"outcome": "Over 1.5"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.06,
"outcome": "Under 4.0"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 6.35,
"outcome": "Over 4.0"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.25,
"outcome": "Under 3.25"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 3.28,
"outcome": "Over 3.25"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.05,
"outcome": "Under 4.5"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 8,
"outcome": "Over 4.5"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.3,
"outcome": "Under 3.0"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 2.97,
"outcome": "Over 3.0"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 3.72,
"outcome": "Under 1.25"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.2,
"outcome": "Over 1.25"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 6.15,
"outcome": "Under 1.0"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.06,
"outcome": "Over 1.0"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 8,
"outcome": "Under 0.5"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.05,
"outcome": "Over 0.5"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.21,
"outcome": "Under 3.5"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 3.58,
"outcome": "Over 3.5"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.46,
"outcome": "Under 2.75"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 2.38,
"outcome": "Over 2.75"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.65,
"outcome": "Under 2.5"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 2.08,
"outcome": "Over 2.5"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.84,
"outcome": "Under 2.25"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.84,
"outcome": "Over 2.25"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 2.15,
"outcome": "Under 2.0"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.56,
"outcome": "Over 2.0"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 2.49,
"outcome": "Under 1.75"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.42,
"outcome": "Over 1.75"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 2.83,
"outcome": "Under 1.5"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.33,
"outcome": "Over 1.5"
}
],
"spreads": [
{
"point": null,
"price": 2,
"outcome": "Away +0.25"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.6,
"outcome": "Home +0.25"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.91,
"outcome": "Away +0.5"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.7,
"outcome": "Home +0.5"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 4.7,
"outcome": "Away +1"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.12,
"outcome": "Home +1"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.92,
"outcome": "Away +0.25"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.73,
"outcome": "Home +0.25"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.49,
"outcome": "Away +0"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 2.34,
"outcome": "Home +0"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.31,
"outcome": "Away -0.25"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 2.97,
"outcome": "Home -0.25"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 6.25,
"outcome": "Away +1"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.06,
"outcome": "Home +1"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 2.08,
"outcome": "Away +0.25"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.62,
"outcome": "Home +0.25"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.5,
"outcome": "Away +0"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 2.31,
"outcome": "Home +0"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.28,
"outcome": "Away -0.25"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 3.14,
"outcome": "Home -0.25"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 7.8,
"outcome": "Away +2.5"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.02,
"outcome": "Home +2.5"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 3.74,
"outcome": "Away +1.5"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.19,
"outcome": "Home +1.5"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 3.34,
"outcome": "Away +1.25"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.24,
"outcome": "Home +1.25"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.03,
"outcome": "Away -1.5"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 7.6,
"outcome": "Home -1.5"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 7,
"outcome": "Away +2"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.04,
"outcome": "Home +2"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 2.92,
"outcome": "Away +1"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.31,
"outcome": "Home +1"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 2.26,
"outcome": "Away +0.75"
},
{
"point": null,
"price": 1.51,
"outcome": "Home +0.75"
}
]
}
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"totals_2.5",
"btts",
"spreads_-1",
"asian_handicap",
"ht_ft"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
AI predictions
6 markets · 4 models picked
Who picked what
15 models × 6 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
|
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
|
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic · 4-5 -1.2u |
Flagship picks across 6 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic · 5-5 -0.3u |
Flagship picks across 6 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||
|
Claude Opus 4 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 6 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic · 125-128 -87.1u |
Flagship picks across 6 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic · 168-149 -107.9u |
68%
Al Hikma
L
|
64%
No
~1.25
W
|
60%
Away -0.25
V
|
52%
Away/Away
V
|
58%
Away -1
~1.05
V
|
62%
Under
W
|
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
68%
Al Hikma Al Hikma has dominant recent history vs Reyady Abaseya including a 3-0 win, plus consistent bookmaker consensus across all spreads favoring...
🔍 researched
2 sources cited
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
64%
No BTTS No priced at 1.26 vs Yes at 3.34 reflects strong market belief in a shutout or single-goal win. The recent 0-0 match and Reyady Abaseya...
Odds: 1.25
🔍 researched
2 sources cited
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
60%
Away -0.25 Away -0.25 (1.84) offers better value than outright Away at longer odds while capturing upside from Al Hikma's documented superiority. Home...
🔍 researched
2 sources cited
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
52%
Away/Away No explicit HT/FT odds provided, but based on consistent Away favoritism across all markets and Al Hikma's proven ability to build leads (3-...
🔍 researched
2 sources cited
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
58%
Away -1 Away -1 spread priced at 1.05 represents exceptional value given Al Hikma's dominance, though the 1.05 odds suggest market is cautious. Home...
Odds: 1.05
🔍 researched
2 sources cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
62%
Under Market consensus heavily favors Under 2.5 with 1.05-1.14 odds vs Over at 4.8-7.5. Despite Reyady Abaseya averaging 62.5% Over 1.5 matches, t...
🔍 researched
2 sources cited
|
|||||||
|
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 6 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai · 30-17 +24.4u |
— | — | — | — | — | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
No pick on this market.
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
No pick on this market.
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||||||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai · 34-47 -25.2u |
55%
Al Hikma
L
|
70%
No
~1.23
W
|
55%
Away +0.25
V
|
60%
Away - Draw
V
|
55%
Away +0.25
~2.15
V
|
65%
Under 2.5
~1.67
W
|
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
55%
Al Hikma Al Hikma has a stronger recent form with 2 wins and 4 losses in their last 6 matches, while Reyady Abaseya has 2 wins, 3 draws, and 1 loss i...
🔍 researched
3 sources cited
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
70%
No Both teams have struggled to score in recent matches, with Reyady Abaseya scoring 4 goals in their last 6 matches and Al Hikma scoring 6 goa...
Odds: 1.23
🔍 researched
3 sources cited
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
55%
Away +0.25 Al Hikma's recent form and head-to-head advantage suggest they are likely to avoid a loss, making the Away +0.25 handicap a favorable bet. (...
🔍 researched
3 sources cited
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
60%
Away - Draw Al Hikma's recent form and head-to-head advantage suggest they are likely to lead at halftime and secure a draw or win by full-time. ([fctab...
🔍 researched
3 sources cited
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
55%
Away +0.25 Al Hikma's recent form and head-to-head advantage suggest they are likely to avoid a loss, making the Away +0.25 spread a favorable bet. ([f...
Odds: 2.15
🔍 researched
3 sources cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
65%
Under 2.5 Both teams have low-scoring games, with Reyady Abaseya averaging 0.67 goals per game and Al Hikma 1.06 goals per game in their last 6 matche...
Odds: 1.67
🔍 researched
3 sources cited
|
|||||||
|
o3 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 6 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||
|
Grok 4 Heavy FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 6 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai · 112-170 -91.3u |
48%
Al Hikma
L
|
68%
No
~1.25
W
|
45%
Away -0.25
V
|
32%
Away/Away
V
|
41%
Away -1
~1.05
V
|
72%
Under 2.5
~1.75
W
|
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
48%
Al Hikma Bookmaker odds consistently price Al Hikma as favorites (around 2.0) against Reyady Abaseya. No head-to-head or form data available beyond t...
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
68%
No BTTS No heavily favored at 1.26; aligns with low totals expectation. No lineups or recent scoring trends accessible. Training data through 2...
Odds: 1.25
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
45%
Away -0.25 Asian lines show away at -0.25 around 1.28-1.34; consistent with h2h favorite status. No injury or form details known. Training data through...
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
32%
Away/Away Away win favored; away/away most plausible full-time path given market bias. No half-time stats available. Training data through 2023.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
41%
Away -1 Away favored overall; -1 lines price away at low odds in several books implying handicap edge. Sparse data forces market reliance. Training...
Odds: 1.05
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
72%
Under 2.5 Multiple under 2.5 lines priced at 1.05-1.14 indicate strong expectation of low scoring. No team info or weather available; rely on market s...
Odds: 1.75
|
|||||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro FlagshipGoogle · 4-7 -1.8u |
Flagship picks across 6 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash Google · 135-151 -121.4u |
— | — | — | — | — | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
No pick on this market.
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
No pick on this market.
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Google · 65-141 -96.1u |
— | — | — | — | — | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
No pick on this market.
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
No pick on this market.
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market. |
|||||||
|
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek · 136-147 -106.2u |
50%
Al Hikma
L
|
70%
No
~1.25
W
|
50%
Away -0.25
V
|
25%
Draw / Away
V
|
35%
Away -1
~1.05
V
|
75%
Under 2.5
~1.75
W
|
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
50%
Al Hikma Reyady Abaseya and Al Hikma are lower-tier Saudi teams with limited data. Bookmaker odds favor Al Hikma away at around 2.05, suggesting a sl...
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
70%
No Both teams struggle to score consistently, and defensive records are modest. Low-scoring trend and odds implying BTTS No at 1.26 suggest cle...
Odds: 1.25
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
50%
Away -0.25 Asian handicap -0.25 gives Al Hikma a half-win cushion, aligning with their slight favorite status. Odds suggest balanced action, but away t...
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
25%
Draw / Away Given low-scoring tendencies, halftime draw is plausible. Al Hikma's second-half superiority could secure a win after a tight first half. Od...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
35%
Away -1 The -1 spread requires Al Hikma to win by at least 2 goals, which is a tall order given low-scoring nature. Odds for Away -1 are very high (...
Odds: 1.05
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
75%
Under 2.5 Both teams tend to play low-scoring affairs in this league, with average goals per game below 2.5. Bookmaker odds heavily favor Under (1.14...
Odds: 1.75
|
|||||||
|
Consensus |
Al Hikma 4/4 |
No 4/4 |
Away -0.25 3/4 |
Away/Away 2/4 |
Away -1 3/4 |
Under 2.5 3/4 |
|
Beat the AIs · Predict the score
Picks closed
Match has already kicked off. Picks are permanent — no late entries.
Ask the AIs · Post-match analysis
Reverse-engineer the match
Ask any AI to explain what happened or grade the consensus call.
Sign in to ask the AIs about this match. Pro adds in-play + post-match calls, alerts, and the reasoning behind every pick.
Bookmaker odds
10 books · sharp books pinned · best price highlighted
| Book | Reyady Abaseya | Draw | Al Hikma |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bet365 ↗ | — | 3.40 | — |
| 10bet | — | 3.25 | — |
| 1xbet ↗ | — | 3.34 | — |
| Betano | — | 3.20 | — |
| Betfair | — | 3.30 | — |
| Betvictor | — | 3.00 | — |
| Dafabet | — | 3.35 | — |
| Marathonbet | — | 3.34 | — |
| Superbet | — | 3.30 | — |
| William-hill | — | 3.40 | — |
Line movement (h2h)
Each line = one bookmaker · sharp books pinned first
Reyady Abaseya Al Hikma
Research trail
What each AI looked up before picking
-
6 tool calls · 3 sources
3 citations captured — unlock with Pro
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
18 tool calls · 2 sources
2 citations captured — unlock with Pro
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.