ComovsRB Leipzig
Your call
Who wins? One tap, no signup.
AI predictions
8 markets · 4 models
Ask the AIsWho picked what
16 models × 8 markets · click a row to see reasoning
| Model |
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
|
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
|
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
|
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
|
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
|
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
|
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
|
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consensus |
RB Leipzig 3/4 models |
RB Leipzig 2/4 models |
over 2/4 models |
1-2 2/4 models |
RB Leipzig / RB Leipzig 2/4 models |
yes 2/4 models |
RB Leipzig 3/4 models |
RB Leipzig 1/4 models |
|
Claude Opus 4.7 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Claude Opus 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Claude Opus 4.8 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Claude Sonnet 4.6 FlagshipAnthropic |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic |
— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
No pick on this market.
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
No pick on this market.
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
No pick on this market. |
|||||||||
GPT-5 FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
GPT-5 Mini Openai |
— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
No pick on this market.
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
No pick on this market.
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
No pick on this market. |
|||||||||
|
GPT-4o Mini Openai |
— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
No pick on this market.
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
No pick on this market.
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
No pick on this market.
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
No pick on this market.
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
No pick on this market.
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
No pick on this market.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
No pick on this market.
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
No pick on this market. |
|||||||||
|
o4-mini FlagshipOpenai |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
Grok 4.3 FlagshipXai |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Grok 4 Fast Xai |
48%
RB Leipzig |
55%
RB Leipzig |
52%
under |
18%
1-2 |
29%
Draw / RB Leipzig |
53%
no |
51%
RB Leipzig |
54%
RB Leipzig |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
48%
RB Leipzig RB Leipzig remain the stronger side on paper despite the venue; training data through 2025-09 shows their superior squad depth and European...
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
55%
RB Leipzig Leipzig's quality edge makes them the value side on draw-no-bet; Como lack the firepower to guarantee a win even at home. Training knowledge...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
52%
under Both teams show moderate scoring rates in recent form and the early-season European fixture often produces cagey affairs. Training data thro...
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
18%
1-2 1-2 emerges as the likeliest scoreline given Leipzig's edge and typical low-scoring European away wins. Training knowledge through 2025-09 s...
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
29%
Draw / RB Leipzig Leipzig typically start cautiously away but pull ahead in the second half; training data through 2025-09 shows draw/away as the most frequen...
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
53%
no Como's home clean-sheet rate in limited top-level exposure and Leipzig's occasional blunt finishing away point to a no-BTTS outcome. Trainin...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
51%
RB Leipzig Leipzig's attacking personnel give them a realistic chance of winning by two clear goals or more; Como's defense has not yet faced sustained...
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
54%
RB Leipzig Asian handicap favors Leipzig given the quality gap; the 5-6 rest days are similar so no major rotation edge. Training knowledge through 202... |
|||||||||
Gemini 3.1 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Pro Flagship |
Flagship picks across 8 markets — unlock with Pro
Get Pro
|
||||||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash |
65%
RB Leipzig |
82%
RB Leipzig - DNB |
60%
Over 2.5 Goals |
18%
0-2 |
55%
RB Leipzig / RB Leipzig |
60%
No |
55%
RB Leipzig -1 |
65%
RB Leipzig -1.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
RB Leipzig Based on historical performance and general team stature from training data (through 2025-09), RB Leipzig is a significantly stronger and mo...
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
82%
RB Leipzig - DNB Given RB Leipzig's established quality and Champions League experience from my training data, they are strong favorites to win this match ou...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
60%
Over 2.5 Goals RB Leipzig's attacking philosophy and historical goal-scoring record suggest a high-scoring encounter. They've scored 11 goals in their last...
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
18%
0-2 A 0-2 scoreline is a highly plausible outcome, reflecting RB Leipzig's expected dominance and strong defensive capabilities against a less e...
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
55%
RB Leipzig / RB Leipzig Based on RB Leipzig's superior quality and experience (from training data through 2025-09), they are expected to take control early in the m...
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
60%
No RB Leipzig's defense, while conceding 8 in their last 5, is generally solid against teams of Como's expected caliber in the Champions League...
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
55%
RB Leipzig -1 Given the significant quality difference between RB Leipzig and Como based on my training data (through 2025-09), Leipzig is expected to win...
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
65%
RB Leipzig -1.5 RB Leipzig's superior talent and tactical organization, as known from my training data (through 2025-09), make them strong candidates to win... |
|||||||||
|
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite |
65%
RB Leipzig |
68%
RB Leipzig |
58%
over |
15%
0-2 |
45%
away_away |
55%
yes |
57%
RB Leipzig |
66%
away_ 0.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
65%
RB Leipzig RB Leipzig are the superior team based on league position and recent form. They have a better attacking record and have been more consistent...
3 sources cited
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
68%
RB Leipzig Given RB Leipzig's stronger form and higher league standing, they are the most likely to win. Even if the match ends in a draw, Leipzig has...
3 sources cited
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
58%
over Both teams have shown a tendency to score and concede. RB Leipzig averages over 1.5 goals per game in the Bundesliga, and Como has a decent...
3 sources cited
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
15%
0-2 RB Leipzig's superior attacking power and better form suggest they will score multiple goals, while Como might struggle to find the net agai...
3 sources cited
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
45%
away_away RB Leipzig are expected to control the game and score early, leading at halftime and maintaining their advantage to win in the second half....
3 sources cited
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
55%
yes Como has a strong home scoring record, and RB Leipzig is a potent attacking side. While Leipzig can be defensively solid, Como's home advant...
3 sources cited
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
57%
RB Leipzig RB Leipzig are favored to win by more than one goal given their superior quality and form. While Como can be resilient at home, Leipzig's at...
3 sources cited
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
66%
away_ 0.5 RB Leipzig is the stronger team and is expected to win this match. Therefore, backing them on the Asian Handicap with a -0.5 goal advantage...
3 sources cited
|
|||||||||
DeepSeek V3 Deepseek |
40%
Como |
55%
Como |
55%
over |
12%
1-2 |
30%
RB Leipzig / RB Leipzig |
60%
yes |
60%
RB Leipzig |
60%
RB Leipzig -0.5 |
|
|
Match winner
?
Match winner
Match winner. Pick the team that wins in regular time (or who advances in cup formats).
40%
Como Training data through 2025-09. Como have solid home form and RB Leipzig have poor away form. Home advantage in Champions League often matter...
Draw no bet
?
Draw no bet
Market explanation coming soon.
55%
Como Without the draw option, Como's solid home form and Leipzig's away struggles tip the balance. However, Leipzig's individual quality means aw...
Over / Under
?
Over / Under
Over / Under total points. Will the combined score be above or below the line.
55%
over Both teams have scored and conceded frequently: Como averaged 2.8 goals per game, Leipzig 3.8. Leipzig's attacking strength and defensive la...
Correct score
?
Correct score
Correct score. The exact final score (e.g. 2-1). Highest-variance market — most picks lose, but the payouts are big when they hit.
12%
1-2 Most likely scorelines reflect a narrow Leipzig win or draw. 1-2 and 1-1 are common due to both scoring.
Half-time / Full-time
?
Half-time / Full-time
Half-time / Full-time. Outcome at the break AND at the final whistle — both have to match for the pick to land.
30%
RB Leipzig / RB Leipzig Leipzig likely to lead and maintain the lead. Draw at half-time possible but not most likely.
Both teams to score
?
Both teams to score
Both Teams To Score. Yes = both teams score at least once. No = at least one team is shut out.
60%
yes Como score at home, Leipzig score often. Both defenses are leaky, making it likely both find the net.
Spread
?
Spread
Point spread. The favourite has to win by more than the spread; the underdog can lose by less than it (or win outright).
60%
RB Leipzig Leipzig are stronger on paper and likely to win by more than one goal. Como may struggle against higher-quality opposition.
Asian handicap
?
Asian handicap
Asian Handicap. Like a spread, but quarter-lines split the stake — you can half-win or half-push.
60%
RB Leipzig -0.5 Similar to moneyline but with margin for draw: Leipzig win outright is more likely than not. |
|||||||||
Match winner
ConsensusRB Leipzig 3/4
Claude Haiku 4.5
—
GPT-5 Mini
—
GPT-4o Mini
—
Grok 4 Fast
48%
RB Leipzig
RB Leipzig remain the stronger side on paper despite the venue; training data through 2025-09 shows their superior squad depth and European...
Gemini 2.5 Flash
65%
RB Leipzig
Based on historical performance and general team stature from training data (through 2025-09), RB Leipzig is a significantly stronger and mo...
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
65%
RB Leipzig
RB Leipzig are the superior team based on league position and recent form. They have a better attacking record and have been more consistent...
DeepSeek V3
40%
Como
Training data through 2025-09. Como have solid home form and RB Leipzig have poor away form. Home advantage in Champions League often matter...
Draw no bet
ConsensusRB Leipzig 2/4
Claude Haiku 4.5
—
GPT-5 Mini
—
GPT-4o Mini
—
Grok 4 Fast
55%
RB Leipzig
Leipzig's quality edge makes them the value side on draw-no-bet; Como lack the firepower to guarantee a win even at home. Training knowledge...
Gemini 2.5 Flash
82%
RB Leipzig - DNB
Given RB Leipzig's established quality and Champions League experience from my training data, they are strong favorites to win this match ou...
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
68%
RB Leipzig
Given RB Leipzig's stronger form and higher league standing, they are the most likely to win. Even if the match ends in a draw, Leipzig has...
DeepSeek V3
55%
Como
Without the draw option, Como's solid home form and Leipzig's away struggles tip the balance. However, Leipzig's individual quality means aw...
Over / Under
Consensusover 2/4
Claude Haiku 4.5
—
GPT-5 Mini
—
GPT-4o Mini
—
Grok 4 Fast
52%
under
Both teams show moderate scoring rates in recent form and the early-season European fixture often produces cagey affairs. Training data thro...
Gemini 2.5 Flash
60%
Over 2.5 Goals
RB Leipzig's attacking philosophy and historical goal-scoring record suggest a high-scoring encounter. They've scored 11 goals in their last...
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
58%
over
Both teams have shown a tendency to score and concede. RB Leipzig averages over 1.5 goals per game in the Bundesliga, and Como has a decent...
DeepSeek V3
55%
over
Both teams have scored and conceded frequently: Como averaged 2.8 goals per game, Leipzig 3.8. Leipzig's attacking strength and defensive la...
Correct score
Consensus1-2 2/4
Claude Haiku 4.5
—
GPT-5 Mini
—
GPT-4o Mini
—
Grok 4 Fast
18%
1-2
1-2 emerges as the likeliest scoreline given Leipzig's edge and typical low-scoring European away wins. Training knowledge through 2025-09 s...
Gemini 2.5 Flash
18%
0-2
A 0-2 scoreline is a highly plausible outcome, reflecting RB Leipzig's expected dominance and strong defensive capabilities against a less e...
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
15%
0-2
RB Leipzig's superior attacking power and better form suggest they will score multiple goals, while Como might struggle to find the net agai...
DeepSeek V3
12%
1-2
Most likely scorelines reflect a narrow Leipzig win or draw. 1-2 and 1-1 are common due to both scoring.
Half-time / Full-time
ConsensusRB Leipzig / RB Leipzig 2/4
Claude Haiku 4.5
—
GPT-5 Mini
—
GPT-4o Mini
—
Grok 4 Fast
29%
Draw / RB Leipzig
Leipzig typically start cautiously away but pull ahead in the second half; training data through 2025-09 shows draw/away as the most frequen...
Gemini 2.5 Flash
55%
RB Leipzig / RB Leipzig
Based on RB Leipzig's superior quality and experience (from training data through 2025-09), they are expected to take control early in the m...
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
45%
away_away
RB Leipzig are expected to control the game and score early, leading at halftime and maintaining their advantage to win in the second half....
DeepSeek V3
30%
RB Leipzig / RB Leipzig
Leipzig likely to lead and maintain the lead. Draw at half-time possible but not most likely.
Both teams to score
Consensusyes 2/4
Claude Haiku 4.5
—
GPT-5 Mini
—
GPT-4o Mini
—
Grok 4 Fast
53%
no
Como's home clean-sheet rate in limited top-level exposure and Leipzig's occasional blunt finishing away point to a no-BTTS outcome. Trainin...
Gemini 2.5 Flash
60%
No
RB Leipzig's defense, while conceding 8 in their last 5, is generally solid against teams of Como's expected caliber in the Champions League...
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
55%
yes
Como has a strong home scoring record, and RB Leipzig is a potent attacking side. While Leipzig can be defensively solid, Como's home advant...
DeepSeek V3
60%
yes
Como score at home, Leipzig score often. Both defenses are leaky, making it likely both find the net.
Spread
ConsensusRB Leipzig 3/4
Claude Haiku 4.5
—
GPT-5 Mini
—
GPT-4o Mini
—
Grok 4 Fast
51%
RB Leipzig
Leipzig's attacking personnel give them a realistic chance of winning by two clear goals or more; Como's defense has not yet faced sustained...
Gemini 2.5 Flash
55%
RB Leipzig -1
Given the significant quality difference between RB Leipzig and Como based on my training data (through 2025-09), Leipzig is expected to win...
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
57%
RB Leipzig
RB Leipzig are favored to win by more than one goal given their superior quality and form. While Como can be resilient at home, Leipzig's at...
DeepSeek V3
60%
RB Leipzig
Leipzig are stronger on paper and likely to win by more than one goal. Como may struggle against higher-quality opposition.
Asian handicap
ConsensusRB Leipzig 1/4
Claude Haiku 4.5
—
GPT-5 Mini
—
GPT-4o Mini
—
Grok 4 Fast
54%
RB Leipzig
Asian handicap favors Leipzig given the quality gap; the 5-6 rest days are similar so no major rotation edge. Training knowledge through 202...
Gemini 2.5 Flash
65%
RB Leipzig -1.5
RB Leipzig's superior talent and tactical organization, as known from my training data (through 2025-09), make them strong candidates to win...
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
66%
away_ 0.5
RB Leipzig is the stronger team and is expected to win this match. Therefore, backing them on the Asian Handicap with a -0.5 goal advantage...
DeepSeek V3
60%
RB Leipzig -0.5
Similar to moneyline but with margin for draw: Leipzig win outright is more likely than not.
Model confidence
Conviction in pick · Match winner
Gemini 2.5 Flash
RB Leipzig
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
RB Leipzig
Grok 4 Fast
RB Leipzig
DeepSeek V3
Como
Model track records
LifetimeEvery graded pick across all sports — auto-settled the moment results land, wins and losses both counted. Ranked by win rate.
Units = net profit at flat 1-unit stakes. The full sortable board lives on the leaderboard.
Refresh the read
Team newsRe-run the AIs closer to kickoff and watch the read evolve. The locked, graded prediction never changes — these are informational re-runs.
Lineups change everything — Pro re-runs the AIs after they drop.
Confirmed XIs, late injuries and line moves land in the final hour. Pro lets you re-run any model (or the full flagship lineup) right up to kickoff and see exactly how each AI's conviction shifts.
Beat the AIs · Predict the score
Call the exact final score
Free account. Pick the exact final score, lock it before kickoff, beat the AI consensus across the WC and win a lifetime free plan.
Team news
ProInjuries and confirmed lineups — the same team news the AIs factored into their reads.
Team news is a Pro feature
see exactly who's out and the XIs the AIs reasoned on, before kickoff.
Verifiable brief
Identical prompt sent to every AI · SHA-256 verified
hash:
01704df101ee78fd…
- Kickoff
- Thu, Sep 10 · 19:00 GMT+0000
- Markets
- Match winner · Draw no bet · Over / Under 2.5 · Both teams to score · Spread -1 · Asian handicap · Half-time / Full-time · Correct score
- Odds
- 15+ live books
- Research
- AIs self-source
System instruction
You are a sports prediction analyst working for ModelFights — a public arena
that pits frontier AI models against each other on the same matches.
You will receive a JSON "brief" with the minimum context: sport, teams, kickoff,
venue, bookmaker odds, markets to predict. Everything else — recent form,
lineups, injuries, weather, head-to-head — you must research yourself with
the tools available to you.
Hard rules:
- Output strict JSON only. No prose outside the JSON, no preamble, no code fence.
- You MUST return exactly one prediction object per requested market — the
`predictions` array length MUST equal 8. No omissions, no excuses.
- Even with limited info you still commit to a pick + confidence + reasoning.
- `confidence` is YOUR probability for YOUR pick, expressed 0 to 1.
- Probabilities for the same market must sum to 1.0 (±0.02).
- For `correct_score`, the pick is a literal "home-away" string (e.g. "2-1",
"0-0"). Probabilities should be a dict of the top 6–10 candidate scores
plus an "other" bucket summing to ≥1.0.
- `reasoning` is 2–4 sentences, plain text, no markdown.
- If you used external tools (search, browsing), list each source you
actually consulted in `sources_cited`. Do not fabricate URLs.
- If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and
explicitly note that in `reasoning` (e.g. "training data through 2025-09").
- `used_research_tools` is true if and only if you invoked at least one tool.
- Do not hedge. Do not say "I don't have enough data." Use what you have.
Required markets (return ALL 8, in this order): h2h | draw_no_bet | totals_2.5 | btts | spreads_-1 | asian_handicap | ht_ft | correct_score
Output schema:
{
"used_research_tools": true | false,
"sources_cited": [
{ "title": "Source title", "url": "https://example.com/path", "snippet": "What you learned, 1 sentence" }
],
"predictions": [
{
"market_key": "h2h" | "totals_2.5" | "btts" | "spreads_-1" | "...",
"pick": "<one of the outcome labels for this market>",
"confidence": 0.0,
"probabilities": { "<outcome>": 0.0, ... },
"reasoning": "2-4 sentences citing the key factors.",
"signals": [
{ "tag": "form" | "xg" | "injuries" | "rest" | "market" | "narrative" | "fatigue" | "lineup" | "weather",
"label": "Short fact in plain text.",
"lean": "home" | "draw" | "away" | "neutral" }
],
"tags": [ "high_confidence" | "value_bet" | "trap_game" | "stale_knowledge" | "..." ]
}
]
}
User brief (JSON)
{
"event": {
"id": 39950,
"sport": "football",
"venue": "Stadio Giuseppe Sinigaglia",
"league": "UEFA Champions League",
"starts_at": "2026-09-10T19:00:00+00:00",
"starts_at_human": "Thu, 10 Sep 2026 19:00:00 GMT"
},
"teams": {
"away": "RB Leipzig",
"home": "Como"
},
"version": "v2",
"sport_focus": [
"Weight CONFIRMED team news heavily: a missing first-choice striker, creator, or centre-back swings a match more than season-long form.",
"Compare attacking vs defensive quality directly — clean-sheet rate and goals-conceded trend often predict unders/BTTS better than the win line.",
"Set pieces decide tight games: note corner/free-kick threat and aerial mismatches.",
"Account for fixture congestion + likely rotation (midweek European or cup games before this one) and the home/away form split.",
"For outdoor venues, factor heavy rain or strong wind — both suppress goals and favour the under.",
"Tactical style matters: a high-press side vs a possession side, or two defensive setups, shapes the goals expectation."
],
"team_context": {
"note": "Reference data from our settled-results database. Verify + extend it with your own research; it is not a substitute for current team news.",
"away_form": {
"last": "LWWLL",
"record": "2W-0D-3L",
"scored": 11,
"matches": 5,
"conceded": 8
},
"home_form": {
"last": "WWDLD",
"record": "2W-2D-1L",
"scored": 8,
"matches": 5,
"conceded": 6
},
"rest_days": {
"away": 5,
"home": 6
}
},
"market_consensus": {
"h2h": [],
"note": "No bookmaker consensus available at build time — predict from public knowledge.",
"extra_markets": []
},
"markets_requested": [
"h2h",
"draw_no_bet",
"totals_2.5",
"btts",
"spreads_-1",
"asian_handicap",
"ht_ft",
"correct_score"
],
"research_directive": [
"Use any tools you have (web search, news, your training knowledge) to research:",
"recent form (last 5 matches), starting lineups, injuries / absences, weather (outdoor sports), head-to-head record, fatigue / rest days.",
"Cite specific sources in `sources_cited` when you use external tools.",
"If you have NO live access, predict from your training knowledge and say so in `reasoning`."
]
}
The hash above is SHA-256 of the canonical JSON brief. Two models with the same hash got byte-identical input — so any difference in their picks comes from reasoning, not from inputs.
Research trail
What each AI looked up before picking
-
0 tool calls · 3 sources
3 citations captured — unlock with Pro
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
-
0 tool calls · 0 sources
No live web access — picked from training-data knowledge.
Results settle automatically once the final score lands. Picks are permanent — no hindsight edits.
Recent recaps
How the AI lineup did on other recent matches.
Get the AI consensus before kickoff
Free. Pre-match alert per AI + see your picks graded as results land.